Lounge of Tomorrow - Disney at the Arclight in August

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)

- Disneyland and all things Disney (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=6)

- - Disney at the Arclight in August (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=10650)

Disney at the Arclight in August

Disney Classics come to Arclight In August

Quote:

ArcLight Hollywood, 6360 W. Sunset Blvd:

Monday, Aug. 2: "Something Wicked This Way Comes" (1983)

Monday, Aug. 9: "The Rocketeer" (1991)

Monday, Aug. 16: "20,000 Leagues Under the Sea" (1954)

Monday, Aug. 23: "The Black Hole" (1979)

Monday, Aug. 30: "Escape to Witch Mountain" (1975)

The ArcLight Sherman Oaks, 15301 Ventura Blvd:

Tuesday, Aug. 3: "Cinderella" (1950)

Tuesday, Aug. 10: "Pinocchio" (1940)

Tuesday, Aug. 17: "Alice in Wonderland" (1951)

Tuesday, Aug. 24: "The Jungle Book" (1967)

Tuesday, Aug. 31: "Peter Pan" (1953)

The ArcLight Pasadena, 336 E. Colorado Blvd.:

Wednesday, Aug. 4: "Newsies" (1992)

Wednesday, Aug. 11: "Bedknobs and Broomsticks" (1971)

Wednesday, Aug. 18: "Pete’s Dragon" (1977)

Wednesday, Aug. 25: "Mary Poppins" (1964)

There a half-dozen or so that I'm really looking forward to.

Bwahaha, I could go for a few of those. Mostly ones I don't have on home vid (or rather, in a format I could watch in the 21st century), so I'd be up for The Rocketeer and The Black Hole.

The Rocketeer is so stupidly overdue for a decent DVD/Blu-Ray release. The only DVD out so far is an atrocity, with a crappy transfer and no extras. It was disgraceful even when it came out, compared to other DVDs of the time.

I have yet to give Newsies a second chance, though I have friends who swear to me that it's a misunderstood gem.

Actually, I have the UK version of The Rocketeer, which is a pretty decent anamorphic 2.35:1 widescreen presentation. But I'd buy a BD in a heartbeat.

It's one of the ones I'd like to see at The Arclight. I'd like to see all the ones at the Hollywood Arclight (maybe not Witch Mountain). I'd also be into checking out Bedknobs... if it's the long version.

What did the Arclight Hollywood do to get stuck with the relative crap?

The "relative crap" are mostly flicks I haven't seen theatrically since their original release, as opposed to the classic animated features that, while undoubtedly "better", are less interesting to me. I've had plenty of opportunities to see them on the big screen. Pasadena is the one that I'm going to (mostly) avoid.

Yeah, I like those animated films way more than the other stuff. But I've seen them at theaters and ad infinitum at home.

The Rocketeer interests me, in particular, because the last time I saw it on the big screen was opening night of the El Capitan. Not just opening night of The Rocketeer, but actual opening night of the El Cap.

And I'd like to revisit the Black Hole because I haven't seen it since 1979, and I'm wondering if it might have some residual camp value that redeems it from my original assessment of craptacular.

You know, I've never seen Something Wicked... I should do something about that.

I don't know if I could ever sit through The Black Hole again. Gosh, it's a terrible movie. 20,000 Leagues would be a good one to see on the big screen...

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman (Post 328737)

And I'd like to revisit the Black Hole because I haven't seen it since 1979, and I'm wondering if it might have some residual camp value that redeems it from my original assessment of craptacular.

Heh, been there, done that, and "craptacular" is the perfect word to describe it. :p

I've still never seen Rocketeer or Newsies.

Quote:

Originally Posted by flippyshark (Post 328725)

I have yet to give Newsies a second chance, though I have friends who swear to me that it's a misunderstood gem.

The woman to my left on a Southwest flight from Baltimore last week was watching Newsies on her laptop. When she got the disc out of her bag I saw the title, and after that I had a hard time trying to not stare. I haven't ever seen it.

I recall quite liking Newsies. But I was 14 and not much of a movie watcher at the time, so I don't trust my recalled assessment at all.

I love "The Black Hole" - the theme song, especially the extended prelude gives me chills.

innerSpaceman, if you can't catch it at the Arclight, I'll fire it up at our house for a screening.

I've never seen Newsies. But, seriously, The Rocketeer is actually a good movie.

I thought Newsies was cool. Loved the "Seize the Day" song.

Ok, what did the Hollywood Arclight do to get the relative crap that is unlikely to have any chance at bringing in an audience outside the relative narrow Disney geek crowd?

Three themes I guess:
Animated Classics
Mostly Live Action Musical Classics
Live Action Non-Musical Classics That Prove That Generally "Live Action Disney Non-Musical Classic" is an oxymoron.

I love seeing old movies theatrically but can't imagine paying (especially Arclight prices) for any of those five and two of them I'd demand reparations if forced to sit through again.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex (Post 328753)

Ok, what did the Hollywood Arclight do to get the relative crap that is unlikely to have any chance at bringing in an audience outside the relativ

Locate themselves in Hollywood where there's a never-ending supply of niche film geeks?

"Something Wicked..." was the first film Chris and I saw together. Not "together" but we were both with the same group of people.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 328756)

Locate themselves in Hollywood where there's a never-ending supply of niche film geeks?

If Hollywood has a surplus of people wanting to pay $18 to watch mediocre to bad old Disney movies on a Monday night then I guess it is a smarter move than I give them credit for. But that still seems like a really narrow niche.

I'll likely never know, I guess, whether I'm right or wrong. Unless someone here goes to all of them and reports on attendance. But that would mean someone having to sit through Something Wicked This Way Comes and that would just be cruel.

I like Something Wicked This Way Comes. A flawed film, no doubt, but Bradbury's script and the lead acting talents of Pryce and Robards shine through. I would have liked to see it with the original Georges Delerue score (it's been released on its own on CD), but it's nowhere near as bad as you might suggest.

It's painfully bad. We can agree to disagree if you'll acknowledge that I'm right and you're just being cantankerous.

I remember it as being pretty darn bad, and horribly disappointing.

I like it.

So did

Quote:

April 29, 1983
DISNEY'S BRADBURY

By JANET MASLIN
IN the center of a small, old-fashioned town, the autumn leaves are blowing down Main Street -that is, a wind machine is blowing the leaves across a movie-set evocation of small-town Americana. ''Something Wicked This Way Comes,'' the Walt Disney production of Ray Bradbury's 1962 novel, begins on such an overworked Norman Rockwell note that there seems little chance that anything exciting or unexpected will happen.

So it's a happy surprise when the film, which opens today at the National and other theaters, turns into a lively, entertaining tale combining boyishness and grown-up horror in equal measure. In tiny Green Town, Ill., the arrival of a highly unusual carnival triggers some strange events, which are witnessed by the inseparable team of Jim Nightshade (Shawn Carson) and Will Halloway (Vidal Peterson). The townspeople, at first entranced by the unexpected carnival troupe, are soon affected in increasingly sinister ways that are best not revealed here, but are certainly good for a shock or two.

When Jim and Will figure out what the carnival is up to, they become the prey of its ringleader, a Mr. Dark (Jonathan Pryce), who organizes an entire parade through Green Town just to scout for the boys. Jim and Will watch the parade covertly, picking out two yellowdraped floats for special notice. ''They're coffins!'' cries one boy cries. ''Yeah - kid-sized!'' the other says.

The gee-whiz quality to this adventure is far more excessive in Mr. Bradbury's novel than it is here, as directed by Jack Clayton. Mr. Clayton, who directed a widely admired version of ''The Turn of the Screw'' some years ago, gives the film a tension that transcends even its purplest prose.

The horror here, which involves some elaborate special effects, is very much in the service of a story about a father and son who rediscover each other, which gives it an added dimension. Without Jason Robards as the father who has disappointed Will, and is given a chance to redeem himself through the evil that the carnival creates, the movie might be nothing but eerie. As it is, the tender moments between father and son help keep the science fiction on a human scale.

''Something Wicked This Way Comes,'' which also features the beautiful Pam Grier as a demonic temptress (she is first seen fondling a pet spider) and Diane Ladd as Jim's vaguely neglectful mother, shouldn't bore adults in the audience. But its fancifulness makes it a film best suited to children, though it may scare them at times. One of Jim's and Will's worst nightmares features about 100 tarantulas creeping into one boy's bedroom and, needless to say, creeping all over the boy as well. Children of all ages, be forewarned.

I loved "Something Wicked This Way Comes" - If he was still in fine form, I'd even be up for a Tim Burton remake of it.

and so did Ebert.

Quote:

Something Wicked This Way Comes
Release Date: 1983

Ebert Rating: ***½

Movies / Roger Ebert / Apr 29, 1983

The opening scenes of "Something Wicked This Way Comes" might remind you a little of Orson Welles' "The Magnificent Ambersons." Both films begin with a nostalgic memory of what it was like to grow up in a small Midwestern town, back before everything became modern and a sense of wonder was lost.

What the two films also have in common is a love of language. The screenplay for "Something Wicked This Way Comes" was written by Ray Bradbury, based on his novel, and it's one of the rare American films to savor the sound of words, and their rhythms. That's true in the writing, and it's also true in the acting; Jason Robards, who has the lead in this film, is allowed to use his greatest gift, his magnificently controlled speaking voice, more poetically in this movie than in anything else he's done in years.

The movie is a fantasy, the story of how Dark's Pandemonium Carnival came to town one night (arriving on a glorious carnival train with no engineer at the controls and no passengers in the cars), and of how the carnival's main attraction was temptation.

What could it tempt you with? With whatever you wanted the most. And in the case of the Robards character, an aging small-town librarian with a young son, what he wanted the most was life and youth. The challenge set him is a difficult one. If he can resist that temptation, he can redeem the whole town. If he relents, all is doomed. The scenes involving the carnival are an interesting blend of special effects and nostalgia, including a merry-go-round that spins backward into time.

The carnival owner, Mr. Dark (Jonathan Pryce), is very likely a confederate of the devil. And his assistants include the very beautiful Dust Witch, played by the stately, lovely Pam Grier in a change-of-career role after her decade of tough women.

"Something Wicked This Way Comes" qualifies as a horror film, but it's an altogether different kind than we've been getting lately. The new breed of horror movies are essentially geek shows, exercises in despair in which all hope has been abandoned and evil rules the world. Bradbury's world of fantasy calls back to an earlier tradition, to the fantasies of Lord Dunsany, Saki and John Collier (but not H. P. Lovecraft!) -- horror fantasies in which evil was a distinct possibility, but men also had within them the possibility of redemption. Robards is offered a choice in this movie, and it is a choice. Things need not end in disaster.

There's another interesting thing about this movie. It's one of the few literary adaptations I've seen in which the film not only captures the mood and tone of the novel, but also the novel's style. Bradbury's prose is a strange hybrid of craftsmanship and lyricism. He builds his stories and novels in a straightforward way, with strong plotting, but his sentences owe more to Thomas Wolfe than to the pulp tradition, and the lyricism isn't missed in this movie.

In its descriptions of autumn days, in its heartfelt conversations between a father and a son, in the unabashed romanticism of its evil carnival and even in the perfect rhythm of its title, this is a horror movie with elegance.

Hell, I might watch it again tonight.

Eh, it established a beautiful tone ... but descended into crap.

I wish I owned a copy.

Ebert compared it to The Magnificent Ambersons? Hmm. I want to see it now.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gemini Cricket (Post 328792)

Ebert compared it to The Magnificent Ambersons? Hmm. I want to see it now.

Keeping in mind what was good about TMA was dumped into the Pacific by RKO.

I loved The Black Hole when it was first released, though I admit I think I wanted it to be much better than it actually was. The movie had everything, but a solid script and a decent director. Why the studio handed it over to such an apparent hack is beyond me. What a waste.

Still, I might go. Can you smoke pot at the Arclight?

Ok, I have to eat crow.

I was completely thinking of the wrong movie. When seeing the title Something Wicked This Way Comes I was thinking of The Watcher in the Woods. I don't believe I've seen Something Wicked This Way Comes so I'll concede it is a good movie.

The Black Hole is still a bad movie and Escape to Witch Mountain is on the wrong side of tolerable. I've never cared for 20,000 Leagues but reasonable people can disagree on that one and The Rocketeer is fantastic because Jennifer Connelly has boobies but is otherwise forgettable.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex (Post 328795)

Ok, I have to eat crow.

By all means.

By the way, we watched The Watcher In The Woods last year. Alex may have been talking about the wrong movie, but now that I know what he's talking about, I'll agree that that one sure is a stinker.

I so want to see a few of these. Tops on my list are 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea and, of course, Alice in Wonderland. Sure, I have the DVD of the latter film, but after suffering the Burton monstrosity I want to feast on some decent big screen Alice.

Pre-Miss Saigon Jonathan Pryce? I apparently need to see this film.