Lounge of Tomorrow

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)
-   Beatnik (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=9)
-   -   Lost! (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=1336)

Moonliner 05-26-2005 06:03 AM

Lost!
 
Is anyone here watching LOST? I heard they had their season finali yesterday. I saw the first few episodes then tuned out.

Do we know what mysterious thing is killing people in the jungle?

What other (if any) things did you learn?

Thanks.

scaeagles 05-26-2005 08:08 AM

Been completely hooked on it all season. It is the one show weekly I gotta see.

So many things have happened, it's hard to tell you anything as far as what we learned. I don't know what you know.

The french woman was apparently working with Ethan to kidnap Claire and take her baby. Do you know about Ethan? Did you know about the French woman? Too hard to talk about about what's been resolved without knowing what you know.

Specifically, regarding the monster, we were supposedly shown a small piece of it last night, but I kept rewinding my tape and couldn't figure out what I was seeing.

BarTopDancer 05-26-2005 08:41 AM

Scaeagles~
Spoiler:
I heard the glimpse of the 'monster' was when Hurley was looking at the comic book on the plane... it showed the polar bear..

Before I heard that I was thinking the glimpse was the shadow spirit thingie that was around when Locke was being pulled down the hole


Rest of my thoughts in spoilers

Spoiler:
OMG!!!!! This is how flashbacks should be done. Short and to the point. Poor Jin!!! That guy in the bathroom.... You can tell Jin never signed on for this when he married Sun.

I cannot believe that Artz just exploded! Was it the dynamite or spontanious combustion? I missed it.

SHARRRRRK anyone? I had a feeling the rescue boat wasn't that. They were only 15 miles out, wouldn't a ship in a shipping lane have noticed the island before? I wonder how long The Others have been on the island and how they are tracking them. And why they only want boys. Are they scouts for Michael Jackson? Are they living in Neverland?? 15 miles is a loooong swim back to shore.

WTF was that spirit ghost thingie??? Could that be the monster? What did Locke see? I'm not sure the monster is a polar bear. I'm thinking it could be some sort of super-human with some sort of pure energy strength/weapon to take down the trees. Or the monster could be that spirit ghost thingie.

Kevin & Bean were bitching about the ending.... it being a ladder... I'm thinking... A ladder to where!?!?! What is down that hatch!!!!!!!!!!!!


So much more than this happened. My VCR shut off in the middle of taping it. I really need TiVO!

scaeagles 05-26-2005 09:10 AM

Bartop -

Bummer about the VCR. I've gotta watch this thing a few more times prior to next season. I heard ABC is replaying it Saturday night.

Spoiler:
What did you think would happen with the hatch? They can't give everything away! Should be fun when they go down it next season. I'll be a bit miffed if they go down the hole and find an impentrable door. I expect some payoff with the hatch early on next season.

So I guess Ethan was in league with Danielle? Since "the others" don't want the baby, they want Walt, I'm figuring Ethan wasn't with the others.

BarTopDancer 05-26-2005 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scaeagles
Bartop -

Bummer about the VCR. I've gotta watch this thing a few more times prior to next season. I heard ABC is replaying it Saturday night.

I'll have to try and tape it so I can re-watch it. Thanks!

Quote:

Spoiler:
What did you think would happen with the hatch? They can't give everything away! Should be fun when they go down it next season. I'll be a bit miffed if they go down the hole and find an impentrable door. I expect some payoff with the hatch early on next season.



Spoiler:
I love that they showed a ladder! I want to know what's down there!! I think just opening it, showing them looking down would have been horrible. At least we know that there aren't a ton of bodies...right at the top.... There better be payoff for the hatch at the beginning of the season. I think too many open story lines is a receipe for disaster.


Quote:

Spoiler:
So I guess Ethan was in league with Danielle? Since "the others" don't want the baby, they want Walt, I'm figuring Ethan wasn't with the others.

Spoiler:
Perhaps Ethan was kidnapping the baby to give to Danielle to give to The Others. Or maybe Ethan is one of The Others, as is Danielle. It wouldn't suprise me to find out she is one of The Others. I wonder if they want Walt because he is 'special'.

scaeagles 05-26-2005 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer
Spoiler:
Perhaps Ethan was kidnapping the baby to give to Danielle to give to The Others. Or maybe Ethan is one of The Others, as is Danielle. It wouldn't suprise me to find out she is one of The Others. I wonder if they want Walt because he is 'special'.

Perhaps.

Spoiler:
It could be that the whole kidnap the baby thing was a red herring to throw the survivors off of who the others really wanted.

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 05-26-2005 10:03 AM

I friggin' loved the finale.

There seems to be some sort of biomechanical defense system at work. And a large Underground...world? Something? What?!

Walt!!!!!!!!

SacTown Chronic 05-26-2005 10:06 AM

Spoiler:
I can't find my car keys. I hope this lost thread can help me.





Spoiler:
Found 'em. They were in my pocket. This lost thread really works!

BarTopDancer 05-26-2005 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scaeagles
Perhaps.

Spoiler:
It could be that the whole kidnap the baby thing was a red herring to throw the survivors off of who the others really wanted.

Spoiler:
Good point! I didn't think of that. Danielle is totally off her rocker... but being on that island for 16 years would remove quite a few cards from most peoples decks. I think she really wanted to trade. I'm glad she gave the baby to Sayid (yum) but I don't think that will be the last time the baby is in harms way

Tref 05-26-2005 12:22 PM

Spoiler:
I missed the whole season but I shall watch the show in re-runs





Spoiler:
Comb. Loose change. Dog hair.

cstephens 05-26-2005 12:42 PM

My thoughts on the finale:

Spoiler:
I've been referring to the monster as Godzilla. With the mechanical sounds it was making last night, I turned to my husband and said that no, it was instead apparently MechaGodzilla. I loved Hurley's line about the "island's security system that eats people".

I actually applauded when Artz got blown up, though I missed the actual blowing up shot. After he had wrapped the stick and was saying how dangerous it was, I looked away for a second...and heard "Kaboom". He was really annoying. I loved the glazed-over look on Hurley's face when they were waiting outside the ship for John, Jack and Kate.

When the blip came on the raft's radar, I was thinking it wasn't a good thing. When Danielle said they were coming for "the boy", I figured they meant Walt, not Claire's baby.

I figured that Charlie did already take the heroin. He was so tired and having a hard time keeping up with Sayid. And then after they visited the plane, he didn't seem to have trouble keeping up with him.

Someone on another board posited a theory that everyone was there because they were doing something wrong. Sun actually did bring up the point of whether they were being punished, which Shannon considered but Claire rejected.

I really enjoyed the show last night. Answered some questions, left others that you're waiting to see what happens.


Non-show related things - has anyone heard Naveen Andrews speak in real life? He was on a local radio show earlier this week, which I missed, but he apparently has a fairly thick British accent, nothing like what he sounds like on "Lost" or "Bride and Prejudice". Also, in listening to another radio show this week, I found out that the guy who played Ethan (the guy who kidnapped Claire and who Charlie killed) is Tom Cruise's cousin.

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 05-26-2005 02:32 PM

Tom Cruise's cousin looks like a melting Tom Cruise candle.

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 05-26-2005 02:38 PM

Spoiler:
Some theories about the Island.

The island IS alive, as believed by Locke. And it does have a reason for calling them in. If true, are the pirates who kidnap children (this time Walt) part of the Island, or are they a threat to the island. Maybe the survivors are meant to protect it. Or maybe it's EVIIIIIIIIIIIIL. Like the creepy pirates. As soon as those dudes showed up, and we got a look at them, I thought, "Oh, poor Losters, you just wasted your flare on the WRONG people."

God, I love it when Sawyer takes off his shirt. I theorize that he takes of his shirt alot because the writers enjoy seeing him shirtless as much as I do.

Another theory is that they are all in Limbo, and until they make amends for past misdeeds, etc., they're trapped. Boone was "released" (died) when he made peace after he had done something selfless to help his fellow Losters, and had made peace with himself.

Granted, the poor dude who blew himself up? What kind of peace did he have? I liked him, even thoug he was annoying, because he was the voice of the audience: Why are YOU pretty people the only survivors we see? You're not the only talent on this island! Why are you still fat, Hurley?!"

I really like that the castaways are starting to ask each other why it's all happening, though.

And I REALLY want to know what the hell those numbers are.

Maybe the Island is a sentient spaceship.

Maybe it's in another dimension.

Maybe the Losters are dead people walking.

There does seem to be some sort of Underground World beneath the island, though. Awesome.

And the invisible monster Tremor worm that sounded like a mechanical godzilla was pretty cool.

I wonder what Walt will manifest when he's off with the creepy pirates. He should manifest another polar bear to eat them all. Or he should manifest Nightcrawler, so that Nightcrawler can BAMF Walt the fvck outta there.

BarTopDancer 05-26-2005 05:52 PM

I found this link. Apparently if you click on the 'numbers' in order it opens up a preview for season 2.

This site is supposed to be full of hidden info about the show.

cstephens 05-26-2005 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eliza Hodgkins 1812
Spoiler:
As soon as those dudes showed up, and we got a look at them, I thought, "Oh, poor Losters, you just wasted your flare on the WRONG people."

...

Maybe the Losters are dead people walking.

Spoiler:
Am I the only one who keeps reading that word as "lobsters"? :)

libraryvixen 05-26-2005 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cstephens
Spoiler:
Am I the only one who keeps reading that word as "lobsters"? :)

Spoiler:
No... I keep thinking of drawn butter.

Yeah, I was so miffed when they took the boy (I'm not an avid Lost watcher). He gave away his dog and now he's with some sex smugglers :(

SusieP. 05-26-2005 09:32 PM

Spoiler:
I'm thinking that everyone on the plane willed that plane to crash. That they all, for a brief second, had the thought that the only way out of their situation was to die and their collective thoughts made the plane go down. They were all in various desperate situations, like it would be easier for Charlie just to kill himself or whatever than to get off heroin. Or for Claire, rather than having the demon baby. Or for Locke, who couldn't walk at that point. Etc, etc.


I'm gonna have to watch it again. I was not surprised when Artz blew up. While he was talking to Hurley I was thinking, I bet they introduced this guy so they could kill him off...and BOOM! He was gone.

SusieP. 05-26-2005 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eliza Hodgkins 1812
Tom Cruise's cousin looks like a melting Tom Cruise candle.

Awww, sad but true!

Good call, as usual. :snap:

BarTopDancer 05-26-2005 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eliza Hodgkins 1812
Spoiler:
Some theories about the Island.

The island IS alive, as believed by Locke. And it does have a reason for calling them in. If true, are the pirates who kidnap children (this time Walt) part of the Island, or are they a threat to the island.



Spoiler:
They DO look like pirates and I think they came from the Black Rock. Now how did the Black Rock get there? Of course a tusanmi is the logical answer, but I predict it is not the correct answer.


Quote:

Spoiler:
Maybe the survivors are meant to protect it. Or maybe it's EVIIIIIIIIIIIIL. Like the creepy pirates. As soon as those dudes showed up, and we got a look at them, I thought, "Oh, poor Losters, you just wasted your flare on the WRONG people."

MMMM Lobster... Oh wait, you said Losters.
Season 2 preview spoiler
Spoiler:
The easter egg preview on that link I put up earlier says "They are not the Survivors they think they are...
whatever that means

Quote:

God, I love it when Sawyer takes off his shirt. I theorize that he takes of his shirt alot because the writers enjoy seeing him shirtless as much as I do.
OH YUMMMMMMMMMM!!!! I had him as my desktop wallpaper until my boss deemed him not work appropriate. :(

Quote:

Spoiler:
Another theory is that they are all in Limbo, and until they make amends for past misdeeds, etc., they're trapped. Boone was "released" (died) when he made peace after he had done something selfless to help his fellow Losters, and had made peace with himself.



OOO that's a new theory. I like it! The producers already said
Spoiler:
they wern't in hell


Quote:

Spoiler:
Granted, the poor dude who blew himself up? What kind of peace did he have? I liked him, even thoug he was annoying, because he was the voice of the audience: Why are YOU pretty people the only survivors we see? You're not the only talent on this island! Why are you still fat, Hurley?!"

Spoiler:
I heard he will be back next season, as will Boone. I don't think people die on the island. I don't think Ethan is dead and I'm not so sure the other people who are dead will stay that way


Quote:

Spoiler:
There does seem to be some sort of Underground World beneath the island, though. Awesome.

Spoiler:
Totally! I think that The Others live in the underground society and they can be heard above ground through some ventillation system.


Other thoughts:

Everything and everyone is interconnected. Every prop is there for a reason. Interconnections:
Spoiler:
Michael & Walt, Charlie and Hurley were all at the same hotel. Sawyer met Charlies dad in Australia. Hurley was on the TV screen when Jin was roughing up the family.
I know there are more, I can't think of them at this hour.

Is there any chance we can get the title of the thread to say "Spoilers" So we can stop with the tags? Thanks!

Gn2Dlnd 05-27-2005 02:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer
I found this link. Apparently if you click on the 'numbers' in order it opens up a preview for season 2.

This site is supposed to be full of hidden info about the show.

:eek: Scary stuff happens when you play around with the seating diagram. :creeped out:

Kels 05-27-2005 07:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer
Season 2 preview spoiler
Spoiler:
The easter egg preview on that link I put up earlier says "They are not the Survivors they think they are...
whatever that means
[/spoiler]

BarTopDancer ~ How did you find it?

BarTopDancer 05-27-2005 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kels
BarTopDancer ~ How did you find it?

Click on the seat numbers in order. I'm not sure if it was my connection or the file but it had to keep caching up.

Also if you click around you can find where the Losters were seated and information about them. The seats will highlight and then you can click on them. When I clicked on Lockes seat I jumped out of mine :eek:. I couldn't find a way to view seats when they wern't highlighted.

With exploration of the site you can find some of the letters that were in bottles. I started finding them at the bottom of the source when I did view source.

There's all sorts of stuff on that site, I know I haven't touched even the beginning.

Gn2Dlnd 06-01-2005 11:16 PM


Gn2Dlnd 06-01-2005 11:18 PM

Robert D. West, of Santa Barbara, California, USA survived a horrific plane crash and is stranded on an island somewhere Northeast of Australia and Southwest of Hawaii. In the event that I am never found, please forward word of my fate to parents, Mr. and Mrs. John West, of Tucson Arizona. Thank you.

Robert

wendybeth 06-01-2005 11:22 PM

Argh!!!! I do not watch 'Lost', but I've a feeling if I did, your above post would really mean something. To that end, I'm feeling mojacious.....

Well, I would be, if I wasn't being told to spread it around....

I'll be back.

Jazzman 06-02-2005 12:27 AM

Does that say "Charlie tears ass through the jungle?"

If it does, that's AWESOME! And hilarious! No wonder the show is so great, if that's the script cues! :D

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 06-02-2005 11:11 AM

[quote=BarTopDancer]

Spoiler:
Totally! I think that The Others live in the underground society and they can be heard above ground through some ventillation system.


That's awesome, M. Great post/thoughts.

Spoiler:
Re: people who will be returning next season who supposedly died this season, I think it might be that they'll appear in flashbacks. I'm not sure it means they aren't actually dead.

scaeagles 06-02-2005 11:56 AM

BIG SPOILER! Do not read unless you want a HUGE spoiler.

Spoiler:
I read that one of the regular males - though they have not announced who - wanted more money than they were willing to pay, so he will be killed off in one of the first two or three episodes next year and will not even appear in anymore flashbacks.

Personally, with the cult popularity of the show, I can't think of anything more stupid for an actor than to demand more money on a show that you know you can be killed off of at any time. Why not build your career?

Locke? Jack? Sawyer? Hurley? Charlie? Jin? Walt? Michael? I would miss any of them. That sucks!

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 06-02-2005 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scaeagles
BIG SPOILER! Do not read unless you want a HUGE spoiler.

Spoiler:
I read that one of the regular males - though they have not announced who - wanted more money than they were willing to pay, so he will be killed off in one of the first two or three episodes next year and will not even appear in anymore flashbacks.

Personally, with the cult popularity of the show, I can't think of anything more stupid for an actor than to demand more money on a show that you know you can be killed off of at any time. Why not build your career?

Locke? Jack? Sawyer? Hurley? Charlie? Jin? Walt? Michael? I would miss any of them. That sucks!

Spoiler:
I read this, too. Supposedly Abrams discussed it. I would look at the actors who have had film careers. Most notably, these days, is the actor playing Sayid. The actor playing Locke has also had a film career, though not so much of late, so he may be very grateful to be where he’s at. The actor playing Michael has had a very small film career, but maybe he’s getting greedy. Jin was in Crash, but has mostly been guest starring on television, so being a regular probably suits him just fine. The hobbit was depressed after not working hardly at all after Lord of the Rings, so he's probably pleased as punch to be a regular on a series.

I really hope Sayid isn’t a goner, but I’d almost have to guess it’s him if the rumor is true. If LOST is conflicting with movie offers, and an actor has had to turn down parts, he'd probably demand a much higher salary, or he'd prefer to go on to what he considers to be bigger and better things in film.

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 06-02-2005 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scaeagles
BIG SPOILER! Do not read unless you want a HUGE spoiler.

Spoiler:
I read that one of the regular males - though they have not announced who - wanted more money than they were willing to pay, so he will be killed off in one of the first two or three episodes next year and will not even appear in anymore flashbacks.

Personally, with the cult popularity of the show, I can't think of anything more stupid for an actor than to demand more money on a show that you know you can be killed off of at any time. Why not build your career?

Locke? Jack? Sawyer? Hurley? Charlie? Jin? Walt? Michael? I would miss any of them. That sucks!

Spoiler:
I read this, too. Supposedly Abrams discussed it. I would look at the actors who have had film careers. Most notably, these days, is the actor playing Sayid. The actor playing Locke has also had a film career, though not so much of late, so he may be very grateful to be where he’s at. The actor playing Michael has had a very small film career, but maybe he’s getting greedy. Jin was in Crash, but has mostly been guest starring on television, so being a regular probably suits him just fine. The hobbit was depressed after not working hardly at all after Lord of the Rings, so he's probably pleased as punch to be a regular on a series.

I really hope Sayid isn’t a goner, but I’d almost have to guess it’s him if the rumor is true. If LOST is conflicting with movie offers, and an actor has had to turn down parts, he'd probably demand a much higher salary, or he'd prefer to go on to what he considers to be bigger and better things in film.

BarTopDancer 06-03-2005 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eliza Hodgkins 1812
Spoiler:
I read this, too. Supposedly Abrams discussed it. I would look at the actors who have had film careers. Most notably, these days, is the actor playing Sayid. The actor playing Locke has also had a film career, though not so much of late, so he may be very grateful to be where he’s at. The actor playing Michael has had a very small film career, but maybe he’s getting greedy. Jin was in Crash, but has mostly been guest starring on television, so being a regular probably suits him just fine. The hobbit was depressed after not working hardly at all after Lord of the Rings, so he's probably pleased as punch to be a regular on a series.

I really hope Sayid isn’t a goner, but I’d almost have to guess it’s him if the rumor is true. If LOST is conflicting with movie offers, and an actor has had to turn down parts, he'd probably demand a much higher salary, or he'd prefer to go on to what he considers to be bigger and better things in film.

Spoiler:
I was thinking it was Boone, then I read that he was NOT a happy camper about being killed off. Maybe they'll bring him back as one of the Others.

I hope it isn't Syaid or Sawyer. I could melt in their eyes........


Reply to EH re: her reply to me.
Spoiler:
I'm sure people who died this season will appear in flashbacks... But I don't think that some of those who have died are dead. I think this island is very bizarre and powerful/magical and some of those who are dead aren't. I'm thinking that somewhere in the show there will be a showdown with The Others and some of their own will have become The Others.

Prudence 06-03-2005 03:09 PM

I have no spoilers. But Wednesday night I was sitting around not tired yet and the first episode came on in re-run and it's ALL YOUR FAULT that I watched it, my husband watched it, and now it's like some horrible drug and we need more.

Damn you all!

Gn2Dlnd 06-03-2005 03:16 PM



Ha-ha!

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 06-03-2005 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prudence
I have no spoilers. But Wednesday night I was sitting around not tired yet and the first episode came on in re-run and it's ALL YOUR FAULT that I watched it, my husband watched it, and now it's like some horrible drug and we need more.

Damn you all!

Dammit, I still haven't seen the pilot. I didn't realize they were reairing episodes. Rerun schedules are so screwy these days.

Hurry up and come out on DVD, LOST!

scaeagles 06-03-2005 03:40 PM

I typically don't enjoy watching reruns that I've seen, but this show is different. You pick up a lot of foreshadowing that you didn't see before because you know more about the characters, the island, etc.

Thoroughly enjoyed watching the pilot again.

mistyisjafo 06-03-2005 03:45 PM

The finale was so frustrating because I didn't feel I learned anything. In fact, I thought a lot of stuff was sort of pointless like Hurley's running through the airport. I feel like I'm watching X-Files all over again. Nothing ever gets resolved!! Which means I'll be waiting with baited breath for next season!

BarTopDancer 06-03-2005 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eliza Hodgkins 1812
Dammit, I still haven't seen the pilot. I didn't realize they were reairing episodes. Rerun schedules are so screwy these days.

Hurry up and come out on DVD, LOST!

I taped it. I can get it to you somehow if you want. I think the DVD comes out at the end of the month. Now we need a DVD player so we can watch LOST at the park. :D

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 06-03-2005 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer
I taped it. I can get it to you somehow if you want. I think the DVD comes out at the end of the month. Now we need a DVD player so we can watch LOST at the park. :D

I got a portable player for Christmas. Heee.

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 06-03-2005 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mistyisjafo
The finale was so frustrating because I didn't feel I learned anything. In fact, I thought a lot of stuff was sort of pointless like Hurley's running through the airport. I feel like I'm watching X-Files all over again. Nothing ever gets resolved!! Which means I'll be waiting with baited breath for next season!

We did learn a couple of things:

Spoiler:
1. There is, somewhere WAY below the island's surface, some kind of underground structure that is man made. And by the sounds of the "monster", it's at least partially mechanical. There's probably a community of people living there. And they're obviously not ape people, if they can build crazy machine monsters and...oh, whatever.

2. We learned that the French woman is crazy, but not so crazy that she was making up that crap about the smoke.

3. Michelle Rodriguez! And she'll probably be back, playing an important role next season.

4. Hurley running through the airport proves that he's always been able to haul ass despite his girth, and it's not just weird Island mojo giving him super powers....like Locke.

5. Sawyer looks really good tearing off his shirt and playing hero.

6. Jin looks very good kissing his wife.

7. Sayid looks very good running.

8. Charlie looks like a spaz when he runs.

9. Even on a mystical Island of What the Fvck, a junkie can find his fix.

10. Jack looks really hot when he's tearing up.

11. Kate is easily fooled for a seemingly street smart gal. Bait and switch, Kate! C'mon!!!!!

12. Some of the other survivors aren't stunningly beautiful, so Hurley is not alone. Not alone! (Personally, I think he's adorable, but he's no Sawyer, Jack, Sayid, Jin, etc.)

13. Black Rock = pirate ship? Hurrah!


I read a review at TWOP that basically said, "What a great hour of television that would have been," so you're not the only one who thought it was a bit bloated.

cstephens 06-03-2005 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer
I think the DVD comes out at the end of the month.

Actually, I believe the DVD is being released in early September.

BarTopDancer 06-03-2005 09:26 PM

Thanks CStephens!

My friend sent me this for all you Sawyer fans.

Prudence 06-03-2005 09:43 PM

And just when I'd gotten that damn llama song out of my head....

scaeagles 06-07-2005 12:44 PM

OH - a spoiler on my previous big spoiler. Apparently the report was false and I have only just learned of the retraction.

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 06-07-2005 01:03 PM

God, I hate that we have to wait for DVDs in September. And new Lost. I want more Lost now.

I'll have to satisfy with this, instead.

http://cdn.channel.aol.com/channels/...0728e-400cb8e1

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 11-19-2008 11:36 AM

Destiny calls, bitches!
 
Welcome back, LOST!

innerSpaceman 11-19-2008 11:46 AM

I watch it on DVD a year after it airs ... but I can't remember when I last did. I don't remember if I saw Season 3 or not. Is this Season 4 that's starting?

I like the show, but I think it's Twin Peaks 2 with no idea of where it's going and certain to devolve (if it hasn't already) into unwatchable chaos.

So I want to watch, but I'm not compelled. Certainly not to watch it weekly "live." I just want to catch up. Have I fallen 2 seasons behind instead of 1??

scaeagles 11-19-2008 11:57 AM

I'll still watch it when it airs, but am not as enthralled with it as I once was. Much more excited for 24.

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 11-19-2008 12:01 PM

Last season and the first have been my favorite seasons, thus far, so I'm very close to peeing my pants with excitement.

BarTopDancer 11-19-2008 12:16 PM

I just started watching my TIVOed shows in anticipation.

Very excited.

bewitched 11-19-2008 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman (Post 254556)
I watch it on DVD a year after it airs ... but I can't remember when I last did. I don't remember if I saw Season 3 or not. Is this Season 4 that's starting?

I like the show, but I think it's Twin Peaks 2 with no idea of where it's going and certain to devolve (if it hasn't already) into unwatchable chaos.

So I want to watch, but I'm not compelled. Certainly not to watch it weekly "live." I just want to catch up. Have I fallen 2 seasons behind instead of 1??

It's season 5 that's starting in January.

SciFi is airing all of the back episodes in 4 episode blocks each Monday. This coming Monday will be season 2, episodes 16-19. They should be just about caught up to the new episodes by January 21st (the start of season 5).

JWBear 11-19-2008 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eliza Hodgkins 1812 (Post 254555)
Welcome back, LOST!

The question is: Does anybody care anymore?

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 11-19-2008 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 254567)
The question is: Does anybody care anymore?

I believe my enthusiasm indicates that I do, at least. Heh.

JWBear 11-19-2008 12:45 PM

I meant the TV watching public in general.

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 11-19-2008 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 254571)
I meant the TV watching public in general.

Each season loses viewers. According to Wiki, there were 13 million last season, in contrast to the 16 million watching the first season. Apparently it's pretty popular Internationally, but so is CSI: Miami. Again: heh.

Disneyphile 11-19-2008 01:06 PM

Ken and I started watching it this summer via NetFlix. We just finished Season 3, and are now watching Season 4 online. We hope to be caught up in time for the Season 5 premiere in January. :)

We're totally addicted to it, so we absolutely share your enthusiasm, EH!

€uroMeinke 11-19-2008 01:07 PM

Perhaps I should try the season 1 DVDs again. I think I got to episode 3

innerSpaceman 11-19-2008 01:12 PM

I'm gonna try to catch up via Sci-Fi Mondays. Thanks, bewitched.






Now, if you would just send me a PM reminder every Monday, that might actually happen! :D

Stan4dSteph 11-19-2008 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eliza Hodgkins 1812 (Post 254569)
I believe my enthusiasm indicates that I do, at least. Heh.

I do! I do! Pick me!

Ghoulish Delight 11-19-2008 01:40 PM

Enthused!

BarTopDancer 11-19-2008 02:04 PM

I think that as it wraps up it will become more popular. There was a period where it was hard to watch because it was so frustrating.

Gn2Dlnd 11-19-2008 03:27 PM

The sci-fi channel is not in hi-def, which looks crappy on our tv.

bewitched 11-19-2008 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman (Post 254579)


Now, if you would just send me a PM reminder every Monday, that might actually happen! :D

I will endeavor to remember. :)

However...this is your weekly reminder for next Monday. I intend to be totally drugged up this coming Monday and am hoping that memory of all sorts is wiped from my mind.




Lost? What is this "Lost" you speak of?:D

bewitched 11-29-2008 11:11 PM

I just discovered all 4 seasons are currently airing on ABC's website. No more waiting for Mondays!:D

(I've had a lot of free time on my hands lately...)

libraryvixen 11-30-2008 09:38 AM

I can't wait for Lost to return! :)

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 12-16-2008 12:02 PM

Ben and Jack = BFF.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2PvsM5Qm50A

Stan4dSteph 12-29-2008 05:28 PM

Ajira Airways -- Destiny Calls

Cadaverous Pallor 12-30-2008 12:25 AM

I think I just realized something about how I feel regarding internet tie-ins with TV shows and movies.

I don't care to visit a website, or see promo vids, or clues, or planted posts, or whathaveyou, before I have watched the show or movie. AFTER I see the actual entertainment in question I go check out websites, but beforehand, I'm just annoyed that I'm not watching the show already.

sleepyjeff 12-30-2008 01:06 AM

While watching 24 hours of Ralphie I had it pointed out to me that Jack's Best Man didn't have yellow eyes anymore:)

BarTopDancer 01-14-2009 11:01 AM

3 hours of Lost! tonight. It looks like it will be enhanced versions of the last 3 episodes.

Betty 01-14-2009 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 263340)
3 hours of Lost! tonight. It looks like it will be enhanced versions of the last 3 episodes.

bah. that means what? 10 seconds of show they should have shown last time? Or is this now with bubbles to explain the show as they go?

either way.. :rolleyes:

Gn2Dlnd 01-14-2009 12:28 PM

Probably "pop-up Lost."

BTW, Sci-Fi channel has recently popped up in hi-def! Just in time for the last season of BSG, yay!

BarTopDancer 01-14-2009 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Betty (Post 263347)
bah. that means what? 10 seconds of show they should have shown last time? Or is this now with bubbles to explain the show as they go?

either way.. :rolleyes:

Pop-up Lost!

Since I'm not going to watch all of last season before next week I look at it as a good reminder of what happened with enhancements to point out things.

bewitched 01-14-2009 07:11 PM

One week! :D

sleepyjeff 01-19-2009 01:16 PM

Ran accross this poem by Yeats and didn't know where to post it; thought of putting it in open mic but it's not my poem; thought of putting it in Daily Grind but, well, that's not quite right either;

Seems to me it sorta fits here:

Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all convictions, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.



Surely some revelation is at hand;
Surely the Second Coming is at hand.
The Second Coming! Hardly are those words out
When a vast image out of Spiritus Mundi
Troubles my sight: somewhere in sands of the desert
A shape with lion body and the head of a man,
A gaze blank and pitiless as the sun,
Is moving its slow thighs, while all about it
Reel shadows of the indignant desert birds.
The darkness drops again; but now I know
That twenty centuries of stony sleep
Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?

--W.B. Yeats

sleepyjeff 01-21-2009 11:47 AM

HAPPY LOST DAY EVERYONE!!!!

Monday.............one day
Tuesday............two day
Wednesday........Lost day
Thursday...........3rd day

:):):)

bewitched 01-21-2009 10:22 PM

:D

JWBear 01-22-2009 12:12 AM

wow

lashbear 01-22-2009 01:11 AM

*sigh*

sleepyjeff 01-22-2009 01:15 AM

Anyone else throw their shoe at the TV when Hurley, wanted by the Police and G-d knows who, decided the best place to hide out was home?
-------------------

To go with Ben or not?

1)Claire haunted Kate to NOT take Aaron back.

2)Sayid, who seemed to be doing Ben's bidding last season, told Hurley to not do anything Ben asked him to do.

3)Sun wants Ben dead.

And the most compelling reason to not go with Ben; 4)Jack has decided to go with Ben....Jack is rarely correct about anything;)

bewitched 01-22-2009 01:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleepyjeff (Post 264678)
And the most compelling reason to not go with Ben; 4)Jack has decided to go with Ben....Jack is rarely correct about anything;)

But he's so hot....

Ghoulish Delight 01-22-2009 08:35 AM

I'm blanking on who the lady at the end was. Was she the one that freaked Desmond out when he was back from the island that time?

scaeagles 01-22-2009 08:52 AM

I believe she was. She worked in some store he had run into during some flashback or another, but I don't recall the details.

The lady in the butcher shop that Ben was talking to who took Locke's body....have we seen her before?

Ghoulish Delight 01-22-2009 09:27 AM

She didn't look familiar.

BarTopDancer 01-22-2009 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 264693)
I'm blanking on who the lady at the end was. Was she the one that freaked Desmond out when he was back from the island that time?

Maybe. I can't remember either.

Goatee dude told Desmond to go find his mom in Oxford. Maybe that's his mom?

Ghoulish Delight 01-22-2009 09:51 AM

Ben's in LA, that probably wasn't Oxford.

Gn2Dlnd 01-22-2009 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 264721)
Ben's in LA, that probably wasn't Oxford.

Ben and Butcher Shop Lady, L.A., Ben and Ms. Hawking, aka Presumably Faraday's Mother, Oxford. Ben does have ways of getting around.

Disneyphile 01-22-2009 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 264693)
I'm blanking on who the lady at the end was. Was she the one that freaked Desmond out when he was back from the island that time?

That's who we think it is. She looks exactly like the lady at the jewelry shop when he tried to buy a ring for Penelope.

BarTopDancer 01-22-2009 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Disneyphile (Post 264741)
That's who we think it is. She looks exactly like the lady at the jewelry shop when he tried to buy a ring for Penelope.

That's HER!!!!!!

JWBear 01-22-2009 10:58 AM

It's the same actress, so I assume it's the same character... But you never know with Lost!

Ghoulish Delight 01-22-2009 11:29 AM

Well, I do recall jewelry lady making comments that implied that she was pretty much the one in charge, so that jives with what we saw yesterday.

sleepyjeff 01-22-2009 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bewitched (Post 264681)
But he's so hot....

How can I argue with that;)

sleepyjeff 01-22-2009 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 264693)
I'm blanking on who the lady at the end was. Was she the one that freaked Desmond out when he was back from the island that time?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Disneyphile (Post 264741)
That's who we think it is. She looks exactly like the lady at the jewelry shop when he tried to buy a ring for Penelope.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 264746)
That's HER!!!!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 264754)
It's the same actress, so I assume it's the same character... But you never know with Lost!


It is the same actress and the same character:

http://lostpedia.wikia.com/wiki/Ms._Hawking

Interestingly enough, this same actress played, back in 2001, an equally intriguing character in a movie titled.....you're not going to believe this.........The Others

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 01-23-2009 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gn2Dlnd (Post 264738)
Ben and Butcher Shop Lady, L.A., Ben and Ms. Hawking, aka Presumably Faraday's Mother, Oxford. Ben does have ways of getting around.

She may also no longer be in Oxford. I think they're all being drawn to Los Angeles. If she's in L.A., Desmond will wind up there, as well.

SzczerbiakManiac 01-24-2009 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleepyjeff (Post 264678)
2)Sayid, who seemed to be doing Ben's bidding last season, told Hurley to not do anything Ben asked him to do.

Or more specifically, Sayid told Hurley to do the opposite of what Ben told him to do.

yeah, I know I am splitting hairs

Cadaverous Pallor 01-24-2009 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SzczerbiakManiac (Post 265344)
Or more specifically, Sayid told Hurley to do the opposite of what Ben told him to do.

yeah, I know I am splitting hairs

That's not splitting hairs, it's actually an important point.

I don't blame Hurley at all on this. If Ben came for me, I'd run screaming.

sleepyjeff 01-24-2009 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SzczerbiakManiac (Post 265344)
Or more specifically, Sayid told Hurley to do the opposite of what Ben told him to do.

yeah, I know I am splitting hairs

Very good point....although I am puzzled why he decided to ignore the advice of Ana-Lucia and turn himself into the police?

How is surrendering to the police the opposite of going with Ben anyway...wouldnt the opposite of going with Ben be staying put?

bewitched 01-24-2009 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleepyjeff (Post 265355)
Very good point....although I am puzzled why he decided to ignore the advice of Ana-Lucia and turn himself into the police?

How is surrendering to the police the opposite of going with Ben anyway...wouldnt the opposite of going with Ben be staying put?

But for some reason, when Hurley takes stupid risks/acts (seemingly) irrationally, it usually works out well.

Ghoulish Delight 01-24-2009 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleepyjeff (Post 265355)
Very good point....although I am puzzled why he decided to ignore the advice of Ana-Lucia and turn himself into the police?

He's regularly ignored his visions of dead people.

Quote:

How is surrendering to the police the opposite of going with Ben anyway...wouldnt the opposite of going with Ben be staying put?
True, but then Hurley seems to find comfort in being locked up.

sleepyjeff 01-24-2009 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bewitched (Post 265359)
But for some reason, when Hurley takes stupid risks/acts (seemingly) irrationally, it usually works out well.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 265363)

True, but then Hurley seems to find comfort in being locked up.

I guess after seeing the look on Ben's face when Ms. Hawking told him he had 70 hours Hurley turining himself into the police may have just been the opposite of what Ben wanted regardless whether or not it was the opposite of what he said.

Although, with Ben, one never knows....after all, he told Locke not to blow up the submarine in order to get Locke to blow up the submarine;)

Cadaverous Pallor 01-25-2009 03:05 PM

Ben's face looks the same no matter what is happening, and even if it does register some supposed shock or happiness, he has flipped things on their head so many times that you can't measure anything by it.

IMHO it really hurts the show.

alphabassettgrrl 01-25-2009 04:50 PM

At least Lost is still weird.

sleepyjeff 01-25-2009 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 265438)
Ben's face looks the same no matter what is happening, and even if it does register some supposed shock or happiness, he has flipped things on their head so many times that you can't measure anything by it.

IMHO it really hurts the show.

I can't say I disagree.

bewitched 01-30-2009 10:22 PM

Now I'm just confused. WTF is up with all of he Charlies? I know the one on the island in the 1950s was young Charles Widmore but who is Penny and Desmond's Charlie? Which also makes me wonder who the crash survivor's Charlie really was (is) (and now I'm wondering about the chance meeting they had when Desmond was in London looking for Daniel).

Disneyphile 01-30-2009 11:11 PM

I think Penny and Desmond named their son after Charlie, since Desmond was there during Charlie's sacrifice in the underwater station.

scaeagles 01-31-2009 11:16 AM

That's what I thought.

Fun to see Widmore on the Island of the Past.

I actually think what Ben does expression wise is good. My reasoning is that he's always in control and tries to maintain that appearance. When Hurley ran out to the police, he tried to maintain the look, but I think he did a good job of having just a tinge of panic in his expression - like he was trying to hide it and just couldn't quite do it.

BarTopDancer 01-31-2009 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 264693)
I'm blanking on who the lady at the end was. Was she the one that freaked Desmond out when he was back from the island that time?

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 264720)
Maybe. I can't remember either.

Goatee dude told Desmond to go find his mom in Oxford. Maybe that's his mom?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gn2Dlnd (Post 264738)
Ben and Butcher Shop Lady, L.A., Ben and Ms. Hawking, aka Presumably Faraday's Mother, Oxford. Ben does have ways of getting around.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Disneyphile (Post 264741)
That's who we think it is. She looks exactly like the lady at the jewelry shop when he tried to buy a ring for Penelope.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eliza Hodgkins 1812 (Post 265152)
She may also no longer be in Oxford. I think they're all being drawn to Los Angeles. If she's in L.A., Desmond will wind up there, as well.

Quote:

Originally Posted by bewitched (Post 266417)
Now I'm just confused. WTF is up with all of he Charlies? I know the one on the island in the 1950s was young Charles Widmore but who is Penny and Desmond's Charlie? Which also makes me wonder who the crash survivor's Charlie really was (is) (and now I'm wondering about the chance meeting they had when Desmond was in London looking for Daniel).

I think Penny and Desmond named their Charlie after Charlie, who I believe was who he said he was.

I also don't think that the meeting between Desmond and Widmore in London was by chance... and I think we're going to see that Daniel's mother is the same woman who sold Desmond the engagement ring... and that she was in Oxford but is now in LA.

RStar 01-31-2009 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 265438)
Ben's face looks the same no matter what is happening, and even if it does register some supposed shock or happiness, he has flipped things on their head so many times that you can't measure anything by it.

IMHO it really hurts the show.

But it's also what makes him such a good villan. He freaks people out by having the uncomfortable lack of readable body language.

Kinda like a ZOMBIE!! :eek:

bewitched 01-31-2009 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Disneyphile (Post 266420)
I think Penny and Desmond named their son after Charlie, since Desmond was there during Charlie's sacrifice in the underwater station.

That's what I thought but now I'm wondering if maybe little Charlie will actually turn out to be big Charlie.

Coincidences just never end up being coincidences on Lost. And seemingly logical conclusions usually end up being anything but.

lashbear 01-31-2009 04:20 PM

Isn't Desmond too young to be Charlie Guitar's Dad ?

bewitched 01-31-2009 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lashbear (Post 266479)
Isn't Desmond too young to be Charlie Guitar's Dad ?


In real time, yes. In Lost time...nope.

bewitched 01-31-2009 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RStar (Post 266464)
But it's also what makes him such a good villan. He freaks people out by having the uncomfortable lack of readable body language.

Kinda like a ZOMBIE!! :eek:


I agree. I think Ben is the perfect villain.

Cadaverous Pallor 02-02-2009 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lashbear (Post 266479)
Isn't Desmond too young to be Charlie Guitar's Dad ?

Hey, shouldn't you be avoiding this thread? Are you guys getting the new season the same time we are?

sleepyjeff 02-02-2009 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bewitched (Post 266478)
That's what I thought but now I'm wondering if maybe little Charlie will actually turn out to be big Charlie.

Coincidences just never end up being coincidences on Lost. And seemingly logical conclusions usually end up being anything but.

Might be something to that.....recall back to season 1 in the episode titled White Rabbit?

Charlie, out of breath, came running up to Jack to inform that a woman was drowning out in the ocean.....he told Jack that he could not swim.

Yet later on:

He lists, as one of the top 10 moments of his life, his father(who wasn't Desmond btw)* teaching him how to swim.

He has no problem swimming down to the underwater station.

Maybe what we are viewing of our Islanders is not a single Time-line but several.....which would not only explain how Charlie could Swim in Season 3 but not in Season 1. It could explain lots of things actually; like how the sound of the smoke monster seems familier to Rose or how Sawyer, after getting back from Prison Island had no recollection of Nikki and Paulo.

*Although, it has been reported that just before Charlie leaps into the pool a childs voice can be heard in the background saying "C'mon Desmond, C'mon".....don't know if that means anything or not

Cadaverous Pallor 02-02-2009 08:18 PM

I'll have to remember that if I ever write plot holes into my stories I can blame it on "several time-lines".

bewitched 02-02-2009 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleepyjeff (Post 266804)
Might be something to that.....recall back to season 1 in the episode titled White Rabbit?

Charlie, out of breath, came running up to Jack to inform that a woman was drowning out in the ocean.....he told Jack that he could not swim.

Yet later on:

He lists, as one of the top 10 moments of his life, his father(who wasn't Desmond btw)* teaching him how to swim.

He has no problem swimming down to the underwater station.

Maybe what we are viewing of our Islanders is not a single Time-line but several.....which would not only explain how Charlie could Swim in Season 3 but not in Season 1. It could explain lots of things actually; like how the sound of the smoke monster seems familier to Rose or how Sawyer, after getting back from Prison Island had no recollection of Nikki and Paulo.

*Although, it has been reported that just before Charlie leaps into the pool a childs voice can be heard in the background saying "C'mon Desmond, C'mon".....don't know if that means anything or not

I do remember that episode but I didn't link A and B together. Intriguing.

Charlie's "father" (i.e. who he grew up knowing as his father) might not be his real father at all.

I'm wondering when it will click for Jack that Aaron is his nephew.

Who is the chick "Ellie" that held the gun on Daniel (when he was going to disarm the bomb) that he kept saying looked very familiar?

SzczerbiakManiac 02-03-2009 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bewitched (Post 266826)
I'm wondering when it will click for Jack that Aaron is his nephew.

I think it's been established in the flash-forwards that Jack knows Claire is his half-sister, so I'm pretty sure he knows Aaron is his nephew.

sleepyjeff 02-03-2009 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bewitched (Post 266826)
Charlie's "father" (i.e. who he grew up knowing as his father) might not be his real father at all.

Maybe......it turned out Kate's step-father was her biological father and her real dad was just some guy......so who knows;)

Quote:

Who is the chick "Ellie" that held the gun on Daniel (when he was going to disarm the bomb) that he kept saying looked very familiar?
His mom I bet:eek:

Ghoulish Delight 02-03-2009 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleepyjeff (Post 266951)
His mom I bet:eek:

Farday's his own dad! Faraday's his own dad!

sleepyjeff 02-03-2009 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 266824)
I'll have to remember that if I ever write plot holes into my stories I can blame it on "several time-lines".

May not be safe for work(F-word is shouted towards the beginning, otherwise it' ok)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yk6Ay...eature=related

sleepyjeff 02-03-2009 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 266952)
Farday's his own dad! Faraday's his own dad!


:eek:

Betty 02-03-2009 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleepyjeff (Post 266955)
:eek:

[sings] I'm my own Grandpa... Iiiiii'm my own Grandpa [/sings]

Cadaverous Pallor 02-03-2009 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleepyjeff (Post 266954)
May not be safe for work(F-word is shouted towards the beginning, otherwise it' ok)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yk6Ay...eature=related

Yeah, pretty much. :)

bewitched 02-03-2009 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SzczerbiakManiac (Post 266904)
I think it's been established in the flash-forwards that Jack knows Claire is his half-sister, so I'm pretty sure he knows Aaron is his nephew.

He learned it when they first got back at his father's funeral. Well, he learned he had a half sister on the same flight named Claire. He seemingly hasn't figured it out yet or I would guess he would have used it against Kate when she refused to see him/go back to the island.

bewitched 02-03-2009 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 266952)
Farday's his own dad! Faraday's his own dad!

Well, that would be freaky. Even for Lost. :eek:

BarTopDancer 02-03-2009 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bewitched (Post 266826)
Who is the chick "Ellie" that held the gun on Daniel (when he was going to disarm the bomb) that he kept saying looked very familiar?

The woman in the coma?

bewitched 02-03-2009 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 267036)
The woman in the coma?

That's better than my guess of, "no fvcking clue." ;)

bewitched 02-04-2009 09:54 PM

I think Ben is trying to force Kate's hand (so she feels like the only option is to return to the island) by making her think someone has a claim to Aaron.

I'm intrigued that Sawyer calls Juliet by her name rather than using a nickname.

Apparently Jack does have a clue about Aaron being his nephew.

BarTopDancer 02-04-2009 11:05 PM

Holy crap!

sleepyjeff 02-05-2009 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 267036)
The woman in the coma?

I think it's Charlotte, the woman he said he was in love with, with all of the nose bleeds.

Ghoulish Delight 02-05-2009 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleepyjeff (Post 267200)
I think it's Charlotte, the woman he said he was in love with, with all of the nose bleeds.

Interesting, especially taking into account the whole "Are you sure you have only been on the island for a short time?" exchange with freaky Asian dude.

I had a guess as to who was asking for the blood tests. My guess was Jack, being someone with a legitimate familial claim, and wanting leverage to get her to the Island. So it turned out to be Ben for the same reason, I wasn't too far off.

CoasterMatt 02-05-2009 09:50 PM

I've got a theory.

Spoiler:
It was the one armed man.

BarTopDancer 02-05-2009 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoasterMatt (Post 267387)
I've got a theory.

Spoiler:
It was the one armed man.

Spoiler:
Mrs. Qlue (whatever happened to her, that group and the children anyway??) in the kitchen with the knife.

sleepyjeff 02-06-2009 11:54 AM

In last weeks show Juliet was speaking Latin with the other captives....turns out all "others" speak the ancient language.

She said Ricardus for Richard........which got me thinking; what's the latin word for Jack?

BarTopDancer 02-06-2009 12:14 PM

I didn't come up with this theory...

Maybe Miles is the baby shown in the premier. He isn't having nosebleeds and Daniel asked if he was sure he hadn't been on the island before.

sleepyjeff 02-06-2009 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 267462)
I didn't come up with this theory...

Maybe Miles is the baby shown in the premier. He isn't having nosebleeds and Daniel asked if he was sure he hadn't been on the island before.

Well, I like the idea that he might be the baby shown in the Premiere(in fact, I think there is a good chance he is since at this point in the series, with only one more season to go, they should not be introducing too many more new characters) but he Did have a nosebleed.........but that actually proves your point. Had he not had any nose bleeds than he'd be less likely to have been the baby don't you think?

BarTopDancer 02-06-2009 12:32 PM

Ya, you're right about the nosebleed.

JWBear 02-06-2009 01:00 PM

How much do you want to bet that Richard has only four toes on each foot?

sleepyjeff 02-06-2009 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 267472)
How much do you want to bet that Richard has only four toes on each foot?

I'll take that bet:

If he does, I will post a 150 word essay on why I love Obama in the Grind....if he doesn't you got to post a 150 word essay on why Newt should be our next President;)

All kidding aside, I still think one of the 815'ers will lose a toe before the end of this season.

Perhaps Locke will lose it sometime while Jack and Ben are playing weekend at Bernies with his body:D

JWBear 02-06-2009 01:36 PM

I'm totally serious. I think he’s a member (perhaps the last surviving one) of the island’s original four toed inhabitants. Here's why:

It’s been confirmed now that Richard is very old – perhaps immortal. None of the rest of the “others” has shown that trait.

He seems more connected to the island than even Ben or John.

He’s given a great deal deference by the rest of the “others” – including even Ben. Hell, sometimes Ben seems to be in awe of him.

sleepyjeff 02-06-2009 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 267480)
I'm totally serious. I think he’s a member (perhaps the last surviving one) of the island’s original four toed inhabitants. Here's why:

It’s been confirmed now that Richard is very old – perhaps immortal. None of the rest of the “others” has shown that trait.

He seems more connected to the island than even Ben or John.

He’s given a great deal deference by the rest of the “others” – including even Ben. Hell, sometimes Ben seems to be in awe of him.

That's mostly true except Ben never seemed to give him all that much deference though. On more than a few occasions he was barking orders at Richard...in fact, he showed more respect to Jack than he did to Richard imho.

Also, a young Widmore didn't seem too keen on following direct orders given to him by Richard(when told to put the gun down, Richard had to physically remove the gun from the immature Other).

SzczerbiakManiac 02-06-2009 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 267480)
Ben seems to be in awe of him.

Well, he is freakin' hot!

I have lusted after Nestor Carbonell since I first saw him on Suddenly Susan.

scaeagles 02-12-2009 08:57 AM

Don't really know what to say except that next week looks like it'll be fun!

Cadaverous Pallor 02-12-2009 09:07 AM

Dude, Jin and Danielle, how awesome was that?!

I'd forgotten about the whole "sickness" thing, and seeing the guy point a gun at his wife and unborn child....yow. Perhaps they'd been converted to Others?

Makes me want to go back and find the moment when Danielle meets Jin in the first season. Seriously, after all that, she should recognize him.

Cadaverous Pallor 02-12-2009 09:14 AM

For the first time, I decided to visit lostpedia without being linked there. Reading Danielle's page it's amazing how many tiny loose ends I'd forgotten about, and how they did refer to things she said in the first season with this 1988 flashback.

Ghoulish Delight 02-12-2009 09:31 AM

So now I'm guessing that the "Other" woman in the 40s that Daniel said looked familiar is Charolette's mom.

BarTopDancer 02-12-2009 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 266459)
I also don't think that the meeting between Desmond and Widmore in London was by chance... and I think we're going to see that Daniel's mother is the same woman who sold Desmond the engagement ring... and that she was in Oxford but is now in LA.

I was right, I was right! YAY! (It's so rare that I'm right when it comes to this show, it's a wee bit exciting ;) )

Some random thoughts...

We know that Ben had contained Smoky in their camp.
What is this "temple" that Robert was referring to that smoky is the security system for? I wonder if Locke is "sick" as well, after his encounter with Smoky.

Cadaverous Pallor 02-12-2009 12:21 PM

Locke still wouldn't shoot a pregnant woman...would he??

Ghoulish Delight 02-12-2009 12:24 PM

I love how they got around Locke's promise to Jin. Hooray loopholes!

Odd that Rousseau never seems to recognize Jin in "present day". But then, I suppose The Crazy could be to blame for that. Or maybe they'll come up with something in a later episode to explain it (maybe she runs into C-3PO).

BarTopDancer 02-12-2009 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 268351)
Odd that Rousseau never seems to recognize Jin in "present day". But then, I suppose The Crazy could be to blame for that. Or maybe they'll come up with something in a later episode to explain it (maybe she runs into C-3PO).

Or the Haitian.

BarTopDancer 02-12-2009 08:46 PM

"He's Korean, I'm from Encino."

Still cracks me up.

bewitched 02-13-2009 01:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 266459)
I also don't think that the meeting between Desmond and Widmore in London was by chance... and I think we're going to see that Daniel's mother is the same woman who sold Desmond the engagement ring... and that she was in Oxford but is now in LA.

Quote:

Originally Posted by bewitched (Post 266826)
Who is the chick "Ellie" that held the gun on Daniel (when he was going to disarm the bomb) that he kept saying looked very familiar?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 268304)
So now I'm guessing that the "Other" woman in the 40s that Daniel said looked familiar is Charolette's mom.

OMG, Ellie is Daniel's mom, Eloise Hawking (pre-Ben)! That's why Daniel said his mother can help save Charlotte-- because she knows how to find the island. Holy crap this gets confusing...I love it!

I think that also points to what JWB was getting at, I think Richard is the puppet master (since he controlled the "Others" when Eloise was there and obviously, IMO, is the one who carries the secrets of the island, like how to get on and off of it).

Right now, my 2 candidates for Jacob are Richard or Jack.



On another note, something that's been bothering me...

We were told (more or less) that Oceanic 815 was brought down because of the magnetic field generated when Desmond was late punching in the numbers at the Swan station, right? BUT, obviously, there was some reason that flight was brought down otherwise, what with all of the people linked together and with the island....So, which is it? Or was that just a plot device that had no real meaning (which doesn't happen very often on Lost)? I mean, if the island wanted them all there, couldn't it have just made the plane crash (like by generating a magnetic field on it's own without needing the intercession of a human)?

bewitched 02-13-2009 09:03 AM

I've been wondering a lot more about Daniel (not sleeping+obsessing). He's an original other, i.e. his mother was there before Dharma ever was and didn't Charlotte say that the man who told her never to come back was old (before she said it was him)? Also, Daniel has to be much older (if indeed Ellie and Eloise are the same people). If the flash to the bomb was, say, 1945, Ellie was about 25ish? Daniel would likely have been born before she was forty, so 1960 or so. He would have to be about 45 or 50. I don't know what, or if this means anything though.

I also think that "original" others can come and go as they please and time jump without ill effect but I wonder if they shift between "times" instead of actually traveling. In other words, they are making parallel time jumps when they appear in say, California, rather than linear ones. How else could they get off of the island and to the U.S. before outsiders came (like when Locke was a child)?

bewitched 02-13-2009 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 268305)
What is this "temple" that Robert was referring to that smoky is the security system for? I wonder if Locke is "sick" as well, after his encounter with Smoky.


Didn't Ben tell Danielle to take Alex "to the temple" in the episode where the mercenaries killed them? WTF is in that temple?

Also, how did Charlotte know to "look for the well" if the Lotus station wasn't there? Someone in the comments section on E! online that when Locke fell, the well closed up and Christian Shepard appeared, it was like Locke descended into Hades.

Which as an aside, someone else thought Christian Shepard's name was a description of Jesus.

BarTopDancer 02-13-2009 09:33 AM

Richard doesn't age, I don't recall seeing any other "old" Others. What's to say Daniel is aging?

Maybe Ellie is also Charlotte's mother?

Pirate Bill 02-13-2009 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 268566)
Maybe Ellie is also Charlotte's mother?

Daniel and Charlotte could be twins separated at birth to protect them from Richard (who's really the father). Daniel was raised by his uncle on a moisture farm while his sister was raised by royalty on Alderaan.

Richard: Search your feelings Dan. You know it to be true.
Daniel: No! That's not true! That's impossible!

Whoa...sorry. Head rush.

I just watched it twice yesterday. Things are really fun this season.

Ghoulish Delight 02-13-2009 12:14 PM

What if Whitmore is Daniel/Charolette's dad!

Cadaverous Pallor 02-13-2009 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bewitched (Post 268547)
If the flash to the bomb was, say, 1945, Ellie was about 25ish?

Richard told Locke the year, it was 1954.

bewitched 02-13-2009 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 268657)
Richard told Locke the year, it was 1954.

Then he'd have to be at least about 44. I dunno, I just think he's an "pure" Other, not a Mudblood.

sleepyjeff 02-15-2009 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bewitched (Post 268527)
Right now, my 2 candidates for Jacob are Richard or Jack.

Jack.....remember Juliet speaking Latin? She called Richard, Ricardus. If Richard equals Ricardus then Jacob would equal Jacobus....or Jack-obus:eek:



Quote:

On another note, something that's been bothering me...

We were told (more or less) that Oceanic 815 was brought down because of the magnetic field generated when Desmond was late punching in the numbers at the Swan station, right? BUT, obviously, there was some reason that flight was brought down otherwise, what with all of the people linked together and with the island....So, which is it?


Try using circular logic and the answer will become obvious.

Remember, Daniel has already told us that Time is like a Record player(and we've seen on numerous occasions thru-out this series hints to that as well).

So you see; the reason they are linked together is that they crashed on the Island and the reason they crashed together on the Island is that they are linked together.

Don't try to think in a straight line......you'll end up with a nose bleed;)

bewitched 02-15-2009 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleepyjeff (Post 268810)
Jack.....remember Juliet speaking Latin? She called Richard, Ricardus. If Richard equals Ricardus then Jacob would equal Jacobus....or Jack-obus:eek: sx

Oooo, the plotus thickenus.





Quote:

Try using circular logic and the answer will become obvious.

Remember, Daniel has already told us that Time is like a Record player(and we've seen on numerous occasions thru-out this series hints to that as well).

So you see; the reason they are linked together is that they crashed on the Island and the reason they crashed together on the Island is that they are linked together.

Don't try to think in a straight line......you'll end up with a nose bleed;)
I tend to think that they are approaching time from a string theory or parallel universe perspective. Nonetheless, I hadn't thought about the crash in that way.

I'm beginning to wonder if the island is where all "whens" that exist concurrently collide.

Gemini Cricket 02-16-2009 05:36 PM

I saw Naveen Andrews today riding a bike around the Kahala Mall parking lot today. I thought about taking a picture but I thought that would be so cheesy to do.

bewitched 02-16-2009 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gemini Cricket (Post 268946)
I saw Naveen Andrews today riding a bike around the Kahala Mall parking lot today. I thought about taking a picture but I thought that would be so cheesy to do.

Naveen Andrews is totally hot!

I love the Kahala area and have been to that mall several times (in fact, when I forgot to pack my dress to change into after my wedding, I frantically searched the Kahala Mall for a replacement)...where in Honolulu is your home?

Gemini Cricket 02-16-2009 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bewitched (Post 268959)
where in Honolulu is your home?

Kailua
:)

lashbear 02-16-2009 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gemini Cricket (Post 268946)
I saw Naveen Andrews today riding a bike around the Kahala Mall parking lot today. I thought about taking a picture but I thought that would be so cheesy to do.

Yes, Jumping on top of him and gyrating would have been much better... :evil:

bewitched 02-16-2009 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gemini Cricket (Post 268960)
Kailua
:)


Lucky butt. ;)
(Isn't that where Lost mostly films?)

innerSpaceman 02-17-2009 12:30 PM

I'm always one season behind on Lost. When it starts to air, it's just a reminder to me to catch the prior season on DVD.


So I'm only halfway through Season 4 and I'm thinking of stopping with Season 4. It's just seeming like a random bunch of stuff thrown at you to keep things going rather pointlessly.


I think I'm going to hold off watching any more seasons until the show ends. I want there to be an end in sight.

SzczerbiakManiac 02-17-2009 01:02 PM

Stick with it. Your patience will be rewarded.

mousepod 02-17-2009 01:13 PM

iSm... I urge you not to hold off. Starting around midway through season 2, I began to wonder whether there was any resolution coming. I was concerned that they were going into X-Files territory, with lots of twisty plot threads that would ultimately be unresolved.

Turns out that I was partly right. But now it's OK. From Entertainment Weekly:
Quote:

The producers have a master plan — and an exit strategy. But that master plan couldn't be unleashed fully until Lindelof and partner Carlton Cuse negotiated a series end date during season 3, a.k.a. The Year Lost Learned a Show About Castaways Stranded on an Island Can Last So Long No Matter How Clever It May Be. ''The same way our characters were sort of locked in cages in season 3, when the show went awry,'' says Cuse, ''we felt locked in cages because we didn't know if our mythology had to go two more years or nine.''
They're answering questions now. And this could be the best season since the first... if you're a sci-fi geek.

BarTopDancer 02-17-2009 01:34 PM

iSm, I too urge you to keep watching.

They were supposed to be on a 5 year plan from the start, which is one of the only reasons I plodded through the frustrating seasons. I believe this is season 5, and they have been answering questions since the start.

scaeagles 02-17-2009 01:35 PM

My wife is not a sci-fi geek and is losing her interest. I am a closet sci-fi geek, so I'm finding it really cool. The thing is you can't pick it up now without having seen the earlier episodes from the season. It's hard enough to know what's going on if you HAVE seen the episodes from this season thus far.

AS far as the plan, 5 season was it, but the writes strike forced them to split those 48 episodes from what would have been season 4 and 5 into 3 16 episode seasons.

BarTopDancer 02-17-2009 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scaeagles (Post 269083)
AS far as the plan, 5 season was it, but the writes strike forced them to split those 48 episodes from what would have been season 4 and 5 into 3 16 episode seasons.

That's right. But the general idea is still there; there is an end in site.

innerSpaceman 02-17-2009 02:09 PM

The Sci-Fi geek in me loved the season 4 episode I left off with (The Constant), which was a great stand-alone sci-fi concept story. The other four eps so far were just stuff thrown at you, and new characters thrown in seemingly just to fill air time with more available backstories.

I'll finish Season 4, since I started it. But if Season 5 ends without the series ending, I will not be watching any more seasons until the series bloody well ends!


Twin Peaks and X-Files were two shows I LOVED that led nowhere despite pretentions to the contrary. Won'T Be fOOleD AgAIn!

Ghoulish Delight 02-17-2009 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman (Post 269088)

I'll finish Season 4, since I started it. But if Season 5 ends without the series ending, I will not be watching any more seasons until the series bloody well ends!

As was said, season 5 will end without an ending. Next season is the pre-ordained season end. So while there is no closure yet, there is a firm promise of closure.

innerSpaceman 02-17-2009 03:19 PM

Ok, well since I wouldn't be starting Season 5 till Season 6 begins, it should be pretty well known by then if that's gonna be Season Last of Lost.

sleepyjeff 02-17-2009 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman (Post 269088)

Twin Peaks and X-Files were two shows I LOVED that led nowhere despite pretentions to the contrary. Won't Be fOOleD AgAIn!

Twin Peaks is nothing like Lost....I mean, yeah, they both have Characters named Cooper......



and Hurley



and Desmond


and Sarah


and Benjamin


and Annie


and Bernard


But that's it........Lost has the Black Rock which is clearly different from the Black Lodge.....

And a one eyed man is nothing like a bar called One Eye Jacks....

And even though Lost has a guy named Jacob who is obsessed with an Island and TP has a guy named Jacoby who is obsessed with an Island doesn't mean the shows are similar....

And I really don't want to have to get into the differences between dwarves and hobbits....at least I shouldn't have to:D


;)

JWBear 02-18-2009 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleepyjeff (Post 268810)
Jack.....remember Juliet speaking Latin? She called Richard, Ricardus. If Richard equals Ricardus then Jacob would equal Jacobus....or Jack-obus:eek:

Actually, Iacobi (hence Jacob) is Latin for James.

Ghoulish Delight 02-18-2009 11:35 PM

Seeing Hurley carrying a guitar case, my money is on Charlie coming back to tell him to catch the plane.

Jack said, "It's weird, I almost think John needed me to read this." Weird? WEIRD?! Two word. SMOKE MONSTER! Jack, you are no longer allowed to call something "weird".

JWBear 02-19-2009 12:08 AM

I'm thinking that the flight crew on that plane are freaking out over several people (and a body) vanishing in mid flight. :cool:

So many questions, though.

bewitched 02-19-2009 02:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 269356)
I'm thinking that the flight crew on that plane are freaking out over several people (and a body) vanishing in mid flight. :cool:

So many questions, though.

But have they really vanished from the flight? Or are they on the plane and on the island?

I want next week's episode now!

lashbear 02-19-2009 05:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 266653)
Hey, shouldn't you be avoiding this thread? Are you guys getting the new season the same time we are?

Just popping in to let you know tonights episode in Australia was the one discussed up to and including post 102 (ie: The one where Hurley surrenders to the police and the whiny sh!t cops a flaming arrow in the chest.)

Ghoulish Delight 02-19-2009 08:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bewitched (Post 269357)
But have they really vanished from the flight? Or are they on the plane and on the island?

I want next week's episode now!

If they remain consistent with previous instances of time travel, they vanished.

Cadaverous Pallor 02-19-2009 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lashbear (Post 269364)
Just popping in to let you know tonights episode in Australia was the one discussed up to and including post 102 (ie: The one where Hurley surrenders to the police and the whiny sh!t cops a flaming arrow in the chest.)

Hey, you're not far behind - awesome! :)

Cadaverous Pallor 02-19-2009 09:16 AM

Remember how when they crashed the first time, Jack kept seeing his dad walking around? Well now that Locke is playing the dead guy, I'd bet money that we'll see him up and around again, being all spooky and distant.

Some great twists in that one. Sayiid being brought on as a prisoner, Kate style. The copter guy showing up with the best line in the show. When the pilot says "We're not going to Guam, are we?" you know you're in trouble. :D

Can't wait for the tearful Sun and Jin reunion!

BarTopDancer 02-19-2009 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bewitched (Post 269357)
But have they really vanished from the flight? Or are they on the plane and on the island?

I want next week's episode now!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 269377)
If they remain consistent with previous instances of time travel, they vanished.

I wonder if "the light" only took those who were on the island to begin with. It's to late to introduce more characters.

Ghoulish Delight 02-19-2009 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 269400)
I wonder if "the light" only took those who were on the island to begin with. It's to late to introduce more characters.

The shots of the one other dude in first class (the guy who gave his condolences to Jack at the ticketing counter) were suspicious. If he does show up on the island, I'm sure it'll be because he'd already been there before.

BarTopDancer 02-19-2009 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 269402)
The shots of the one other dude in first class (the guy who gave his condolences to Jack at the ticketing counter) were suspicious. If he does show up on the island, I'm sure it'll be because he'd already been there before.

I agree.

I don't have season 1, but was there someone at the airport who gave condolences to Jack then too?

Ghoulish Delight 02-19-2009 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 269404)
I agree.

I don't have season 1, but was there someone at the airport who gave condolences to Jack then too?

Well, there was Ana-Lucia.

Ghoulish Delight 02-19-2009 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleepyjeff (Post 269127)
Twin Peaks is nothing like Lost....I mean, yeah, they both have Characters named Cooper......

"New shoes"

sleepyjeff 02-19-2009 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 269320)
Actually, Iacobi (hence Jacob) is Latin for James.

As in James Sawyer?

:eek:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 269407)
"New shoes"

:snap:

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 02-19-2009 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 269386)
Remember how when they crashed the first time, Jack kept seeing his dad walking around? Well now that Locke is playing the dead guy, I'd bet money that we'll see him up and around again, being all spooky and distant.

Some great twists in that one. Sayiid being brought on as a prisoner, Kate style. The copter guy showing up with the best line in the show. When the pilot says "We're not going to Guam, are we?" you know you're in trouble. :D

Can't wait for the tearful Sun and Jin reunion!

I LOVE Frank. I've long loved Jeff Fahey, so that's probably why. Did miss his scraggly beard and crazy hair, though. Yes, I did.

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 02-19-2009 11:45 AM

So...Penny. Dead or alive? I'm hoping we at least get a flashback because that was one HELL of a fight she put up, if she and Ben went one-on-one. Perhaps Desmond was involved, too.

If she's dead...and I'm assuming she is...poor Desmond. Then again, Ben looked pretty damn whipped. Hmm.

I wonder how pissed Jin is going to be when he sees Sun. No baby Sun.

I'm guessing Baby Sun and Baby Claire are somewhere being toddlers together, but who knows?

Cadaverous Pallor 02-19-2009 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eliza Hodgkins 1812 (Post 269430)
So...Penny. Dead or alive? I'm hoping we at least get a flashback because that was one HELL of a fight she put up, if she and Ben went one-on-one. Perhaps Desmond was involved, too.

If she's dead...and I'm assuming she is...poor Desmond. Then again, Ben looked pretty damn whipped. Hmm.

Oh yeah, messed up Ben. Hmm. Was Desmond in the cargo hold or something?

Quote:

I'm guessing Baby Sun and Baby Claire are somewhere being toddlers together, but who knows?
With Baby Desmond, maybe. It's like there's a LOST orphanage somewhere.

BarTopDancer 02-19-2009 12:03 PM

Did I totally miss where they said Penny beat the crap out of Ben?

Also, they have been time traveling all over, and no one else has reverted in their age. What makes you think that Sun, Claire and Desmond would? Or are you referring to their kids?

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 02-19-2009 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 269435)
Did I totally miss where they said Penny beat the crap out of Ben?

Also, they have been time traveling all over, and no one else has reverted in their age. What makes you think that Sun, Claire and Desmond would? Or are you referring to their kids?

No, that's my assumption. Ben told the gang that he had a promise to fulfill. (Presumably that refers to when Ben promised Widmore that he would kill Widmore's daughter (Penny), in retaliation for Widmore killing Ben's.) Penny was safe so long as she couldn't be found, but Desmond showing up would alert Ben to her whereabouts; he'd simply have to find the right dock.

So...I assume he found her and killed her. Though it looks like she (or Desmond, or both) put up quite the fight.

And, I'm talking about their kids. Sun left her baby behind. Kate left Aaron. I am guessing that they kept the children together, but I'm possibly way wrong about that.

scaeagles 02-19-2009 01:09 PM

Excellent point re: Ben and Penny, Eliza

BarTopDancer 02-19-2009 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eliza Hodgkins 1812 (Post 269439)
No, that's my assumption. Ben told the gang that he had a promise to fulfill. (Presumably that refers to when Ben promised Widmore that he would kill Widmore's daughter (Penny), in retaliation for Widmore killing Ben's.) Penny was safe so long as she couldn't be found, but Desmond showing up would alert Ben to her whereabouts; he'd simply have to find the right dock.

Oooo!!!!!!! I completely forgot about that promise. That makes complete sense.

RStar 02-19-2009 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 269386)
The copter guy showing up with the best line in the show. When the pilot says "We're not going to Guam, are we?" you know you're in trouble!

Oh, that's who the pilot is! The chopper pilot, Frank! I thought I should know who that was, but didn't recognise him.

BarTopDancer 02-19-2009 05:44 PM

I'm loving the one-liners.

Last week "He's Korean, I'm from Encino"
This week "We're not going to Guam, are we?"

I hope they keep them up.

bewitched 02-19-2009 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 269377)
If they remain consistent with previous instances of time travel, they vanished.

But that's only with people actually on the island. What happens if you time travel to the island?

bewitched 02-19-2009 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 269377)
If they remain consistent with previous instances of time travel, they vanished.


I meant to point out earlier that Locke is an example of this...he is dead in the real world and alive on the island. Both places at one time (well, really 3 years apart, but time isn't moving at a parallel pace). Granted, the circumstances are different but I think it is clear that TPTB's version of "time" travel allows for a person to be in more than one reality (place and/or time). That's part of what I meant earlier when I wondered whether the Others who "left" the island (and then returned) didn't actually just inhabit 2 different realities at the same time.

Stan4dSteph 02-20-2009 07:55 AM

On the podcast, Darlton said that 316 and the next episode are actually shown out of numbered sequence, so apparently they decided that it would be more interesting to see the effects before the cause(s).

Anyone else watching Fringe? I'm enjoying the little Lost references that are included there, although I have probably missed some. I'll have to find some geeky fan site that tracks them all. :p

sleepyjeff 02-20-2009 11:07 AM

During season 3 Kate and Sawyer were working on what we later learned from Juliet was a landing strip.......

Could the plane have landed on the Island(well, the other Island actually) after the O-6 vanished?

Cadaverous Pallor 02-20-2009 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bewitched (Post 269518)
But that's only with people actually on the island. What happens if you time travel to the island?

The plane was in the Island's airspace. It's like how Jin was blown off the ship then time traveled in the water. The island has a blast zone.

As for how they got from the plane to the land, my assumption would be that you never materialize in time in mid air - though they had it much better than Locke did in the well.

Quote:

Originally Posted by bewitched (Post 269565)
I meant to point out earlier that Locke is an example of this...he is dead in the real world and alive on the island. Both places at one time (well, really 3 years apart, but time isn't moving at a parallel pace). Granted, the circumstances are different but I think it is clear that TPTB's version of "time" travel allows for a person to be in more than one reality (place and/or time).

I don't think that's true at all. Locke was alive, then he left the island, and now he's dead. We were seeing it simultaneously because everything on the island was a flashback to just after the 6 left. That's why, now that they're back, they find Jin in a new circumstance, driving a Dharma van, because he's been living on the island for 3 years since they left.

SzczerbiakManiac 02-20-2009 01:08 PM

If the Island has always been traveling through time like Eloise Hawking said, how is it that the freighter could stay parked outside of the Island's "blast zone" and venture to it any time they pleased—bearing 300º or not?

Cadaverous Pallor 02-20-2009 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SzczerbiakManiac (Post 269635)
If the Island has always been traveling through time like Eloise Hawking said, how is it that the freighter could stay parked outside of the Island's "blast zone" and venture to it any time they pleased—bearing 300º or not?

She said they were able to predict the when and where it would be, and that it was in a spot for a window, and that this current window was about to close. The island isn't constantly moving, it's still for a bit, then moves, then still, then moves. Remember all the talk about "moving the island"?

BarTopDancer 02-20-2009 01:42 PM

I think the island was jumping more because Ben had moved it, but the donkey wheel was off. When they stabilized it the island was more stable in time.

Pirate Bill 02-20-2009 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SzczerbiakManiac (Post 269635)
If the Island has always been traveling through time like Eloise Hawking said...

I don't think the island has always been moving through time. It has been moving from location to location. Her words (paraphrased...but I watched it 3 times yesterday so I might be close), "Instead of trying to discover where the island is supposed to be, they found a way to locate where it's going to be...in time." She emphasized "time" which makes it sound like it is time traveling always. But I think it actually means they can predict the where and when. As in, "the island will be located at these exact coordinates at this exact time."

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 02-20-2009 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stan4dSteph (Post 269575)
Anyone else watching Fringe? I'm enjoying the little Lost references that are included there, although I have probably missed some. I'll have to find some geeky fan site that tracks them all. :p

Yes. I haven't gone crazy trying to identify them, because I know there really just referenced for the sake of fandom, and don't really impact the plot of either show. Do think it's a cool that both shows exist in basically the same verse.

bewitched 02-20-2009 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stan4dSteph (Post 269575)
Anyone else watching Fringe? :p

I tried to watch it, and like it. I really did. But Olivia's voice annoyed the holy crap out of me.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 269600)
The plane was in the Island's airspace. It's like how Jin was blown off the ship then time traveled in the water. The island has a blast zone.

But that doesn't negate the idea that they can occupy 2 different realities (times/places) at the same time.

Quote:

I don't think that's true at all. Locke was alive, then he left the island, and now he's dead. We were seeing it simultaneously because everything on the island was a flashback to just after the 6 left. That's why, now that they're back, they find Jin in a new circumstance, driving a Dharma van, because he's been living on the island for 3 years since they left.
I've always had the impression that time moves much more slowly on the island than it does off of the island. I don't remember them ever insinuating or showing that they were just leaving out 2 9/10 years on the island. Jack stated that Locke came to him and Kate a couple of months ago (In There's no Place Like Home), not a couple of years ago.

innerSpaceman 02-22-2009 11:55 PM

Hello again from the guy who's always one season behind.

So the 4th season picked up nicely. I'll even buy the excuse of the writer's strike for not being able to develop the characters they added. And the season got better and better as it went along.


So now I don't feel like waiting a whole 'nuther year to catch up. Are season 5 episodes available online anywhere??

Cadaverous Pallor 02-23-2009 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bewitched (Post 269773)
But that doesn't negate the idea that they can occupy 2 different realities (times/places) at the same time.

Where do you see evidence of that idea?

bewitched 02-23-2009 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 270019)
Where do you see evidence of that idea?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whitney
I don't remember them ever insinuating or showing that they were just leaving out 2 9/10 years on the island. Jack stated that Locke came to him and Kate a couple of months ago (In There's no Place Like Home), not a couple of years ago.

I'm also still standing by my feeling that I think they are skipping through time based on a parallel universe or multiverse theory, both of which postulate that all times exist concurrently and moving through time would not be skipping forward or backward linearly but moving from one already existing world (not constrained by time) to another. The most reasonable mode of travel between universes on the show, IMO (based on what I've seen) would be through wormholes (which, while not general referred to in most multiverse theories, does provide a means of travel which is not rejected in the theory). In this scenario, one would in effect, exist in two places at one time since the person entering the wormhole would only "appear" to be gone for an infinitesimally small fraction of a second to the people observing (ala the movie Contact). This would also explain why "windows are only open for a finite period of time" (as Eloise stated) since one end of a traversable wormhole in physics is generally regarded as being "accelerated" or to have a higher gravitational field than the other end, i.e. are not stationary. This allows for time at the exit to have moved at a slower pace than time at the entrance (although time within the wormhole would seem to move at a consistent pace).

I once heard someone describe parallel universes as "we are all living and all dying at all times"; in other words, we are, in effect, immortal. One of the guys that writes the show said in an interview that their concept of time travel was rooted in a scientifically accepted theory.

Ghoulish Delight 02-23-2009 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bewitched (Post 270060)
I'm also still standing by my feeling that I think they are skipping through time based on a parallel universe or multiverse theory, both of which postulate that all times exist concurrently and moving through time would not be skipping forward or backward linearly but moving from one already existing world (not constrained by time) to another. The most reasonable mode of travel between universes on the show, IMO (based on what I've seen) would be through wormholes (which, while not general referred to in most multiverse theories, does provide a means of travel which is not rejected in the theory). In this scenario, one would in effect, exist in two places at one time since the person entering the wormhole would only "appear" to be gone for an infinitesimally small fraction of a second to the people observing (ala the movie Contact).

But that's completely inconsistent with Rousseau's account of Jin disappearing when the flash happened.

Quote:

This would also explain why "windows are only open for a finite period of time" (as Eloise stated)
The "windows are only open for a finite period of time" because the island moves. The room with pendulum tells them, "during the period of time between x & y, the island will be in this location. After time y, the island will move and we don't know where it will be." It has nothing to do with time travel. There has been nothing that says the island itself travels in time, it seems to be moving in space instead.

BarTopDancer 02-23-2009 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman (Post 269966)
So now I don't feel like waiting a whole 'nuther year to catch up. Are season 5 episodes available online anywhere??

ABC.com.

I think Lost is probably the one show you don't have to worry about ending abruptly. The small revolt from Jericho viewers will look like child's play compared to the revolt from Lost viewers if they randomly pull the plug.

bewitched 02-23-2009 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 270062)
But that's completely inconsistent with Rousseau's account of Jin disappearing when the flash happened.

Not necessarily. Insofar as I know, the people moving through time on the island are only moving through the past. I have never read anything in this theory (although granted, my knowledge is limited to a layman's study) that says people in the past would experience a time/space traveler as a permanent fixture. In my understanding, all times/spaces already exist as do the people and things in them. Someone moving from their own current universe would only occupy another immutable universe for a fixed period of time before moving on to another, or back to their own universe. I also accept the idea that even if this is the overriding theory that they are using, they are not above tweaking it for their purposes.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 270062)
The "windows are only open for a finite period of time" because the island moves. The room with pendulum tells them, "during the period of time between x & y, the island will be in this location. After time y, the island will move and we don't know where it will be." It has nothing to do with time travel. There has been nothing that says the island itself travels in time, it seems to be moving in space instead.

Parallel universes/multiverses allows for space/time travel. It is still, technically time travel because all times (and places in time) exist at once, including all possible current times. In this theory, the island's movement through space would be the island moving between many possible current times.

bewitched 02-23-2009 11:34 PM

As an aside, if you remember at the Orchid station, on the instruction tape, Marvin Candle said the station sat on a store of "exotic matter". Morris-Thorne wormholes are postulated to be held open (or stable) by a form of "exotic matter".

Cadaverous Pallor 02-24-2009 12:57 AM

IMHO, you're adding an extra crunchy layer which the show doesn't have any real evidence of, and doesn't answer any questions. Sure, all things are possible. But why try to make it more complicated? ;)

Pirate Bill 02-24-2009 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stan4dSteph (Post 269575)
Anyone else watching Fringe? I'm enjoying the little Lost references that are included there, although I have probably missed some.

I just got all caught up on Fringe and I haven't caught a single Lost reference. Can you give me some examples?

Stan4dSteph 02-24-2009 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pirate Bill (Post 270118)
I just got all caught up on Fringe and I haven't caught a single Lost reference. Can you give me some examples?

The only one I've caught was an Oceanic Airlines ticket that was in someone's apartment. There are apparently a lot more.

Pirate Bill 02-24-2009 10:22 AM

I just found a LostPedia entry that tries to flesh out the overlaps between Lost and Fringe. Other than the Oceanic Airline ticket and shared cast, everything else is really a stretch.

It's my understanding that Oceanic Airlines is not unique to Lost.

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 02-24-2009 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pirate Bill (Post 270118)
I just got all caught up on Fringe and I haven't caught a single Lost reference. Can you give me some examples?

I think both there's a link to Lost's time/space focus and the emerging multiverse focus on Fringe. The evidence connecting the shows may be thin, but the writers/producers have basically confirmed that both shows are playing around in the same universe, however different they are doing so. The "science" of Fringe resembles some of the "science" explored by the Dharma Initiative on Lost. I don't think there are plans to do crossover events or anything similarly obvious or extreme. Seems more a nod to the uber fans of both shows than anything else.

Betty 02-24-2009 04:37 PM

Apparently I need to check out Fringe. I'm not surprised, I'm always behind on these things.

bewitched 02-24-2009 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 270099)
IMHO, you're adding an extra crunchy layer which the show doesn't have any real evidence of, and doesn't answer any questions. Sure, all things are possible. But why try to make it more complicated? ;)


Because I otherwise find Lost to be rather simplistic and boring. ;)

Ghoulish Delight 02-26-2009 12:20 AM

Okay, time passage is warped on the island vs. off (which now that I think about it follows from the episode where Faraday was shooting rockets off the island). So that covers the 3 year discrepancy.

Now, is it just Ben and John who don't time travel or is it the fact that one was severely injured and the other dead?

Does anyone remember how Locke came to know of Ell=oise Hawking?

Cadaverous Pallor 02-26-2009 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 269386)
Remember how when they crashed the first time, Jack kept seeing his dad walking around? Well now that Locke is playing the dead guy, I'd bet money that we'll see him up and around again, being all spooky and distant.

Wow, this may be the first time that I actually predicted something on this show correctly....though he isn't spooky and distant. CLOSE ENOUGH!

BarTopDancer 02-26-2009 09:55 AM

I mentioned on twitter I'd elaborate more here..

I really didn't like how they showed Ben killing Locke. I know it was necessary so there were "no questions" but it still bothered me. I think they could have cut away more and then show the scene where Ben was cleaning up then Locke hanging. But that's my personal preference.

LSPoorEeyorick 02-26-2009 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 270504)
Does anyone remember how Locke came to know of Ell=oise Hawking?

I just presumed that someone who spoke with him (Richard, or Christian) told him at a moment that we didn't see on camera.

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 02-26-2009 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 270504)
Okay, time passage is warped on the island vs. off (which now that I think about it follows from the episode where Faraday was shooting rockets off the island). So that covers the 3 year discrepancy.

Now, is it just Ben and John who don't time travel or is it the fact that one was severely injured and the other dead?

Does anyone remember how Locke came to know of Ell=oise Hawking?

I think Ben and John left the island under different circumstances than the Oceanic survivors, and so had to return the old fashioned way? Meaning, they had to crush. That's my guess.

I would also guess that Widmore provided Locke with a file on Hawking. Since Widmore knew about her and her whereabouts (him being the one who informed Desmond.)

I am curious to know if Ben was actually doing Locke a favor. Perhaps a suicide cannot resurrect? And I do think Locke is resurrected - not an Island ghost. I think he's alive. The van where he was being stored (by Ben) anagrams to Resurrection, which is different than what Christian, Charlie, and other deaders are like. I also suspect that Christian was always a part of the island...

Ben took care of Locke's body for a reason. Then again, he killed him just as soon as Locke revealed Hawking's whereabouts, so it's just as possible that Ben's only intention was to keep Locke alive long enough to get what he needed from him. Ah, Ben and Widmore. Both seem to have the island's best interests at heart (? - or not), but both are bad mother****ers.

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 02-26-2009 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 270530)
Wow, this may be the first time that I actually predicted something on this show correctly....though he isn't spooky and distant. CLOSE ENOUGH!

I think that's because he's resurrected, not a ghost. He's very likely flesh and blood, those he has yet to physically interact with anyone so it's not a proven theory.

SzczerbiakManiac 02-26-2009 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eliza Hodgkins 1812 (Post 270556)
I think Ben and John left the island under different circumstances than the Oceanic survivors, and so had to return the old fashioned way? Meaning, they had to crush.

To crush? I don't understand. What are they crushing?

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 02-26-2009 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SzczerbiakManiac (Post 270561)
To crush? I don't understand. What are they crushing?

Crash.

SzczerbiakManiac 02-26-2009 12:17 PM

Ah, sorry. I thought it might have been a typo but I couldn't figure it out.

I should have though because that was a pretty easy one. <smacks forehead>

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 02-26-2009 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SzczerbiakManiac (Post 270564)
Ah, sorry. I thought it might have been a typo but I couldn't figure it out.

I should have though because that was a pretty easy one. <smacks forehead>

No, best to check with me. Heh. My brain very frequently takes the word I want to use and replaces it with something totally random and unrelated. I figure I've had a stroke I don't know about.

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 02-26-2009 01:59 PM

Hmm, to shoot holes in some of my earlier musings, a friend pointed out that Christian's body was also missing after the plane crashed. And he's able to hold baby Aaron, so he can be corporeal. Hmm, hmm, hmm.

bewitched 02-26-2009 07:35 PM

GD, I would assume Daniel told Locke about his mother since they were all together before Locke went back. Daniel seems to know that his mother knows how to get to the island. (Although I suppose Widmore could have also told him since he obviously knows where Eloise is.)

I'm curious why Ben seemed genuinely interested in helping Locke until Locke said he knew about Eloise Hawking then BAM!

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 02-26-2009 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bewitched (Post 270643)
GD, I would assume Daniel told Locke about his mother since they were all together before Locke went back. Daniel seems to know that his mother knows how to get to the island. (Although I suppose Widmore could have also told him since he obviously knows where Eloise is.)

I'm curious why Ben seemed genuinely interested in helping Locke until Locke said he knew about Eloise Hawking then BAM!

Either Ben's reason for killing Locke was metaphysical (a suicide couldn't resurrect, perhaps) or he needed information from him before he could die. Since he killed Ben right after he mentioned Hawking's whereabouts, I'd wager that's the information he needed.

Ghoulish Delight 02-26-2009 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eliza Hodgkins 1812 (Post 270644)
Either Ben's reason for killing Locke was metaphysical (a suicide couldn't resurrect, perhaps) or he needed information from him before he could die. Since he killed Ben right after he mentioned Hawking's whereabouts, I'd wager that's the information he needed.

It seemed less that he was waiting for the right moment to kill Locke, and more like a sudden change of plan upon learning that Locke knew of Eloise. For some reason, Ben really didn't want Locke to find her. I mean, when we see Ben and Eloise together later, there's no hint of, "Damnit, how did HE find me?" She seems perfectly fine with Ben knowing where she is.

That's why I'm so interested to figure out how Locke found out about her. Who gave him knowledge that Ben didn't want him to have?

Stan4dSteph 02-26-2009 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 270649)
That's why I'm so interested to figure out how Locke found out about her. Who gave him knowledge that Ben didn't want him to have?

Christian gave Locke her name right before Locke left the island. My guess is "dude from Fringe" gave Locke her whereabouts.

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 02-27-2009 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 270649)
It seemed less that he was waiting for the right moment to kill Locke, and more like a sudden change of plan upon learning that Locke knew of Eloise. For some reason, Ben really didn't want Locke to find her. I mean, when we see Ben and Eloise together later, there's no hint of, "Damnit, how did HE find me?" She seems perfectly fine with Ben knowing where she is.

That's why I'm so interested to figure out how Locke found out about her. Who gave him knowledge that Ben didn't want him to have?

I'm sorry, I continue to not understand why he wouldn't have acquired that knowledge from Widmore. Widmore knew about Hawkings. I assume he supplied Locke with her file, same as the rest.

And that's a good point about Ben not wanting Locke to know about her. That further makes me think it was Widmore who supplied the information.

Betty 02-27-2009 04:45 PM

What is this war the speak of?

You think it's a Ben vs. Whidmore type of thing?

Ghoulish Delight 02-27-2009 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eliza Hodgkins 1812 (Post 270745)
I'm sorry, I continue to not understand why he wouldn't have acquired that knowledge from Widmore.

See Steph's quote below. I thought I remembered that much, wanted confirmation.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stan4dSteph (Post 270651)
Christian gave Locke her name right before Locke left the island. My guess is "dude from Fringe" gave Locke her whereabouts.

Dude from Fringe? I'm not watching Fringe, so no idea who that might be. Is it the now-dead driver?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Betty (Post 270754)
What is this war the speak of?

You think it's a Ben vs. Whidmore type of thing?

It was either Ben or Widmore who mentioned a coming war on the island to Locke, and that he should be on the "right side".

bewitched 02-27-2009 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 270756)
Dude from Fringe? I'm not watching Fringe, so no idea who that might be. Is it the now-dead driver?

Yes, the driver.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 270756)
It was either Ben or Widmore who mentioned a coming war on the island to Locke, and that he should be on the "right side".

Widmore said it. The simple answer is that he means a war between him and Ben. On the other hand, nothing on Lost is ever simple.

sleepyjeff 03-03-2009 03:51 PM

How does Sun "know" Ben killed Jin?

Only Locke would know this and Locke never talked to Sun.

I think this is VERY important.

Especially given the fact that the second to last thing Locke told Ben before Ben strangled him was the news that Jin was still alive.

lashbear 03-04-2009 04:31 AM

I am just about to record tonights episode (as it's 10:30PM and we can't stay up that late to watch it...)

Here's what we're seeing:




10.30pm – 11.30pm
Lost (M)

The Little Prince

Kate discovers that someone knows the secret of Aaron's true parental lineage. Meanwhile, the dramatic shifts through time are placing the lives of the remaining island survivors at risk.

scaeagles 03-04-2009 08:18 PM

I don't get to see the episode tonight. Our local station is experiencing technical difficulties. Sigh. online tomorrow, I suppose - at least ABC makes them available relatively quickly.

bewitched 03-05-2009 12:47 AM

YAY, Sawyer and Juliet!!!

Cadaverous Pallor 03-05-2009 09:26 AM

I was happy to see that Sawyer got himself some peace during the 3 years - even if I still cannot stand the actress who plays Juliet.

I LOVED the end of this episode and cannot wait until next week. What a great season this is!

New theory. Ben was injured in the crash. Everyone else (that we've seen so far) was magically transported to the island completely unharmed (and in Locke's case, rejuvenated). This means the island hates Ben, Ben is truly evil, and destined to lose. This does not vindicate Widmore though. I hope both of them go down.

JWBear 03-05-2009 10:27 AM

Also, The O6 ended up in 1977 with Saywer (excuse me... "LaFleur") et al. Ben and Locke did not. Interesting.

Ghoulish Delight 03-05-2009 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 271595)
Also, The O6 ended up in 1977 with Saywer (excuse me... "LaFleur") et al. Ben and Locke did not. Interesting.

I figured that much out last week. There's no way Jin arrives in a pristine VW bus and a pristine Dharma jumpsuit unless they are back in time.

Though now that I think about it, my initial theory that being sufficiently injured prevents you from time traveling is shaky, what with Jin bouncing around while unconscious. So there's got to be some other explanation for Ben not making the jump.

Of course, we only know about Kate, Hurley, and Jack. No telling yet where Sun and Sayid are. Am I missing anyone else from the plane?

BarTopDancer 03-05-2009 10:45 AM

We don't know for sure that Ben didn't make it. Maybe he's with Sun and Sayid.

Ghoulish Delight 03-05-2009 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 271603)
We don't know for sure that Ben didn't make it. Maybe he's with Sun and Sayid.

We saw Ben last episode. He's unconscious with the injured from flight 316. Locke: "He's the man who killed me."

BarTopDancer 03-05-2009 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 271604)
We saw Ben last episode. He's unconscious with the injured from flight 316. Locke: "He's the man who killed me."

Oh ya.


Did anyone else catch the name of the woman who gave birth? Pretty sure it was Annie (and what else has that actress been in? It's driving me crazy!)

Ghoulish Delight 03-05-2009 11:47 AM

Amy.

Reiko Aylesworth
(she's been on 24)

Ghoulish Delight 03-05-2009 11:57 AM

So Lostpedia reminded me of some stuff about Horace. I remembered that we'd seen him before in the episode(s?) about Ben's arrival on the island, and the purge and all that. I'd forgotten that he was the one who built Jacob's cabin and whose corpse had the blueprints for said cabin.

Cadaverous Pallor 03-05-2009 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 271595)
Also, The O6 ended up in 1977 with Saywer (excuse me... "LaFleur") et al. Ben and Locke did not. Interesting.

Wait, when we see Locke with the New Plane people, they are on the beach, with the canoes. I'm totally lost as to when we saw the canoes there before, timewise, but it's definitely not post-Losties camp. Seems to me the New Plane and Locke are there in 1977, same as the O6, just on the beach side of the island (which we know is far from the Dharma compound).

JWBear 03-05-2009 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 271636)
Wait, when we see Locke with the New Plane people, they are on the beach, with the canoes. I'm totally lost as to when we saw the canoes there before, timewise, but it's definitely not post-Losties camp. Seems to me the New Plane and Locke are there in 1977, same as the O6, just on the beach side of the island (which we know is far from the Dharma compound).

Locke, Ben, and the rest of the flight 316 are at the Hydra station – the same station Jack was being held at by the Others, and where he operated on Ben. In 1977, this station was (relatively) brand new, and was still fully staffed by DI (and polar bears!). In the scenes with the 316ers, it has obviously been abandoned and looks even more rundown than when the Others were using it. Ergo, the 316ers landed on the Island in “current” time – late 2007/early 2008.

bewitched 03-05-2009 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 271636)
Wait, when we see Locke with the New Plane people, they are on the beach, with the canoes. I'm totally lost as to when we saw the canoes there before, timewise, but it's definitely not post-Losties camp.

It was in the episode when Sawyer saw Kate and Claire when Claire was giving birth. Remember, they walked back to beach and it was all wrecked and there were a couple of canoes with an Ajira Airways water bottle. They took the canoes part of the way to the Orchid station and got shot at from another canoe.

Looking on IMDB, it was the 4th episode this season, "The Little Prince"

eta: Since it was when they were still time jumping, it was a post Losties camp, we just didn't know (at the time) that it was the Ajira camp...we just assumed it was the Oceanic camp that had been trashed (or at least I did). And personally, I think Locke (and Ben) are current time, as is the Ajira camp.

bewitched 03-05-2009 09:06 PM

A review I just read got me thinking (it was about how various seasons seem to be the yin/yang of each other)...and I may be on a totally wrong path...but does Milton's Paradise Lost and Paradise Regained resonate with anyone else? I don't want to really flesh out my thoughts yet since neither book is fresh enough in my mind.

Synopsis:

Here.

And here.

JWBear 03-05-2009 10:19 PM

There are so many interweaving references - literary and otherwise - in this show. I have no doubt that Milton is one of them.

Cadaverous Pallor 03-06-2009 11:33 AM

There are officially too many things for me to remember. :)

Disneyphile 03-06-2009 01:21 PM

Ken's become quite the Lost philosopher, almost as much as he is on LOTR stuff. I keep trying to get him to post in this thread, but he still hasn't. :(

JWBear 03-06-2009 02:23 PM

I found this, and it made me giggle...


sleepyjeff 03-06-2009 02:28 PM

^Excellent:snap:

SzczerbiakManiac 03-06-2009 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 271600)
Though now that I think about it, my initial theory that being sufficiently injured prevents you from time traveling is shaky, what with Jin bouncing around while unconscious. So there's got to be some other explanation for Ben not making the jump.

A friend pointed out to me that both Ben and John touched the donkey wheel. Maybe that has something to do with them staying in "real" time...?

Ghoulish Delight 03-06-2009 03:02 PM

Aha! That's what they have in common. Good call.

JWBear 03-06-2009 04:04 PM

They have several things in common.

Ghoulish Delight 03-06-2009 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 271783)
They have several things in common.

Yes, but that's something A) that they have in common B) that the 5 who DID time travel don't share and C) is linked directly to getting on/off the island. Definitely the best candidate I've seen so far for why the other 5 would time travel but not them.

JWBear 03-06-2009 07:11 PM

The O5 were not supposed to leave The Island. Ben and Locke were.

Stan4dSteph 03-06-2009 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 271642)
Ergo, the 316ers landed on the Island in “current” time – late 2007/early 2008.

If Locke was in "current time" when he was in NYC, it wasn't late 2007/early 2008. NY got rid of the Statue of Liberty license plates in 2001.

Ghoulish Delight 03-06-2009 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stan4dSteph (Post 271804)
If Locke was in "current time" when he was in NYC, it wasn't late 2007/early 2008. NY got rid of the Statue of Liberty license plates in 2001.

Then that was an editorial mistake/decision because that is the correct timeline as presented (crashed in '05, 3 years passed).

Ghoulish Delight 03-06-2009 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 271803)
The O5 were not supposed to leave The Island. Ben and Locke were.

I'm still hoping they tie everything back into a semi-plausible, practical explanation, not just a hand-waving "the Island wants it" mumbo jumbo explanation. I don't expect anything to be scientifically sound or anything, but I won't be particularly satisfied if it all boils down to mysticism. As such, there needs to be a functional difference between those that time travel and those that don't, beyond "supposed to".

JWBear 03-06-2009 09:33 PM

Yes, it was a production error. They happen.

And sorry GD... Crashed 9/22/04. Ben, Desmond, & O6 left Island 12/30/04.

JWBear 03-06-2009 09:37 PM

Just checked Lostpedia. Best guesstimate is 316 crashed sometime in January 2008.

JWBear 03-06-2009 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 271808)
I'm still hoping they tie everything back into a semi-plausible, practical explanation, not just a hand-waving "the Island wants it" mumbo jumbo explanation. I don't expect anything to be scientifically sound or anything, but I won't be particularly satisfied if it all boils down to mysticism. As such, there needs to be a functional difference between those that time travel and those that don't, beyond "supposed to".

Who said anything about mystical mumbo-jumbo? I just said that they were not supposed to leave.

Ghoulish Delight 03-07-2009 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 271819)
Who said anything about mystical mumbo-jumbo? I just said that they were not supposed to leave.

Yes, but "not supposed to" isn't enough to explain why the flash didn't cause them to time travel. There has to be a physical difference between them and those that do time travel. Specifically, a physical difference that they both share, and that happened to Locke some time between the time he was on the island before and when he got back (since he USED to travel in time with the flashes). Leaving the island by turning the wheel fits the bill perfectly.

JWBear 03-07-2009 11:48 AM

I'm sure that having turned the wheel has something to do with it; but perhaps there is an intelligence at work in this. We still do not know who (or what) Jacob is, and how much control over what happens on (and off) the Island that he has.

Pirate Bill 03-09-2009 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 271864)
...perhaps there is an intelligence at work in this.

There must be. The points in time they would jump to with each flash seem a little more than random. It's almost like Lock or someone else in the group needed to be in some of those points in time for some purpose and that the island (or some intelligence as you say) put them there.

Ghoulish Delight 03-09-2009 08:50 AM

If the series ends with "It all happened because the Island/some intelligent entity wanted it to happen like that" without some explanation of a mechanism as to HOW said intelligence accomplished it, I will be displeased.

Pirate Bill 03-09-2009 09:14 AM

Unfortunately I think there are some questions we're just not going to get answers to. The smoke monster being one of them.

We know Smokey is a security system and is somehow tied to the temple. We may even get more information about the origin, purpose, who or what is controlling it, etc. But I doubt we'll ever know exactly what it is. It's just magic smoke that makes a mechanical noise and I don't think it's ever going to be explained as anything more than that.

The donkey wheel. How does it work and what's with the freezing environment?

I don't think the numbers or the true purpose of entering them every 108 minutes will ever be revealed in any more detail than we already have.

J.J. Abrams has made it known that he likes unopened boxes of mystery. He got the ball rolling in that direction.

Ghoulish Delight 03-09-2009 09:20 AM

I don't expect, or want, every question answered. As long as we're left with some semblance of a sensible universe that this happened in that allows for us viewers to fill in the blanks ourselves, and not just a bunch of "It was fate to happen" hand waving.

Betty 03-09-2009 10:05 AM

I agree - although I would like more info on the smoke monster in particular. I don't need a blueprint or anything - but I want more then it's a "security system" made of smoke that sounds mechanical and appears to "look" at you.

sleepyjeff 03-09-2009 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pirate Bill (Post 272055)
Unfortunately I think there are some questions we're just not going to get answers to. The smoke monster being one of them.

This is the shows oldest mystery and the one that hooked so many people to the show........it's one thing to not answer a question like this in a short 2 hour movie(Cloverfield for example); the audience has not invested a lot of time and dare I say....emotion in the answer. To not answer this one satisfactorily would be a huge slap in the face.



Quote:

The donkey wheel. How does it work and what's with the freezing environment?
I rate this as a mid-level type question....I am curious and want to know the answer but I wouldn't consider it a deal breaker if they didn't address it further.

Quote:

I don't think the numbers or the true purpose of entering them every 108 minutes will ever be revealed in any more detail than we already have.
I think the reasons given as to why they needed to enter numbers every 108 minutes has been sufficiently addressed.....but as to why those specific numbers and how they are connected to Hurley winning the Lottery we'll probably never get any more answers.

Quote:

J.J. Abrams has made it known that he likes unopened boxes of mystery. He got the ball rolling in that direction.
Because the unopened box, no matter how infuriating, frustrating, and maddening it can be is always less lame than the opened one;)

SzczerbiakManiac 03-09-2009 12:15 PM

I just realized that Frank Lapidus (the pilot) didn't touch the donkey wheel either....

BarTopDancer 03-09-2009 04:11 PM

I despise open endings. It's the main reason I did not like Cloverfield. I wanted (still do) to know what that stupid thing was, where it came from, yadda yadda yadda.

I'm really trying to prepare myself for an open ending to Lost, to not expect answers to the smoke monster*, beyond what we know. To the numbers, beyond what we know, to why polar bears were on the island and those who touch the donkey wheel end up in Tunisia. But I'm still gonna be annoyed.

We know that smokey can be controlled by Ben and is a security system to the temple. But what is the temple?

I've been catching some of the reruns on Sci-Fi during the day and it's hard to remember what has and hasn't been answered yet. Right now Kate and Sawyer are being held captive and Mr. Friendly just came out.

Ghoulish Delight 03-09-2009 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 272144)
We know that smokey can be controlled by Ben and is a security system to the temple. But what is the temple?

Oh, that reminds me! I'm assuming the temple is connected to the giant idol we saw briefly this last episode. How awesome was THAT?!

I would be shocked if they don't give a little bit more insight into the #'s and smokey. Even if the answer to the numbers is something as simple as, "Those are the intervals that the time jumps happen on, so we use them as easy reference points," or even, "They don't 'mean' squat on their own, we just planted them to f*ck with Hurley." As long as it's something. As sleepy said, those were the 2 key mysteries that the show was built around, it would be ludicrous/lazy to just ignore them.

I don't expect them to lay out a technical blueprint of the donkey wheel, but I do expect we'll know more about exactly what it means to "move the island".

BarTopDancer 03-09-2009 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 272145)
I would be shocked if they don't give a little bit more insight into the #'s and smokey. Even if the answer to the numbers is something as simple as, "Those are the intervals that the time jumps happen on, so we use them as easy reference points,"

They appear so much.

I do wonder if the numbers are the intervals the time jumps happen. I'm not patient enough to go back and watch prior episodes, but did it did seem that the pauses between jumps got longer, then shorter as time went by?

bewitched 03-09-2009 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 272144)
why polar bears were on the island

Didn't they already reveal that they were brought by DHARMA for genetic and learning experiments?



I can't believe that they won't explain the numbers since they have been such a big part of the mythology of the show.

Pirate Bill 03-10-2009 09:05 AM

My theory is that the numbers are just self referential. Let's see if I can explain:

Hurley uses the numbers and wins the lottery. Bad things happen to him so he begins to believe the numbers are cursed. (We keep seeing the numbers pop up everywhere but that's just coincidental or people see what they want to see or the producers are messing with our heads.) He goes to Australia and ends up on the island where he finds the numbers marked on the outside of the hatch and are being used as a code to reset the 108 minute clock.

Hurley goes back in time to 1974. "The incident" occurs requiring them to enter numbers into a computer to reset a 108 minute clock. Hurley chooses to use the cursed number sequence because he was "supposed to." (This is an unchangeable time line, not the Back To The Future type of time line.) In order to keep the number sequence available for all generations to use he etches it on the outside of the hatch and records it to tape to be broadcast by radio (that sounded an awful lot like Hurley's voice on the transmission the Frenchies picked up).

Hurley's friend from the mental institution (can't remember his name) hear's the numbers on the radio broadcast. Something eventually causes him to go insane (possibly number and/or island related). He goes to the loony bin constantly repeating those numbers. Hurley uses the numbers and wins the lottery.

JWBear 03-10-2009 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pirate Bill (Post 272271)
My theory is that the numbers are just self referential. Let's see if I can explain:

Hurley uses the numbers and wins the lottery. Bad things happen to him so he begins to believe the numbers are cursed. (We keep seeing the numbers pop up everywhere but that's just coincidental or people see what they want to see or the producers are messing with our heads.) He goes to Australia and ends up on the island where he finds the numbers marked on the outside of the hatch and are being used as a code to reset the 108 minute clock.

Hurley goes back in time to 1974. "The incident" occurs requiring them to enter numbers into a computer to reset a 108 minute clock. Hurley chooses to use the cursed number sequence because he was "supposed to." (This is an unchangeable time line, not the Back To The Future type of time line.) In order to keep the number sequence available for all generations to use he etches it on the outside of the hatch and records it to tape to be broadcast by radio (that sounded an awful lot like Hurley's voice on the transmission the Frenchies picked up).

Hurley's friend from the mental institution (can't remember his name) hear's the numbers on the radio broadcast. Something eventually causes him to go insane (possibly number and/or island related). He goes to the loony bin constantly repeating those numbers. Hurley uses the numbers and wins the lottery.

:snap: :snap: :snap:

sleepyjeff 03-10-2009 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pirate Bill (Post 272271)
My theory is that the numbers are just self referential. Let's see if I can explain:

Hurley uses the numbers and wins the lottery. Bad things happen to him so he begins to believe the numbers are cursed. (We keep seeing the numbers pop up everywhere but that's just coincidental or people see what they want to see or the producers are messing with our heads.) He goes to Australia and ends up on the island where he finds the numbers marked on the outside of the hatch and are being used as a code to reset the 108 minute clock.

Hurley goes back in time to 1974. "The incident" occurs requiring them to enter numbers into a computer to reset a 108 minute clock. Hurley chooses to use the cursed number sequence because he was "supposed to." (This is an unchangeable time line, not the Back To The Future type of time line.) In order to keep the number sequence available for all generations to use he etches it on the outside of the hatch and records it to tape to be broadcast by radio (that sounded an awful lot like Hurley's voice on the transmission the Frenchies picked up).

Hurley's friend from the mental institution (can't remember his name) hear's the numbers on the radio broadcast. Something eventually causes him to go insane (possibly number and/or island related). He goes to the loony bin constantly repeating those numbers. Hurley uses the numbers and wins the lottery.

I think you've got it..........once you learn how to think in a circle this show is a lot easier to understand...:cheers:

Pirate Bill 03-11-2009 10:32 AM

1 Attachment(s)
I'm listening to the Lost Podcast w/ Jay & Jack (show 4.16). I've attached an interesting side-by-side comparison that a caller mentioned on the podcast. On the left is Ramses II. On the right is the statue from Lost.

JWBear 03-11-2009 11:04 AM

Hmmm... And ol' Ramses's legs are broken off right about where the 4 toed statue was broken....


BarTopDancer 03-11-2009 11:52 AM

When did we see the full statue?

There is so much to remember! :(

Ghoulish Delight 03-11-2009 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 272538)
When did we see the full statue?

There is so much to remember! :(

After John fell down the well. In the first episode that we saw that happen, they showed Sawyer holding the rope, coming out of solid ground, then they cut away. Then they showed the scene again in the next episode (or was there an episode in between?), this time, instead of cutting away, we see them look up and see the statue. Then they flash immediately (I think that's the last flash).

Ghoulish Delight 03-11-2009 01:25 PM

So I'm reading a biography of Timothy Leary. There are a lot of names in it, I'm pretty bad at retaining names when I'm reading biographies. So when I reached the period in Leary's life when he became a faculty member of Harvard's psychology department, I assumed the familiar name of a fellow faculty member and ally to Leary through his controversial psychedelics experiments was someone from earlier in Leary's life that I had forgotten about.

It took me about 50 pages for it to click.

Richard Alpert.

Interestingly, the real Alpert went on to become a spiritual leader, known as Baba Ram Dass, and taught, among several other things, Buddhism. With the show's many other references to Buddhism, I don't suppose that's mere coincidence, though I assume it's more simply a clever nod and doesn't imply that the character has any actual relation to the real Alpert.

Ram Dass was also apparently the inspiration for the roller skating guru disguise in Fletch.

Betty 03-11-2009 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 272533)
Hmmm... And ol' Ramses's legs are broken off right about where the 4 toed statue was broken....


I wonder how many toes Richard has.

Cadaverous Pallor 03-11-2009 04:13 PM

Holy crap, I think Pirate Bill figured it out. :eek:

Now STOP THAT, I want the series to be a surprise. :p

bewitched 03-11-2009 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pirate Bill (Post 272532)
I'm listening to the Lost Podcast w/ Jay & Jack (show 4.16). I've attached an interesting side-by-side comparison that a caller mentioned on the podcast. On the left is Ramses II. On the right is the statue from Lost.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 272533)
Hmmm... And ol' Ramses's legs are broken off right about where the 4 toed statue was broken....


The decorative carving doesn't match up. Also, I don't believe that Ramses II was depicted with hair in the statue you've pictured. (nor does Rameses have pointed, doglike ears)



I think a better choice for the statue (which appears to have pointed ears) is Anubus, one of the Egyptian gods of the afterlife whose specific role was to watch over the dead and guide lost souls on their trip to the afterlife. Anubus is half human/half jackel (which would also explain the 4 toes) and carries a flail, which the statue appears to be holding in his right hand.

And how about this (which I just thought of while typing):

What if the island is the Egyptian afterlife and the Others are, in fact dead, ancient Egyptians (which would explain why they don't age; they are whatever age they were when they died-- it would also explain Richard's eyeliner)? The Egyptians considered those who reached the afterlife to be immortal. Looking up Aaru (the afterlife) on Wiki, it is often depicted as a series of islands (which I didn't remember, but hey...). Interestingly, the gates a soul has to pass through to get to the afterlife are guarded by demons (smoke monster, anyone?) There are several other Egyptian gods the statue could depict such as Bast or Mut that have pointed ears and are male (female gods generally had rounded shoulders; that said, I'm just guessing it's male) but they don't fit as well into what we know so far.

It may also explain why Ben killed Locke...so that he could be eternal leader of the Others.

Finally, I think it may explain why the Islanders can't have babies/die. In Egyptian mythology, whether or not you go to the afterlife and become eternal depends on the weight of your sins. If you have little to no sin, you go to Aaru. But what if you go to Aaru and then sin (say, by killing or purging a bunch of people)? Maybe the punishment is no babies in eternal world. As an aside, I don't remember anyone saying that the original Dharma people couldn't have babies (and as Sawyer said to Juliet, "maybe whatever made the Others unable to have babies hasn't happened yet"), we just see the 21st century Others as not able to have babies. Also a good explanation for why Claire and Sun were able to have their babies...because they weren't Others.

Now I want to go look up the hieroglyphs we've seen around the island to see if any of the symbols depict specific gods.

bewitched 03-11-2009 06:00 PM

Hmmm...

(The Hanso Foundation was behind the original Dharma Initiative)

bewitched 03-11-2009 06:11 PM

And before you ask, sadly I don't have anything better to do tonight...

This is likely where the idea that the statue is Ramses II came from:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lostpedia
* The statue may be in reference to the poem "On a Stupendous Leg of Granite", by Horace Smith. The poem begins, "In Egypt's sandy silence, all alone, / Stands a gigantic Leg". The poem refers to the fallen Ramesses II colossus near Luxor, Egypt. The poem is about the irony of power--and the end of powerful civilizations. Percy Bysshe Shelley's version of the poem, "Ozymandias," also describes the foot statue.

* The Colossus of Rhodes, one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World, snapped off mid-leg in an earthquake not long after it was built.


Ghoulish Delight 03-11-2009 09:29 PM

Repeat!?! Booo.

Stupid March Madness.

I'm glad I watched a bit of it though. This time I noticed Amy pull something (earplugs) out of the control box of the sonic wall. I was wondering how she could have been hearing perfectly fine up until then.

Pirate Bill 03-12-2009 09:35 AM

I'm not necessarily sold on the Lost statue being Ramses II. I just thought it was interesting that both statues have a very similar stance and were also broken off just above the foot. Another difference between the 2 is Ramses has the left leg forward but the Lost statue appears to have the right leg forward.

However, they both seem to be about the same height, hands down to the side holding objects, facing forward with one leg in front of the other.

Another caller (in the same Lost Podcast episode) mentioned that it looks like the statue is holding an ankh (which also supports your Anubis idea). Interestingly, Amy's husband, Paul, had an ankh necklace.

Cadaverous Pallor 03-12-2009 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pirate Bill (Post 272658)
Another caller (in the same Lost Podcast episode) mentioned that it looks like the statue is holding an ankh (which also supports your Anubis idea). Interestingly, Amy's husband, Paul, had an ankh necklace.

Yeah, the ankh necklace plus large statue equals Egypt. Which is kind of insane. WTF, writers? WTF.

sleepyjeff 03-12-2009 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 272720)
Yeah, the ankh necklace plus large statue equals Egypt. Which is kind of insane. WTF, writers? WTF.

How far away is Tunisia(aka ~The exit~) from Egypt?

Disneyphile 03-12-2009 04:22 PM

Well, there is a connection with Egypt and Atlantis.

I'm still set on the whole Atlantis theory. :)

Ghoulish Delight 03-12-2009 04:28 PM

Lost is an anagram of Slot. The whole show is nothing but a metaphorical representation of the programming of a modern Vegas slot machine. The numbers are the seed for the random # generator. Each plane crash or capsized boat represents a new player inserting their player's club card. What the donkey wheel represents should be obvious, I'm not going to bore you with that.

It's probably at the Luxor, thus Ramses.

sleepyjeff 03-12-2009 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 272720)
Yeah, the ankh necklace plus large statue equals Egypt. Which is kind of insane. WTF, writers? WTF.

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleepyjeff (Post 272749)
How far away is Tunisia(aka ~The exit~) from Egypt?

Egypt was once a member of the Carthaginian Empire(Carthage is in Tunisia).

The Egyptian god of War((Charles Widmore told Locke "War is coming")) carries an ankh.

Ghoulish Delight 03-19-2009 07:32 AM

Poor Sun! They had me for a while there. The plane definitely time traveled (it went from night to day, noticed by the copilot), so they had me believing that they all were back in '77 afterall. But that just didn't make sense with the abandoned Dharma station. So now I wonder WHEN they actually are.

And, what is going to happen to Ben next. The other passengers still on that island know that Frank and Sun took the boat. Which means Ben regains consciousness and tells them. And when we saw him in the hatch/sickbay, he was in WAY worse shape than a bump on the back of his head. Someone or something messes him up good.

Good episode. The only thing I didn't like was that last conversation between Jack and Sawyer. The conflict there was forced and heavy handed. It just didn't make sense to me that the two of them would so instantly be hostile to each other. I understand it's a continuation of the power struggle theme between them, but in that situation it just didn't make sense for Jack to be such a dick. Or even for Sawyer to be so snide in response.

SzczerbiakManiac 03-19-2009 09:06 AM

I'm scratching my head as to why Sun didn't warp back to 1977. What was different about her?

Ghoulish Delight 03-19-2009 09:12 AM

Yeah, there goes the donkey wheel theory.

Hmm, she's the only other one who saw Widmore in person, isn't she....

SzczerbiakManiac 03-19-2009 09:50 AM

Interesting...!

Ghoulish Delight 03-19-2009 10:14 AM

Hahaha, I've just figured out where I know Caesar from. He's in I [heart] Huckabees, as the translator for the old lady singing about olive trees. Hahaha. I also remember his role in Three Kings, but Huckabees is definitely why he's familiar.

sleepyjeff 03-19-2009 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SzczerbiakManiac (Post 273804)
I'm scratching my head as to why Sun didn't warp back to 1977. What was different about her?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 273805)

Hmm, she's the only other one who saw Widmore in person, isn't she....

No, Lapidus, Ben, and Locke have all met Widmore..........oh, snap, they're with Sun:eek: Nice catch maybe:snap:

Nevertheless, I am thinking Sun having had a baby may have more to do with it than meeting Widmore.

Or it could just be a simple matter of the Island sending people where they need to be to obtain a desired outcome.....:confused:

Ghoulish Delight 03-19-2009 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleepyjeff (Post 273818)
No, Lapidus, Ben, and Locke have all met Widmore..........oh, snap, they're with Sun:eek: Nice catch maybe:snap:

Precisely, thus my use of "other".
Quote:

Nevertheless, I am thinking Sun having had a baby may have more to do with it than meeting Widmore.
I thought of that, but I'm still trying to think more in terms of what the ones who stayed with the plane had in common, and I'm pretty sure Locke didn't have a baby.

Quote:

Or it could just be a simple matter of the Island sending people where they need to be to obtain a desired outcome.....:confused:
Could be, but even if it turns out to be someone/thing making stuff happen, I continue to hope for a more satisfying conclusion that provides some clues as to the mechanics behind it all, rather then some omniscience/omnipotence.

Pirate Bill 03-19-2009 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleepyjeff (Post 273818)
Or it could just be a simple matter of the Island sending people where they need to be to obtain a desired outcome.....:confused:

That's what it looks like to me. Their encounter with Christian makes it seem like they have a job to do. (Paraphrased: "You've got quite a journey ahead of you.") Are they going to somehow rescue the "Neithers"* from 1977?

*Neithers - the name my son gave to the group of Losties stuck in 1977. They're not Dharma, they're not Others, they're Neithers.

sleepyjeff 03-19-2009 11:39 AM

Another theory(not mine, I read it on another board) I like is based on the orchid orientation video with the rabbits: In that video Dr Candle/Chang/Hallowax freaked out when a second rabbit, identical to the one he was holding, appeared. It was more than just a "oh no, now my video is ruined" type freak out.....more like a "oh no, the world will end if they touch each other" kind of fit.

So, we know that Ben is already at Dharmaville circa 1977.........could Sun be there? We know that Widmore(an other/hostile) did have business dealings with Sun's father(could he also be an other/hostile?)

Cadaverous Pallor 03-19-2009 01:11 PM

If Christian takes them to some lever and says "push this to travel back in time and save your friends" I'll be very annoyed. But...how do you travel back in time on purpose?

That poor kid who plays young Ben. Yeech. Enough with the lipstick.

It's occured to me that Sun gave her baby up to go find Jin, knowing full well she'd probably never be back. That's f'd up. Am I forgetting something there?

sleepyjeff 03-19-2009 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 273860)
If Christian takes them to some lever and says "push this to travel back in time and save your friends" I'll be very annoyed. But...how do you travel back in time on purpose?

That scene has been bugging me a little;

1)Why would there be a torn and ragged Dharma sign hanging around in 2007? Ben and the others surely would have took it down back when they killed off Dharma......to me this suggests that something changed in the time line and the others never took over Dharmaville. Although, clearly, Dharma wasn't there so something still happened...I am stumped:confused:

2) How did Christian show Sun the picture from 1977?


He used a flashlight........:eek:

Ghoulish Delight 03-19-2009 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleepyjeff (Post 273883)
That scene has been bugging me a little;

1)Why would there be a torn and ragged Dharma sign hanging around in 2007? Ben and the others surely would have took it down back when they killed off Dharma......to me this suggests that something changed in the time line and the others never took over Dharmaville. Although, clearly, Dharma wasn't there so something still happened...I am

Don't know if they're in the past or the future, but I'm certain the plane and those who remained on it did travel in time, just not to 1977. Perhaps they are in a period between the purge and when the Others claimed the barracks as their own.

Or perhaps it was just a sloppy creative decision made in case it wasn't obvious where they were.

bewitched 03-19-2009 02:26 PM

Did anyone else notice the black smoke coming in the building when Sun was talking to Christian?

Also, It would appear that Ben has always known who (at least some of) the Losties are.



Nice catch sj, so I guess we know Christian isn't Jacob. I'm still sticking with the Jack is Jacob theory.*









*Subject to change with plot twists or per my whim.

bewitched 03-19-2009 02:42 PM

After reading E! online, who the fvck is the person behind and just to the right of Sun (right after the smoke enters) in the room where she's talking to Christian?

Ghoulish Delight 03-19-2009 02:47 PM

I'd have to see, but wouldn't that be Frank?

sleepyjeff 03-19-2009 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 273886)
Don't know if they're in the past or the future, but I'm certain the plane and those who remained on it did travel in time, just not to 1977. Perhaps they are in a period between the purge and when the Others claimed the barracks as their own.

If they did(and I guess they must have at least a little since night did turn into day right before the crash) it couldn't be by more than a year*.....so my question as to why that Dharma stuff is still hanging around remains a valid one.



*1977 plus 30 years equals 2007....Unless we can't even trust the on screen narration

Ghoulish Delight 03-19-2009 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleepyjeff (Post 273908)
*1977 plus 30 years equals 2007....Unless we can't even trust the on screen narration

Good point. So:

1) alternate reality caused by time travel
2) for some reason there are Dharma sign still around, even though it had been Others' land for so long
3) wrong/misleading info when we're told it was 30 years ago
4) stupid production decision because they wanted to be sure it was obvious where they were.

My guess is option 4.

sleepyjeff 03-19-2009 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 273910)
Good point. So:

1) alternate reality caused by time travel
2) for some reason there are Dharma sign still around, even though it had been Others' land for so long
3) wrong/misleading info when we're told it was 30 years ago
4) stupid production decision because they wanted to be sure it was obvious where they were.

My guess is option 4.

I fear you are probably right.

bewitched 03-19-2009 03:22 PM

Nope, Frank is standing right next to her (on the left). There is someone (it looks like a woman) sitting in the shadows behind and to the right of Sun.

sleepyjeff 03-19-2009 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bewitched (Post 273915)
Nope, Frank is standing right next to her (on the left). There is someone (it looks like a woman) sitting in the shadows behind and to the right of Sun.


I bet it's Claire....she was last seen hanging with her Dad, no reason to be surprised she's still with him.

bewitched 03-19-2009 03:39 PM

They need to make the episodes something more along the lines of 3 hours.


Someone on E! also mentioned Richard saying that the sonic fence couldn't keep them (the Others) out. That would fit nicely with the theory that the Others are all dead and the island is Aaru.

Ghoulish Delight 03-19-2009 03:59 PM

The Others seem to bleed a lot when shot, for being dead.

bewitched 03-19-2009 04:14 PM

Hmmmm, good point. Maybe the ones who got shot are are Dharma people who were assimilated into the Others as Ben was and now Ethan seems to have been? (And thinking about it...it seems as though there's a better than average chance that over the years more than a few people have been shipwrecked and/or crashed on the island, survived and never got off; which also makes me wonder if we'll eventually discover Mr. Eko's brother amongst the Others or hanging out w/ Christian.)

I dunno, but if the Others can get through the fence, there must be something special about them.

Ghoulish Delight 03-19-2009 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bewitched (Post 273921)
I dunno, but if the Others can get through the fence, there must be something special about them.

They could simply know the island well enough to know ways around it.

Or have really good ear plugs.

JWBear 03-19-2009 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 273922)
They could simply know the island well enough to know ways around it.

Or under it...

Ghoulish Delight 03-19-2009 04:49 PM

So, with Ben meeting Sayid in 1977, and therefore likely to at least know who Sawyer is, I'm forming an idea. Ben somehow becomes beholden to the Losties, to where he's basically forced, once he grows up, to play things out the way they do to keep them alive and make things happen again as they've already happened. Probably not because he wants to, more of a self preservation sort of thing. Thus his pissy attitude the whole time, not wanting to save the jerks who are blackmailing him, but having no other choice.

Just a hunch.

BarTopDancer 03-19-2009 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleepyjeff (Post 273883)
2) How did Christian show Sun the picture from 1977?


He used a flashlight........:eek:

In that same scene there is speculation that there is a woman in the background, behind Sun.


I really want to know about the Others. Why are they considered hostile? Where did they come from? Why did Richard want them killed?

What is Smoky guarding? Where was it kept when Ben let it loose last season? Where did it come from?

Ghoulish Delight 03-19-2009 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 273942)
In that same scene there is speculation that there is a woman in the background, behind Sun

Probably Claire, as she was with spectre Christian before (see above).

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 273942)

I really want to know about the Others. Why are they considered hostile? Where did they come from? Why did Richard want them killed?

Richard IS an other, he doesn't want them killed. They're considered hostile because they want to kill the people in Dharma because they feel it's "their" island.

BarTopDancer 03-19-2009 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 273943)
Probably Claire, as she was with spectre Christian before (see above).

Richard IS an other, he doesn't want them killed. They're considered hostile because they want to kill the people in Dharma because they feel it's "their" island.

I was posting and running before.

I mean why do the Others consider it "their" island.

bewitched 03-19-2009 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 273954)
I was posting and running before.

I mean why do the Others consider it "their" island.

My personal working theory is that the island is part of Aaru (the Egyptian afterlife) and the Others are dead souls who now have eternal (after)life. Hence the island is the purview of those dead souls...the Others.

I think Smokey is the guardian of the gates or temples that souls have to pass through to reach Aaru.

There is what appears to be a woman in the shadows behind Sun just as the doors fly open and tendrils of what appears to be Smokey enter the room. As to who it is, I agree with GD that it is likely Claire.

Cadaverous Pallor 03-19-2009 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 273954)
I was posting and running before.

I mean why do the Others consider it "their" island.

They were there first.

bewitched 03-19-2009 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 273981)
They were there first.

Well, that too. ;)

Ghoulish Delight 03-19-2009 09:42 PM

Bleh to the afterlife theory. It's a good thought, but I will be sorely disappointed if it all turns out to be afterlife.

Pirate Bill 03-20-2009 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bewitched (Post 273974)
There is what appears to be a woman in the shadows behind Sun just as the doors fly open and tendrils of what appears to be Smokey enter the room. As to who it is, I agree with GD that it is likely Claire.

I rewatched it last night looking for this woman in the background and saw what you are talking about. Unfortunately, I think in this case it's a production mistake. It looks like a cameraman (or camerawoman) to me.

I have Lost saved to my computer. Unfortunately I can't get a screenshot since it plays back in a video overlay. But I did blow out the brightness to try to get a better look and it definitely looks like someone leaning over a camera with the camera resting on their right forearm, in a handheld shot sort of way. Looks like he (or she) is getting the reverse shot of Christian from behind Sun but wasn't hidden well enough.

If you can find a screenshot then crank up the brightness and you'll see what I'm talking about.

As for the afterlife theory, this came up in season 1 and the writers said that it isn't. Doesn't mean that dead people aren't walking around. It just means that the island is not where the dead go.

SzczerbiakManiac 03-20-2009 12:37 PM

Didn't the producers say early on that this is not "purgatory" nor are they all dead?

BarTopDancer 03-20-2009 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SzczerbiakManiac (Post 274154)
Didn't the producers say early on that this is not "purgatory" nor are they all dead?

Ya.

They also said it's not a dream and won't end with it being in a snow globe.

bewitched 03-20-2009 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pirate Bill (Post 274090)
As for the afterlife theory, this came up in season 1 and the writers said that it isn't. Doesn't mean that dead people aren't walking around. It just means that the island is not where the dead go.

Sure...crush my dreams of having figured it out. Thanks. A lot. ;)




(Thanks for the info on the woman. I wonder if they will just dismiss it as the production error it appears to be even after so many people seem to have seen it; or if they will build it into the story.)

bewitched 03-20-2009 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SzczerbiakManiac (Post 274154)
Didn't the producers say early on that this is not "purgatory" nor are they all dead?

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 274156)
Ya.

My theory being right or wrong notwithstanding...

Aaru is not a sort of purgatory in the general sense that we think of the word. It is more of a parallel world where dead souls go to have eternal life.

Also, clearly at least some number of the people roaming the island are dead, which makes me really hope that the guitar Hurley was carrying means we get to see Charlie again.

I wonder if the people assumedly stuck in 2007, who logically should have ended up in 1977, were "dead". Maybe Frank and Sun "died" in the plane crash but were alive on the island. I get the feeling to come back to life, so to speak, you have to have been to the island before. I know this doesn't explain Ben but I think he might, for some reason, be an exception to the rule.

And yes, I think about Lost way too much.

sleepyjeff 03-23-2009 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bewitched (Post 274239)
My theory being right or wrong notwithstanding...

Aaru is not a sort of purgatory in the general sense that we think of the word. It is more of a parallel world where dead souls go to have eternal life.

Also, clearly at least some number of the people roaming the island are dead, which makes me really hope that the guitar Hurley was carrying means we get to see Charlie again.

I wonder if the people assumedly stuck in 2007, who logically should have ended up in 1977, were "dead". Maybe Frank and Sun "died" in the plane crash but were alive on the island. I get the feeling to come back to life, so to speak, you have to have been to the island before. I know this doesn't explain Ben but I think he might, for some reason, be an exception to the rule.

And yes, I think about Lost way too much.


I have a very old cassette tape I made back in college. I used it to tape lectures and when done with a class I would tape another lecture over the top....finally, I taped some music on it(Shonna Laing).

As you can imagine, after all of these years the sound on this tape is awful....you can hear whispers in the background almost all of the time and once in a while one of the whispers will come in loud and clear as if it were part of the song.

Perhaps the Island is nothing more than that piece of Scotch tape one puts on the bottom of a cassette so one can record again;)

SzczerbiakManiac 03-25-2009 10:19 AM

Vintage DHARMA ads

JWBear 03-25-2009 10:12 PM

Fvck! :eek:

Gemini Cricket 03-25-2009 10:33 PM

I saw them shooting some scenes for Lost at one of the scenic lookout points here on O'ahu. Lots of honey wagons, so I get a lot of the cast was out and about.

Ghoulish Delight 03-25-2009 10:37 PM

Well, that explains why Ben's so sure Sayid's a killer.

Who the fvck, in that position, doesn't unload the clip into his head?

And I don't think I noticed before that Ben's dad is Laszlo.

And was that Sebastian?

JWBear 03-25-2009 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 275190)
And was that Sebastian?

Yes.

sleepyjeff 03-26-2009 01:15 AM

I wonder if Sun hit Ben in the head with the paddle at the same time Sayid shot little Ben.

Of course, since the incidents occured 30 some odd years apart that's not really possible.....but, what I mean is, I wonder if the two incidents occured, in some sort of universal mirror type whatchmacallit, together?

Also, I got to wonder if Ben has the ability to travel in time like Desmond does? Perhaps Ben was wearing a bullet proof vest and perhaps this little, innocent Ben, is actually older Ben in a little Ben body.

Ghoulish Delight 03-26-2009 07:25 AM

Island heals him.

sleepyjeff 03-26-2009 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 275207)
Island heals him.

Or maybe Jack saves him.....wouldn't that freak out Dharmaville...."what is this Janitor doing here?":D

lashbear 03-26-2009 01:18 PM

Hey !! We can watch ALL the back-episodes on ABC.com now !! Anyone for a Lost-athon tonight at our place?

RStar 03-26-2009 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lashbear (Post 275260)
Anyone for a Lost-athon tonight at our place?

Not if you're not home! ;)

Who is Sebastian?

JWBear 03-26-2009 05:20 PM

The guy in the chair:


SzczerbiakManiac 03-29-2009 07:28 PM

Free Geronimo Jackson Song
 
For a limited time (I don't know how long, so you better hurry if you're interested) you can download a free Geronimo Jackson song called "Dharma Lady" from the iTunes Music Store. I think you must have an account, but the song is free. Just search the iTMS for "Geronimo Jackson" and you'll see it. This song was hinted at on the March 4th Official Lost Video Podcast.

lashbear 03-30-2009 12:04 AM

Brad drove us past lots of LOST locations today !! :D

...we got to see Sawyer nude sumbaking !








...I wish

sleepyjeff 03-31-2009 11:22 AM

From episode 5(This place is Death of this season:

Quote:

BEN: There’s someone… someone here in Los Angeles. Let me take you to them and I’ll show you the proof.

SUN: Someone? Who?

BEN: The same person that’s gonna show us how to get back to the Island.

KATE: [Standing behind Ben] Is that what this is about? [Walks toward Jack.] You knew about this.

JACK: No. No I was go…

KATE: And that’s why you were pretending to care about Aaron to convince me to go back there! [Points toward her car.]

JACK: I wasn’t pretending anything.

KATE: [Backing towards her car] This is insane. You guys are crazy.

JACK: [Approaches Kate] Kate.

KATE: [Sharply] Jack! Don’t. [Opens her car door and climbs in.]

[Sayid turns and walks away from the group.]

BEN: Sayid.[nervously] Where are you going?

SAYID: [Stops and turns toward Ben] I don’t want any part of this. [Turns toward Jack] And if I see you [points to Ben] or him again it will be extremely unpleasant for all of us.

[Sayid turns and walks away while the screech of Kate’s tires is heard leaving the parking lot.]
...and now from the most recent episode(He's our you...


Quote:

OLDHAM: It's beyond your control so fighting it is a poor use of your energies. You see whether you struggle or not, one thing's for sure friend, you will tell us the truth.

[Switch to a marina. Ben, Sun, Kate, Jack, and Sayid are on the pier.] Sun had a gun to Ben's throat.]

BEN: There's somebody. Somebody here in Los Angeles, let me take you to them.

SUN: Who?

BEN: The same person that's going to show us how to get back to the island

KATE: So that's what this is about? This is insane. You are all crazy.

[Kate walks to her car, gets in and drives away. Sayid starts walking away.]

BEN: Sayid, where are you going?

SAYID: I don't want any part of this. [points to Ben] If I see you again it'll be extremely unpleasant for us both.

[Sayid turns and walks away. Switch to a lounge. Sayid is sitting at the bar downing a drink. A woman speaks. It is Ilana.]

Interesting:)

Cadaverous Pallor 03-31-2009 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleepyjeff (Post 276152)
From episode 5(This place is Death of this season:



...and now from the most recent episode(He's our you...





Interesting:)

Am I missing something?

JWBear 03-31-2009 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 276166)
Am I missing something?

The dialog is different.

sleepyjeff 03-31-2009 12:55 PM

^Exactly! It was a flashback to a scene from a previous episode...except, it wasn't;)

JWBear 03-31-2009 02:18 PM

I believe that it isn't the first time they did that (same event, but slightly different when viewed from the perspective of two different characters).

Are they trying to tell us something, or are they messing with our minds?

Ghoulish Delight 03-31-2009 02:20 PM

Or are they not reshooting, but using the best takes they had to string together approximately the same scene from different angles with no intention of changing them meaning at all, hoping no one notices?

Cadaverous Pallor 03-31-2009 08:11 PM

I did notice the difference, but I thought, yeah, that's what they have always done. In the first season we learned about people's pasts in piecemeal flashbacks that we thought went a certain way but were later revealed to be less than full stories. Sun has flashbacks showing Jin being mean to her and coming home with blood on his hands. Jin has flashbacks and we see him under pressure from her dad, doing the dirty work and coming home with blood on his hands. Same scenes, different angles, extra dialog, more information.

sleepyjeff 03-31-2009 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 276255)
I did notice the difference, but I thought, yeah, that's what they have always done. In the first season we learned about people's pasts in piecemeal flashbacks that we thought went a certain way but were later revealed to be less than full stories. Sun has flashbacks showing Jin being mean to her and coming home with blood on his hands. Jin has flashbacks and we see him under pressure from her dad, doing the dirty work and coming home with blood on his hands. Same scenes, different angles, extra dialog, more information.


And that probably is what this is....but this time it wasn't just extra dialog....some of the words were changed altogether.

Can you tell I love this show:D

BarTopDancer 04-01-2009 10:02 PM

DUDE (the 2nd to last scene).

Ghoulish Delight 04-01-2009 10:31 PM

Boooooooooooooooooo!

I, for one LIKE th new Jack.

Horrible. Horrible episode. Horrible.

It's BEN! It's freaking BEN! "Innocent child" my ass. It's fvcking Ben. Period. End of story. There is NO reason any of those three should be going to any effort to save the little fvck. It's BEN!

But alright, let's pretend I overlook that utter, absurd, ridiculous, completely fvcking stupid bullsh*t that they for some ridiculous reason care about Ben simply because he's a child, never mind that he grown up to be BEN! Let's pretend I accept the retardedly simplistic "but he's a CHILD" crap.

Yes, let's pretend.

So they find Richard. And he says, "He'll lose his innocence, you sure?"

There. Goodbye to the only SHRED of justification for them wanting to save Ben. He's not "Ben" yet, he's just an innocent boy, right? Well here's Richard telling you he'll lose his innocence. So hey, no more reason to save him, right? No more innocence, right?

No? You're going to go ahead and save his evil ass? Seirously? W. T. F.?!?!?!

Bullsh*t.

There isn't a reason in the effing world that any of them should have wanted to save Ben, child or not. Period. Bullsh*t.

BarTopDancer 04-01-2009 10:38 PM

If what happened already happened (the cleanse and other events) then it's playing out as it's supposed to happen. They aren't able to change the future.

I wonder if this event took place before or after Richard and Ben met in the jungle a few seasons ago.

It was interesting that Richard took him to Jacob's cabin, and there was a shadow in there. I heard someone say he should clear it with Charles and someone else. Did anyone catch the other name?

Ghoulish Delight 04-01-2009 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 276504)
If what happened already happened (the cleanse and other events) then it's playing out as it's supposed to happen. They aren't able to change the future.

That doesn't require them to actively do something. There is no logical motivation. They should have done nothing, and something else should have intervened to save him. For them to decide to save him is bullsh*t. Jack had it right. Don't do sh*t, if he's supposed to be saved, something will save him.

Quote:

I wonder if this event took place before or after Richard and Ben met in the jungle a few seasons ago.
After.

Quote:

It was interesting that Richard took him to Jacob's cabin, and there was a shadow in there. I heard someone say he should clear it with Charles and someone else. Did anyone catch the other name?
That wasn't Jacob's cabin, that was Smokey's temple. Just watched it again, didn't see a shadow. And the other name sounded like "Elle" as in Elle Farday.

JWBear 04-01-2009 10:48 PM

That wasn't Jacob's cabin, it was the Temple.

Charles (Widmore) and Elle (Mrs Hawking).

(ETA: GD beat me to it.)

JWBear 04-01-2009 10:52 PM

Oh... And was that a young Tom leading Kate & James to Richard?

sleepyjeff 04-02-2009 01:56 AM

Whatever happened, happened my eye......in the time travel debate between Hurley(who doesn't buy whh) and Miles(a big believer in whh) Miles seemed to be full of answers but Hurley stumped him with his final question.

I agree with GD....not a very good episode...in fact, I am going to come out and say this one was the worse one this year and possibly the worse one in the past two years....no way they go thru all that trouble to save a kid that is either going to live anyway (if they really believe in the whh stuff) or if not grow up to become the man who kills, tortures, kidnaps and basically ruins the lives of all those who are trying to save him. Especially had a hard time believing that Juliet, the woman who went thru some much torment at Ben's hands(who was it again that sent Juliet's lover to his death?) would do so much to save him.....and worse yet, deliver him to the others:rolleyes:

Maybe on re=watch I'll catch something redeeming about this episode; but as it stands now, Hurley/Miles aside, this one was a waste of valuable Lost time...imho.

Ghoulish Delight 04-02-2009 07:15 AM

Oh, and it's going to wipe Ben's memory?! Seriously?! That's the best they could come up with? Fvck, they might as well have had Ben build 3PO while they were at it.

scaeagles 04-02-2009 07:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 276503)
There isn't a reason in the effing world that any of them should have wanted to save Ben, child or not. Period. Bullsh*t.

I disagree. Sawyer and Juliet are both quite happy with the lives they currently have and have made that very clear.

Kate would never had had Aaron if it weren't for Ben.

The process of getting to where they are sucked, certainly, but those three wouldn't have traded it with where they are now.

Jack, on the other hand, doesnt want to help Ben. Obviously Sayid wants him dead. Jin.....that one is questionable as to why he rendered aid.

Ghoulish Delight 04-02-2009 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scaeagles (Post 276542)
I disagree. Sawyer and Juliet are both quite happy with the lives they currently have and have made that very clear.

Kate would never had had Aaron if it weren't for Ben.

None of which matters. Sawyer and Juliet's happy little life would be under no threat if Ben died in that operating room. He was beyond medical help and they would have suffered no consequences if he died.

But that's beside the point, because he doesn't die. That's a fact. Ben Linus grows up to become Ben Linus. So they can't kill him, they can't prevent him from being saved. That doesn't mean they have any reason to do be the ones that save him. There is no logical emotional reason for that. It's Ben.

scaeagles 04-02-2009 09:58 AM

Depends.

It would seems as if their reasoning is entirely the reason why Ben Linus becomes Ben Linus. Circular, but if they don't save him in that fashion, he doesn't become who he is. If he isn't who he is, they don't have the opportunity to save him in that fashion.

I do see what you are saying, I just disagree. I wasn't a huge fan of the episode, but it wasn't because of that.

RStar 04-02-2009 10:15 AM

They should have called this episode "And Kate knocks on many doors".....

sleepyjeff 04-02-2009 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RStar (Post 276586)
They should have called this episode "And Kate knocks on many doors".....

:snap:

Cadaverous Pallor 04-02-2009 03:15 PM

Yeah, totally lame.

Why would the writers make Richard say "he'll never be the same, you sure you still want me to take him?" Why give them the choice, which then makes it even more stupid for them to say yes?

They tried very hard to show that Kate loves all children now due to her own experiences but I found it not only ridiculous but insulting to parents everywhere. The kid is already evil. He's already SET A VAN AND HOUSE ON FIRE TO BETRAY HIS OWN PEOPLE. And Kate/Sawyer/Juliette can't pretend these things from their past/Ben's future haven't happend, because they have.

Sure, Ben has to live, but it doesn't have to be Anakin-building-3po. They didn't have to Nuke the Fridge. Something else could have saved him.

Lame. :(

Ghoulish Delight 04-02-2009 03:20 PM

Actually, it's all moot as there is no way Sayid should have failed to kill him without something else preventing him from doing so. Fully loaded gun, point blank, no interference, and the trained killer takes 1 shot and walks away? Don't think so.

sleepyjeff 04-06-2009 02:27 PM

Upon re-watch I did find something worthwhile: That dock scene has changed, ever so slightly, again.

Also notice that in the background a boat named Illusion
:eek:

Quote:

BEN: There's someone. Someone here in Los Angeles. Let me take you to them.

SUN: Who?

BEN: The same person that's going to show us how to get back to the island.

KATE: [to Jack] Is that what this is about? You knew about this?

JACK: No. No. I was…

KATE: [interrupts] And that is why you were pretending to care about Aaron? To convince me to go back there?

JACK: I wasn't pretending anything.

KATE: This is insane. You guys are crazy.

JACK: Kate.

KATE: Jack! Don't!
Compare to the quotes in post # 360.

SzczerbiakManiac 04-06-2009 02:49 PM

Shenanigans on Lost
Some pretty damming photo evidence relating to young Ben (aka Harry Potter Ben... lol) getting shot.

Ghoulish Delight 04-06-2009 02:54 PM

Sadly, I'm starting to not even give them enough credit to be purposely trying to mislead us. It's seeming more and more like pure laziness/sloppiness.

sleepyjeff 04-06-2009 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SzczerbiakManiac (Post 277360)
Shenanigans on Lost
Some pretty damming photo evidence relating to young Ben (aka Harry Potter Ben... lol) getting shot.

Wow, I didnt catch that one.

sleepyjeff 04-06-2009 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 277363)
Sadly, I'm starting to not even give them enough credit to be purposely trying to mislead us. It's seeming more and more like pure laziness/sloppiness.

I go back and forth...some things seem like it would be more work to make the "mistake" than to not(like that ghostbusting scene in DOA where all the frames on the wall were metal when Miles headed up the stairs and wood when he came back down)......other things do seem to be just plain laziness(like the eye glasses in Frank's shirt pocket appearing and disapearing).

:confused:

Ghoulish Delight 04-06-2009 03:45 PM

From that link

Quote:

or why Richard has been the same age since the 1950’s. Who cares?
Considering that they've bothered to age (or un-age) Whitmore, Ben, Eloise, etc. AND the fact that Richard's lack of aging has been explicitly mentioned on the show (Sawyer if I recall correctly), I'm willing to be that isn't a "Eh, whatever" decission, there's clearly something behind that.

While this particular one (Ben's wound switching sides) appears to be a major mistake, most of what's said on that site is yet more, 'Why do they keep leaving things a mystery?!?!" whining from Lost fans. Ummmm, because if they answer all the questions, the show is over. Why don't you wait until the show is done before you start bitching about things that aren't answered yet. I personally watch the show BECAUSE there are unanswered mysteries. I may be missing something here, but I'm pretty sure that's the point of the show.

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 04-06-2009 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 276645)
Actually, it's all moot as there is no way Sayid should have failed to kill him without something else preventing him from doing so. Fully loaded gun, point blank, no interference, and the trained killer takes 1 shot and walks away? Don't think so.

Ben shot Locke at point blank and Locke didn't die. I toss this up to the Island doesn't want Locke to die. And it doesn't want Ben to die. Whatever IT (the Island) is. Bah.

sleepyjeff 04-06-2009 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 277382)
From that link

Considering that they've bothered to age (or un-age) Whitmore, Ben, Eloise, etc. AND the fact that Richard's lack of aging has been explicitly mentioned on the show (Sawyer if I recall correctly), I'm willing to be that isn't a "Eh, whatever" decission, there's clearly something behind that.


Certainly......there have been some instances where Richards agelessness has been hinted at(like when Ben asked him if he remembered Birthdays) to outright mentioned as a matter of fact(like when Juliet said he was "very old").

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 04-06-2009 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 276538)
Oh, and it's going to wipe Ben's memory?! Seriously?! That's the best they could come up with? Fvck, they might as well have had Ben build 3PO while they were at it.

That was actually the only thing about the episode that really bothered me - the memory wipe.

I give props to the actress who plays Kate, because I think it was her finest work. She started out this show with hardly anything to recommend her besides her natural beauty. It was well worth it to see her scene with Claire's mother. And I thought it was a simple and good reason for Kate to return to the Island after so much protesting.

And, like or hate Ben, I still think the verdict is out. If it turns out the Island is the most important thing ever, and Ben has really done nothing but serve the Island, then blame the piece of **** Island. Heh. I think I'll reevaluate how I feel about most of the characters after the series ends.

Ghoulish Delight 04-06-2009 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eliza Hodgkins 1812 (Post 277396)

And, like or hate Ben, I still think the verdict is out. If it turns out the Island is the most important thing ever, and Ben has really done nothing but serve the Island, then blame the piece of **** Island. Heh.

It may turn out that way, but all the characters know at this point of decision is that he's the direct cause of most of their suffering and that little boy is going to grow up to be directly and indirectly responsible for the deaths of many people they considered friends. And even if they could see clearly enough to realize that space-time continuity meant they could in no way PREVENT him from growing up that way, no amount of motherly instinct can make me believe that any of them would be able to overlook who that boy is enough to take an active role in saving his life. Unless the island is mind-controlling them, it's nonsense.

SzczerbiakManiac 04-06-2009 05:47 PM

Just to make the conversations easier to compare:

BEN: There's someone. someone here in Los Angeles. Let me take you to them and I'll show you the proof.
BEN: There's somebody. Somebody here in Los Angeles, let me take you to them.
BEN: There's someone. Someone here in Los Angeles. Let me take you to them.

SUN: Someone? Who?
SUN: Who?
SUN: Who?

BEN: The same person that's gonna show us how to get back to the Island.
BEN: The same person that's going to show us how to get back to the island
BEN: The same person that's going to show us how to get back to the island.

KATE: [Standing behind Ben] Is that what this is about? [Walks toward Jack.] You knew about this.
KATE: So that's what this is about? This is insane. You are all crazy.
KATE: [to Jack] Is that what this is about? You knew about this?

JACK: No. No I was go...
JACK: No. No. I was…

KATE: And that's why you were pretending to care about Aaron to convince me to go back there! [Points toward her car.]
KATE: [interrupts] And that is why you were pretending to care about Aaron? To convince me to go back there?

JACK: I wasn't pretending anything.
JACK: I wasn't pretending anything.

KATE: [Backing towards her car] This is insane. You guys are crazy.
KATE: This is insane. You guys are crazy.

JACK: [Approaches Kate] Kate.
JACK: Kate.

KATE: [Sharply] Jack! Don't. [Opens her car door and climbs in.]
KATE: Jack! Don't!

BEN: Sayid.[nervously] Where are you going?
BEN: Sayid, where are you going?

SAYID: [Stops and turns toward Ben] I don't want any part of this. [Turns toward Jack] And if I see you [points to Ben] or him again it will be extremely unpleasant for all of us.
SAYID: I don't want any part of this. [points to Ben] If I see you again it'll be extremely unpleasant for us both.

Cadaverous Pallor 04-06-2009 07:00 PM

Back in the days of actual film editing, a mistake like the wrong-side-of-chest gunshot would have been due to a flipped piece of film. Is that even an issue anymore?

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 04-06-2009 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 277400)
It may turn out that way, but all the characters know at this point of decision is that he's the direct cause of most of their suffering and that little boy is going to grow up to be directly and indirectly responsible for the deaths of many people they considered friends. And even if they could see clearly enough to realize that space-time continuity meant they could in no way PREVENT him from growing up that way, no amount of motherly instinct can make me believe that any of them would be able to overlook who that boy is enough to take an active role in saving his life. Unless the island is mind-controlling them, it's nonsense.

I don't know. Conscience is a funny thing. I believe that one of them was capable of making a decision to kill a child in the name of Greater Good. And I can see on of them capable of making a decision to see an injured child and ignore the man that child becomes. Both are totally believable to me. I bought Sayid's reaction. I bought Jack's. And I bought Kate, Juliette and Sawyer's reactions.

I rather like that Sayid thought he was preventing something but instead is directly responsible for making Ben the person he turns out to be.

sleepyjeff 04-06-2009 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SzczerbiakManiac (Post 277412)
Just to make the conversations easier to compare:

BEN: There's someone. someone here in Los Angeles. Let me take you to them and I'll show you the proof.
BEN: There's somebody. Somebody here in Los Angeles, let me take you to them.
BEN: There's someone. Someone here in Los Angeles. Let me take you to them.

SUN: Someone? Who?
SUN: Who?
SUN: Who?

BEN: The same person that's gonna show us how to get back to the Island.
BEN: The same person that's going to show us how to get back to the island
BEN: The same person that's going to show us how to get back to the island.

KATE: [Standing behind Ben] Is that what this is about? [Walks toward Jack.] You knew about this.
KATE: So that's what this is about? This is insane. You are all crazy.
KATE: [to Jack] Is that what this is about? You knew about this?

JACK: No. No I was go...
JACK: No. No. I was…

KATE: And that's why you were pretending to care about Aaron to convince me to go back there! [Points toward her car.]
KATE: [interrupts] And that is why you were pretending to care about Aaron? To convince me to go back there?

JACK: I wasn't pretending anything.
JACK: I wasn't pretending anything.

KATE: [Backing towards her car] This is insane. You guys are crazy.
KATE: This is insane. You guys are crazy.

JACK: [Approaches Kate] Kate.
JACK: Kate.

KATE: [Sharply] Jack! Don't. [Opens her car door and climbs in.]
KATE: Jack! Don't!

BEN: Sayid.[nervously] Where are you going?
BEN: Sayid, where are you going?

SAYID: [Stops and turns toward Ben] I don't want any part of this. [Turns toward Jack] And if I see you [points to Ben] or him again it will be extremely unpleasant for all of us.
SAYID: I don't want any part of this. [points to Ben] If I see you again it'll be extremely unpleasant for us both.

I can't wait to see if that visit this scene again.....it'd be nice if it was exactly the same as one of the above(to prove once and for all that it's just lazy editing) or if it's blatently different in some way(so that even the casual viewer can see that something has changed).

Tom 04-07-2009 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 277427)
Back in the days of actual film editing, a mistake like the wrong-side-of-chest gunshot would have been due to a flipped piece of film. Is that even an issue anymore?


Actually, much more an issue now than bevore. You couldn't really flop a piece of film because the two sides of a strip are not the same and it can really only be projected one way. However, now with digital editing it's easy to flop a shot with the push of a button. That was actually the first thing I checked in those stills from the episode, and while it's not entirely conclusive, I don't think any flopping happened. The second shot shows Ben with an abrasion on the right side of his face (his right), which I think was there before being shot, from to his father. In the first still, that abrasion isn't visible, but that side of his face is in darkness. It doesn't seem to be on the other side. Also the wound in the second still isn't just on the wrong side, but is farther removed from the center of his chest. I think it was just misplaced, for whatever reason.

Pirate Bill 04-07-2009 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eliza Hodgkins 1812 (Post 277436)
I rather like that Sayid thought he was preventing something but instead is directly responsible for making Ben the person he turns out to be.

As are Jack, Kate, Juliette, and Sawyer. If Jack had operated on Ben then maybe he would have grown up to hate the hostiles instead of join them. After all, one of them tried to kill him but he was saved by a member of Dharma. Instead, Jack doesn't operate (was that what he was brought back to do but refused his calling?) and Kate et al take him to the hostiles where he is cured, memory wiped, innocence lost. Which is what was supposed to happen because you can't change the future.

sleepyjeff 04-07-2009 01:19 PM

More thoughts on What happened happened:

1) Back a season or two there was an episode(Cabin fever I think) in which Richard presented a very young John Locke a test.....one of the items in the test was a comic book(The mystery tales #40). This was no make believe prop; the comic actually does exsist and the very last story in the book is about a bridge collapse on March 31st. The engineer wishes he could go back in time to stop the collapse....the next day he finds out that the collapse hasn't happened...yet. In the end he does stop the bridge from collapsing. The title of the story is March has 32 days......WHH aired on April 1st(March 32nd);)

2) Everytime Jack crashes on the Island Ben needs an operation...what's up with that:D

3) Did Kate have someone watching Aaron while he slept two doors away? Seems kind of odd to almost lose your son in a grocery store one minute and then leave him alone in a hotel room the next:confused:

4) When Juliet decided to give Ben up to the others it looked almost like the idea came to her in a short sort of trance......could she have been given some sort of information from the past/future like Daniel gave to Desmond???

sleepyjeff 04-07-2009 04:49 PM

5) Which came first, the chicken or the egg?.................It can be said that the reason Ben went to such extraordinary lengths(kidnapping, mind games, imprisonment, etc) to get Jack to operate on his tumor was that Ben knew, way back in 1977, that Jack refused to operate on himself........but........the main reason Jack refused to operate on Ben was because of those very same extraordinary lengths:eek:

Ghoulish Delight 04-07-2009 04:58 PM

Except Ben's memory is going to be wiped.

BarTopDancer 04-07-2009 05:07 PM

I'm going to be disappointed if the conclusion of Lost is essentially "definition circular see circular definition".

Cadaverous Pallor 04-07-2009 07:16 PM

Every time I open this thread I get more and more annoyed at what awfulness has happend. The show was f'n amazing only a couple of episodes ago and now I'm down in the dumps about it.



I'm sorry guys, I just cannot buy what these characters have done, and even if I could, it means that I now hate these characters for being so f'n annoying and stupid.

sleepyjeff 04-08-2009 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 277627)
Except Ben's memory is going to be wiped.

True....but the Others seem to keep pretty good records of anyone and everyone associated with the Island. Jack's refusal to operate on Ben may not be a matter of public(Dharma) record; but the fact that someone named Jack Shepard was there at the same time as someone named Sayid Jerral shot him will be........not a stretch to put 2 and 2 together for a smart guy like Ben.

sleepyjeff 04-08-2009 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 277629)
I'm going to be disappointed if the conclusion of Lost is essentially "definition circular see circular definition".

Breaking the circular cycle may just be the whole point of Lost.


:D

Disneyphile 04-09-2009 01:06 AM

Did anyone happen to take a very close look (i.e. pause) at the large hieroglyph at the back of the lower temple where Ben encountered Smokey for "judgement"?

It depicts Anubis, the Egyptian god of the dead, who is kneeling to Smokey, presenting him with an offering, most likely a soul.

Also, remember when the woman asked Lipidus, "What lies at the shadow of the statue?"... well, take a look at this wiki entry about the Egyptian belief of shadows: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egyptian_soul.

This further reinforces my theories about the Atlantis/Egypt mythology being the basis of the whole "mystery". :)

However, I totally won't rule out the possibility that the island itself is the underworld. (Smokey being the cumulative energy of the harvested souls.)

Also, ever notice how Richard seems timeless (even perhaps immortal)... and he has a LOT of eyeliner... take a look at the heiroglyph of the eye of Horus (king of the gods on earth), the son of Osiris, who is the other Egyptian god of the underworld. Richard just might be Horus...

Which brings us to Ken's theory:

The island is the gateway to the underworld, where souls are judged, as depicted in the hieroglyphs in the temple, and as we witnessed via Smokey and Ben.

scaeagles 04-09-2009 06:05 AM

That was a great episode.

Pirate Bill 04-09-2009 09:36 AM

A couple new theories of mine:

1. Richard (who doesn't actually wear eyeliner, it's just his eyelashes) is what Locke now is. The island resurrected him so now he doesn't age. Locke now won't age.

2. The new losties (Ilana and friends) have been "infected" by whatever "infected" Rousseau's crew. They've been changed into others.

SzczerbiakManiac 04-09-2009 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Disneyphile (Post 277971)
Richard seems timeless (even perhaps immortal)... and he has a LOT of eyeliner...

Just FYI, Nestor Carbonell's eyelashes are naturally very dark. He does not wear eyeliner.

SzczerbiakManiac 04-09-2009 09:50 AM

Bah! Pirate Bill beat me to it. :)

Disneyphile 04-09-2009 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SzczerbiakManiac (Post 278010)
Just FYI, Nestor Carbonell's eyelashes are naturally very dark. He does not wear eyeliner.

Damn. :( (And, why the hell can't I have eyelashes like that?)

But, hey... the hieroglyphs are still definitely Egyptian in nature, and some of the myths seem to coincide with what's been happening.

sleepyjeff 04-09-2009 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scaeagles (Post 277975)
That was a great episode.

I agree...I loved this episode.

Disneyphile 04-09-2009 10:42 AM

Ben is friggin evil. I love him. :evil:

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 04-09-2009 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Disneyphile (Post 278034)
Ben is friggin evil. I love him. :evil:

I think my friend Mike and I may be the only two people who don't think he's evil. Heh.

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 04-09-2009 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pirate Bill (Post 278006)
A couple new theories of mine:

1. Richard (who doesn't actually wear eyeliner, it's just his eyelashes) is what Locke now is. The island resurrected him so now he doesn't age. Locke now won't age.

2. The new losties (Ilana and friends) have been "infected" by whatever "infected" Rousseau's crew. They've been changed into others.

Hmm. Re: #2, I think they're working for Charles W.

Charles W. who was, apparently, Wolverine when he was a younger man. Heh.

scaeagles 04-09-2009 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eliza Hodgkins 1812 (Post 278068)
Hmm. Re: #2, I think they're working for Charles W.

Charles W. who was, apparently, Wolverine when he was a younger man. Heh.

I had thought that, but then realized they most likely would have taken Ben out. I think she is just a tough lady who decided to take charge after Cesar was shot.

Stan4dSteph 04-09-2009 01:19 PM

Those two new crashies definitely have some sort of knowledge of the island or something. That phrase was a test I think, to see how the pilot would react.

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 04-09-2009 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scaeagles (Post 278085)
I had thought that, but then realized they most likely would have taken Ben out. I think she is just a tough lady who decided to take charge after Cesar was shot.

Hmmm. That is a very, very good point.

sleepyjeff 04-09-2009 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stan4dSteph (Post 278087)
Those two new crashies definitely have some sort of knowledge of the island or something. That phrase was a test I think, to see how the pilot would react.


I totally agree.....their behavior was by far the creepiest last night.

Cadaverous Pallor 04-09-2009 02:28 PM

So....all the other stuff Ben did was a-ok, all the other people he tortured or killed, directly or indirectly...but having his daughter killed instead of leaving the island, that's the one thing the island has a problem with?

The smokey bit was hokey. Did anyone find it compelling, or somehow emotional?

sleepyjeff 04-09-2009 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Disneyphile (Post 277971)
Did anyone happen to take a very close look (i.e. pause) at the large hieroglyph at the back of the lower temple where Ben encountered Smokey for "judgement"?

It depicts Anubis, the Egyptian god of the dead, who is kneeling to Smokey, presenting him with an offering, most likely a soul.

Also, remember when the woman asked Lipidus, "What lies at the shadow of the statue?"... well, take a look at this wiki entry about the Egyptian belief of shadows: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egyptian_soul.

This further reinforces my theories about the Atlantis/Egypt mythology being the basis of the whole "mystery". :)

However, I totally won't rule out the possibility that the island itself is the underworld. (Smokey being the cumulative energy of the harvested souls.)

Also, ever notice how Richard seems timeless (even perhaps immortal)... and he has a LOT of eyeliner... take a look at the heiroglyph of the eye of Horus (king of the gods on earth), the son of Osiris, who is the other Egyptian god of the underworld. Richard just might be Horus...

Which brings us to Ken's theory:

The island is the gateway to the underworld, where souls are judged, as depicted in the hieroglyphs in the temple, and as we witnessed via Smokey and Ben.


Great stuff there...brings me back to the very first episode. When the Losties were on the beach and the monster was ripping apart the Jungle.....many had something to say about it:

Quote:



Shannon: "What was that?"

Charlie: "That was weird, right?"

Walt: "Was that Vincent?"

Micheal: "It's not Vincent"

Claire: "Did anybody see that"

Hurley: "Yeah"

Random Lostie: "It didn't sound like an animal, not exactly"

Rose: "That sound it made, I kept thinking that there was something familier about it"


Now on the face of it, it would seem that only Rose was offering us any kind of clue to what that thing was......but although I and just about everyone else dismissed it as the silliness of a child not knowing that a dog is not capable of making that kind of racket I think Walt may have been more accurate than we all once thought.

Jackals are, after all, members of the canine family.

Besides, does anyone remember Walt being wrong about anything?

He told Locke not to open the Hatch...
He tried to prevent his father from building the raft...
He even told Shannon to be quiet...

:eek:

BarTopDancer 04-09-2009 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eliza Hodgkins 1812 (Post 278067)
I think my friend Mike and I may be the only two people who don't think he's evil. Heh.

I'm not convinced he's evil and this week's episode sways me to the not-evil camp even more. He didn't kill Rousseau, told her to run when she hears the whispers (I was hoping they would get more into what the whispers are), wouldn't kill Alex and you could see him rethink killing Penny when her son appeared.

I haven't liked him most of the series but I didn't like Juliet either and she's proven herself to not be horrible (thus far). I still want to know what happened to the children the Others took at the beginning of the series..

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 04-09-2009 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 278125)

I haven't liked him most of the series but I didn't like Juliet either and she's proven herself to not be horrible (thus far). I still want to know what happened to the children the Others took at the beginning of the series..

I've loved him, evil or good, because he's what interested me about the show at a time when I was rapidly losing interest.

I would like to know what happened to those kids, too.

Also, when he warned Frenchie about the whispers, I thought it was more threat than out of consideration for her safety. He said, "If you want your daughter to live," which I took to mean that if Rosseau followed the whispers as a way to find her daughter, they would kill her daughter. I don't know. I've been wrong many times about this show.

Pirate Bill 04-09-2009 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 278120)
So....all the other stuff Ben did was a-ok, all the other people he tortured or killed, directly or indirectly...

I'm having trouble thinking of someone Ben killed or had killed who Smokey would not judge to be bad or bad for the island. I'm not saying Ben was justified in killing off the Dharma folks or that they were bad people deserving of death. Just that it's probably what the island wanted, by Smokey's judgement.

Maybe Alex's death is, so far, the only "bad" consequence as a direct result of Ben's selfish actions.

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 04-09-2009 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pirate Bill (Post 278134)
I'm having trouble thinking of someone Ben killed or had killed who Smokey would not judge to be bad or bad for the island. I'm not saying Ben was justified in killing off the Dharma folks or that they were bad people deserving of death. Just that it's probably what the island wanted, by Smokey's judgement.

Maybe Alex's death is, so far, the only "bad" consequence as a direct result of Ben's selfish actions.

See, her death was less a result of his selfishness than some others, wasn't it? If he was doing what the Island wanted - not give up at any cost - than he may feel guilty over Alex's death because he could have prevented it. But he may have done the right thing (for the Island) by not preventing it. Whereas, when he sent Goodwin off on a dangerous mission to infiltrate the tail end crash victims' camp, Ben did so to separate Goodwin and Juliette because he was jealous. That was definitely selfishly motivated. He had to send someone, sure, but he sent Goodwin to be a prick.

I wonder if we'll ever fully understand how Smokey passes judgment. When Eko saw visions within the smoke, he was then killed. I wonder if it's how one judges himself that decides whether he lives or dies. Eko had respect for the Island, but perhaps Eko judged himself as unworthy and was killed. (Or, you know, because the actor wanted to leave the show.) And perhaps Ben, even faced with the consequences of his actions, truly believed he did what was necessary. Even if he is haunted by guilt and craves forgiveness. Based only on two scenarios, it seems the person being judged as some say. But I am probably grasping at straws. :)

Still wondering about the curious mechanical noise Smokey makes when it's out and about the Island.

sleepyjeff 04-09-2009 05:01 PM

After last nights episode one does wonder what Ben's purpose is now.....follow Locke around like a puppy dog? He's been forbidden to attempt to usurp Locke anymore and since it appears that Locke really doesn't need Ben's help finding anything at this point just where does he fit in?

Is he simply just another "other"? A mere member of Locke's flock? If so, why did he even bother coming back to the Island? Seems to me he'd have more fun if he just left Locke, the Island et al....take his toys and go home so to speak:

Maaaybe Ben should just YAGE:

How might that go:

Quote:


Well I'm gonna go then! And I don't need any of this! I don't need this stuff, and I don't need you. I don't need anything except this and that's it and that's the only thing I need, is this. I don't need this or this. Just this picture of me and Alex. And this gun, the picture of me and Alex and the gun and that's all I need. And this donkey wheel. The picture of me and Alex, the gun and this donkey wheel, and that's all I need. And this Ajira water bottle. The picture of me and Alex, and this Ajira water bottle, and the donkey wheel and the gun. And this doll. The picture of me and Alex, this gun and the donkey wheel and the doll and that's all I need. And that's all I need too. I don't need one other thing, not one - I need this! The gun, and the black baton thing, and the doll, and the Ajira water bottle, for sure. Well what are you looking at? What do you think I am, some kind of a jerk or something? And this! And that's all I need. The picture of me and Alex, the gun, the donkey wheel, this black baton thing and the doll.

Posted by blybug @ http://www.losttv-forum.com/forum/forum.php
:):):)

BarTopDancer 04-09-2009 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eliza Hodgkins 1812 (Post 278130)
Also, when he warned Frenchie about the whispers, I thought it was more threat than out of consideration for her safety. He said, "If you want your daughter to live," which I took to mean that if Rosseau followed the whispers as a way to find her daughter, they would kill her daughter. I don't know. I've been wrong many times about this show.

I did not think of the comment in that light. Perhaps it was a threat.

And what are those whispers? Where do they come from? What are they saying?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pirate Bill (Post 278134)
I'm having trouble thinking of someone Ben killed or had killed who Smokey would not judge to be bad or bad for the island. I'm not saying Ben was justified in killing off the Dharma folks or that they were bad people deserving of death. Just that it's probably what the island wanted, by Smokey's judgement.

Perhaps we have yet to learn what "bad things" Dharma has done. We know they lied to Ben's father about what they needed him on the island for. Maybe they killed puppies.

sleepyjeff 04-09-2009 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 278177)
Perhaps we have yet to learn what "bad things" Dharma has done. We know they lied to Ben's father about what they needed him on the island for. Maybe they killed puppies.



"But you'll also have to watch out for mass murderers, serial killers, torturers and. . .puppy kickers."

~Daria to her sister Quinn~
Daria


:D

JWBear 04-09-2009 09:20 PM

I finally watched last night's episode




FVCK! That was good!


I love me some resurrected Locke!

BarTopDancer 04-09-2009 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 278120)
The smokey bit was hokey. Did anyone find it compelling, or somehow emotional?

I did in a "this is your life" manner. I was so happy to not have to stop-motion the replay or hunt out the slides on the internet like we had to do for Eko.

MouseWife 04-09-2009 10:00 PM

Locke was awesome.

We watched it and then when my son came home I had to sit quietly while he watched it...so that I wouldn't blow it for him.
Loved when Sun saw Locke through the window.

sleepyjeff 04-09-2009 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 278120)
The smokey bit was hokey. Did anyone find it compelling, or somehow emotional?

I found it a tad hokey myself.....kinda reminded me of Light Magic;)

katiesue 04-10-2009 09:35 AM

My theory on the same scenes with slightly different dialogue. Who's to say that it's not them but in just slightly different times. Like they keep getting sent back to the same place, and since they are the same people the outcome is the same but they don't say the exact same thing each time they're there. Does that make any sense?

sleepyjeff 04-10-2009 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by katiesue (Post 278292)
My theory on the same scenes with slightly different dialogue. Who's to say that it's not them but in just slightly different times. Like they keep getting sent back to the same place, and since they are the same people the outcome is the same but they don't say the exact same thing each time they're there. Does that make any sense?

Exactly!!!

sleepyjeff 04-14-2009 10:49 AM

...and another thing;

The radio transmitting the numbers; when the 815 ers's arrived it was one voice; when the French arrived it was a different voice(perhaps Hurleys) and when 316 arrived it was a third voice.

No way these are production errors in that there are 3 seperate voices...it had to be done purposefully and for a reason.

Are we witnessing 3 Seperate Realities or are people constantly changing the recording? If the latter, why?

BarTopDancer 04-14-2009 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleepyjeff (Post 278746)
Are we witnessing 3 Seperate Realities or are people constantly changing the recording? If the latter, why?

I am watching Through the Looking Glass and the code that Charlie has to enter is the corresponding numbers/notes to Good Vibrations. They said it was programmed by a musician. Could that musician be Charlie?

Morrigoon 04-14-2009 04:47 PM

How many season box sets do I have to catch up on for this thread to make sense to me?

Ghoulish Delight 04-14-2009 04:54 PM

When you find out, let me know.

Cadaverous Pallor 04-16-2009 08:29 AM

I still think the different versions of scenes thing is no deeper than they want to reveal different things to us slowly, much the same way they did in the first season. Sun remembers her history one way, Jin sees it another, and when we saw Jin's flashbacks they involved the same scenes told differently. No big deal.

So let's see where we're at this week.

Kate has become a terrible liar. They did this to her a couple of times before in the last season or so, where she was supposed to be lying and was really obvious. I was as disappointed then as I am now. Remember in the first season when she was the kind of person who could dissolve her identity into new situations without a hitch? Now she can't even keep a basic secret?

Miles' flashbacks were awesome, especially pierced skunk miles. :D

I hope it doesn't go this way, but I keep envisioning the doctor getting wind of the Hostiles coming to kill them and using all his pull to send his beloved wife and only son off the island, bidding her to keep Miles away from the island at all costs, even saying that he doesn't love them.

SzczerbiakManiac 04-16-2009 09:20 AM

I'm wondering if the accident involving The Hatch (Swan station?, I can't remember) that results in The Button needing to be pushed also gave Miles his power.

Stan4dSteph 04-16-2009 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SzczerbiakManiac (Post 278904)
I'm wondering if the accident involving The Hatch (Swan station?, I can't remember) that results in The Button needing to be pushed also gave Miles his power.

That's my guess.

Also loved the reveal of Bram and the "other faction," whoever they are. The "What lies in the shadow of the statue" people.

Ghoulish Delight 04-16-2009 10:40 AM

I'm going with my hunch that the statue shadow people are somehow connected to Richard. Would make sense with Richard's agelessness and the ancient statue.

BarTopDancer 04-16-2009 11:36 AM

Does the 5th toe lie in the shadow of the statue?

BarTopDancer 04-16-2009 12:16 PM

Someone on another board said that the guy who asked about the shadow of the statue was on the most recent flight and is currently on the island.

Stan4dSteph 04-16-2009 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 278923)
Someone on another board said that the guy who asked about the shadow of the statue was on the most recent flight and is currently on the island.

Yes, Bram and the other woman whose name I can't remember.

sleepyjeff 04-16-2009 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SzczerbiakManiac (Post 278904)
I'm wondering if the accident involving The Hatch (Swan station?, I can't remember) that results in The Button needing to be pushed also gave Miles his power.


Yeah, me too. I am also wondering if perhaps the Losties start to see the flashing time-travel light again during this "incident" and Miles, attempting to save his father in spite of his own belief that what happened, happened, grabs a hold of his dad's arm hoping that he will "flash" with him(not a stretch, since on previous flashes whatever the losties were holding did in fact come with them(such as their clothes, a rope, back packs etc).

This would explain why Candle doesn't have an arm in some of those videos;)

BarTopDancer 04-16-2009 04:22 PM

Watching Confirmed Dead...

How did they get the plane on the sea floor?

sleepyjeff 04-16-2009 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 278972)
Watching Confirmed Dead...

How did they get the plane on the sea floor?

Never mind that .....how did they convince the world that a plane that took off from Sydney bound for LA crashed near Java.

That would be like a plane taking off from New York bound for Rome winding up in Tijuana:eek:


Turns out this was indeed a writing/geography error and not something mysterious:(

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 04-17-2009 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stan4dSteph (Post 278932)
Yes, Bram and the other woman whose name I can't remember.

I refer to her as "That whorey bitch who killed Pullo's pretty but shrewish wife."

sleepyjeff 04-30-2009 07:53 PM

Daniel plays the piano.....I wonder if he knows Good Vibrations?

Ghoulish Delight 04-30-2009 08:16 PM

This is starting to look a lot like that episode of Star Trek: Next Generation, where they got stuck in a time loop and they kept going 'round and 'round until finally Data figured out a way to pass a message on to the next time loop that gave them enough of a clue to break the loop (like, say, a sequence of numbers).

Stan4dSteph 05-01-2009 06:56 AM

Poor Daniel, but why was he all "crazy dude waving a gun around?" That really didn't make any sense to me given his character so far, except that it served the plot point of getting him shot.

Ghoulish Delight 05-01-2009 07:25 AM

I think the direction they were going is that his new discovery that it might be possible to change the past had changed his attitude, made him more in charge and assertive.

sleepyjeff 05-01-2009 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 280994)
This is starting to look a lot like that episode of Star Trek: Next Generation, where they got stuck in a time loop and they kept going 'round and 'round until finally Data figured out a way to pass a message on to the next time loop that gave them enough of a clue to break the loop (like, say, a sequence of numbers).

I think you're right.......of course, the creators of Lost probably never watch Star Trek;)

Stan4dSteph 05-13-2009 07:15 PM

Sobek

scaeagles 05-14-2009 04:55 AM

Last night set up an interesting final season.

BarTopDancer 05-14-2009 08:26 AM

I wonder if that was the original incident at the Swan or if them hitting the electromagnetic pocket was the original incident that required the button pushing.

Does anyone remember what the station is where Desmond turned the key?

Ghoulish Delight 05-14-2009 08:29 AM

A bit of a cheat introducing entirely new characters and story to create the cliffhanger. And having some ancient dude transmute himself into looking like Locke pushes things further into the realm of the supernatural. I didn't really love the finale and am less than optimistic about how much I'll like the final season. All of the characters entirely switching motivations on a whim is getting tiresome.

Cadaverous Pallor 05-14-2009 08:39 AM

"I changed my mind". Dunh dunh DUNH!!!! Um, lame.

"Why do you really want to blow up the island?" Jack/Juliet: "Because I'm heartbroken." What??? Not because you hate the goddamned island? Both of them have to have relationship reasons? Lame.

Quick, here's a flashback explaining why Juliet pushes men away! Ok, now immediately have the scene where she pushes Sawyer away! Ok, that's a wrap.

Open the show with the guy who ends up being Locke! Now, reveal that it's him at the end of the show!

They had all season to set up an awesome finale, but instead they crammed it in the last minute. Lazy, sloppy, and not at all effective.

The only moment I actually enjoyed was Juliet going down the chute, because I think Sawyer is at his best when he's losing something. Emotional scene, done well. An anomaly in a sea of WTF.

Oh, and Jacob?? "Here's a pen." "Here's a candy bar." "Talk to me for a second so your beloved gets killed." WHA? And not WHA? in a good way. :rolleyes:

This finale left a bad taste in my mouth, which I hope dissipates by 2010.

Stan4dSteph 05-14-2009 08:50 AM

Wow. Seriously a lot going on last night! The return of Vincent. Rose and Bernard enjoying their "retirement." Did anyone else notice in the scene with Kate and that other little boy that he was holding her toy plane?

The notLocke reveal was awesome! Locke box! So I guess he really is still dead then. Or not.

I think the statue is Sobek. Here's another source of info with the following quote: It was believed, in some sects, that Sobek was the creator of the world.

Also I went searching online, since I was wondering what Richard (Ricardus) had said and didn't take Latin in school, and found that the answer to "What lies in the shadow of the statue." is "Ille que nos omnis servabit."

"He that will save us all."

BarTopDancer 05-14-2009 09:14 AM

The other people who were killed in the fire arrow fight were all non-speaking parts, so them all being killed doesn't really bother me. Easier to do that and focus on the real story line instead of making up random stories like they did for Palo and Nikki. I love that they showed Rose and Bernard in 1977 and being "retired" and Vincent. Hooray for alive doggie!

I was sucked in with Jacob and the dark haired man (good vs. evil?) in the beginning but showing Jacob meeting everyone randomly quickly grew tiresome. Why did he pick those people to meet? Is the dark haired man "the island" - is he the smoke monster, Kate's horse, Christian Sheppard* and notLocke?

And what happened to the kidnapped children and people who disappeared during season 1?

JWBear 05-15-2009 09:54 AM

I think I’m beginning to figure things out… There is a power struggle between Jacob and the other guy – the one he was talking to on the beach. (One of the other boards I read are calling this guy “Esau”; so for simplicity’s sake, so will I) There is something that keeps them from attacking each other directly.

At some point (after the purge?), Esau was trapped in the cabin. The ring of ash kept him from escaping. Ben took Locke to the cabin, thinking this is where Jacob was. Esau was long haired guy we saw; the one that asked Locke for help. Locke broke the ring of ash, thus allowing Esau to escape.

Esau is the one who has been taking the shapes of dead people on the island. It was Esau we saw in the form of Christian, Alex, Eko’s brother, etc. It is Esau who is impersonating Lock.

Esau got Locke to leave the island (and perhaps Ben too). When Locke’s dead body came back to the island, Esau took Locke’s form.

It was Esau/Locke that told Richard to tell PastLocke that he needed to die to save the island.

It was Esau that told Locke to turn the frozen donkey wheel.

It was Esau in the form of Alex that told Ben to do everything Locke said.

Esau has been manipulating Locke and Ben; and he used the time skipping to carry out his plan to defeat Jacob.

I’m sure Hawking and Widmore are working for opposite sides. I’m just not sure yet who is working for which side.


ETA: And I hope Jacob is the good guy, 'cause the actor playing him is totaly hawt!

Cadaverous Pallor 05-15-2009 10:46 AM

If Esau, a character they just made up, really is behind everything then I'm super pissed.

SzczerbiakManiac 05-15-2009 10:47 AM

In the beginning of the episode, when Jacob and Esau were on the beach, Jacob was wearing a white shirt with light pants. Esau was wearing a black shirt and dark pants. Ergo, Esau is clearly the bad guy because everybody knows the good guys wear white.

SzczerbiakManiac 05-15-2009 11:02 AM

This guy posits that Smokey and Esau are the same entity. It makes sense to me.

Stan4dSteph 05-15-2009 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 283313)
If Esau, a character they just made up, really is behind everything then I'm super pissed.

He's not a new character, we're just finally seeing him in his possibly original form. The scene on the beach appears to be from the Black Rock era, but from the dialogue it's clear that Jacob and Esau have been around for a while at that point.

BarTopDancer 05-15-2009 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stan4dSteph (Post 283325)
He's not a new character, we're just finally seeing him in his possibly original form. The scene on the beach appears to be from the Black Rock era, but from the dialogue it's clear that Jacob and Esau have been around for a while at that point.

I was thinking the same thing. When I saw the ship I was thinking it may be the Black Rock. I hope they show more of that era and how the ship ended up so far inland.

Cadaverous Pallor 05-15-2009 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stan4dSteph (Post 283325)
He's not a new character, we're just finally seeing him in his possibly original form. The scene on the beach appears to be from the Black Rock era, but from the dialogue it's clear that Jacob and Esau have been around for a while at that point.

Yes, I understand that. They made that clear in this one episode. Has anything in any of the prior episodes alluded to a dark horse, at all? I sincerely doubt it.

"How do we reconcile conflicting motives? Create a character that was 'there all along'." Last minute, made up bullsh1t. I call Shenanigans.

BarTopDancer 05-15-2009 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 283332)
Yes, I understand that. They made that clear in this one episode. Has anything in any of the prior episodes alluded to a dark horse, at all? I sincerely doubt it.

"How do we reconcile conflicting motives? Create a character that was 'there all along'." Last minute, made up bullsh1t. I call Shenanigans.

Huh? We've already seen him in Jacob's cabin. He's the guy that everyone thought was Locke. Speculation that the "island" was smoky, Kate's horse and Christian were wrong, unless he is also "the island". There have always been themes of good vs. evil.

I'm confused as to why you think he is a new character.

Cadaverous Pallor 05-15-2009 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 283336)
Huh? We've already seen him in Jacob's cabin. He's the guy that everyone thought was Locke. Speculation that the "island" was smoky, Kate's horse and Christian were wrong, unless he is also "the island". There have always been themes of good vs. evil.

I'm confused as to why you think he is a new character.

I'll try one more time.

Up until last night, the presence in Jacob's cabin was Jacob. Locke was Locke. Ghostly apparitions were either interpreted as Jacob, or rather, the Island's intentions manifest as Jacob being Christian etc.

As they've done many times before, they have a new head pop up to be the be-all-end-all answer to everything. Who is the ultimate adversary? It's Ben and the Others. No, it's Dharma, see they were here before. No, meet this guy named Widmore, he's totally it. No, there's this supernatural island presence called Jacob, he's running the show. No, check out this guy Richard, he never ages. No, here, meet ANOTHER SUPERNATURAL GUY, he was at the bottom of this THE WHOLE TIME, totally seriously you gotta believe us. How dare you say that there was no evidence of him before and that we just made him up last minute?!

Maybe it's me, maybe I'm just sick of being bait and switched. Maybe I am over getting Animal Farmed, with the words on the barn door getting changed every time I watch an episode.

How many other things need to be "revealed"? How many times do I have to be told that I wasn't told anything to begin with? By this standard they could do an ultimate final episode where everything we know was utter bullsh1t. Maybe there's yet another man behind the curtain behind the yet another man behind the curtain behind yet another....

:rolleyes:

innerSpaceman 05-15-2009 03:47 PM

So ... I've never seen a minute of the current season. Should I stop right where I am?

BarTopDancer 05-15-2009 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 283367)
I'll try one more time.

Up until last night, the presence in Jacob's cabin was Jacob. Locke was Locke. Ghostly apparitions were either interpreted as Jacob, or rather, the Island's intentions manifest as Jacob being Christian etc.

They never told us it was Jacob. We assumed it was Jacob and that were predicting Jacob may be Locke or Christian. The show never told us this was fact.

Quote:

As they've done many times before, they have a new head pop up to be the be-all-end-all answer to everything.
When did they tell us this? I was always under the impression that these were conclusions we came to, not conclusions the show told us.

Quote:

Maybe it's me, maybe I'm just sick of being bait and switched. Maybe I am over getting Animal Farmed, with the words on the barn door getting changed every time I watch an episode.
How are they bait and switching when they never told us any of this? We assumed it, predicted it, sometimes correctly, sometimes incorrectly.

I get being annoyed with the show. I've been annoyed with so many unanswered questions. I'm trying to understand why you are annoyed that the show is going in a direction different then the assumptions and predictions the people on the interwebs (all over the interwebs) have come to.

Or else I'm totally a ditz and forgot where they showed us all this conclusively.

Cadaverous Pallor 05-15-2009 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman (Post 283373)
So ... I've never seen a minute of the current season. Should I stop right where I am?

Why are you reading this thread? It's all spoiled.

Ghoulish Delight 05-15-2009 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 283374)
I get being annoyed with the show. I've been annoyed with so many unanswered questions. I'm trying to understand why you are annoyed that the show is going in a direction different then the assumptions and predictions the people on the interwebs (all over the interwebs) have come to.

1) I will never get being annoyed at unanswered questions. The point of the show is unanswered questions. When the questions are answered, the show is over. 2) It's not that it's going in a different direction than predicted, it's that it has introduced something that entirely invalidates everything we've known up until now. It's "not only did you guess wrong, you guessed wrong because we've completely hidden a vital piece of information that didn't allow you to even remotely come close to the correct guess. Everything you've learned about characters' motivations and relationships is 100% invalid now, start again."

In other words, I'd much prefer explanations that lead to me thinking, 'Ooooooh, THAT'S how that all makes sense," instead of, "WTF? That changes everything!"

Quote:

So ... I've never seen a minute of the current season. Should I stop right where I am?
Let me pull out my crystal ball and determine whether you personally will like the season, as well as the season that doesn't exist yet...

Cadaverous Pallor 05-15-2009 04:01 PM

They went to Jacob's cabin. Ben said it was Jacob in there. Christian claimed he was Jacob at one point.

Not that saying something conclusively has ever stopped them from changing the "facts" on us.

When they put Esau in the picture and told us it was him that was Locke, it infers that there are two supernatural beings at play when we only knew about one. The inference is clear, as JW posted. Even if you don't go that far it still means that everything is up for questioning.

There are twists when characters do things we don't expect, there are twists when new information is revealed about existing circumstances. This is NOT a twist, because this character was not in play for the last 5 years.

I really don't know how else I can put it.

BarTopDancer 05-15-2009 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 283376)
1) I will never get being annoyed at unanswered questions. The point of the show is unanswered questions. When the questions are answered, the show is over. 2) It's not that it's going in a different direction than predicted, it's that it has introduced something that entirely invalidates everything we've known up until now. It's "not only did you guess wrong, you guessed wrong because we've completely hidden a vital piece of information that didn't allow you to even remotely come close to the correct guess. Everything you've learned about characters' motivations and relationships is 100% invalid now, start again."

In other words, I'd much prefer explanations that lead to me thinking, 'Ooooooh, THAT'S how that all makes sense," instead of, "WTF? That changes everything!"

I'm not picking on Jen, I'm trying to understand.

I don't see it as hiding a vital piece of information from us, I see it as us making assumptions about something, and we assumed wrong.

I don't interpret the finale the same way you two do, so obviously we have to agree to disagree, I'm just trying to look at it from a different perspective.

innerSpaceman 05-15-2009 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 283375)
Why are you reading this thread? It's all spoiled.

Heheh, not with my memory, which is just that nowadays.

By the time the DVDs come out, I will have forgotten the 4 posts I read.

JWBear 05-15-2009 06:05 PM

The PTB on this show have been hiding and subsequently revealing important pieces of information from day one. It's what they do. It's what this show is about.

lashbear 05-15-2009 09:10 PM

It's OK, the finale of Season 6 will reveal that it's all just Jack's Big Dream Sequence. He'll wake up and go to work as normal, except he'll get chased by the smoke monster, which turns out to be a swarm of killer bees... but we're the ones who will have been stung.

lashbear 05-15-2009 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 283392)
The PTB on this show have been hiding and subsequently revealing important pieces of information from day one. It's what they do. It's what this show is about.

Except the important pieces of information have (for the most part) been plausible - but now they're travelling off to cloud-cuckoo-land. We've suspected it will happen all along, so we shouldn't be surprised or disappointed, really.

Cadaverous Pallor 05-16-2009 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 283392)
The PTB on this show have been hiding and subsequently revealing important pieces of information from day one. It's what they do. It's what this show is about.

So if they "revealed" that this was the Truman Show on a soundstage with Jack as the star, would that be ok by you? Or the original suspicions that they were in purgatory, or in a snowglobe, or on another planet, or in a drug induced hallucination?

Again - a "twist" is when something that we currently know about is altered. A is pregnant. B had an affair. When you add elements that were completely hidden, that is not a twist. It's an "oh wait no".

I can accept a brand new puppetmaster. It's happened. Like 4 times. They were introduced a while back already, and the effects they had were obviously coming from something other than the people we already knew.

When the ship showed up and the team landed on the island, it was immediately obvious that something was fishy. The viewers did never believed it was a helpful team, even though the team was trying to fool the Losties. When it was eventually revealed that it was Widmore's ship it made sense. That is a plot twist, and a well executed one.

We are near the end of the series. You can't come out in the last 10 min of a play and introduce characters. It's invalidates what you've been watching. You build a story so people can feel involved, you don't just add and add and then it ends suddenly.

It's also lazy. As they said on the Simpsons at the end of the Lord of Flies spoof...."and they're eventually rescued by.....oh let's say Moe."

JWBear 05-16-2009 08:40 AM

It's not like they just made him up. He's been there all along and the witters have been giving us clues. It's just that no one read the clues for what they were and figured it out.

Ghoulish Delight 05-16-2009 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 283429)
It's not like they just made him up. He's been there all along and the witters have been giving us clues. It's just that no one read the clues for what they were and figured it out.

For my taste, the "clues" were far too vague. For all of the other surprises, there was an obvious, specific vacuum in the story that they filled.

There were whispers and killings and kidnappings - so we meet the others

Desmond was stranded, being kept from his wife, and a mysterious ship was looking for the island and Desmond - so we meet Whidmore.

There is an abundance of scientific equipment, and strange things like polar bears - so we learn about Dharma.

There are mysterious happening on the island in the form of the living dead, smoke monsters, et al. - so we learn about Jacob.

But this new guy? His effect is so overreaching, and dropped in so suddenly, it's a total hand wave. "Hey, everyone, check out this guy. He hates Jacob....oh and by the way he's responsible for pretty much everything that's happened."

All I can think is the end of the Simpsons Lord of the Rings spoof episode. "And they were rescued by, oooh, let's say Moe."

Cadaverous Pallor 05-16-2009 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 283430)
All I can think is the end of the Simpsons Lord of the Rings spoof episode. "And they were rescued by, oooh, let's say Moe."

I just posted that....and it's the Lord of Flies, not Lord of the Rings. :p

BarTopDancer 05-16-2009 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 283430)
For my taste, the "clues" were far too vague. For all of the other surprises, there was an obvious, specific vacuum in the story that they filled.

There were whispers and killings and kidnappings - so we meet the others

Desmond was stranded, being kept from his wife, and a mysterious ship was looking for the island and Desmond - so we meet Whidmore.

There is an abundance of scientific equipment, and strange things like polar bears - so we learn about Dharma.

There are mysterious happening on the island in the form of the living dead, smoke monsters, et al. - so we learn about Jacob.

But this new guy? His effect is so overreaching, and dropped in so suddenly, it's a total hand wave. "Hey, everyone, check out this guy. He hates Jacob....oh and by the way he's responsible for pretty much everything that's happened."

All I can think is the end of the Simpsons Lord of the Rings spoof episode. "And they were rescued by, oooh, let's say Moe."

AhHa! This breakdown totally made it clear to me where you and CP are coming from. It makes sense now and I totally see your point. Esau is a random character. For some reason I kept thinking you guys had an issue with 'young Jacob'.

Ghoulish Delight 05-16-2009 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 283435)
I just posted that....and it's the Lord of Flies, not Lord of the Rings. :p

I really should wait at least half an hour after waking up before posting on a weekend.

Cadaverous Pallor 05-16-2009 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 283437)
AhHa! This breakdown totally made it clear to me where you and CP are coming from. It makes sense now and I totally see your point. Esau is a random character. For some reason I kept thinking you guys had an issue with 'young Jacob'.

Ah, cool! Sorry about the confusion. It's Esau that sucks. ;) Young Jacob, meh (good looking tho), but Esau, boo.

sleepyjeff 05-18-2009 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 283428)


We are near the end of the series. You can't come out in the last 10 min of a play and introduce characters. It's invalidates what you've been watching. You build a story so people can feel involved, you don't just add and add and then it ends suddenly.

Quick, name one character from Jules Verne's The Mysterious Island?

Spoiler:
You probably said Captain Nemo, a character who didn't appear in that book until it was almost......pause for effect....5/6th of the way in;)


Quote:

It's also lazy. As they said on the Simpsons at the end of the Lord of Flies spoof...."and they're eventually rescued by.....oh let's say Moe."
I agree with this observation, the entire finale did have a sorta Deus ex machina sort of feel to it....from Bernard/Rose/Vincent being "retired" to Juliet changing her mind about an H-bomb based on a glance:rolleyes:


Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 283429)
It's not like they just made him up. He's been there all along and the witters have been giving us clues. It's just that no one read the clues for what they were and figured it out.

Perhaps, but I sort of get the feel that the writers placed the clues before they really knew what they were clues for.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer

AhHa! This breakdown totally made it clear to me where you and CP are coming from. It makes sense now and I totally see your point. Esau is a random character. For some reason I kept thinking you guys had an issue with 'young Jacob'.

What if it turns out that "Esau" goes by the name Aaron?

BarTopDancer 05-18-2009 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleepyjeff (Post 283631)
What if it turns out that "Esau" goes by the name Aaron?

I said I see their point, not that I agree with their point.

sleepyjeff 05-18-2009 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 283634)
I said I see their point, not that I agree with their point.


Oh, I know....just throwing out that possibility as I feel that characters(Aaron) story isn't done yet.

Otherwise, I actually do agree with their point......it's time to(and has been for quite a while now) start finishing the stories of the characters we already know and I don't want to see another single new face on this show....no matter how minor or major......until we find out more about the ones who already have been introduced ....such as Walt, Libby, Cindy, Kelvin, etc. etc.

BarTopDancer 05-18-2009 01:39 PM

So when did the statue (speculation is that it is either Sobek or Taweret) fall? And did the fall of the statue begin the fertility problems women were having? Or did the "incident" start those? When was Ethan born?

Not my original ideas, it's floating around the web.

Here is a good link.

Ghoulish Delight 05-18-2009 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 283638)
So when did the statue (speculation is that it is either Sobek or Taweret) fall? And did the fall of the statue begin the fertility problems women were having? Or did the "incident" start those? When was Ethan born?

Ethan was conceived and born on the island. Had to have been since Juliette, who delivered him, had been there for 3 years when he was born. So unless Horace and Amy went off island at some point, which was not shown, Ethan must have been conceived and born there.[/quote]

BarTopDancer 05-18-2009 01:58 PM

Didn't Juliette deliver him when they went back in time? Does that mean that she delivered him even though she wasn't brought to the island until he was an adult? The time loop is going to do me in.

sleepyjeff 05-18-2009 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 283638)
So when did the statue (speculation is that it is either Sobek or Taweret) fall? And did the fall of the statue begin the fertility problems women were having? Or did the "incident" start those? When was Ethan born?

Not my original ideas, it's floating around the web.

Here is a good link.


Between those two I'd lean towards Sobek...Taweret is a female god I believe and Egyptian Goddesses didn't wear short skirts(they wore long dresses) like our statue...but the male gods did.

As for what happened to the statue to cause it to fall......got me, maybe the H-Bomb or maybe moving the Island or maybe the breaking of the world(no wait, that last one is a wheel of time thing...:blush: )

Ghoulish Delight 05-18-2009 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 283640)
Didn't Juliette deliver him when they went back in time? Does that mean that she delivered him even though she wasn't brought to the island until he was an adult? The time loop is going to do me in.

Yes. She delivered him after she (and Sawyer, and Miles, and Jin) had been living with the others for 3 years.

Gemini Cricket 05-18-2009 02:11 PM

1 Attachment(s)
One of the guys in the cast of my show (Tommy McCurdy) was in 5 episodes of 'Lost'.
He shot at someone named Sawyer...
:)

BarTopDancer 05-18-2009 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 283642)
Yes. She delivered him after she (and Sawyer, and Miles, and Jin) had been living with the others for 3 years.

But who delivered him before then? He was about the same age has her when they were doing the book club and the plane crashed.

Pirate Bill 05-18-2009 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 283644)
But who delivered him before then? He was about the same age has her when they were doing the book club and the plane crashed.

Juliette delivered him. She always delivered him. She first arrived on the island somewhere around 2001, lived in the barracks with the Others until 2004, jumped back in time to 1974, delivered Ethan in 1977. That's the way it always happened.

When Ethan met Juliette in 2001(ish) he was meeting the doctor that delivered him in 1977. It happened in his past, but Juliette's future.

BarTopDancer 05-18-2009 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pirate Bill (Post 283645)
Juliette delivered him. She always delivered him. She first arrived on the island somewhere around 2001, lived in the barracks with the Others until 2004, jumped back in time to 1974, delivered Ethan in 1977. That's the way it always happened.

When Ethan met Juliette in 2001(ish) he was meeting the doctor that delivered him in 1977. It happened in his past, but Juliette's future.

Ya, I got that. I'm just not convinced that's the way it always happened.

Ghoulish Delight 05-18-2009 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 283646)
Ya, I got that. I'm just not convinced that's the way it always happened.

Based on what they've implicated so far, as well as the usual rules of time travel (both purely sci-fi rules, and theoretical rules), everything we've seen up to the point of Juliette setting off the bomb has always happened.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.