Lounge of Tomorrow

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)
-   Lounge Lizard (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   I look great in this picture! (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=5255)

Cadaverous Pallor 02-08-2007 11:19 PM

I look great in this picture!
 
Click here.

Disneyphile 02-08-2007 11:26 PM

Wow. More excuses to just keep weight on.

Now, if only the camera had a way to digitally remove heart disease too.....

Kevy Baby 02-08-2007 11:28 PM

How about a camera that increases girthiness?

MouseWife 02-09-2007 12:12 AM

Wow...wasn't Paula Abdul doing this in her videos? :D

tracilicious 02-09-2007 07:47 AM

Um, as much as I would like to look thinner in pictures, what does this say about our culture?

Sub la Goon 02-09-2007 07:49 AM

I don't mean to offend here, but if this was done with CP, she would probably disappear entirely.

LSPoorEeyorick 02-09-2007 08:14 AM

Que ridiculoso!

Alex 02-09-2007 08:19 AM

What I don't understand is why these things would be build into the camera when they can generally be done just as easily and much better on the computer with software (and without losing the original picture).

But I wondered the same thing about desaturation feature on NA's camera.

Stan4dSteph 02-09-2007 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LSPoorEeyorick (Post 119691)
Que ridiculoso!

Je suis d'accord!

innerSpaceman 02-09-2007 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Stroup (Post 119693)
But I wondered the same thing about desaturation feature on NA's camera.

I was wondering that about NA's camera, too. But the fact is, it's much more likely to be done if you can do it in camera ... with no post-production necessary. Ease of special effects when it comes to casual photos is a boon.

Sure, you can photoshop anything after the fact .... but sometimes you wouldn't want to bother, whereas doing it on the spot would be fun.



If we take the "slimming effect" to its next logical step ... there'd be a Funhouse Mirror setting that I might have fun with while I'm taking the pictures, but be too bored with those photographs to bother with when my ADD kicks in 10 minutes later.

3894 02-09-2007 09:36 AM

Here's how I know I'm old...
 
I don't care about the slimming feature. Give me all you've got of that Soft Glow!

NirvanaMan 02-09-2007 10:07 AM

And America just got a little fatter.

Cadaverous Pallor 02-09-2007 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Disneyphile (Post 119665)
Wow. More excuses to just keep weight on.

Now, if only the camera had a way to digitally remove heart disease too.....

It should come with a coupon for a discount at the therapist's office.

Seriously, if you hate your appearance enough that you need to modify it in good photos of yourself, you have problems.

Quote:

Originally Posted by iSm
I was wondering that about NA's camera, too. But the fact is, it's much more likely to be done if you can do it in camera ... with no post-production necessary. Ease of special effects when it comes to casual photos is a boon.

What he said. NA showed me her camera's abilities and it's so easy, even the photoshopper in me was impressed. Many people do not have photoshop, or the knowledge to pull off effects like that, and the camera does it all for you with instant results.

Alex 02-09-2007 10:36 AM

I guess, but it wouldn't require photoshop. I guess my biggest issue is that (I'm assuming) the original photo is lost (so you can't have both the funny picture and the good picture) and the method for evaluating decency of the result is inherently crappy (being squished down to a one-inch screen covers a lot of sins).

Regardless of ease of use, at some point the photo is going to be offloaded for further distribution and viewed then. Just seems better to me to have those features built into the image viewer than the image taker.

But then I'm not much of a casual photographer (and hardly ever take pictures of people, so the slimming is particularly useless to me unless I want to minimize a tree or something) so I'm sure my perspective is once again warped.

Not Afraid 02-09-2007 10:38 AM

It'a all about instant gratification - and ease. The various setings on my camera make it easy to just play at the moment and to see the results right away. (The screen on my camera is pretty large considering the size of the thing.) This also gets me using more settings on my camera and learning more about it as I play.

To use the photoshop method requires:
  1. Going home (1/2 hour)
  2. Downloading photos (10 minutes)
  3. Choosing one (a milion years)
  4. Opening photoshop (3 minutes)
  5. spending the time in photoshop required to created desired effect (eons for me)

I'd never do it - or at least never do it regularly and certainly not with more than one picture. My attention span is not that great.

Plus, I enjoy being out capturing the moment quite a bit more than I enjoy sitting at my computer.

MouseWife 02-09-2007 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3894 (Post 119707)
I don't care about the slimming feature. Give me all you've got of that Soft Glow!

LOL Uh, yeah....I realized you can do this on my photo program....

Hey if I can clear up the kids zits why can't I ease up some wrinkles? It's not like I am doing it to all of the pictures....maybe just one or two...:D

Capt Jack 02-09-2007 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevy Baby (Post 119667)
How about a camera that increases girthiness?

turn it sideways

tracilicious 02-09-2007 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NirvanaMan (Post 119710)
And America just got a little fatter.


I'm going to take this in another direction. I don't think anyone is going to see this camera feature and think, "Wheee! Now I don't even want to lose weight!" But it does send the message that you aren't even worth looking at in photos unless you are thin. Which is a worthwhile message for any kind of media to send, as they make a LOT of money off of it.

Hate yourself more America! We're raking in the dough! (No pun intended.)

Cadaverous Pallor 02-09-2007 11:11 AM

Did anyone else notice that you can also make people fatter with this camera?

Fun Prank: Take a pic of a friend, quickly make them look fatter, then show them the pic while saying "what a great picture!" :evil:

3894 02-09-2007 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 119740)

Fun Prank: Take a pic of a friend, quickly make them look fatter, then show them the pic while saying "what a great picture!" :evil:


Yeah .... no. :(

innerSpaceman 02-09-2007 07:58 PM

Maybe future cameras will have the Dorian Gray effect .... your series of self-portrait photos get fatter and fatter at the turn of a dial while you mysteriously and amazingly lose tons of weight in real life!

Kevy Baby 02-09-2007 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevy Baby (Post 119667)
How about a camera that increases girthiness?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Capt Jack (Post 119734)
turn it sideways

The camera or my junk?

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3894 (Post 119707)
I don't care about the slimming feature. Give me all you've got of that Soft Glow!

I tried that, but I think I put the setting too high:


Alex 02-09-2007 09:47 PM

Kevy, I know you like the risque humor, but posting a photo of your genitals is just going too far.

Kevy Baby 02-09-2007 10:11 PM

LOL Alex!

lashbear 02-09-2007 10:51 PM

Anyone else notice that in the movie, the subjects got thinner and the trees in the background stayed the same.

I bet it doesn't do that in real life, and there'll be a lot of photos in people's albums like this:



Gee, Goofy's lost weight too, huh?

:p

Not Afraid 02-09-2007 10:52 PM

But, Rob, you torso is so long and your legs are so short!

lashbear 02-09-2007 11:15 PM

yeah, but ain't I svelte ??

DreadPirateRoberts 02-09-2007 11:23 PM

I like your hat. :)


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.