![]() |
Tokyo Disney Sea: Tower Of Terror...**{drools}**
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Let's go!
|
Holy GOD! :eek:
Now THAT'S what a theme park is supposed to build these days. |
I looked at these pics and my first thought was "We suck".
That's amazing- very, very cool.:snap: |
oh...
my... God! :eek: ride it hell...I could LIVE there |
The Japanese version of the Mansion is in Fantasyland of Tokyo Disneyland (it's great and the CM costume is kawaii). Our Zapppop is bringing our attention to the ToT. Here's a cool page about it (spoilers).
Let's go for New Years! |
YES! Let's go!
The placement of the TOT is so great as well. It is near the "Queen Mary" and just makes the view incredible. Not that it isn't already incredible. |
I love the artist's rendering of the terrified little boy in the elevator- he doesn't look 'fun-scared', he looks like 'I'm gonna die!' scared.
|
Quote:
yeah...cooool aint it?? :evil: |
That makes DCA's ToT look like a big mustard turd.
Question: Is Japan's ToT like DCA's or WDW's? |
Why don't our local Imagineers have a freaking clue??
That said, exterior design is one thing .... if the attraction is as bare-bones as the DCA version, it won't matter how cool it looks from the outside. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
You could have the same ride pattern like zapp says and have incredible visuals inside. I'm willing to bet it'll be incredible, like everything else at TDS.
Says the person who's never been there but drools over reports |
The exterior is not what costs a lot of money. Bad architechture, design and construction costs about as much as excellent architecture, design and construction.
Perhaps it was just a poor choice of artistic direction. But our Imagineering Department CHOSE a craptacular design, and I do not think budget constraints had very much to do with it. (The actual attraction that I grew tired of quickly? Well, that's another story and money probably played a large part.) |
I'm willing to stick my neck out and say that Number 1 cost a whole lot less than Number 2:
![]() ![]() |
Sad, really. I still don't get the purple on DCA's.
|
Not to be an appologist for DCA, but Tokyo's tower is themed to fit into an East Coast architecture, where DCA's is more Spanish/Moorish design refelctive of early 20th century Hollywood.
A comparison with WDW's tower is probably more appropriate And I wonder how DLP's tower will look? |
Yes, better to compare DCA's with the original Tower at DisneyWorld (which, btw, is technically No. 1, while DCA's is appropriately No. 2).
While not as grandly excentric gothic as No. 3 in Japan, the original has a 20's Hollywood styling that is much more appealing and creepy than the design chosen for California. If you look at the level of detail in the original, you'll see that it's about as ornate as the DCA version, but in a different architectural style. The price tag for the exteriors would, I suspect, be similar. I'm willing to concede that the luxurious detail of the Tokyo DisneySeas version comes with a higher cost, but I remain convinced that the exterior work represents a small fraction of the overall attraction cost. The descriptions on the page that mousepod linked to above sound like the same old, quickly boring show scenes that we have in DCA. What a shame. |
The Tokyo version looks very Byzantine- sort of West meets East.
|
I found it interesting that the interiors of both DCA and WDW's towers are strikingly similar in decor and design, while the exterior architecture is VERY different. I wonder how similar the next 2 will be to their elders?
|
Quote:
It's not going into Disneyland Park though. It's going to Walt Disney Studios Park. Here's a recent pic from Parc Walt Disney Studios: ![]() |
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() Ok, to my eyes, this shows that they spent far more money on the exterior of the TDS one and far less on WDW and DCA's. In fact, DCA's and WDW's look very similar. TDS has set a very high standard for theming. I am of the highly subjective opinion that with Disney's ridiculous gobs of cash they should make everything as perfect as the current technology allows. Apparently that's what TDS is doing, and we deserve the same. |
Well, TDS has money to spend and we don't. All hail OLC.
But, I believe the architecture difference have more to do with the placement of the attraction than the money spent. Take the Haunted Mansion in the various parks for example: New Orleans, antebellum style mansion in New Orleans Square ![]() WDW in Liberty Square with a North-eastern style mansion. ![]() Phantom Manor in Frountierland with Victorian architecture popular in the west during the gold rush. ![]() And Tokyo's which is in Fantasyland and is a replica of WDW's version. (TY MP) ![]() |
Heheh, an arugment which goes out the window when Tokyo puts the Hudson River architecture Mansion in Fantasyland, where the design makes zero sense.
Also, and more appropriate to this discussion, both American Towers of Terror feature 1920's California architecture. One's simply more boring, less creepy. Both are accurate, but one is more interesting and more appropriately frightening. The exterior of the original looks to have cost a few palty hundred thousand dollars more than the DCA sequel. Perhaps it's not really the "fault" of the imagineers, but rather the curse of DCA that has resulted in the most boring-looking Tower of Terror being chosen for California. If so, it's hardly surprising that the only Disney park worse than DCA, the Walt Disney Studio Park in France, would select the boring model as their ToT. |
Yeah, I agree the Fantasyland architecture is not a direct hit, but at least it looks like Toad Hall which is actually in Fantasyland. Sort-of.
I think the Tokyo TOT facad works with the Eastern Seaboard theme of that area of TDS. It is sort of like some Hudson Valley or Newport RI mansio which fits in with the rest of the area. A Spanish Revival building just wouldn't fit in as it does at DCA and WDS. |
Quote:
Bottom line - OLC rocks, Disney can suck my dick until they come out with an E-ticket-made-from-scratch-not-a-copy-newest-tech-ultimate-facade-complete-repeatability-actual-ride-in-Disneyland. Hell, add in "not-based-on-a-movie-or-tv-show" and I just might die of shock. |
Hmmm, let's see. The last one that I can recall is Big Thunder Mountain Railroad in 1978. Nothing since then fits the excellent Cadaverous criteria. (And, to my knowlege, Big Thunder remains the only post-Walt attraction to meet that criteria. In other words, don't hold your breath.)
|
Cosmic Waves - 1998 ;)
BTW: BTMRR opened in 1979 |
Quote:
|
You deleted it befor I could give you mojo!
|
That's as small the font gets.
|
F***!
|
This is the concept art for Parc Walt Disney Studios version:
![]() |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:06 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.