Lounge of Tomorrow

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)
-   Disneyland and all things Disney (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Tokyo Disney Sea: Tower Of Terror...**{drools}** (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=3022)

Isaac 02-28-2006 11:26 AM

Tokyo Disney Sea: Tower Of Terror...**{drools}**
 






















€uroMeinke 02-28-2006 11:30 AM

Let's go!

Cadaverous Pallor 02-28-2006 11:33 AM

Holy GOD! :eek:

Now THAT'S what a theme park is supposed to build these days.

wendybeth 02-28-2006 11:50 AM

I looked at these pics and my first thought was "We suck".

That's amazing- very, very cool.:snap:

Capt Jack 02-28-2006 11:53 AM

oh...



my...




God! :eek:

ride it hell...I could LIVE there

mousepod 02-28-2006 12:00 PM

The Japanese version of the Mansion is in Fantasyland of Tokyo Disneyland (it's great and the CM costume is kawaii). Our Zapppop is bringing our attention to the ToT. Here's a cool page about it (spoilers).

Let's go for New Years!

Not Afraid 02-28-2006 12:04 PM

YES! Let's go!

The placement of the TOT is so great as well. It is near the "Queen Mary" and just makes the view incredible. Not that it isn't already incredible.

wendybeth 02-28-2006 12:08 PM

I love the artist's rendering of the terrified little boy in the elevator- he doesn't look 'fun-scared', he looks like 'I'm gonna die!' scared.

Capt Jack 02-28-2006 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wendybeth
I love the artist's rendering of the terrified little boy in the elevator- he doesn't look 'fun-scared', he looks like 'I'm gonna die!' scared.


yeah...cooool aint it?? :evil:

Gemini Cricket 02-28-2006 12:49 PM

That makes DCA's ToT look like a big mustard turd.


Question:
Is Japan's ToT like DCA's or WDW's?

innerSpaceman 02-28-2006 01:31 PM

Why don't our local Imagineers have a freaking clue??





That said, exterior design is one thing .... if the attraction is as bare-bones as the DCA version, it won't matter how cool it looks from the outside.

Cadaverous Pallor 02-28-2006 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman
Why don't our local Imagineers have a freaking clue??

I would not blame the Imagineers, I'd blame the budget. This thing is going to cost a LOT of money.

€uroMeinke 02-28-2006 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman
Why don't our local Imagineers have a freaking clue??

I thought much of this and the rest of the park was done by our local imagineers

Isaac 02-28-2006 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman
Why don't our local Imagineers have a freaking clue??

The Oriental Land Company exports their theme park attractions to our local imagineering deptartments for designing with a huge or sometimes unlimited budget. The estimated budget for this version of TOT is $181 million. The imagineers that designed TOT for DCA had a budget of (at the most, and a bit unlikely) $100 million thanks to Paul Pressler & Cynthia Harris. Our imagineers are their imagineers too. So it's not the imagineers that are to blame. They can make anything good, if you give them the money to bring their ideas to life.


Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman
That said, exterior design is one thing .... if the attraction is as bare-bones as the DCA version, it won't matter how cool it looks from the outside.

Ride-wise, it will follow the same basic operating layout as DCA. The elevator moves backwards into the shaft, up to the show scenes & effects, then drops, and forward into the loading area again. The elevator moving forward during the ride will remain a Floridian exclusive, mainly cause it's so problematic. I'm sure the japanese version will have a few nice surprises that'll more than make up for this.

Cadaverous Pallor 02-28-2006 02:25 PM

You could have the same ride pattern like zapp says and have incredible visuals inside. I'm willing to bet it'll be incredible, like everything else at TDS.

Says the person who's never been there but drools over reports

innerSpaceman 02-28-2006 02:43 PM

The exterior is not what costs a lot of money. Bad architechture, design and construction costs about as much as excellent architecture, design and construction.

Perhaps it was just a poor choice of artistic direction. But our Imagineering Department CHOSE a craptacular design, and I do not think budget constraints had very much to do with it. (The actual attraction that I grew tired of quickly? Well, that's another story and money probably played a large part.)

Cadaverous Pallor 02-28-2006 03:30 PM

I'm willing to stick my neck out and say that Number 1 cost a whole lot less than Number 2:




Gemini Cricket 02-28-2006 03:35 PM

Sad, really. I still don't get the purple on DCA's.

€uroMeinke 02-28-2006 03:39 PM

Not to be an appologist for DCA, but Tokyo's tower is themed to fit into an East Coast architecture, where DCA's is more Spanish/Moorish design refelctive of early 20th century Hollywood.

A comparison with WDW's tower is probably more appropriate

And I wonder how DLP's tower will look?

innerSpaceman 02-28-2006 03:47 PM

Yes, better to compare DCA's with the original Tower at DisneyWorld (which, btw, is technically No. 1, while DCA's is appropriately No. 2).

While not as grandly excentric gothic as No. 3 in Japan, the original has a 20's Hollywood styling that is much more appealing and creepy than the design chosen for California. If you look at the level of detail in the original, you'll see that it's about as ornate as the DCA version, but in a different architectural style. The price tag for the exteriors would, I suspect, be similar.

I'm willing to concede that the luxurious detail of the Tokyo DisneySeas version comes with a higher cost, but I remain convinced that the exterior work represents a small fraction of the overall attraction cost. The descriptions on the page that mousepod linked to above sound like the same old, quickly boring show scenes that we have in DCA. What a shame.

wendybeth 02-28-2006 03:50 PM

The Tokyo version looks very Byzantine- sort of West meets East.

Not Afraid 02-28-2006 04:08 PM

I found it interesting that the interiors of both DCA and WDW's towers are strikingly similar in decor and design, while the exterior architecture is VERY different. I wonder how similar the next 2 will be to their elders?

Isaac 02-28-2006 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by €uroMeinke
I wonder how DLP's tower will look?

Same as ours pretty much. Some of the concept art from their TOT was on display in DCA before our version opened because the artwork was identical.
It's not going into Disneyland Park though. It's going to Walt Disney Studios Park.

Here's a recent pic from Parc Walt Disney Studios:



Cadaverous Pallor 02-28-2006 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by €uroMeinke
A comparison with WDW's tower is probably more appropriate

Being that I've never been on Florida's tower, and it was built over a decade ago, I have to admit that it doesn't really concern me that much how it compares. But here it is anyway, with DCA thrown in:







Ok, to my eyes, this shows that they spent far more money on the exterior of the TDS one and far less on WDW and DCA's. In fact, DCA's and WDW's look very similar.

TDS has set a very high standard for theming. I am of the highly subjective opinion that with Disney's ridiculous gobs of cash they should make everything as perfect as the current technology allows. Apparently that's what TDS is doing, and we deserve the same.

Not Afraid 02-28-2006 04:39 PM

Well, TDS has money to spend and we don't. All hail OLC.

But, I believe the architecture difference have more to do with the placement of the attraction than the money spent.

Take the Haunted Mansion in the various parks for example:

New Orleans, antebellum style mansion in New Orleans Square



WDW in Liberty Square with a North-eastern style mansion.



Phantom Manor in Frountierland with Victorian architecture popular in the west during the gold rush.


And Tokyo's which is in Fantasyland and is a replica of WDW's version. (TY MP)


innerSpaceman 02-28-2006 05:02 PM

Heheh, an arugment which goes out the window when Tokyo puts the Hudson River architecture Mansion in Fantasyland, where the design makes zero sense.

Also, and more appropriate to this discussion, both American Towers of Terror feature 1920's California architecture. One's simply more boring, less creepy. Both are accurate, but one is more interesting and more appropriately frightening. The exterior of the original looks to have cost a few palty hundred thousand dollars more than the DCA sequel.

Perhaps it's not really the "fault" of the imagineers, but rather the curse of DCA that has resulted in the most boring-looking Tower of Terror being chosen for California. If so, it's hardly surprising that the only Disney park worse than DCA, the Walt Disney Studio Park in France, would select the boring model as their ToT.

Not Afraid 02-28-2006 05:07 PM

Yeah, I agree the Fantasyland architecture is not a direct hit, but at least it looks like Toad Hall which is actually in Fantasyland. Sort-of.

I think the Tokyo TOT facad works with the Eastern Seaboard theme of that area of TDS. It is sort of like some Hudson Valley or Newport RI mansio which fits in with the rest of the area. A Spanish Revival building just wouldn't fit in as it does at DCA and WDS.

Cadaverous Pallor 02-28-2006 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Not Afraid
Well, TDS has money to spend and we don't. All hail OLC.

This branches into the whole "we don't have money because it's been wasted on purchasing ABC" discussion. I won't bore everyone with that again :)

Bottom line - OLC rocks, Disney can suck my dick until they come out with an E-ticket-made-from-scratch-not-a-copy-newest-tech-ultimate-facade-complete-repeatability-actual-ride-in-Disneyland. Hell, add in "not-based-on-a-movie-or-tv-show" and I just might die of shock.

innerSpaceman 02-28-2006 05:28 PM

Hmmm, let's see. The last one that I can recall is Big Thunder Mountain Railroad in 1978. Nothing since then fits the excellent Cadaverous criteria. (And, to my knowlege, Big Thunder remains the only post-Walt attraction to meet that criteria. In other words, don't hold your breath.)

Isaac 02-28-2006 05:39 PM

Cosmic Waves - 1998 ;)


BTW: BTMRR opened in 1979

Not Afraid 02-28-2006 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zapppop

BTW: BTMRR opened in 1979

You're supposed to whisper it. ;

Not Afraid 02-28-2006 06:12 PM

You deleted it befor I could give you mojo!

Isaac 02-28-2006 06:13 PM

That's as small the font gets.



orbitalpunk 03-01-2006 12:03 AM

F***!

Isaac 03-01-2006 11:31 AM

This is the concept art for Parc Walt Disney Studios version:



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.