I haven't been to a concert since 1986.

Who was it? :) I gotta know.

Mormon Tabernacle Choir

For me it was Lisa Lisa....87'


:blush:

That was, of course, a joke. It wasn't the M.T. Choir.

During college from 86-90, being that I was a music major, I performed in and attended several concerts, but it's a tad different in context than what one considers to be a concert in this thread.

Well, I bought it. :D

But I've never heard any artist proclaim that they are the end all authority on anything or that they expect to be taken more seriously than a non-artist. They are just expressing their views.

When you post, I don't think "Oh, Leo thinks he is a self -appointed authority on everything. Man, he sure is full of himself". I am able to recognize the fact that you are expressing your opinion. I see no need to attach all the other preconceptions. So, why is it, when someone is an artist, they are only expected to express their opinions in their songs and nowhere else?

I think these labels only surface when one disagrees with the opinion of the person they are labeling. If you were to hear an artist say, "I support the war and this president in all that they do", would you honestly consider them to be a self-important, grandstanding, self appointed authority?

And as far as them sticking to their particular medium, why should their opinions be stifled in another platform, whether it be talking to a crowd or doing an interview? Why are they somehow out of bounds? Chances are, if they wrote a song about how they feel about the war, they are going to have the same opinion in other forums. Should you only express your political views in the area of computer programming but not on a message board? Does that make you self-important?

In my opinion, no it does not.

And if it is ok to speak politically when it meshes with the outlook of the audience it seems safe to say that an anti-Bush message probably played pretty well to a UK audience.

I suppose it depends on presentation. Are you going to tell me that Alec Baldwin, Sean Penn, Madonna, Barbara Streisand, blah, blah, blah, don't consider themselves to be far superior in intelligence than anyone else?

Many people here probably think I am full of myself. But this is a forum for debate and discussion. Many of these celebrities don't wish to be challanged or to debate or to have to defend positions. Criticism of them and/or their view is always uncalled for. While I am opinionated, I want to discuss and hear what you think. I don't think I'm smarter than any other poster here. NA being the exception that makes the rule.:)

Edited to add: I feel like I'm being pulled down a road that I'm not intending to go down. If someone wants to express themselves politically at a concert, fine. I just don't really want to hear it. Like I said before, I wouldn't want to go hear a performance of Tchaikovsky's 6th where the conductor stops the performace to tell me he doesn't like a minimum wage increase. It's OK that performers/artists do. It's also OK that fans don't want to hear it and therefore boycott silently, as I do, or shout about i from the rooftops, trying to rally others to their cause. This is all I'm saying.

Interesting, you only listed celebrities who have spoken out on the liberal side of issues.

No Charlton Heston, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Dennis Miller, Tom Selleck, or Larry Miller.

No, I doubt they think they are smarter than everyone else. They just think they are right. We are all allowed to argue for the causes we believe in and promote them to the best of our abilities. Just because they happen to be in a position where more people are interested (rightly or wrongly) in listening isn't an argument that they should shut up.