![]() |
Breaking NEWS Martha to be released
Heh what rodents the media are... camping outside the prison waiting to catch martha collect her stuff and shuffle out...
I can't wait till she writes her next book all hardened from club Fed. Could we expect chapters such as: ~ How to make a decorative shiv from a cafeteria spoon and gum wrappers. ~ Herbal Toilet hooch (turning bread into a delightfully refreshing alcoholic beverage with a surprisingly wide variety simple flavorings) ~ Smuggling your favorite spices in swallowed condoms (which herbs not to try) ~ Novel accompaniments for eating raw cell block tough "Clams" ~ Making a depilatory powder from common cleaning supplies ~ Hiding contraband with style and aplomb ~ Proper Etiquette when servicing two guards at once ~ Throwing an after lock-down party ~ Much to my chagrin there's no planting allowed in "The Yard" ~ How to keep ones social decorum in a group shower experience |
The one tidbit I've loved from her jailhouse experience is that she was busted for smuggling in spices and herbs for her jailhouse food. LOL.
However, I must admit that I thought her being sent to prison in the first place was kind of stupid. I always thought it was foolish for the State of New York to spend so much money on prosecuting her when there was so much bigger fish to fry. But that's just me. I'm looking forward to her version of The Apprentice. Somehow, I'm glad she's still in there kicking. :) |
I hope Martha does just fine.
:) |
Quote:
:confused: |
Lol- she's leaving prison richer and thinner than she was when she went in....
|
You know, she chose to go to prison. She could have remained out of prison during the appeals process, but made the decission to just get it over and done with.
|
its called making an example.... unfortunately, the federal goverment believes that it still must do it...
|
Ok, I found something very amusing this morning. On the CNN website, the story starts with the following sentence.
Quote:
|
Quote:
Teehehehe! |
Quote:
I know that Martha is one of those people that we love to hate -- but I don't think anyone (except the State of New York) wanted her to ACTUALLY head to jail. Dare I say, however, that jail was in some ways a positive experience for her? I'm glad she survived the whole ordeal and is almost done putting it behind her. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm not sure it's spin, honestly. The woman might not be as hunky-dory as her publicist would have her belive but she's doing better than anyone I know. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
If you want to be mad at someone, be mad at the media. |
Quote:
I think the point GC and I were trying to make is that the law is *not* enforced uniformly. You have someone like Martha, who in the grand scheme of things, did something that tons of people like her do daily. But those others are not prosecuted. And then the really big fish, who've ruined thousands of lives with their financial scams, get off scott free leaving a trail of victims in their wakes. Thinking about it, it's my opinion that Americans are really into the concept of "playing fair". It's drummed into us all during childhood. If Kevy can go, Sheila can go. If Kevy gets punished for it, Sheila gets punished for it. Then we find out when we grow up that the American bureaucracy doesn't play fair -- it's all about who has the power and the interests protected by those in power. To use a very poor analogy, it's like the LAPD pulling over black drivers because they're breaking the law. The LAPD mostly likely tickets/arrests black drivers at a far *higher* rate than white people. Are white folks better drivers? Hardly not, I see them every day on the San Diego freeway!! :D I won't even go into the number of minorites on death row because I'll be really careening off the subject of Martha. But the LAPD will tell us that they're just protecting the public, they've making an example out of the "bad drivers", but all of us know better. It's not fair and I think it really annoys those (like me) who have bought into the whole "fair play" concept. If a politician or a prosecutor or a police officer want to tell me they're making an example of someone, I want to see them uniformly apply this concept to everyone; not just those they see as "easy pickins'." My goodness, that response turned into quite a long-winded screed. Sorry! ;) :) |
And I strongly disagree with the premise that poor Martha was targeted unfairly. She's not the only one to go down in the Imclone case, you just don't hear about the other defendants who also did time (like Imclone's CEO, Sam Waksal, or the stockbroker, Peter Bacanovic). You also don't hear about the other insider trading busts. You just hear about this one because a big name was involved and the media swarms all over a fallen star.
I will not say that the government is perfect. However, I will say that law enforcement (be it at a national, state, or local level) is, overall, good, fair and effective with what they have to work with. No, it is not perfect (otherwise OJ would not be free). Yes, there are some PEOPLE who are ineffective, dishonest, racist, and just plain corrupt. (And I would love to respond to the DWB charge mentioned, but I don't want to go OT too much). But I believe the system, overall, is good. I have yet to see or hear ANY evidence that Martha was "unfairly" targeted. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:09 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.