Lounge of Tomorrow

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)
-   Daily Grind (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=18)
-   -   Bush Says Rumsfeld Resigning, Gates to Replace Him (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=4686)

Moonliner 11-10-2006 08:19 AM

Bravo for Steele. Word around here (Maryland) is that the RNC position is to give him a paying job that allows him to stay in politics for another run in '08, '10 or '12. I look forward to his next run.

Nephythys 11-10-2006 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moonliner
Bravo for Steele. Word around here (Maryland) is that the RNC position is to give him a paying job that allows him to stay in politics for another run in '08, '10 or '12. I look forward to his next run.


Ditto that.

SacTown Chronic 11-10-2006 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scaeagles
Consensus is the absence of leadership.

I've seen you toss that Thatcher quote around here more than a few times....and it's a lame one.

No, consensus is not always the absence of leadership. Sometimes there's a consensus because the way to go is so fvcking obvious to everyone.

wendybeth 11-10-2006 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scaeagles
WB, we've talked about the 9/11 report and even you have expressed that yes, rather than a complete truth telling, this was also about a CYA for EVERYONE. I really don't buy a whole lot of it, and I think you had also said the same thing.

I have posted a quote from Clinton saying he passed on taking him. Clinton saying it in his own words. Take it for what you will, but Clinton admitting it vs. a political commission?

I said politics were played with it, but I still think it's more informative than anything else out there and I suspect if it were more critical of Clinton you and every other con would be singing it's praises.

I'd like to see the quote from Clinton.

Ghoulish Delight 11-10-2006 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nephythys
Heehee- a RINO's revenge?

So your version of bi-partisan is Bush keeling over and only putting up people the Dems want?

What party is Lincoln Chafee in again?

Ghoulish Delight 11-10-2006 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight
What party is Lincoln Chafee in again?

LOL...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15651273/

Nephythys 11-10-2006 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight
What party is Lincoln Chafee in again?


He's a RINO- Republican in Name Only. Just like Zell is a DINO

Nephythys 11-10-2006 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight


Cool- anyone else is welcome to him- now if we could get rid of the rest of the RINO's it would be a happy thing.

Don't fool yourself into thinking a D or R behind someone's name means diddly when it comes to being aligned with the party beliefs. That's a joke.

Ghoulish Delight 11-10-2006 09:45 AM

I so desperately wish there were 3rd party candidates I could support...but there aren't.

And the fact remains, Bush couldn't get Bolton through the Republican-stacked house the first time. So it's hardly a matter of "only candidates that Democrats want".

Nephythys 11-10-2006 10:05 AM

If he cuts on Bolton after this thing with Rumsfeld the perception could be that he is abandoning his choices just because of the election- I think that is a mistake.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.