€uroMeinke |
12-19-2005 10:23 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by scaeagles
I do wonder what everyone thinks about Lincoln. Those items I mentioned earlier most certainly did happen, along with many other questionable and perhaps illegal actions. Were they a necessary evil? It is certainly possible at the time that he was viewed as a Constitution hating power hungry egomaniac. History does not view him this way.
Do we live in a country where there are necessary evils? Government itself is a necessary evil.
|
Hard to say - I guess this might be a result of "History is written by the victor." which in this situation if we "win the war on terror" I guess this will be seen as a necessary evil. I guess time will tell just how much of the terrorist enemy was in our midst.
I tend to think this may turn out like the hunt for communists, while certainly there were some at home, the real victory was ultimately defeating them abroad by simply leveraging our better economic system. Likewise, I think Islamic Fundametalism will go the way of communism, lots of nice ideals, but way to oppressive for its citizens to live with.
But getting back to Lincoln, the civil war and succeding states were a very tangible "enemy," but in some ways it's interesting to contemplate what might have been, if the nation was allowed to split in two with Lincoln a raving imperialist war monger.
|