| Eliza Hodgkins 1812 | 
			08-19-2008 07:59 PM | 
		 
		 
		
		 
		
		
		
		
		Most of my spelling and grammar offenses are a result of self-correcting as I reread my writing before others see it.  Spelling and "by-the-book" grammar are not my strong points, I admit.  That doesn't, however, mean I love words, sentences, paragraphs, writing or reading any less than someone who also values those things and has perfected their punctuation marks and A, B, Cs.  If I write something here and quickly review, I don't often ferret out the mistakes.  If I wrote "your" where I meant to write "you're", I will read "you're", so won't know to correct myself.  And I most certainly know the difference between the two even if I continue to make that mistake. 
 
When I allow myself the time, my writing usually proceeds as follows: 
 
Round 1: Self-expressoin with stream of consciousness embelishments. 
Round 2: Review and rewrite, to improve the narrative, refine my opinions, etc.  At this point, I'm still auto-correcting.  I rarely catch the spelling and grammar snafus. 
Round 3: Review, and more rewrites. At this point, it becomes clear that I need to proofread. 
Round 4: I read one word at a time to identify and correct spelling errors. 
Round 5: I read one sentence at a time to correct grammar mistakes and any additional spelling mistakes (such as "its" and "it's"). 
Round 6: I take a break from editing.  I don't look at the piece for hours or a day or more. 
Round 7: I read the piece again as a whole, once again to make sure I'm pleased with its entirety, and if I make any significant changes that require additional proofreading, I begin the process all over again. 
 
By round 7, after a great deal of work, I usually have something that boasts faultless spelling and grammar.  And I continue to argue that commas are a matter of personal preference.  I use them when I feel like using them. 
 
When posting on the LoT or sending emails to co-workers, I usually make it through Round 1, maybe Round 2.  Call it laziness.  Call it "not enough hours in the day".  I may embarrass myself from time to time, but usually my meaning comes across.  I was once consoled by a wise mate who (and here I poorly paraphrase) said original and good creative writing is hard to come by, but precise spelling and grammar can be learned or corrected by a helpful editor.  I'd rather be skilled at both, but que sera... 
   
Doesn't mean I don't envy those who are clearly able to express themselves beautifully with nearly flawless execution.  (I'm looking at you, LSPE, Tom, NM, Alex, ism, etc., etc., etc.) :D 
	 |