Lounge of Tomorrow

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)
-   Lounge Lizard (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   8.8 Quake hits Japan... tsunami warnings issued (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=11028)

innerSpaceman 03-15-2011 07:07 AM

I'd agree that the U.S. press pandering to the potential nuclear disaster is the kind of journalism that brings us Charlie Sheen Week and Lindsey Lohan Mania ... but can you understand how even the threat might play particularly hard in, ya know, Japan?

Kevy Baby 03-15-2011 07:58 AM

The initial quake has been upgraded to a 9.0

blueerica 03-15-2011 08:56 AM

Got final confirmation last night that all aunts and cousins are present and accounted for, even if not a bit hungry due to shortened supplies.

*phew*

BarTopDancer 03-15-2011 08:58 AM

Yay!

Would you know of an organization for donations to go out there (other than the Red Cross)?

JWBear 03-15-2011 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman (Post 343811)
I'd agree that the U.S. press pandering to the potential nuclear disaster is the kind of journalism that brings us Charlie Sheen Week and Lindsey Lohan Mania ... but can you understand how even the threat might play particularly hard in, ya know, Japan?

Not having seen how the Japanese media is handling the situation, I can't comment. I was referring to the coverage I've seen in the US media.

innerSpaceman 03-15-2011 09:41 AM

Well, the French national safety authority, ASN, has rated the Japan nuclear reactor danger level at 6 (out of 7 on the international scale). Chernobyl was the only 7. Three Mile Island was a 5.

I don't watch U.S. news, but given this - I don't think serious concerns could be called "overblown."

JWBear 03-15-2011 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman (Post 343818)
I don't think serious concerns could be called "overblown."

Neither do I. And don't get me wrong; there are serious concerns. But most of what I see in the media is not serious concern; but overreaction at best and outright hysteria at worst.

CoasterMatt 03-15-2011 12:11 PM

A dam burst in Fukushima prefecture, but I don't hear pundits talking about hydropower policy.

Alex 03-15-2011 12:40 PM

That's because it was an irrigation dam (but the point is valid). I'm far more concerned about Oroville Dam in a 6.0 earthquake than I am our various nuclear plants in an 8.5.

Or look one one accident at a single drill site did last year in the Gulf.

This is not to say that what is happening at the Japanese reactor isn't serious. But it can be serious and still be true that the press is over-reacting.

And having a 6 rating on that scale does not mean that it will have any serious impact on anything other than a local scale.

JWBear 03-15-2011 01:02 PM

I haven't fact checked this yet, but I just read a comment that every nuclear plant in operation saves the burning of about 2 million tons of coal a year. With 442 operating nuclear plants worldwide that's a total of 884 million tons per year. Just think how much mining, waste, and pollution those nukes prevent.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.