Motorboat Cruiser |
09-19-2006 11:11 PM |
No argument from me at all that the peaceful Muslims are not doing enough to counter the radical idealogy of the extremists. Until they step in, there won't be peace.
I suppose the thing that bugs me, however, is that prior to our invasion of Iraq, it was only the extremists that hated us. Now, I think the reason that the moderate Muslims aren't speaking up is that they are appalled at our actions as well. I seem to remember a very different attitude from the moderates after 9/11. There were many in the middle east that denounced the actions of Osama Bin Laden and his ilk. Now, they see us locking up people without a trail, some of which who are undoubtably innocent. They see us trying to change the law so that it is easier to torture. They see us building humungous bases in Iraq but neglecting the rebuilding of the infrastructure. This isn't the America they once knew and any fragile support that we once had has been decimated.
So I agree that they aren't doing enough to achieve the peace. I just don't think that, overall, they have seen much reason to, given that our attitude is to basically do whatever we want, whether the world is with us or not, and regardless of even our own laws and constitution.
Quote:
Former secretary of state Colin L. Powell said yesterday that he decided to publicly oppose the Bush administration's proposed rules for the treatment of terrorism suspects in part because the plan would add to growing doubts about whether the United States adheres to its own moral code.
"If you just look at how we are perceived in the world and the kind of criticism we have taken over Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib and renditions," Powell said in an interview, "whether we believe it or not, people are now starting to question whether we're following our own high standards."
|
Of course, I suppose it is just about time for the right to begin demonizing Colin Powell and branding him a islamo-fascist sympathizer. But he still makes a very good point.
|