Lounge of Tomorrow

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)

- Lounge Lizard (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=11)

- - Soooo.... (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=136)

While walking to La Salsa in Coronado, my son asked why we don't have one of those houses right along the beach....:rolleyes:

He said he would buy one when he grows up. :D

And, his dream house, he said, would have a pool as big as the house.

So, right now, yes, I'm a little excited. Just got the word, this coming Sunday, I'm having brunch with Kevin Brownlow while he is in SF (receiving the Mel Novikoff award at the SF Film Festival). Pretty sad if you think about it, I'm all hot and bothered over someone who looks like an absent minded professor. :D

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3894 (Post 132989)

And that's the entire point of a romance novel, just as a mystery is the entire point of a mystery novel. It's predictable. Formulaic. The writers are hacks, not necessarily meaning they're bad writers (some are, some aren't) but that they're writers-for-hire writing to specific stylistic and editorial guidelines, including euphamisms and descriptions (called "tags"), length of manuscript, monogamous relationship for heroine, and happy ending.

The reader of romance novels knows what she's getting, just as the reader of mystery novels knows what she's getting. People read romance novels to be taken away from stuff IRL. Think of a reader in a hospital waiting room or on the subway to or from a stressful job. She just wants to be taken out of her life for a little bit. Romance novels do that.

Those sex scenes. With a few exceptions (like Ellora's Cave Publishing), the sex scene is supposed to advance the plot. A lot of it isn't true to female sexuality, IMO. It reads mechanical when the reader isn't invested in the characters and the outcome of the romance.

Those horrible covers. Here's the inside scoop: the bodice-ripper cover(called "clinch cover") intentionally appeals to older readers, as in 60 and older.

The romance novel industry is heading in new directions. The readership is aging. In Feb of this year, Harlequin launched a new contemporary romance series called Everlasting, series romance spanning years or an entire lifetime, depending. Harlequin NEXT is a new-stages-of-life imprint: "From that first baby at 45 to the first date after divorce or widowhood; from that first day of college-accompanied by your freshman daughter! - to dealing with three generations living in the same house".

I'm heading in new directions, too. My writing career has evolved and I am writing with my husband now. We just sold a manuscript about a mystery we solved on an Indian reservation. Yes, true story. No, not a murder mystery. When the book is out, I'm so hawking it to you.

I hope you don't think I'm insulting you. The truth is, I have a "collection" of romance novels for a reason... I like reading them :) I think I plowed through the entire Johanna Lindsay collection in my teens ;)

It's just that I'm acknowledging my interest in them has more to do with the setting than the "scenes". So, in truth, my interest relies even more upon the actual work the author puts into their novel, in terms of period research, their skill at weaving the story into the setting in a manner suitable to the time period, etc.

Out of curiosity, do you read non-romance historical fiction?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Morrigoon (Post 133039)

I hope you don't think I'm insulting you.

No worries. People like what they like.

As for a dream house, the smaller the better. I'm seriously not dusting a 10,000 sq.ft. house!

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3894 (Post 133044)

No worries. People like what they like.

As for a dream house, the smaller the better. I'm seriously not dusting a 10,000 sq.ft. house!

Doesn't you dream house come equipped with staff?

My dream house is a relatively modest six room house (bedroom, bathroom, kitchen, two work rooms; no living room, family room, dining room, garage needed).

The important thing is that is surrounded by a couple thousand acres of wooded or hilly land so that I can pretend to not have neighbors.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Stroup (Post 133047)

That's a dream compound. We'll need to incorporate this into the LoT commune concept.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3894 (Post 133044)

No worries. People like what they like.

As for a dream house, the smaller the better. I'm seriously not dusting a 10,000 sq.ft. house!

Dust? You dust?;)

my dream house is self cleaning. :snap: