Lounge of Tomorrow

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)
-   Daily Grind (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=18)
-   -   A Prop 8 challenge for swankers (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=8699)

Morrigoon 10-17-2008 02:09 PM

A Prop 8 challenge for swankers
 
Okay guys, I don't know about you, but I'm getting worried about this election. I think it's time for some grass-roots efforts to get the word out there about voting No on Prop 8. So here's my challenge to you:

Create a flyer (your own or one shared by another LoTer) that reminds people to vote No. Could be as simple as a circle slash with Prop 8 in the center, or as detailed as you want, I don't care, as long as it reminds people why it's so important to vote no.
Go to Kinko's, make 100 copies of your flyer, and distribute all of them in a manner of your choosing (on car windshields in the Target parking lot, on your neighbors' doorsteps, hand them out in person in a public place, whatever).
Then post here that you've done it.

I haven't got much in the way of prizes, but I will give a reindeer Mickey ear hat to everyone who completes the challenge (While supplies last. Yes, the ones from last year's Xmas party).

Feel free to use this thread to discuss/share flyer and distribution ideas.

My hope is that we'll all (myself included) feel inspired to continue the effort and spread the word even further than the initial hundred. But I can tell you from experience that handing out more than a hundred flyers is a lot to bite off, so please start with that, and if you still feel inspired, then go make more copies, etc.

Kevy Baby 10-17-2008 02:15 PM

One can go here for ideas.

Gemini Cricket 10-17-2008 02:19 PM

I think that's a great idea.
Even if it's just as little as you putting a bumper sticker on your car, everything helps.

:)

Morrigoon 10-17-2008 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gemini Cricket (Post 246766)
I think that's a great idea.
Even if it's just as little as you putting a bumper sticker on your car, everything helps.

:)

Or taped in my car's window :)

Morrigoon 10-17-2008 02:24 PM

Oooh, they have a No on Prop 8 store too: http://www.noonprop8store.com/eshop/10Browse.asp

(I know that technically belongs in the other gay marriage thread, but whatever, it's from Kevy's link)

innerSpaceman 10-17-2008 02:26 PM

I'll be glad to help out as soon as my life becomes available again ... in 10 days.

Morrigoon 10-17-2008 02:28 PM

Any time, any place (well, any time prior to the closing of the polls)

Andrew 10-17-2008 02:43 PM

Someone make a clever sign/flyer and upload a PDF. I'll participate in distributing but I have no artistic talent to speak of.

Gemini Cricket 10-17-2008 02:49 PM

So on the Metro, on my way to the Ahmanson's Theatre last night, a No on 8 canvasser stopped me. Maybe 20 years old or so. So, I started grilling him about what he knew about Prop 8 and what it meant. He knew what he was talking about, which was great. I told him I had already voted No on 8. He offered to give me stickers, I told him I already had one but I said for him to save them for someone who doesn't have any. I thanked him for what he was doing.
I'm glad he knew his stuff.
I'm not so glad knowing that I'm turning into one of those snarky old men who would quiz young whipersnapers about what they know.
:D

BarTopDancer 10-17-2008 02:49 PM

I like the line of thought directed at straight people for Prop 8: "can I vote on your right to marry"

Gemini Cricket 10-17-2008 04:32 PM

This is the new ad for No on 8.
It looks like it just went up on YouTube.
It only has one comment on it (mine), there is room for more.
:)

JWBear 10-17-2008 04:36 PM

Gibbonsinthelibrary???

Ghoulish Delight 10-17-2008 04:39 PM

Saw that one on TV last night.

Gemini Cricket 10-17-2008 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 246815)
Gibbonsinthelibrary???

Yes, my good man. Gibbonsinthelibrary.


lashbear 10-17-2008 07:49 PM

batsinthebelfrey perhaps ? :p

Gemini Cricket 10-17-2008 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lashbear (Post 246834)
batsinthebelfrey perhaps ? :p

Most definitely.
:D

wendybeth 10-18-2008 12:51 AM

I know I can't vote up here in Wa, but I have gotten into several arguments over this with people, most notably my conservative clients. Since I hold sharp pointy shears I always win.:D

Ghoulish Delight 10-21-2008 11:34 AM

Ugh. You know what's most disheartening about the fact that Prop 8 is now ahead in the polls? The demographic that's moved the most towards supporting it is young voters. WTF happened?

Betty 10-21-2008 11:41 AM

Frankly I think the new No on 8 ad isn't all that convincing.

The yes on 8 ads are all into alarming people and they need to address the fallacies that the ads portray in order to "fight back".

I think the people that are bent on voting Yes don't care about people being treated equally under the law and those ads won't have any impact. They want to vote yet because the Yes on 8 ads have tricked them into thinking all sorts of terrible things will happen.

Moonliner 10-21-2008 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 247405)
Ugh. You know what's most disheartening about the fact that Prop 8 is now ahead in the polls? The demographic that's moved the most towards supporting it is young voters. WTF happened?

Young people's opinions are easier to sway by making crass appeals to emotion?

Gemini Cricket 10-21-2008 11:57 AM

I'm not for certain about the young vote and what that poll means.

Here is something I posted on Facebook to a friend of mine who is frustrated about Prop 8.

Quote:

R, the Yes on 8 people have more money. They have been funded by bigger groups. LDS church, Knights of Columbus, etc.

I've lived through this twice already: once in Hawai'i in 1998 and once in 2005 in Boston during the whole aftermath of the legalization of gay marriage. It's going to get uglier as Nov. 4 gets closer.

The one thing both sides need to realize is that life goes on no matter what happens with Prop 8.

The Yes people need to realize too that the day after Prop 8 passes (if it passes), it will be slapped with a lawsuit. And the whole process happens again.

The No people need to think about who is supporting Yes on 8 and remember these businesses and organizations. In the future, when these people ask for support remember that their answer to them should still be "No". If a religious organization, like the LDS church asks for support of some cause, find a like minded cause and support them instead. The LDS church and other homophobic religious organizations will never see a drop of my support or money. Ever.

It is always disheartening to see a Yes on 8 commercial. But remember, no matter how loud they are or how many signs they have, they are not on the side of what is right. Their children and their children's children will realize how wrong they were on this issue and their legacy will become one of intolerance and hypocrisy. On that, I can be certain.
For me, I am not too worried about what the outcome of 8 will be.
Honestly, I'm not.
If 8 passes, it will be challenged.
If 8 fails, it will be challenged.
Eventually, there will be marriage equality. No doubt about that.

Kevy Baby 10-21-2008 12:19 PM

Where can I get No on 8 yard signs? I just need a couple, but I want them to be highly visible.

Ruthie 10-21-2008 12:20 PM

"It is always disheartening to see a Yes on 8 commercial. But remember, no matter how loud they are or how many signs they have, they are not on the side of what is right. Their children and their children's children will realize how wrong they were on this issue and their legacy will become one of intolerance and hypocrisy. On that, I can be certain."

So true, Gemini Cricket. You sound like a very wise person.

JWBear 10-21-2008 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevy Baby (Post 247422)
Where can I get No on 8 yard signs? I just need a couple, but I want them to be highly visible.

here

Kevy Baby 10-21-2008 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 247438)

Thank you. But I don't think I would get them in time to make a difference. I was hoping I could find some place in the OC that I could swing by and pick them up.

Ghoulish Delight 10-21-2008 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevy Baby (Post 247462)
Thank you. But I don't think I would get them in time to make a difference. I was hoping I could find some place in the OC that I could swing by and pick them up.

Perhaps one of the democratic party offices have 'em. The one I know of is on Chapman by our place, but there are others scattered around.

Kevy Baby 10-21-2008 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 247470)
Perhaps one of the democratic party offices have 'em. The one I know of is on Chapman by our place, but there are others scattered around.

Good idea. I will check there.

BarTopDancer 10-21-2008 01:47 PM

My friend is working the phone banks Thursday. I will ask and see if he can pick some stuff up if you'll be in the area before the election.

Ghoulish Delight 10-21-2008 01:49 PM

Ugh, I'm finding myself having such an angry reaction to the Yes On 8 folks. Today I was in a store and the fvcking KoC ad came played on the radio station that was tuned in. I had an urge to find and smash the radio.

Yesterday I drove past a bunch of people waving Yes On 8 signs, some with pictures of a mom and dad hugging and kissing their sweet innocent child. I sat at a red light across from them for a while, and by the time it turned green and I could pass them, I had to stop myself from rolling down the window and shouting horrible things at them.

Frustratingly, once I got past them and calmed down, all I wanted to do is go back and talk to them reasonably, but I know that I'd just get angry again if I tried and it would not turn out well.

Sigh. I don't respond well to fear and hate.

BarTopDancer 10-21-2008 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 247481)
Ugh, I'm finding myself having such an angry reaction to the Yes On 8 folks. Today I was in a store and the fvcking KoC ad came played on the radio station that was tuned in. I had an urge to find and smash the radio.

Yesterday I drove past a bunch of people waving Yes On 8 signs, some with pictures of a mom and dad hugging and kissing their sweet innocent child. I sat at a red light across from them for a while, and by the time it turned green and I could pass them, I had to stop myself from rolling down the window and shouting horrible things at them.

Frustratingly, once I got past them and calmed down, all I wanted to do is go back and talk to them reasonably, but I know that I'd just get angry again if I tried and it would not turn out well.

Sigh. I don't respond well to fear and hate.

I'm finding myself doing the same thing.

I saw some No on 8 people out with handmade signs. I'm really tempted to do that one day, after work before the election.

I also think that I'm going to end up ending a few friendships over this, I don't think I can be friends with people who think it's ok to take away rights.

katiesue 10-21-2008 02:01 PM

My area has become literally plastered with Yes on 8 in the past week. Yard signs, bumper stickers, idiots on street corners waiving signs. This morning I wanted to stop the car and yell at them, at the very least flip them off. Not that either of these are very mature or get me anywhere but it's crazy how many signs and things I see.

Moonliner 10-21-2008 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by katiesue (Post 247488)
My area has become literally plastered with Yes on 8 in the past week. Yard signs, bumper stickers, idiots on street corners waiving signs. This morning I wanted to stop the car and yell at them, at the very least flip them off. Not that either of these are very mature or get me anywhere but it's crazy how many signs and things I see.

I wonder, do these people see Prop-8 as a gay rights issue, or a freedom of religion issue?

It would make a vast difference in how I would confront them on it.

Ghoulish Delight 10-21-2008 02:10 PM

Judging from the tone of the ads, it's being framed as a freedom of religion issue. They're being "forced to tolerate" (oh no, tolerance!!) something they "morally object" to. And "churches could lose their tax exempt status" or be sued!

katiesue 10-21-2008 02:11 PM

All the materials are from the same orginization - which I can't remember right now. Some of the people holding signs says "Yes on 8 = Freedom of Speech, and Yes on 8 = Restoration of Marriage" There are a few other slogans that I can't remember.

Edited to add - here it is Protect Marriage

BarTopDancer 10-21-2008 02:14 PM

There should be new signs with "protect marriage" and then use images of Brittany and her 2 marriages, Madonna and her marriages, McCain and his affair, etc...

Ghoulish Delight 10-21-2008 02:14 PM

That and "protect the children" with some twisted, "The institution of marriage exists only for the benefit of children, and children should be raised by their biological parents, so we need to protect marriage." Nevermind that adoption, divorce, in-vetro, marriage between sterile people, etc. etc. would remain perfectly legal. :rolleyes:

JWBear 10-21-2008 02:15 PM

How is this a free speech issue?

Gemini Cricket 10-21-2008 02:17 PM

There was a really horrible "Save Traditional Marriage" ad that played in Hawai'i in '98. It showed the idiot who headed the campaign standing there with his dog. (I'm sure you can guess where the ad went from there.) But he said, "If gays are allowed to marry, then will I be able to marry my dog?"
It was so very degrading and petty.
I feel sorry for how dumb some people are about this issue. I'm no rocket scientist, but I ain't no buffoon... unless I'm being buffoonish on purpose...

Ghoulish Delight 10-21-2008 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gemini Cricket (Post 247503)
But he said, "If gays are allowed to marry, then will I be able to marry my dog?"

Hmm, I think I'd respond, "Be my guest, dog fvcker."

katiesue 10-21-2008 02:34 PM

I know a lot of these groups have issues with the word “marriage”. Now correct me if I’m wrong but to my understanding in some churches you’re not considered “married” unless you have a ceremony in that particular church with a priest. I know this is true for Catholics. Now if 8 were to get voted down you still couldn’t be gay and “married” in the Catholic Church’s eyes because they wouldn’t perform the ceremony, which is their right. I know many people who are Catholic who were not married in the church but elsewhere and unless you later go in and have your “marriage” blessed, to the church it’s a “civil union” anyway. So I don’t get the threat or problem. If your particular religion doesn’t want to perform a gay marriage based upon it’s beliefs then no problem. Why does it matter anymore than if someone goes to Vegas or City Hall which aren’t usually religious ceremonies anyway but civil ones?

My Aunts suggestion was that we go the British way. You have a legal ceremony and then should you want to, a religious ceremony at whatever institution you subscribe to. Takes the religion aspect out of it.

Ghoulish Delight 10-21-2008 02:41 PM

There is absolutely nothing that voting against prop 8 will do to change a church's tax-exempt status nor its right to choose who it will and will not perform marriages for. Period. The pro-8 is utter nonsense and outright lies. It's beyond me how it's even legal to use false information in a political campaign.

BarTopDancer 10-21-2008 02:44 PM

I heard Pepperdine issues a cease and desist order for the "professor" in one of the Yes on 8 ads. I can't find a link for the story though :(

Gemini Cricket 10-21-2008 02:51 PM

Quote:

A pastor volunteers at a phone bank in conservative-leaning Orange County on Oct. 16 to urge Californians to vote no on Proposition 8, which would outlaw same-sex marriages in the state.
Source

BarTopDancer 10-21-2008 03:04 PM

I think I am going to be more pissed if 8 passes than I am going to be if McCain wins.

CoasterMatt 10-21-2008 03:09 PM

Here's the story on the Pepperdine professor.

Morrigoon 10-21-2008 03:16 PM

Okay, here's a rough draft of my flyer (Times New Roman, 18-point type for Header and Footer (bolded here), 14-point type for the body):
Quote:


What is Proposition 8
And why should you vote NO?


This election season, there is one thing on the ballot with even greater long-term consequences for Californians than just deciding who gets to mess up Washington for the next 4 years.

Proposition 8 is an assault on personal rights. It is an attempt by out-of-state special interests to amend OUR state constitution to make discriminating against gays legal. It not only permits, but requires the state to treat gays like second-class citizens by refusing them the right to get married to their chosen spouse, therefore depriving them of all the rights and privileges that come with marriage and are considered essential for the efficient operation of a combined household. Domestic partnerships are NOT the same, and only convey a small fraction of the rights and privileges afforded to everyone else.

If Proposition 8 passes, over twelve thousand marriages will be nullified. Tens of thousands of future marriages will be forbidden.

41 years ago, in the landmark civil rights case, Loving vs. Virginia, the US Supreme Court ended race-based legal restrictions on marriage. As absurd as bans on interracial marriage sound to us today, so will Proposition 8 sound to our children and grandchildren 40 years from now. And just as you should be embarrassed for previous generations’ racism, so you should be embarrassed for today’s bigots, attempting to write their own phobias into the state’s Constitution. There is no difference between voting to ban gay marriage today and voting to ban interracial marriage half a century ago. Proponents of Proposition 8 are using the same arguments that were used to support anti-miscegenation laws in the early part of the last century. As we are reminded every Martin Luther King Day, separate is not equal. The only way to treat opposite-sex unions the same as same-sex ones without allowing same-sex marriage is to eliminate legal marriage entirely, changing all current marriages into civil unions as well. If you really want to protect marriage, protect it for everyone.

Proposition 8 is hate legislation.

Vote NO on Prop Hate!


Gemini Cricket 10-21-2008 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Morrigoon (Post 247522)
Okay, here's a rough draft of my flyer...

I love it.
Visible mojo for Morrigoon.
:)

Morrigoon 10-21-2008 03:23 PM

Too wordy, but I can't help myself. And maybe logic will reach some folks.

Ghoulish Delight 10-21-2008 03:28 PM

I'd try to shorten it a bit, and call out the lies from the other side.

Use bullet points. People respond to bullet points.

* No church will be forced to perform marriages they don't approve of
* No on Prop 8 make life easier for the families of countless adopted children.
* Churches will maintain tax exempt status.
* No on Prop 8 protects the institution of marriage for everyone



Tom 10-21-2008 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by katiesue (Post 247509)
Now if 8 were to get voted down you still couldn’t be gay and “married” in the Catholic Church’s eyes because they wouldn’t perform the ceremony, which is their right. I know many people who are Catholic who were not married in the church but elsewhere and unless you later go in and have your “marriage” blessed, to the church it’s a “civil union” anyway. So I don’t get the threat or problem.

This is a very logical response to an illogical position. Favoring prop 8 comes from fear and hatred of gay people. If it were otherwise, then truthful and logical arguments could be offered in its defense. The false and logically twisted arguments that its supporters make are obvious covers for their true reasons, which are not considered politically acceptable to be spoken of openly.

Chernabog 10-21-2008 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by katiesue (Post 247509)
I know many people who are Catholic who were not married in the church but elsewhere and unless you later go in and have your “marriage” blessed, to the church it’s a “civil union” anyway. So I don’t get the threat or problem.

The threat and problem is that the church thinks that gay people are sinful and that gay relationships are an abomination. Therefore, they will try to block all attempts to validate gay relationships. As marriage is the ultimate form of relationship validity (both socially and legally), the religious idiots want to block it for the same reason that we want it. Having gay marriage legal means that it is truly okay to be gay, and that scares the living crap out of their homophobic arses.

BarTopDancer 10-21-2008 05:35 PM

A little more info on my Twitter post -

There were 7 or 8 if not more No on 8 signs along the path I took home from the freeway. This path was basically off the 133 down to just before Sand Canyon. Not a super busy road. Last week I noticed a bunch of No on 8 signs placed along the path. Yesterday I noticed a few of the No on 8 signs missing. Didn't think anything of it, as I could have just overlooked them. Today I am certain they have all been removed. Other political signs are up, just the No on 8 signs have been removed. There are no Yes on 8 signs up (there weren't before either).

Chernabog 10-21-2008 05:39 PM

Really it is very depressing -- I *had* thought that we had made great strides in the past ten years (and we have, don't get me wrong), but I thought we were past the point of such blatant homophobia in California by so many people (there will always be bigoted a-holes out there... but so MANY just scares me).

BarTopDancer 10-21-2008 05:45 PM

If I can get my hands on more, I'll put them up again. I don't have monies to buy them right now though :(

Do networks (regular and cable) have to accept campaign commercials for air time?

Kevy Baby 10-21-2008 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 247577)
A little more info on my Twitter post

Crap: now we have to cross reference between Twitter and LoT?

My head hurts.

Morrigoon 10-21-2008 05:59 PM

I'm so angry over Prop 8 that it's starting to affect me physically. I'm literally fatigued and sickened every time I see/hear yes on 8 ads. My big mistake was earlier today when I was looking for info on the percentage of funding behind Prop 8 that came from the Mormon church and other out-of-state interests, and I happened upon a discussion following an article in the Deseret News. I shouldn't have kept reading, but I did. I can't wait for this to be over.

Prudence 10-21-2008 07:38 PM

The hatred in the radio ads surprises and saddens me, but honestly I'm just glad I'm down here, registered to vote, and have the privilege to cast my vote against Prop 8.

MouseWife 10-21-2008 07:53 PM

Morri~I know what you mean. Like I said, I don't know how I'll face people after this. And if somehow it passes? That stupid commercial that says they need to listen to the people; hey, it passed. When things arne't the way they want it, it isn't right.

I think the stealing of the signs is cowardly and shows they fear that they are going to lose.

Although, I understand that the Yes on 8 are being stolen, also. I think that is because the signs are rude.

Yeah, it makes me sick, too.

Bible schmible. Love and respect your brothers and sisters. That is what God wants, right? Shame on those who would deny anyone what they have.

Can't you get free signs somewhere? I wanted to get some Obama ones and No on 8 but I haven't had a chance....just thought of it today...I wonder where I got the idea. :D :snap:

Oh yes, Pru, the radio ads turn my stomach, I feel the hatred. I can't imagine how someone feels who this is directed personally to. And don't tell me it isn't personal. You have to put a face to it, you can't just call it a proposition.

Morrigoon 10-21-2008 08:29 PM

You do have to buy the signs... I paid $5 for my Obama sign from the Santa Ana office, but I overheard tonight that they're asking $8 for them from the Lake Forest office, and that she has trouble getting the main offices to give her any at all. For No on 8 signs, she said you have to order them online from NoOn8.com and that they arrive in about 2-3 days, they come from LA.

Pru: I'm so glad you're here and got registered :)

I'm thinking of buying posterboard and making my own signs.

BarTopDancer 10-21-2008 08:43 PM

Grrr. A NEW Yes on 8 ad, all about the "a prince can marry a prince" saying that gay marriage will be taught in schools.

The No on 8 campaign better get moving with ads to refute this.

I have a very bad feeling that this thing is going to pass and it makes me sick.

MouseWife 10-21-2008 09:17 PM

I've heard that commercial.

It is twisting something that happened. I really doubt that they aimed to teach that, kids aren't necessarily taught marriage, they are taught family. Perhaps one of the students has gay parents or had a question about it. Perhaps that child lives in a home where they make everything voodoo.

I don't buy that b.s. commercial. And, the way they say 'It really happened!'

And, thanks about the news about the signs.

I need to find where to go locally. I hear that you can pick up Obama shirts there....

Not Afraid 10-21-2008 09:25 PM

I simply cannot understand why anyone is for Prop. 8. No one is taking away the rights of churches. Churches can believe and accept whatever they want to believe and accept. Church is a choice.

Gay couples already adopt or have children, raise families, have their own children, buy property together - share everything that a married couple also share with any of the other legal benefits a married couple. Why shouldn't they have the same legal protection that other people do?

Marriage is a generic term shared by people both religious who care to marry in a sacred ceremony and those who simply want the many benefits that a married couple enjoy since they are already joined in a partnership. Why would anyone have an objection to these benefits:

  • joint parenting, adoption,foster care, custody, and visitation (including non-biological parents);
  • status as next-of-kin for hospital visits and medical decisions where one partner is too ill to be competent;
  • joint insurance policies for home, auto and health;
  • dissolution and divorce protections such as community property and child support;
  • immigration and residency for partners from other countries;
  • inheritance automatically in the absence of a will;
  • joint leases with automatic renewal rights in the event one partner dies or leaves the house or apartment;
  • inheritance of jointly-owned real and personal property through the right of survivorship (which avoids the time and expense and taxes in probate);
  • benefits such as annuities, pension plans, Social Security, and Medicare;
  • spousal exemptions to property tax increases upon the death of one partner who is a co-owner of the home;
  • veterans' discounts on medical care, education, and home loans; joint filing of tax returns;
  • joint filing of customs claims when traveling;
  • wrongful death benefits for a surviving partner and children;
  • bereavement or sick leave to care for a partner or child;
  • decision-making power with respect to whether a deceased partner will be cremated or not and where to bury him or her;
  • crime victims' recovery benefits;
More here (I think I have posted this before)

I haven't gotten into any arguments over Prop 8 and it is unlikely that will happen too often in Long Beach - although I have seen a few Yes on 8 signs.

Yes on 8 just doesn't make sense.

Ghoulish Delight 10-21-2008 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Not Afraid (Post 247618)
I simply cannot understand

Fear, hate, prejudice, and lies.

Not Afraid 10-21-2008 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 247619)
Fear, hate, prejudice, and lies.

What is this - the middle ages?

Cadaverous Pallor 10-21-2008 10:06 PM

I had a coworker say she couldn't decide how to vote on it. She said she thinks gov't should stay out of marriage. I said well, then vote no. She said she just couldn't pick and abstained on that one, and had already mailed her ballot.

She's such a nice person too, but man, am I livid. :mad:

I brought it up with another coworker because now I feel stupid for not talking about it sooner. Hopefully I can sway him, he seems kind of on the fence about it too.

Morrigoon 10-21-2008 10:15 PM

My standpoint is, I prefer an abstention to a Yes. Abstaining doesn't directly help gay marriage, but remembering that every yes vote requires an extra no vote to counter it, eliminating yeses will help the cause indirectly.

For people who can't be convinced to vote No, I'll settle for eliminating their yes by convincing them to abstain.

BarTopDancer 10-21-2008 10:19 PM

I'm so excited! I managed to convince one of my 'going to vote yes based upon the word marriage' co-workers that marriage is a verb these days, and allowing same-sex marriage isn't going to do anything to weaken her marriage. She thought about it over the weekend, and decided that she couldn't take away the rights of her Aunt. She voted no. Her husband couldn't get away from the term marriage and voted yes. She tried to convince him otherwise, but he just couldn't get around the term. If it was to allow marriage benefits and to call them civil unions (for everyone) he would have voted no.

I also made my own NO on 8 signs. Using the actual design of the signs I added white space and the verbiage "Please don't take away the rights of my friends". I'm going to make a few more "Don't Hate. Don't Discriminate" and if I'm feeling ornery "Can I vote on your right to marry?" and "marriage should be protected from the 'straights'. Brittany anyone? How about Madonna? Or McCain and his affair?".

Not Afraid 10-21-2008 10:43 PM

Why do I find it funny that Madonna - a fag hag if there ever is one - is being used to mock straight marriage.

Morrigoon 10-21-2008 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 247633)
I'm so excited! I managed to convince one of my 'going to vote yes based upon the word marriage' co-workers that marriage is a verb these days, and allowing same-sex marriage isn't going to do anything to weaken her marriage. She thought about it over the weekend, and decided that she couldn't take away the rights of her Aunt. She voted no. Her husband couldn't get away from the term marriage and voted yes. She tried to convince him otherwise, but he just couldn't get around the term. If it was to allow marriage benefits and to call them civil unions (for everyone) he would have voted no.

I also made my own NO on 8 signs. Using the actual design of the signs I added white space and the verbiage "Please don't take away the rights of my friends". I'm going to make a few more "Don't Hate. Don't Discriminate" and if I'm feeling ornery "Can I vote on your right to marry?" and "marriage should be protected from the 'straights'. Brittany anyone? How about Madonna? Or McCain and his affair?".

Visible mojo, BTD!

BarTopDancer 10-21-2008 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Not Afraid (Post 247636)
Why do I find it funny that Madonna - a fag hag if there ever is one - is being used to mock straight marriage.

I'm naming public figures out who probably don't have type of marriage that the Yes on 8 people are thinking of when they say protect marriage. Doesn't matter that she's a hag. They want to protect traditional family values. Madonna is anything but traditional.

Hetero's have done a great job of making a mockery out of the "institute of marriage". Divorce rate is around 50%.

Kevy Baby 10-21-2008 11:15 PM

Well; marriage is the prime cause of divorce. Did you know that every single divorce was preceded by marriage?

Shocking!

Strangler Lewis 10-22-2008 05:50 AM

I think part of the opposition is homophobic, but I also think part of it stems from the usual Joe Sixpack insecurity that liberals/gays think that they will somehow have better, hipper marriages than straights. Therefore, the anti-8 groups should run ads featuring gay couples arguing about money, fighting in front of the children, beating on each other and so on.

Betty 10-22-2008 06:04 AM

I had a discussion about 8 with my teenage daughter yesterday. You know -we've talked a lot about the presedentail candidates but not the prop's. She was saying she would vote yes which rather alarmed me - so we discussed why I was voting no. She kept saying - didn't know that - really - that's not fair.

I hope that if the subject comes up with her friends, she can voice these facts. They are freshmen but will be ready or nearly ready to vote in the next election for president in 4 years. And who knows, maybe if she does mention something to her friends, they might ask their parents about it.

Then I think - ha! Like that will ever happen. Teenagers standing up against their friends for a cause that doesn't directly affect them at their very moment in time and that those teens would then go and (gasp) talk to their parents. Dream on.

But at least we were able to discuss it.

Morrigoon 10-22-2008 09:04 AM

Nonsense, teens LOVE to take on a cause they understand little about :) especially when influenced by a charismatic peer who convinces them that their rights are at stake.

Gemini Cricket 10-22-2008 09:44 AM

Quote:

Despite tough economic times, an amazing 59,000 Mormon families have succumbed to substantial pressure from church elders, and have given huge amounts of money to California's Yes on 8 campaign. These Mormon families have given a staggering $18.6 million since June 1st and the total grows daily. This represents 77% of all money raised and 88% of all individual money raised (not including funds from the big out of state organizations). In Arizona where a gay marriage ban is back on the ballot after losing just two years ago, Mormon families have contributed nearly all of the $6.9 million to the Yes on 102 campaign. What is going on here?
Source

Kevy Baby 10-22-2008 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Morrigoon (Post 247703)
Nonsense, teens LOVE to take on a cause they understand little about :) especially when influenced by a charismatic peer who convinces them that their rights are at stake.

Of course, if one disagreed with the influencing party, then that influencer would be viewed as a brainwashing monster.

BarTopDancer 10-22-2008 09:47 AM

See here's the thing.

If 8 passes it's going to court.
If 8 fails it's going to end up back on the ballot.

This election isn't the end all of the issue.

MouseWife 10-22-2008 10:05 AM

GC~ Sadly I think people believe following whatever their church says will get them into heaven.

The teen issue~ my son 'debated' with his close friends the last election; over abortion, the war, religion, you name it. He stood up for his beliefs, ones that I haven't brainwashed him with, I would say he has more enlightened me than I him.

But, it was difficult. It really did cause a rift {like how I feel now, probably, but now it is on a larger amount of people} with these people, some he's known since he was 4 years old.

I hope that your daughter can stand up and voice her opinion but I would still {{{hug}}} her for opening up her mind and her heart. Unfortunately, a lot of kids parents are worried about telling their kids that it is okay to be different and that is what she gets stuck with.

katiesue 10-22-2008 10:57 AM

Madz is 12 and in her enlightened, informed opinion Prop 8 is Stupid. When the first No on 8 ad came out, the wedding one, we were watching TV and she said she didn't get it. So I explained that it was trying to say what if people you loved had all these obsticales in their way and couldn't marry who they wanted to. She kind of got that then I told her it was for gay marriage. To be honest I don't think it had occured to her that you couldn't get married if you were gay. So I explained what if GC or Isaac or ISM found someone they loved but they're not allowed to get married because they're gay. "Well that's just stupid". So now when any Prop 8 ads come on her comment is "it's Stupid that they can't get married".

MouseWife 10-22-2008 11:16 AM

I think what you did, katiesue, putting a face to the issue, is key.

Unfortunately, I think people pretend they don't see things.

My aunt told us she and her son were debating the issue and she told him that you had to support the 'no'. She said that back when she was a child in grade school, {oh, I'd the '50s? not sure what part}, the principal came to their house and told their father if the kids spoke Spanish in class they would be sent home. So, she said, don't let that happen. Don't give anyone control over your life.

Gemini Cricket 10-22-2008 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by katiesue (Post 247751)
So now when any Prop 8 ads come on her comment is "it's Stupid that they can't get married".

Madz is so very awesome. And so is Mom!
:)

Morrigoon 10-22-2008 12:06 PM

Well, doing a prop 8 search on twitter is encouraging, but we all know that only taking a sample from the wired world is not representative.

Ghoulish Delight 10-22-2008 04:41 PM

Awesome. Just got handed a letter from an openly gay coworker asking to vote against 8 (in which I learned he was married in '04 in SF to his partner). I of course told him I already was. It was in an envelope with my name on it, so I assume he's only handing them to people whom he has a working relationship with and is not blanketing the company, but good for him for doing something!


ETA: Heh, also learned that he was a practicing devout Mormon for 30 years.

Prudence 10-22-2008 07:40 PM

I object to the idea of amending any constitution to limit standard rights for particular groups of people. Generally constitutional changes are reserved for specifically enumerating rights.

innerSpaceman 10-22-2008 08:25 PM

Which will, in fact, be the basis of the lawsuit filed if Prop H8 passes. There's some sort of precedent which holds the Constitution cannot be amended by ballot initiatives for the purpose of taking away Constutitional rights ... or some such thing.

scaeagles 10-22-2008 08:31 PM

The problem, as I see it, is (and I'm assuming that it would be the same as the federal Constitution) that there is no limitation to what can be an amendment. I would guess that if enough people voted for it, one could amend the constitution declaring that chickens have voting rights and the owners have the power to vote on behalf of their chickens (thereby reducing the voting power of non-chicken owners).

BarTopDancer 10-22-2008 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 247577)
A little more info on my Twitter post -

There were 7 or 8 if not more No on 8 signs along the path I took home from the freeway. This path was basically off the 133 down to just before Sand Canyon. Not a super busy road. Last week I noticed a bunch of No on 8 signs placed along the path. Yesterday I noticed a few of the No on 8 signs missing. Didn't think anything of it, as I could have just overlooked them. Today I am certain they have all been removed. Other political signs are up, just the No on 8 signs have been removed. There are no Yes on 8 signs up (there weren't before either).

The signs have been replaced and re-done. They now say "this sign has been torn down [number] times. Stop the hate. No on 8. With a print out of the Irvine municipal code that it is illegal to remove political signs.

innerSpaceman 10-22-2008 08:43 PM

scaeagles, there's a limit on what can be amended BY BALLOT MEASURE to the California Constitution. I've seen the case law on it.

That's not to say there isn't any conflicting case law. But there will be a lawsuit on that basis if the measure passes.

BarTopDancer 10-22-2008 09:01 PM

From what I understand, amendments cannot be made based upon vote. Only the legislation can make them.

Kevy Baby 10-22-2008 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman (Post 247953)
There's some sort of precedent which holds the Constitution cannot be amended by ballot initiatives for the purpose of taking away Constitutional rights ... or some such thing.

Now THERE'S a solid legal argument if I have ever heard one!

:)

innerSpaceman 10-22-2008 09:58 PM

BTD, Constitutional amendments can be made by ballot initiative. What's at issue is whether there is a limit to what types of amendment. As I said, case law exists setting precedent that Constitutional rights cannot be eliminated by ballot measure vote. And just because there may (or may not) be conflicting case law does not make it a squishy legal argument, Kevy ... just an argument. The courts will decide.

BarTopDancer 10-22-2008 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman (Post 247977)
BTD, Constitutional amendments can be made by ballot initiative. What's at issue is whether there is a limit to what types of amendment. As I said, case law exists setting precedent that Constitutional rights cannot be eliminated by ballot measure vote. And just because there may (or may not) be conflicting case law does not make it a squishy legal argument, Kevy ... just an argument. The courts will decide.

Thank you!

Morrigoon 10-23-2008 09:57 AM

The whole point of having a constitution is to prevent a simple majority from voting away the rights of a minority on a whim.

innerSpaceman 10-23-2008 10:26 AM

Exactly. Which is why I think the legal challenge to any Prop H8 passage will be on very firm ground.

Gemini Cricket 10-23-2008 10:31 AM

I know, it seems like you can find a poll somewhere, anywhere to support your take on something but this I found interesting:
Quote:

The proposed ban, known as Proposition 8, is opposed by 52 percent of those likely to vote, with 44 percent in favor, according to a poll by the Public Policy Institute of California. The ban is opposed by two-thirds of Democrats in a state where Senator Barack Obama holds a lead of 23 percentage points over Republican Challenger John McCain, the poll found.
Source
Honestly, I don't know what to believe. But here's to hoping...

Strangler Lewis 10-23-2008 10:46 AM

I think the difference is between whether you have an amendment to the constitution or a revision of the constitution. Revisions have to be submitted to the voters by the legislature. Amendments do not. There is certainly case law on what constitutes a revision, but I don't have it at the tip of my tongue.

Chernabog 10-23-2008 11:02 AM

One would hope that an amendment which takes away a Constitutionally-granted fundamental right of a minority (which normally must be looked at per the In Re Marriage cases under the strict scrutiny standard) would constitute a "revision".

Again... I need to review the case law and see what sorts of examples are out there, because I don't usually delve into that area.

Chernabog 10-23-2008 11:11 AM

http://www.religioustolerance.org/hommarl8.htm

^^ Some interesting stuff in there.

Just FYI, the last poll shows Prop 8 being defeated 52% to 44%. Great news, and new commercials with the (or a) Superintendent of public schools telling voters about the lies of the Yes on 8 people.

Last night I went to a house party that raised over $4000. (in the raffle I won a Barack Obama shirt, and BJ won a $375 photography session woot woot!). They said that there has been more money raised by the No on 8 people than on any other LGBT issue (I think they said in either CA history or US history). But of course we are being outspent by the Mormons. How they feel SO PASSIONATELY about taking away other people's rights is plain sick to me....

Please everyone, keep telling your friends about this!!

Ghoulish Delight 10-23-2008 11:15 AM

I wonder. If it does pass and it is upheld, I could certainly see the rise of another ballot prop, an amendment that would repeal the prop 8 amendment.

Not Afraid 10-23-2008 11:26 AM

I haven't found one person in my client base who is a Yes on 8 person. I love Long Beach.

innerSpaceman 10-23-2008 11:28 AM

Apparently the LHC people are organizing a costume thingy for the WeHo Halloween Carnival where they all dress up as No on 8 signs.

I hope I run into them. :D

Gemini Cricket 10-23-2008 11:30 AM

I've only seen one Yes sign in Burbank so far. But then again, I'm right by three big movie studios.

Chernabog 10-23-2008 11:37 AM

http://www.noonprop8.com/

WOOT there's the ad I'm talking about. This is more of what we need (message from the California Superintendent of Schools)

Morrigoon 10-23-2008 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chernabog (Post 248069)
One would hope that an amendment which takes away a Constitutionally-granted fundamental right of a minority (which normally must be looked at per the In Re Marriage cases under the strict scrutiny standard) would constitute a "revision".

Again... I need to review the case law and see what sorts of examples are out there, because I don't usually delve into that area.

There is case law to support that marriage is a fundamental right protected under "life, liberty and pursuit of happiness". I don't remember the case name but it had to do with prisoners.

There is case law to support that protections afforded to racial, religious, and gender minorities is to also be applied to sexual orientation. Again, I no longer have a record of the case name. Although this I'm sure you can find easily.

Then of course there's Loving vs. Virginia, which nullified anti-miscegenation laws (eg: legalized interracial marriage)

And Brown vs. Board of Education, which we all know establishes that separate is not equal.

Dang, I used 5 cases in the paper I wrote, can't remember what the 5th case was for, probably a weaker supporting argument. Of all the things I wish I hadn't thrown out from college, its the physical copy of this paper I miss the most (since the digital was lost in a hard drive crash)

Chernabog 10-23-2008 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Morrigoon (Post 248084)
There is case law to support that marriage is a fundamental right protected under "life, liberty and pursuit of happiness". I don't remember the case name but it had to do with prisoners.

There is case law to support that protections afforded to racial, religious, and gender minorities is to also be applied to sexual orientation. Again, I no longer have a record of the case name. Although this I'm sure you can find easily.

Then of course there's Loving vs. Virginia, which nullified anti-miscegenation laws (eg: legalized interracial marriage)

And Brown vs. Board of Education, which we all know establishes that separate is not equal.

Dang, I used 5 cases in the paper I wrote, can't remember what the 5th case was for, probably a weaker supporting argument. Of all the things I wish I hadn't thrown out from college, its the physical copy of this paper I miss the most (since the digital was lost in a hard drive crash)

However, you are talking about federal cases there (which in certain instances DO control if there's a conflict between state and federal, which is too complicated to go into here). This is a state law matter for right now (though it will ultimately be a federal matter -- and once Scalia and Thomas are dead or retire, the US Supremes will hopefully fall on the correct side of fundamental human rights).

In the In Re Marriage cases, the California Supreme Court recognized that:

Quote:

Although our state Constitution does not contain any explicit reference to a “right to marry,” past California cases establish beyond question that the right to marry is a fundamental right whose protection is guaranteed to all persons by the California Constitution. (See, e.g., Conservatorship of Valerie N. (1985) 40 Cal.3d 143, 161 [219 Cal. Rptr. 387, 707 P.2d 760] (Valerie N.) [“The right to marriage and procreation are now recognized as fundamental, constitutionally protected interests. [Citations.] … These rights are aspects of the right of privacy which … is express in section 1 of articleI of the California Constitution which includes among the inalienable rights [*810] possessed by all persons in this state, that of ‘privacy.’ ”]; Williams v. Garcetti (1993) 5 Cal.4th 561, 577 [20 Cal. Rptr. 2d 341, 853 P.2d 507]
In re Marriage Cases, 43 Cal. 4th 757, 809-810 (Cal. 2008)

The big deal of those cases is not that the right to marry is fundamental, but that sexual orientation was made a "suspect class" like race:

Quote:

The issue is one of first impression in California,however, and for the reasons discussed below we conclude that sexual orientation should be viewed as a suspect classification for purposes of the California Constitution's equal protection clause and that statutes that treat persons differently because of their sexual orientation should be subjected to strict scrutiny under this constitutional provision.
In re Marriage Cases, 43 Cal. 4th 757, 841 (Cal. 2008) Of course, this statement does say "statutes" and the "amendment/revision" is technically not a "statute" but it might be treated the same (I'm not sure on that).



Of course, this part is nice too: ;)

Quote:

Accordingly, we conclude that the right to marry, as embodied in article I, sections 1 and 7 of the California Constitution, guarantees same-sex couples the same substantive constitutional rights as opposite-sex couples to choose one's life partner and enter with that person into a committed, officially recognized, and protected family relationship that enjoys all of the constitutionally based incidents of marriage.
It is incongruous to say that marriage is a basic human fundamental right guaranteed by the California Constitution.... but only for some people (which is the point of the In Re Marriage cases to begin with). Let's just try our best to make sure it does not pass, and not have to worry about this stuff.

Morrigoon 10-23-2008 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chernabog (Post 248071)
But of course we are being outspent by the Mormons. How they feel SO PASSIONATELY about taking away other people's rights is plain sick to me....

I'm not entirely sure they're all so passionate about Prop 8, most of them are just afraid of opposing their church. They've been calling them in for special meetings with their church leadership to discuss "suggested" donation amounts. Note that suggested is in quotes...

Morrigoon 10-23-2008 12:13 PM

Cherny: Good research, yeah I did my paper on a national scale. But like you say, ultimately, the (national) constitutionality of this battle will end up being decided on the national level.

Does the state supreme court not take national constitutionality into account?

Kevy Baby 10-23-2008 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman (Post 248078)
Apparently the LHC people are organizing a costume thingy for the WeHo Halloween Carnival where they all dress up as No on 8 signs.

I hope I run into them. :D

But isn't that just preaching to the choir?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chernabog (Post 248083)
http://www.noonprop8.com/

WOOT there's the ad I'm talking about. This is more of what we need (message from the California Superintendent of Schools)

On the radio this morning (KLOS), EVERY commercial break included a No on 8 ad that targeted the "teaching gay marriage in schools" issue with remarks from the CA Supt./Schools.

JWBear 10-23-2008 12:24 PM

If the case gets to the USSC, can't the overturning od Colorado's Amendment 2 be used as precedence against 8?

BarTopDancer 10-23-2008 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevy Baby (Post 248098)
But isn't that just preaching to the choir?

On the radio this morning (KLOS), EVERY commercial break included a No on 8 ad that targeted the "teaching gay marriage in schools" issue with remarks from the CA Supt./Schools.

That ad has been all over KROQ (at least in the morning).

Strangler Lewis 10-23-2008 12:32 PM

Lawrence v. Texas would be the most direct precedent. Beyond saying that there was no rational basis for criminalizing gay sex, the majority spoke at some length about the personal nature of the decision of whom to love. It would seem odd to say that the personal decision of whom to love is only respected to the extent that you can't be thrown in jail for it but that it does not extend to the stabilizing institution of marriage.

Morrigoon 10-23-2008 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevy Baby (Post 248098)
But isn't that just preaching to the choir?

Choir members gotta show up on Sunday if anyone's going to hear them sing.

Morrigoon 10-23-2008 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strangler Lewis (Post 248109)
Lawrence v. Texas would be the most direct precedent. Beyond saying that there was no rational basis for criminalizing gay sex, the majority spoke at some length about the personal nature of the decision of whom to love. It would seem odd to say that the personal decision of whom to love is only respected to the extent that you can't be thrown in jail for it but that it does not extend to the stabilizing institution of marriage.

SL! That was the other court case I was trying to think of, you darling you! :)

Gemini Cricket 10-23-2008 04:19 PM

1. Lies.
2. Threats:
Quote:

“On October 20, 2008, I received a certified-mail letter for the Prop 8 campaign requesting I withdraw my support of Equality California (EQCA) and demanding that I donate the same amount of money that I donated to the NO on Prop 8 campaign,” said Jim Abbott, Managing Partner of Abbott & Associates/Abbott Realty Group of San Diego, Calif. “The Prop 8 letter was very threatening if I chose to continue to fully exercise my right to support the NO on Prop 8 campaign.”
“This type of outrageous scare tactic from Prop 8 is intolerable. As a business owner, practicing Catholic, and civic leader who has served on the EQCA board for nearly three years, I believe in equality and rights for all...especially for my employees, 25 percent of whom are LGBT,” Abbott said.
Source

Ghoulish Delight 10-23-2008 04:23 PM

My opinion of AT&T, Comcast, Time Warner, Abbott and Associates, and California Association of Club Executives has gone up.

Kevy Baby 10-23-2008 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gemini Cricket (Post 248184)
1. Lies.
2. Threats:
Source

I am just stunned. I have no words. I WILL spreads this around to everyone, regardless of who I might piss off.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 248185)
My opinion of AT&T, Comcast, Time Warner, Abbott and Associates, and California Association of Club Executives has gone up.

I can guess why, but por que?

Never mind, I missed one page of the PDF.

Ghoulish Delight 10-23-2008 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevy Baby (Post 248187)
I am just stunned. I have no words. I WILL spreads this around to everyone, regardless of who I might piss off.

I can guess why, but por que?

There's a PDF of the letter Abbott received, as well as a copy of the list of contributors to Equality Califonia (above).

Strangler Lewis 10-23-2008 04:33 PM

It's an interesting issue, but that could be extortion. He should send the letter to the San Diego D.A. and, when they refuse to look into it, Jerry Brown. He should also, of course, say, fine, publish away.

Kevy Baby 10-23-2008 05:00 PM

What I really wish I could do is picket the Yes on H8 offices. But then I would have to go to Sacramento and that just isn't worth it.

BarTopDancer 10-23-2008 06:10 PM

The Yes on 8 people are up and down OSO pkwy and Alicia.

BarTopDancer 10-23-2008 06:21 PM

We need a list of all the supporters (besides the LDS church) who are financing Yes on 8.

Now that I think about it, this is probably one of the largest examples of a church forcing its will on the state.

JWBear 10-23-2008 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 248204)
We need a list of all the supporters (besides the LDS church) who are financing Yes on 8.

Now that I think about it, this is probably one of the largest examples of a church forcing its will on the state.

Here you go! (If you can stomach a visit to their webpage, that is.)

BarTopDancer 10-23-2008 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 248210)
Here you go! (If you can stomach a visit to their webpage, that is.)

GMTA. I went to get a list. It forced a registration, so I used "Jesus said don't judge" for the name and "equalityforall@itswhatjesuswoulddo.com" for the email.

Kevy Baby 10-23-2008 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 248214)
GMTA. I went to get a list. It forced a registration...

Really? I was able to look at the lists without registration.

Prudence 10-23-2008 09:31 PM

The pdf threat mentions something about undoing -- in the name of majority rule -- what four "unelected jurists" have done The irony there clearly escapes them.

Betty 10-24-2008 06:52 AM

And every name on the list is of a religous nature it would seem. You know - I don't tell them how to run their churches - but boy would I like to.

My daughter would really like to go to church with her friend. My husband and I do no attend church... we both did growing up, going to youth group etc and then realizing it was just not for us.

We won't let her go to church with her friend and their family. We've offerend to let her go with our mother in law instead - and she doesn't want to. It's more of doing stuff with her friend then going to church.

But this prop 8 BS just confirms that we totally made the right decision. I have no idea what silly ideas they'll try and brainwash her with and I have no intention of going to church first to find out.

Call me close minded if you want. I just can't get over people telling others to hate. The twisting of the words of the bible, the cherry picked things that are chosen to follow and ignore. It's just sickening. There is just no realy grasp of the "practice what you preach".

BarTopDancer 10-24-2008 08:13 AM

I'm going to have to start taking the 133 to and from work just to avoid all the people with Yes on 8 signs out there. They invoke such feelings of anger. I thought Jesus said don't judge, love everyone.

Morrigoon 10-24-2008 08:21 AM

I'm actually thinking of plastering the area with my own signs on telephone poles and such, just so I can drive to work feeling good instead of pissed off. I totally understand how ya feel, BTD.

Morrigoon 10-24-2008 08:28 AM

By the way, has anyone had a chance to complete the challenge yet? I'm planning on doing it this weekend. There are only 11 days left till the election.

Betty 10-24-2008 09:59 AM

I heard a new ad on the radio this morning - must better. Directly addresses the teaching kids about marriage angle.

BarTopDancer 10-24-2008 11:22 AM

EQCA has been spreading the word about the threatening letters from the 'protect marriage' people.

In happy news my parents are both voting NO on 8. I didn't even have to try and convince them.

Ghoulish Delight 10-24-2008 01:15 PM

I wonder why Apple waited so long, but they've announced their opposition to Prop 8 and a $100K donation to the No campaign. Better late than never.

Kevy Baby 10-24-2008 01:18 PM

I'm beginning to think that the swing in the polls to show that "Yes" was pulling ahead is a good thing for defeating 8. It is pushing people who weren't speaking up (and donating) to come out of the closet.

Ghoulish Delight 10-24-2008 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevy Baby (Post 248350)
I'm beginning to think that the swing in the polls to show that "Yes" was pulling ahead is a good thing for defeating 8. It is pushing people who weren't speaking up (and donating) to come out of the closet.

Perhaps, perhaps not. I see it more as a money flow thing. Yes got a LOT of money, from the LDS and other sources. The No side simply does not have the funding, so they had to be very strategic with their spending. So they spent a little bit of money at the beginning to generate some fund raising efforts. Those fund raising efforts generated some more, free, word of mouth for a while and built a lead for "No". I get the feeling they fully expected that lead to evaporate, knowing that the Yes folks would have the fundage to start advertising early and often. I get the feeling the strategy was to hold off on spending until either a pre-planned date, or until the poll numbers dropped back to even, then use whatever money they managed to get together for one last surge, which is what we're seeing now.

ETA: Actually, that might explain why Apple waited. They may have been asked to hold off for a bit, hoping to pick a moment where enough people were paying attention for it to make a decent impact.

Cadaverous Pallor 10-24-2008 02:47 PM

I stopped by the Dem office here and they said they have run out of No on 8 stickers due to demand, and that more are on the way. :)

JWBear 10-24-2008 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevy Baby (Post 248350)
I'm beginning to think that the swing in the polls to show that "Yes" was pulling ahead is a good thing for defeating 8. It is pushing people who weren't speaking up (and donating) to come out of the closet.

So to speak... ;)

BarTopDancer 10-24-2008 02:52 PM

The Irvine office said they have been photocopying No on 8 stuff to hand out. I'm going to stop by on my way home.

Chernabog 10-24-2008 03:07 PM

When I went to a No on 8 fundraiser the other day the rep from the campaign said that they were saving a lot of money initially (due to limited resources), so that they could blitz the airwaves in the next few weeks.

BarTopDancer 10-24-2008 07:52 PM

LA Times Opinion section has a bit on the threatening letters the Yes on 8 campaign has been sending out.

Story here.

I also emailed several news stations, maybe they'll pick it up if enough people contact them.

Gemini Cricket 10-25-2008 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 248398)
LA Times Opinion section has a bit on the threatening letters the Yes on 8 campaign has been sending out.

Story here.

I also emailed several news stations, maybe they'll pick it up if enough people contact them.

Apple joins the list of No on 8 supporters.
Quote:

Apple Inc. announced on Friday that it had donated $100,000 to fight California’s Proposition 8, which aims to change the state’s constitution in order to outlaw marriage equality, the San Francisco Chronicle reports.
“Apple was among the first California companies to offer equal rights and benefits to our employees’ same-sex partners, and we strongly believe that a person’s fundamental right -- including the right to marry -- should not be affected by their sexual orientation,” the company said in a statement. “Apple views this as a civil rights issue rather than just a political issue and is therefore speaking out publicly against Proposition 8.” (The Advocate)

Source

Ghoulish Delight 10-25-2008 02:29 PM

Gah, the lies are so infuriating!

I passed someone today holding a sign reading, "Prop 8 = Parental Rights". What the hell? It has absolutely nothing to do with parental rights. It might as well have said, "Prop 8 = saving puppies' lives!" for all it has to do with reality.

Coming back the other way my anger got the best of me and as I slowed to turn the corner these jokers were on, I had my window down and yelled, "That's a lie and you know it!" The liar smiled and waved.

MouseWife 10-25-2008 05:18 PM

Looking on my news station {I think they are the ones who send my my updates} I saw that on each page, they have a 'Yes on 8' ad. :mad:

Today, after a dryspell, I received more emails. I replied this way, and you tell me, was I rude or what?

"We are voting for Obama and voting No. on Prop H8.

Please refrain from sending any more political emails.

We personally find them offensive and hateful."


and

"As you know, I am against Prop 8. I won't deny anyone the security of being married to the one that they love.

And, honestly, we are all brothers and sisters under one God, I think that He wouldn't want us to treat one another this way. Look into your heart and be leery of how others interpret the bible.

But, that is my opinion and you are welcome to yours.

Love to you"


Go ahead and guess which one was to my sister and which one to my fil?

My sis, bless her. She just doesn't get it, you know?

BarTopDancer 10-26-2008 09:20 AM

I think they were good emails.

MouseWife 10-26-2008 03:22 PM

Thanks, BTD.

Not a word back on either front.

Gemini Cricket 10-27-2008 10:54 AM

Here's a great No on 8 article that should be spread around. It's written by someone in the LDS church who opposes Prop 8:

Quote:

With Proposition 8 it is time to stand for justice, not discrimination. It is time to stand for equality. It is time to be on the right side of history. Regardless of race, gender, or sexuality human beings are human beings and deserve to be treated as such. Today I voice my public support in favor of treating my gay and lesbian brothers and sisters as equals, and ask my fellow Mormons to do the same.
Source

Gemini Cricket 10-27-2008 04:45 PM

This is a wonderful story.
It has been many moons since I said that a Catholic priest actually inspired me. Today, after 22 years, I found one:
Quote:

Farrow then had his epiphany when he was asked by a Prop. 8 supporter in Fresno to speak up in favor of the measure. He knew he couldn't and that in fact he had to do just the opposite.

"I am morally compelled to vote no on Proposition 8," he told his congregation, saying he had to break "a numbing silence" about church prejudice against homosexuals.

Among the critics in his own parish and beyond, there are those who quote the Bible to condemn homosexuality and gay marriage.

"The Bible is not a book, it's a library written over 15 centuries," Farrow told me, suggesting that Christianity has and should continue to evolve. "People who approach scripture in a literal fashion are attempting to manipulate God himself."

To Farrow, condemning gay and lesbian marriage is as offensive as the condemnations of interracial marriage not too many decades ago.
Source

Kevy Baby 10-27-2008 04:56 PM

Quote:

"The Bible is not a book, it's a library written over 15 centuries," Farrow told me, suggesting that Christianity has and should continue to evolve. "People who approach scripture in a literal fashion are attempting to manipulate God himself."
This has to be one of the most wonderful things I have read about the Bible.

Betty 10-27-2008 05:52 PM

Apparently the "other side" is doing similar things. I got a letter - okay a folded up 8 1/2 x 11 paper with yes on 8 garbarge inside and a post it note with a note addressed to my husband and myself.

Signed Kevy. (I only know one Kevy and I rather doubt it's from kevybaby.;) )

Return address is a suite of businesses in corona on magnolia. Looking at google street view it's on magnolia and ontario.

Anyway, no last name. No balls at all.

Frankly, if someone is going to send out that crap, they should at least have the balls to put their name on it.

I'm trying to decide if I should bring the letter to the address and go to each suite listed and see if they support it. And then they can kiss my ass if they do. Easy enough to tell them they've lost my business if it applies.

No name on it - long list of suites - clearly the person can't back up their beliefs.

It really pissed me off getting it. Like hate mail or something was delivered.

Kevy Baby 10-27-2008 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Betty (Post 248890)
Signed Kevy. (I only know one Kevy and I rather doubt it's from kevybaby.;) )

Nope: not me.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Betty (Post 248890)
Return address is a suite of businesses in corona on magnolia. Looking at google street view it's on magnolia and ontario.

Anyway, no last name. No balls at all.

Frankly, if someone is going to send out that crap, they should at least have the balls to put their name on it.

I'm trying to decide if I should bring the letter to the address and go to each suite listed and see if they support it. And then they can kiss my ass if they do. Easy enough to tell them they've lost my business if it applies.

No name on it - long list of suites - clearly the person can't back up their beliefs.

It really pissed me off getting it. Like hate mail or something was delivered.

Chances are pretty good that IF you found the correct suite/business that it will be one of the following:
  1. A temporary office for a Yes on 8 campaign or other such organization. They will happily get into a debate with you with completely narrow minded views that are impossible to get into a rational argument with.
  2. A company that specializes in "hit" campaigns in which case they probably won't care what your opinion is. Unfortunately, we have printed hit pieces in the past (not this year) that I was embarrassed to be associated with (it's not my company, so I have to do what the boss sez).
  3. A small church with extreme fundamental views. There are many churches that congregate in business parks. See #1 above for argumentability.
  4. (And this is a long-shot) An actual business with an extremist fundy that owns it. Also a fruitless argument and highly unlikely that you would patronize the business otherwise.
Personally, I wouldn't waste my time on this.

BarTopDancer 10-27-2008 06:12 PM

On my way home I had some words with a Yes on 8 supporter at the corner of Alicia and Trabucco.

Me: Don't vote to take away rights!
Supporter: They already have rights!
Me: Exactly! YOU'RE trying to take them away!
Supporter - starts to walk away
Me: You know I'm right or you wouldn't be walking away.
Supporter - turns around
Me: What would Jesus do? I don't think he'd be cool with being hateful and discriminatory towards others.
Supporter - She opens her mouth to say something
Me: you know I'm right

and the light turned green.

---

Probably not the smartest thing to do, but driving past them 10 times a week (2x a day x 5 days a week) gets to you.

alphabassettgrrl 10-27-2008 06:20 PM

I wasn't able to get a "no on 8" yard sign because too many people already wanted them and they ran out. They hope to get some in soon.

I talked to our bus driver on the trip home (just a few minutes) and his question was about churches- that they'd have to change. No, churches (as far as I've seen) still get to choose who they marry. I didn't ask which way he was voting (if I take the bus again, maybe I will) but at least he's voting.

Minor. I know. I gave all the corner "yes" supporters the thumbs down over the weekend. I doubt they saw it but I can't pass and do nothing.

Kevy Baby 10-27-2008 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alphabassettgrrl (Post 248895)
No, churches (as far as I've seen) still get to choose who they marry.

I like to give two specific examples: the Catholic church (most will not allow you to marry in the church unless you are Catholic) and the LDS church. According to the latter, one is not "truly" married unless you are married in THE Temple in SLC (I don't know the official name). And, unless you are an LDS, you aren't even allowed to ATTEND (to witness) a marriage in that Temple.

BarTopDancer 10-27-2008 06:42 PM

I had a conversation with my LDS co-worker today. He's voting Yes (I tried, and I'll keep trying). On a positive note he doesn't believe the campaign ads on TV about teaching in school and thinks it's messed up to use the MA laws as what will happen in CA (and he shares that information with others).

He also thinks that regardless of what way the election goes people who are gay will eventually have the actual right to marry.

I ended the conversation asking him who will stand up when people come for his rights, or his daughters rights. No answer.

alphabassettgrrl 10-27-2008 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevy Baby (Post 248898)
I like to give two specific examples: the Catholic church (most will not allow you to marry in the church unless you are Catholic) and the LDS church.


Yeah. That.

Kevy Baby 10-27-2008 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alphabassettgrrl (Post 248905)
Yeah. That.

When you can specifics, it always makes the argument stronger.

Well, almost always...

katiesue 10-27-2008 06:55 PM

Yay - there have been yes on 8 supporters flipin everywhere around here. And on the streetcorners morning and night. Finally today a group of No on 8 supporters took up another street corner with mostly hand made signs - YAY. I honked like mad for them.

Morrigoon 10-27-2008 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 248902)
I had a conversation with my LDS co-worker today. He's voting Yes (I tried, and I'll keep trying). On a positive note he doesn't believe the campaign ads on TV about teaching in school and thinks it's messed up to use the MA laws as what will happen in CA (and he shares that information with others).

He also thinks that regardless of what way the election goes people who are gay will eventually have the actual right to marry.

I ended the conversation asking him who will stand up when people come for his rights, or his daughters rights. No answer.

Failing that, maybe you can at least convince him to abstain?

BarTopDancer 10-27-2008 10:10 PM

How in the fvck can the Yes on 8 campaign get away with blatant lies about gay marriage being taught in schools in CA just because it is part of the MA curriculum?

Seriously, I'm asking. Isn't that slander or something? It's a complete and utter lie. I know the No on 8 commercials are countering it, but how can they say it to begin with?

Edit - apparently some parents are not happy with the ads

Morrigoon 10-28-2008 12:41 AM

YES!

The other day I contacted some random person on Twitter who was asking about the churches-forced-to-marry thing. Basically, went to his profile, visited his site, commented there clarifying things. I just got an email from him... Secured another NO vote! :)

Betty 10-28-2008 06:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevy Baby (Post 248892)
Nope: not me.

Well of course it wasn't you!

And yeah - I hear you on the arguing thing. It just makes me angry.

I look at the few lawn signs in our neighborhood and think poorly of the people who live there.

FYI - in the house that's for rent, the yes on 8 sign I mentioned before was down within a day. First it was kicked over, then removed. I like to think someoene called the rental company and said WTF.

It was clearly the neighbors sign as it's now up in their yard and has been ever since.

But now with the lawn signs, it's very easy to see who the neighborhood idiots are. Maybe we should avoid their houses on Halloween. We wouldn't want to catch "the bigotry" from them and their tainted candy.

Moonliner 10-28-2008 07:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Betty (Post 248959)
Well of course it wasn't you!

And yeah - I hear you on the arguing thing. It just makes me angry.

I look at the few lawn signs in our neighborhood and think poorly of the people who live there.

FYI - in the house that's for rent, the yes on 8 sign I mentioned before was down within a day. First it was kicked over, then removed. I like to think someoene called the rental company and said WTF.

It was clearly the neighbors sign as it's now up in their yard and has been ever since.

But now with the lawn signs, it's very easy to see who the neighborhood idiots are. Maybe we should avoid their houses on Halloween. We wouldn't want to catch "the bigotry" from them and their tainted candy.

Before you heap too much vitriol on the neighbours, take a moment to reflect that many people seem to view this not as a gay rights issue, but as an issue of the state interfering with their freedom of religion.

BarTopDancer 10-28-2008 08:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moonliner (Post 248964)
Before you heap too much vitriol on the neighbours, take a moment to reflect that many people seem to view this not as a gay rights issue, but as an issue of the state interfering with their freedom of religion.

Except it's not. It's one religion trying to impose their views on the rest of the state. It doesn't effect them in any way, shape or form, yet they want to take away rights for thousands of people. I certainly won't be standing up for them if their rights are ever in jeopardy.

Morrigoon 10-28-2008 08:19 AM

their freedom to impose their religion on other people's relationships...

innerSpaceman 10-28-2008 08:21 AM

I wasn't able to convince my two Mormon crewmates to at least abstain. :(

Morrigoon 10-28-2008 08:24 AM

crewmates?

BarTopDancer 10-28-2008 08:35 AM

I'm not going to push my co-worker to hard. He's got common sense about him and he's doing what he feels is right. His issue is with the word "marriage" and that a "marriage" should only be between 2 people of opposite sex, in a church blessed by god. He doesn't have an issue taking away the term "marriage" from hetero couples who weren't married in a church either.

At least he's pushing that the campaign ads are full of lies to his friends who believe them. Maybe a last minute crisis of consciousness will hit some of the Yes on 8 people in the voting booth.

Moonliner 10-28-2008 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 248973)
Except it's not. It's one religion trying to impose their views on the rest of the state. It doesn't effect them in any way, shape or form, yet they want to take away rights for thousands of people. I certainly won't be standing up for them if their rights are ever in jeopardy.

I never said it was. I just said that's the perception.

Betty 10-28-2008 08:50 AM

No - I think the yes on 8 folks should be shunned. they are either blindly following their church without thinking for themselves or are no better then those who would discriminate based on ones skin color.

They would shun others - why not let all the others shun them instead.

I know - maybe I should be more accepting of those with different thoughts and values... but damnit - they ought to get a taste of their own medicine and see how bitter it is.

innerSpaceman 10-28-2008 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Morrigoon (Post 248977)
crewmates?

Friends on this year's Halloween Party Crew. Two of them, including Autumn - who is basically my co-conspirator and equal host - are Mormon. I waited till after the party was done to have "The Talk" with them.

Frankly, they are two of the least hateful people I've ever known, so there's no mistaking their choice for hatefulness. Once I confirmed they are voting the way they are from their own volition rather than LDS decree, I had no choice of my own to but to respect their freedom of choice and cordially disagree with theirs.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Betty
I know - maybe I should be more accepting of those with different thoughts and values... but damnit - they ought to get a taste of their own medicine and see how bitter it is.

Perhaps. But not from me. Who loses if I were to give them a taste of their own medicine? If I must become as intolerant as they in order to "teach them a lesson," I am the big loser.

It was enough to state my case, point out the hypocrisy of Mormons to foist their definition of marriage on others, and appeal to their lasting hurt that their personal view of the "right" definintion of marriage (i.e., male polygamy) has been made illegal by the determination of others.

Kevy Baby 10-28-2008 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Betty (Post 248959)
But now with the lawn signs, it's very easy to see who the neighborhood idiots are. Maybe we should avoid their houses on Halloween. We wouldn't want to catch "the bigotry" from them and their tainted candy.

Or, go as a gay couple. Siegfried and Roy, Ellen and Portia, Bert and Ernie

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 248973)
It's one religion trying to impose their views on the rest of the state.

Actually, it is not just one religion.

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman (Post 248976)
I wasn't able to convince my two Mormon crewmates to at least abstain. :(

What; were they doing it right there on the lawn?

alphabassettgrrl 10-28-2008 09:36 AM

ISM- that's a good way to handle it. We can all disagree, but it's definitely progress to handle that disagreement with respect and cordiality. The biggest problem I have with politics today is the vilification of the other side simply because they're "the other side".


Kevy Baby 10-28-2008 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alphabassettgrrl (Post 248997)
The biggest problem I have with politics today is the vilification of the other side simply because they're "the other side".

Which, unfortunately, we are seeing right here in this thread.

BarTopDancer 10-28-2008 09:54 AM

Two wrongs don't make a right.

I'm quickly losing respect for anyone who is voting Yes because the church told them so. I actually gained respect for my co-worker because he has his own thoughts on the issue.

When one can have a discussion and back up their choices, it's one thing. When all they can do is spout lies and propaganda it's another.

And it may be more than one religion, but LDS has funded something like 77% of the Yes on 8 campaign. They are the church I'm holding responsible for this campaign of hatred.

Strangler Lewis 10-28-2008 10:00 AM

ISM, what principled case did your Mormon friends make other than telling you to your face that your lifestyle was immoral? If there is such a case to be made, I haven't heard the Prop. 8 folks make it.

Betty 10-28-2008 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevy Baby (Post 249008)
Which, unfortunately, we are seeing right here in this thread.

Okay - that was probably for me. :( Spewing spite and all. I won't actually get off my butt and do anything about it... so lazy and spiteful I guess I am.

Ghoulish Delight 10-28-2008 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevy Baby (Post 249008)
Which, unfortunately, we are seeing right here in this thread.

I tolerate a great many opinions and differences of belief. However I draw the line at attempting to deprive someone of equal rights.

Betty 10-28-2008 10:05 AM

Mark and Brian had a funny sketch I heard this morning that was a replay from yesterday... a spoof of the Yes on 8 ads... not sure if you can hear it but it really made fun of them. If you vote no on 8, you'll turn gay, so will your kids, even your dog will be gay, type of thing.

Gemini Cricket 10-28-2008 10:12 AM

My friend Stephanie wrote something amazing on her Facebook page about losing her father this past weekend and one of the difficulties her father's partner faced after Steph's dad's death.

It's much too long to post here. But I did re-post it on my Facebook page for people to read.

It's a powerful piece.

Check it out.

Morrigoon 10-28-2008 10:16 AM

So this morning on my way to work I looked at the corner where that stupid Yes sign is. The sign was still there, but also on the corner, in a more prominent position, was a No sign :)

Kevy Baby 10-28-2008 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Betty (Post 249018)
Mark and Brian had a funny sketch I heard this morning that was a replay from yesterday... a spoof of the Yes on 8 ads... not sure if you can hear it but it really made fun of them. If you vote no on 8, you'll turn gay, so will your kids, even your dog will be gay, type of thing.

Go to this link and choose "Prop 8 Ad 10-27-2008"

It is really funny.

innerSpaceman 10-28-2008 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strangler Lewis (Post 249014)
ISM, what principled case did your Mormon friends make other than telling you to your face that your lifestyle was immoral? If there is such a case to be made, I haven't heard the Prop. 8 folks make it.

Nope, that's it.

Who am I to tell them what their moral code should be, and who are they to tell me?

They would vote to outlaw drinking and smoking if given the opportunity. They are just trying to make the world a better place by their vote, based on their personal (I'm sure LDS-influenced) views of what a better place would look like.

Certainly, I have a moral code that brooks little opposition. And I certainly vote and take other actions to make the world a better place in my view.

Minding my own damn business and not impinging on the rights of others is my own view of a better place, but who am I to declare it must be the view of everyone?


Funny, though, how they think nothing of voting to take away my rights to marry ... but have never once had a talk with me to influence my decisions to drink alcohol, smoke pot, or have sex with men. These discussions would have been fruitless, and I'm sure they knew that ... but I knew my asking them to abstain or vote No on 8 would be fruitless, and yet I certainly had that dicussion with them.


I'm bothered they feel they can go into the voting boothy to take away my right to marry, but won't just ask me nicely not to marry another guy. Heheh.


Still, their petty bigotry, intolerance, and religiousity small mindedness are but small elements of otherwise wonderful people. I will remain friends with them. My predilections for drinking, gettting high, and sucking dick are but small elements of the "otherwise" wonderful Zlick, and so they will remain friends with me.


I tried.


They are literally the only two people I know who will be voting Yes on 8, so I have no one else I can hope to convince.


Still, I'd like to do something in these final days. I really dropped the ball on working to defeat Prop 8.

Morrigoon 10-28-2008 10:30 AM

How about distributing 100 flyers?
Quote:

Originally Posted by Morrigoon
Okay guys, I don't know about you, but I'm getting worried about this election. I think it's time for some grass-roots efforts to get the word out there about voting No on Prop 8. So here's my challenge to you:

Create a flyer (your own or one shared by another LoTer) that reminds people to vote No. Could be as simple as a circle slash with Prop 8 in the center, or as detailed as you want, I don't care, as long as it reminds people why it's so important to vote no.
Go to Kinko's, make 100 copies of your flyer, and distribute all of them in a manner of your choosing (on car windshields in the Target parking lot, on your neighbors' doorsteps, hand them out in person in a public place, whatever).
Then post here that you've done it.

I haven't got much in the way of prizes, but I will give a reindeer Mickey ear hat to everyone who completes the challenge (While supplies last. Yes, the ones from last year's Xmas party).

Feel free to use this thread to discuss/share flyer and distribution ideas.

My hope is that we'll all (myself included) feel inspired to continue the effort and spread the word even further than the initial hundred. But I can tell you from experience that handing out more than a hundred flyers is a lot to bite off, so please start with that, and if you still feel inspired, then go make more copies, etc.


Morrigoon 10-28-2008 01:03 PM

Just spent my lunch arguing Prop 8 with some random guy I shared a table with in the food court. Sadly, I believe I was unsuccessful. He's convinced that his kids are going to be taught gay marriage in school, and nothing will convince him otherwise.

Promo-Man 10-28-2008 02:31 PM

Prop 8 is just full of hate

Gemini Cricket 10-28-2008 03:02 PM

Dianne Feinstein is featured in the newest No on 8 ad:
See it here.

Well, good for her.
:)

Chernabog 10-28-2008 03:04 PM

I'm reading all these accounts of Mormons from out of state spending $30,000+ on Yes on 8, pouring their life savings into this.

How amazingly sad. To spend all your money trying to block someone else's right to marry in a state a thousand miles away.

Cadaverous Pallor 10-28-2008 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Betty (Post 248983)
They would shun others - why not let all the others shun them instead.

Shunning doesn't make anything better. Neither does vilifying.

These are misled people. They only want what's best and they are scared. They need to be educated, not locked away from reality, left victims of ignorance and evil persuasion.

I hope no one would leave me behind when other revolutions show up on my doorstep.

Chernabog 10-28-2008 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 249176)
These are misled people. They only want what's best and they are scared. They need to be educated, not locked away from reality, left victims of ignorance and evil persuasion.

They need to be educated but so many cannot be educated -- because they don't WANT to be educated. They don't want to open their eyes, and that is their moral failing. There's a world of difference between the ignorant person open to knowledge and the ignorant person proud of how closed-minded they are.

innerSpaceman 10-28-2008 05:10 PM

Yep, it astounded me how my otherwise most good-hearted friends who, ya know, somehow feature some frontier Jesus Christ in their cult religion, can consider it the moral high ground to doom other people to a life of relative loneliness.


But if that's their moral viewpoint, how can they be "educated" out of it?

Can you be educated out of yours?

alphabassettgrrl 10-28-2008 05:49 PM

If a more logical argument were made, then yes, I hope I would adopt that viewpoint. I've tried to live my life by reasonably rational layouts, so if a better argument exists, I'd like to give it a chance.

I saw a new "no on 8" sign coming home from school today. Yay!

BarTopDancer 10-28-2008 06:27 PM

I was driving home from work and saw two women on the corner with No on 8 signs. So after acknowledging them I drove to to the next light and bought poster board and a sharpie at Target, turned around and stood out with them for about an hour. One said "No on 8, don't hate" and the other said "don't vote to take away rights, No on 8". I got a lot more response to the 2nd sign.

The response overall was a lot more positive than I was expecting (South County at Alicia and Muirlands). Lots of honks, cheers from all ages, races and genders. Only 2 vehicles yelling at us - one was a middle aged man and the 2nd was 2 teenagedish boys who were confused if they should "like" or "dislike" Prop 8.

If anyone is interested one of the women is going to be by El Toro and the 5 towards the In n Out side of the mall every day until the election.

katiesue 10-28-2008 06:37 PM

Yay - there's been a corner by me that's been Yes on 8 - and like 25 people every morning/eveining. Yesterday the No on 8 peeps got a small foothold on one corner. Tonight - they had three. I honked for them like mad. If I didn't have to be somewhere I would have stopped and pitched in.

And I just got a please vote No on 8 phone call explaining all the misinformation out there.

Gemini Cricket 10-28-2008 07:08 PM

BTD - That's awesome!
:snap:

Morrigoon 10-28-2008 07:31 PM

All 4 corners by my place had crowds of yeses waving their yellow signs. I turned right around and went to the market, then another, then another till I found posterboard. Made my own signs and went out there to counter protest. Some other No folks showed up around the same time. We stood on opposite sides of Trabuco waving our signs and exchanging friendly looks. One guy came over and gave me a lawn sign to stick on my corner next to the yes that was out there. He told me the yes people scatter like cockroaches the moment more than one No shows up.

Morrigoon 10-28-2008 07:31 PM

BTD: Awesome, thanks for stopping! That made my night when I saw your tweet about it.

Keeping my new posterboard signs in my car, for any opportunities that should arise in the next week.

innerSpaceman 10-28-2008 07:35 PM

I love the guerilla counterprotest stories! Way to go, BTD and Goonie.


Maybe it's the area I live in, but I've yet to see a Yes on 8 sign or demonstration.

I almost wish I would so I could follow the awesome example of you folks!

Prudence 10-28-2008 07:37 PM

I don't understand the "teaching marriage in school" issue. How exactly is marriage "taught"? And if marriage is a sacred religious ceremony and we should be up in arms at churches being "forced" to marry gay couples, why is marriage taught in schools at all?

Morrigoon 10-28-2008 07:37 PM

iSm: pick a corner, any corner, they're all lucky! :)

BTW: if you lived down here, you'd get pissed off every day, trust me, it's not fun constantly seeing those people.

JWBear 10-28-2008 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman (Post 249257)
I love the guerilla counterprotest stories! Way to go, BTD and Goonie.


Maybe it's the area I live in, but I've yet to see a Yes on 8 sign or demonstration.

I almost wish I would so I could follow the awesome example of you folks!

Same here.

Cadaverous Pallor 10-28-2008 07:55 PM

Not sure if I posted this before, but I saw a bunch of No on 8 demonstrators at the plaza in downtown Orange. No counter demonstrators, which surprised me. The "support our troops" guys still show up to counter the peaceniks each Wednesday, and I see plenty of Yes on 8 stickers around.

It warmed the cockles of my heart ;)


Yay to our resident demonstrators! You rule.

katiesue 10-28-2008 07:55 PM

I have two mormon churchs within eyesight and a third less than 4 miles from here (and on my way to work). I'm totally surrounded. I'd say easily every 5th car has a Yes sticker on it.

innerSpaceman 10-28-2008 08:11 PM

Hmmm, there is the big Mormon Temple at Overland and Santa Monica. :evil:

BarTopDancer 10-28-2008 08:18 PM

Does the city own the lawn (the side by the street) outside these buildings?

katiesue 10-28-2008 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman (Post 249280)
Hmmm, there is the big Mormon Temple at Overland and Santa Monica. :evil:

Totally off topic but Madzers daycare was near there when we lived in LA. And I'd show her the SunAmerica Building where I worked. So every time she saw the Mormon Temple she'd tell me that one day that would be were she worked.

innerSpaceman 10-28-2008 09:14 PM

I'm pretty sure that huge lawn is sovereign Mormon Territory.

But I'm not quite clear about the sidewalk out in front of the lawn.







Still ... demonstrating to drivers along Santa Monica Boulevard on the West Side of L.A. would be like Preaching to the (Mormon Tabernacle) Choir.

Not Afraid 10-28-2008 10:04 PM

I saw a few No people on street corners in LB this weekend, but no Yes people out and about. Apparently, they were all in Orange County - lining up on PCH every few blocks all the way from Brookhurst to Sunset Beach.

Maybe we should have our own stand-in there.

And, after NOT rear ending a car with a bumper sticker that says "Yes On 8 - Protect the Family" I've decided I need a bumper sticker that says "No on 8 - Protect Families"

BarTopDancer 10-28-2008 10:26 PM

There was a large group of No on 8 out at PCH and Main Thursday, Friday and Saturday. It does seem that a lot of the Yes on 8 people mobilized down into OC. The further south and inland you go the more there are. It's the demographic.

The signs on my car say "Please don't take away the rights of my friends". I'm finding that people are more receptive to the fact that rights are being taken away then claims of protecting or not protecting families.

Ghoulish Delight 10-29-2008 12:41 PM

I think I'm done arguing that gay marriage is not going to be taught in schools.

Screw that. My new response? "So? Alert the media! Our children are going to be taught about freedom in schools! Their teachers are going to teach them that in America, they're free to make their own choices about their lives! It's the end of our country as we know it!"

Morrigoon 10-29-2008 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 249376)
There was a large group of No on 8 out at PCH and Main Thursday, Friday and Saturday. It does seem that a lot of the Yes on 8 people mobilized down into OC. The further south and inland you go the more there are. It's the demographic.

The signs on my car say "Please don't take away the rights of my friends". I'm finding that people are more receptive to the fact that rights are being taken away then claims of protecting or not protecting families.

Wanna join up & do some happy hour demonstrating? You said those folks you stood with yesterday will be out again, right?

innerSpaceman 10-29-2008 12:47 PM

Why is election day always near Halloween? Who's the nimrod who thought that up?!

Morrigoon 10-29-2008 12:51 PM

Get all the scary stuff out of the way at once, I suppose.

Kevy Baby 10-29-2008 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman (Post 249532)
Why is election day always near Halloween? Who's the nimrod who thought that up?!

Because they are so similar in concept.

Chernabog 10-29-2008 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 249525)
Screw that. My new response? "So? Alert the media! Our children are going to be taught about freedom in schools! Their teachers are going to teach them that in America, they're free to make their own choices about their lives! It's the end of our country as we know it!"

And Bunnicula will take over the world!!!! Just like in GC's avatar.

Gemini Cricket 10-29-2008 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chernabog (Post 249629)
And Bunnicula will take over the world!!!! Just like in GC's avatar.

I protest! I am not a rabbit!



:D :p

innerSpaceman 10-29-2008 03:41 PM

But your wascaly, alwight.





Sigh, just got a call from LHC asking me to volunteer on election day and had to turn them down. No more time off for me. I'm a bad, bad, fag.

Gemini Cricket 10-29-2008 03:55 PM

Quote:

TORRANCE -- Authorities say a Torrance man who used an anti-gay marriage "Yes on Prop. 8" sign to attack an openly gay man has been charged with a felony hate crime.
Joseph Storm, 23, got into a scuffle with a 22-year-old man wearing a "No on 8" button early Sunday in Torrance, according to Deputy District Attorney Janet Wilson.
Source
:(

innerSpaceman 10-29-2008 04:55 PM

Well, to be honest, if the gay dude really pulled the Yes on 8 sign out of someone's lawn and threw it in the street, he provoked some sort of reaction.

That's just not a cool thing to do, and we've discussed that very thing here in this thread. It's tempting, but wrong. The correct reaction is to put up a competing No on 8 sign, in the vicinity if possible.


I'm not saying he deserved to get bashed. But it's not like the guy came running at him with the sign just because he was gay, or was advocating for a different electoral outcome.



Again, that's IF the claims of the accussed are true. Admittedly a very BIG IF for a guy who reacts with violence ... about 200 times as WRONG as removing the lawn sign.

Kevy Baby 10-29-2008 10:35 PM

On my way home last night, there were Yes on 8 Protesters on all four corners of Lambert and St College. Because of how I was feeling (bad cold), I did not stop. I spent all last night and today regretting that decision. On the drive home tonight, I decided that despite having zero energy, etc., I was going to stop and have a discussion.

Alas, they were not there. However, I saw the sign on the church on the NE corner:

Protesters on the Corner
Are Not From This Church

It made my night :)

Gemini Cricket 10-30-2008 08:35 AM

An interesting article about the limbo the same-sex couples who married in CA will be in if Prop 8 passes.
Quote:

Proposition 8 would amend the state Constitution to define marriage as only between a man and a woman, but the measure does not address what would happen to the estimated 16,000 same-sex couples who have tied the knot since gay marriage became legal in California on June 17.
Source

BarTopDancer 10-30-2008 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Morrigoon (Post 249528)
Wanna join up & do some happy hour demonstrating? You said those folks you stood with yesterday will be out again, right?

Sorry, no can do. Any demonstrating I do up until the election will be in HB, but chances are, it won't be much (my teachers don't take demonstrating to save rights as an excuse to not turn in homework).

One woman lives in HB and will be closer to home. The other woman will be by the Laguna Hills mall, near In n Out. No idea what time though.

I think NoOn8.org has a sign up for demonstrating and working election day. I can't do any of the times. Stupid work. :(

Andrew 10-30-2008 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gemini Cricket (Post 249732)
An interesting article about the limbo the same-sex couples who married in CA will be in if Prop 8 passes.

Source

Attorney General Jerry Brown has stated that in his opinion the measure does not invalidate marriages performed when they were legal. The difference between this and the '04 marriages authorized by Mayor Newsom is that they were declared to have never been legal, while these are definitely legal right now.

Morrigoon 10-30-2008 10:12 AM

Well that's a relief, because the way the amendment is written, "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California," seems to indicate that the state would no longer recognize those marriages.

Morrigoon 10-30-2008 10:18 AM

Ooh, I like this quote: (from Wikipedia)

"Marriage is ... something more than a civil contract subject to regulation by the state; it is a fundamental right of free men.... Legislation infringing such rights must be based upon more than prejudice and must be free from oppressive discrimination to comply with the constitutional requirements of due process and equal protection of the laws." - CA Supreme Court, 1948

innerSpaceman 10-30-2008 12:36 PM

This is not going away, no matter what the result of the election is.


I believe the lawsuit challenging Prop 8's legality to remove fundamental rights from the California Constitution will be successful (if, after Tuesday, it becomes necessary).

Morrigoon 10-30-2008 12:54 PM

Of course it's not going away, people, once granted their rights, are not just going to give up and go back to the way things were. But it's going to cost the state millions if the fight has to continue. And I'd much rather this not have to escalate to the Federal level at this time... I don't think the country's ready to do right by it.

Ghoulish Delight 10-30-2008 01:12 PM

Gah, I can't turn it off. Pulling into a parking lot at lunch there was someone with a sign with their back to me. I couldn't see the sign, so as I sat there waiting for the left turn light to change, I felt myself getting tenser, gripping the steering wheel thinking, "That better be a "No" sign. Grrrrrrrr."

The light changed, I turned.


"$5 footlongs at Subway"

:blush:

innerSpaceman 10-30-2008 01:13 PM

Oh, there's a gay joke in there somewhere ... but I'm too tired.

BarTopDancer 10-30-2008 01:39 PM

I'm really tempted to print out "don't take away rights" flyers and put them on cars with Yes on 8 stickers.

Kevy Baby 10-30-2008 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 249848)
I'm really tempted to print out "don't take away rights" flyers and put them on cars with Yes on 8 stickers.

Nah, just do like I do: firebomb the car.

BarTopDancer 10-30-2008 08:27 PM

New No on 8 ad.

Primetime My Name is Earl placement.

Ghoulish Delight 10-30-2008 08:29 PM

I might print myself a sign for the back window of my car.

"Freedom and Equality. No on 8"

CoasterMatt 10-30-2008 08:37 PM

What about the real traditional meaning of marriage?

Two people committed to loving and caring for each other.

These people saying that "marriage is in jeopardy" must be in cold, meaningless relationships, if the legal definition of somebody else's marriage determines the value of their own.

JWBear 10-30-2008 09:11 PM

This one was shown twice during Ugly Betty tonight.

alphabassettgrrl 10-30-2008 09:50 PM

But some people *do* gauge their family and their lives by comparison with others. If the club's open to too many other people, they feel less special.

Or they think that gay people can't possibly mean their commitments in the way that straight people do (because getting married at the drive-through chapel in Vegas and getting divorced when the weekend ends is so committed).

Personally I think celebrities have done a lot of damage to the idea of marriage and if anything, I'd like to see *that* change.

Andrew 10-30-2008 10:55 PM

The Sam Jackson ad ran during 30 Rock here in the SF Bay Area. Gave me chills.

BarTopDancer 10-30-2008 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 248943)
How in the fvck can the Yes on 8 campaign get away with blatant lies about gay marriage being taught in schools in CA just because it is part of the MA curriculum?

Seriously, I'm asking. Isn't that slander or something? It's a complete and utter lie. I know the No on 8 commercials are countering it, but how can they say it to begin with?

Anyone?

innerSpaceman 10-30-2008 11:28 PM

Lies are the currency of political campaigns, and especially of those on the side of EVIL.

Tom 10-30-2008 11:43 PM

The latest Field Poll shows the measure trailing 49-44%. This pollster's last poll, in September had it trailing by 17%.

Cadaverous Pallor 10-31-2008 08:32 AM

We as a culture are ok with being lied to. We may yell about it, but people that lie for gains are not totally ruined for doing so. I tend to have a black and white opinion on this myself, so I get pissed when I think about the concept of lying as an accepted necessary evil. Personally, I can envision a serious system where if you tell outright lies about what your ballot measure will do in order to not only get your measure passed but to actually frighten people, the measure should be disqualified.

This is why I am not a politician :)

Betty 10-31-2008 09:20 AM

Not just disqualified, but under certain circumstances, there should be a penalty involved. Seems like it's okay to say just about whatever you want about these props and other politicians and there's nothing anyone can do about it. Well - I guess you could sue for slander or libel against another person, but a prop. can't sue people it's opponents for lying about it.

The lies can be very outlandish with just an inkling of truth or perceived truth and that's all that matters.

You can't trust any of the ads - and very few people are going to really do the research to find out the truth. And even then, how many people that read the entire prop's literature, actually grasp what it really means.

And one wonders why politics are all effed up and we have budget problems.

Gemini Cricket 10-31-2008 09:34 AM

This one's for 3rd graders... like iSm.
;)

Alex 10-31-2008 09:37 AM

If Prop 8 passes, gay marriage will be taught in schools (to the extent that marriage is discussed in schools anyway). I have no problem with that. It is called informing children of the reality in which they live. It is kind of like bitching that if anti-miscegenation laws are overturned it would be bad because mixed race marriages will be taught in schools.

But the segment of the population bothered by that is already used to preferring a world in which public schools lie to children to support religious teaching.

Ghoulish Delight 10-31-2008 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex (Post 250023)
If Prop 8 passes, gay marriage will be taught in schools (to the extent that marriage is discussed in schools anyway). I have no problem with that. It is called informing children of the reality in which they live. It is kind of like bitching that if anti-miscegenation laws are overturned it would be bad because mixed race marriages will be taught in schools.

Yeah, that was what I was getting at earlier. It suddenly occurred to me that the response to that should be, "Yeah? So?"

Strangler Lewis 10-31-2008 09:44 AM

The average school administrator likes to avoid controversy, so I imagine that when marriage is discussed, neutral terms like spouse will be used. This will undoubtedly annoy some. I also think that schools will avoid "reading time" books that feature straight romances out of concern that gay parents will lobby for stories featuring gay romances.

I think gay marriage is more likely to be "taught," if at all, in high schools as part of a civil rights discussion.

Strangler Lewis 10-31-2008 09:48 AM

Oh, and I assume that at some point, some adventurous drama teacher will try to do a gay version of "Marty."

"When you gonna get married, Marty, hah? When you gonna get married?"
"I'm a big ugly man, ma. I'm a big, dumb ugly man. What guy would have me?"

Ghoulish Delight 10-31-2008 02:55 PM

Woohoo, passed a pair of "No" sign waivers today!

One thing that it made me realize, as car after car went by honking and waving, for all the "Yes" signs I've passed I haven't seen anyone honking and waving like that at all.

I don't know whether to be encouraged or worried by that. On the one hand, it's really great to see that there's more vocal support for the "No" signs. On the other hand, with the poll numbers already so tight, it makes concerned that there's something akin to the mythical Bradley effect where people aren't willing to outright admit their support.

BarTopDancer 10-31-2008 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 250117)
Woohoo, passed a pair of "No" sign waivers today!

One thing that it made me realize, as car after car went by honking and waving, for all the "Yes" signs I've passed I haven't seen anyone honking and waving like that at all.

I don't know whether to be encouraged or worried by that. On the one hand, it's really great to see that there's more vocal support for the "No" signs. On the other hand, with the poll numbers already so tight, it makes concerned that there's something akin to the mythical Bradley effect where people aren't willing to outright admit their support.

I realized that same thing the day after I was out with my NO sign. I can't recall any honks or cheers when passing yes holders.

I'm wondering with the polls so tight if there isn't going to be an anti-Bradley effect, where people aren't willing to outright admit their opposition, especially those who are religious.

innerSpaceman 10-31-2008 02:59 PM

Brad, that ad was, like, so gay.

Ghoulish Delight 10-31-2008 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 250119)
I'm wondering with the polls so tight if there isn't going to be an anti-Bradley effect, where people aren't willing to outright admit their opposition, especially those who are religious.

One would hope, but based on the utterly meaningless honking data, I'd guess it would be the other way. They won't publicly via their vehicle or to a pollster have the balls to say, 'I want to take rights away', but once that curtain is closed...

Morrigoon 10-31-2008 03:24 PM

I found the opposite. When I was standing among all those yes people with my no sign, the honking was insane. I found the No people far more likely to share a knowing nod, or a thumbs up. And that was true even when it was just the one yes lady and myself. No folks were quieter in expressing their support, whereas the yes people are honking and waving

alphabassettgrrl 10-31-2008 04:35 PM

My "no" sign went up in my yard this afternoon. I hope it lasts until the election. I saw the "no" sign near the university campus has disappeared, replaced a bit further down the road with a "yes".

The "no" and Democratic groups have also recieved a donation from me, so that's double good!

Chernabog 10-31-2008 06:19 PM

I also donated again today. I think you can do it directly on noonprop8.com (and also view the new ad narrated by Samuel Jackson). These ads are all much better than the mamsy-pamsy crap that the No on 8 camp was putting out initially.

Andrew 11-01-2008 02:42 PM

This purports to be a searchable database of everyone who has contributed for or against Prop 8, however I can't find my own name (three donations totalling $150) or my mom's (one, $100) either. It could be useful in determining which businesses to boycott for supporting it, but I am having trouble getting any useful results.

Chernabog 11-01-2008 03:02 PM

Yeah that database is odd as I don't appear for multiple donations (though I love how only 3 out of pages and pages of people in Valley Village donated for prop 8).

Ghoulish Delight 11-01-2008 05:58 PM

Bill Clinton just called and asked me to vote no on 8.

Morrigoon 11-02-2008 02:26 AM

Watch the other videos by the people that did the one GC linked, they're all funny. And have the best. slogan. ever.

Here's another cute YouTube ad (by someone else):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yU4udzEbcdQ

Morrigoon 11-02-2008 02:52 AM

Have you guys seen this more recent ad? Caught it on tv yesterday:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oj-0xMrsyxE

(can't remember if anyone else posted this yet)

Morrigoon 11-02-2008 03:09 AM

Haha... another ad by the people GC linked earlier.

Seem familiar?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8cILkvO-tSw

Cadaverous Pallor 11-02-2008 02:04 PM

This one isn't as good but she said "yoinking"!

Gemini Cricket 11-02-2008 02:30 PM

Spreading the word about the Yes on 8 fliers out there that imply that Obama supports the Yes on 8 campaign. Obama has stated that he is opposed to Prop 8.

Spread the word.

Quote:

Many of you know that the “Yes” campaign recently mailed a full-page, full-color, two-sided flier aimed at the African American voter.

The first side has a HUGE picture of Obama, with a large caption saying Obama is against same-sex marriage – they fail to explain that Obama is against Prop 8 however. The second side contains several endorsements from African American religious and political leaders.

The statewide campaign cannot generate an in-kind (e.g. snail mail) response. Their plan is to run a TV spot and pass out palm cards at the polls to rebut the “Yes” flier. This is great, but we can do more.

Attached is a two-sided newsletter which details Obama’s as well as other politicians’ stance on Prop 8 (an unequivocal NO), includes endorsements from African American religious leaders, the Latino community, and an explanation of what the Bible really says about same-sex marriage (nothing).

Please do two things:

(1) Print out this flier, make copies, and distribute ASAP before election day. I plan to walk my entire neighborhood and leave one at every house. Remember, this is a targeted piece for the African American and Latino Christian demographics. So if you received the Yes flier described above, you neighbors are probably good targets for the No newsletter as well. If not, think about where you can reach out and distribute to the appropriate demographic. (We have limited time left, so let’s make sure we hit the right audience).

(2) Forward this e-mail (with attachment) to your CA friends and ask them to do the same!

Thank you, thank you, thank you all for your continued hard work!

We can win. And together we will!

Will
<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence
of our friends. - - * Martin Luther King, Jr.

Please support equality and the right to marry.
Vote no on Prop 8.
www.lovehonorcherish.org

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Will Proctor
2121 Maine Avenue
Long Beach, CA90806

(213) 840-0330 (c)
(562) 218-3333 (h)
(562) 218-6666 (f)

wproctor@alumni.law.upenn.edu
wproctor@alumni.cmu.edu


Strangler Lewis 11-02-2008 04:24 PM

GC, maybe this is expedient, but it's BS. Obama says he's opposed to gay marriage. Clinton signed the Defense of Marriage Act. The Bible says nothing about same sex marriage because it says that homosexuality is an abomination. Who is this ad supposed to appeal to/trick?

Chernabog 11-02-2008 04:35 PM

It is supposed to be a response to the lies of the Yes on 8 campaign, these statements aren't coming out of the blue. When someone says that Obama supports prop 8 when Obama does not, that is a lie. When someone says that gay marriage is talked about in the bible, when it is not, that is a lie.

I've read blogs and chatted with many people who don't believe in gay marriage but are voting no on 8 because they don't believe that their view of marriage should control everyone's, or that something discriminatory should be written into the CA Constitution, or that gay people getting married (even though they don't see it as a religious/"real" marriage) doesn't affect their own religious/"real" marriage. Saying you don't believe in gay marriage and a "yes" vote are not inextricably linked. Obama, Clinton, Biden, Schwartzenegger (who vetoed a bill which would legalize gay marriage, the bastard), etc. can believe that a "no" vote is the proper vote.

So nobody's being "tricked" here.

Cadaverous Pallor 11-02-2008 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strangler Lewis (Post 250346)
GC, maybe this is expedient, but it's BS. Obama says he's opposed to gay marriage. Clinton signed the Defense of Marriage Act. The Bible says nothing about same sex marriage because it says that homosexuality is an abomination. Who is this ad supposed to appeal to/trick?

Obama officially opposes prop 8.

We got a recorded call from Bill Clinton urging us to vote no on prop 8.

There's no trick involved. Yes, they both have a less than helpful history on the issue, but they both officially oppose the prop.

Strangler Lewis 11-02-2008 06:25 PM

Clinton called me, too, and I hung up on him. When he signed the Defense of Marriage Act, I wrote him a critical letter. His fence sitting response was that he did not support discrimination against gay people. However, he said, the bill came before him and he signed it. Then, crickets. No attempt to reconcile the two responses. His support now is hypocritical garbage given that, even if 8 loses, the federal government does not have to recognize California's same sex marriages.

As for Obama, I submit that when someone is asked if they support gay marriage, the question is do they support gays being allowed to enter into state-recognized marriage. If someone says "No, I don't support gay marriage," that means they do not support gays being allowed to enter into state-recognized marriage. One can, perhaps, answer "I don't care what the state does, but I would object to my church performing such ceremonies," but, to my knowledge, Obama did not offer that refinement. If he's offering it now, it's inconsistent with what he said before.

I also don't see it as a terrible distortion to say that the Bible is against same sex marriage when it's against same sex sex. The No on 8 approach should not be about Bible study pilpul.

innerSpaceman 11-02-2008 06:48 PM

Really, it's complete Bullsh!t that Obama's against Prop 8. He doesn't support Gay Marriage, i.e., he supports Prop 8. Less talking out of both side of his mouth might make me less disposed to not vote for him Tuesday.

Gemini Cricket 11-03-2008 06:26 AM

Sacha Baron Cohen crashes Yes on 8 rally!
Source
:evil:

scaeagles 11-03-2008 06:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman (Post 250366)
Really, it's complete Bullsh!t that Obama's against Prop 8. He doesn't support Gay Marriage, i.e., he supports Prop 8. Less talking out of both side of his mouth might make me less disposed to not vote for him Tuesday.


One of the big things that has turned me off to McCain is his illegal immigration crap.....he plays both sides of that issue in completely non spinable ways.

Cadaverous Pallor 11-03-2008 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gemini Cricket (Post 250410)
Sacha Baron Cohen crashes Yes on 8 rally!
Source
:evil:

Aww, the article doesn't even say what his sign said!

Regarding Clinton and Obama's anti-gay marriage stances...I really do think times are changing regarding gay rights and that in the midst of it there is going to be some leftover debris from an earlier age. The electorate that is coming of age isn't going to let this crap go on for much longer and it's just a matter of time.

If either of them were for prop 8 I'd be seriously pissed off. But they are not, and they're not sitting on the fence either. Even though they both have a poor past on the issue, they are both against the prop, and to me, that's progress.

Ask McCain or Palin about their stance, contrast, compare.

innerSpaceman 11-03-2008 08:56 AM

I'm not saying McCain's better on the issue. I'm saying nothing turns me off about a politician much more than taking BOTH sides of an issue via cowardice or expediency.

I understand Obama thinks he can't get elected if he supports gay marriage. But coming out against Prop 8 IS supporting existing gay marriage rights. He can't have it both ways ... at least not with me. Ugh, he's not president-elect till tomorrow and already the lies start.

Kevy Baby 11-03-2008 10:24 AM

Regardless of whether either candidate comes out for or against Prop 8, to me it is (mostly) irrelevant. I don't want my Presidential candidate to be focusing on a state issue Yes, this can/will be a national issue at some point, but it isn't right now. My decision as to who I should vote for as President is NOT going to be based on their position on California's Proposition 8.

Kevy Baby 11-03-2008 10:28 AM

There were a lot of new "Yes on 8" signs that popped up last night in front of our property (I live in a condo).

There were a lot of hand-made "No on 8" signs that appeared along Imperial Hwy in Brea. Most of them used familiar catch phrases for the cause, but I was amused by the one that read "Insert Witty Slogan - Vote No on 8."

BarTopDancer 11-03-2008 10:53 AM

Yesterday I saw a lot more No on 8 signs, quite a few of them were near Yes on 8 signs. I also saw a lot more hand made signs.

I have to say that a lot of people have been surprising me with their decision to vote no. They aren't religious but they aren't people you would automatically assume they would be voting no. I've lost one friend over this (she deleted me from her Facebook and won't return my communication attempts) and the only other person I know [of] who is voting Yes is my co-worker, who [as I listed above] has beliefs beyond "the church told me so".

JWBear 11-03-2008 11:32 AM

BTD,

I know how you must be feeling, because it happened to me. In 2004, I lost a very close friend because I wouldn’t vote to reelect President Bush. After 9/11 he became very conservative politically. It got to the point where every conversation became a political argument. Finally during a phone call one night, after I again stated I’d never vote for Bush, he got nasty and called me a “liberal wacko”. I hung up on him. He emailed me saying that he was ending our friendship because I “lacked the ability to communicate” (i.e.: I had an opinion different from his). It still hurts, but I realize now that it was for the best. Our relationship had become toxic. Hang in there. Real friends will respect your opinions, even if they do not agree with them.

Kevy Baby 11-03-2008 11:37 AM

On Saturday evening, we pulled up to some Yes protesters. I rolled down my window (much to S's consternation) and asked "Why do you want to take away people's rights?" The response was, of course, that they weren't taking away people's right's. There were more words exchanged of course, but I don't recall the rest.

Gemini Cricket 11-03-2008 11:42 AM

I can't express enough how great it feels to see my friends and even some family members showing their passionate support for the No on 8 campaign. It makes me smile. No matter what happens tomorrow, I'll be okay because I know I'm lucky to be in such good company.
:)

katiesue 11-03-2008 11:42 AM

Saw hand painted on the back windshield of a car yesterday "I didn't vote on your marriage".

On my Yes on 8 streetcorner on the way to work the No's had taken over one corner again. They're more of a ragtag bunch with handmade signs but they're more energetic than the bland Yes on 8 peeps with their pre-made signs.

Gemini Cricket 11-03-2008 11:48 AM

On the way over to Erik's on Saturday, I noticed several Yes signs surrounding the creepy white Stepford Family statue that guards Foothill Ranch. A few hours later, they were gone. That made me happy.

katiesue 11-03-2008 12:07 PM

Oh almost forgot - creepy bumper stickers yesterday. This car had like 5 of them plastered all over it. There were two creepy kid faces, a boy and a girl, the sticker said "Pleeeaaaseee give us a Mommy and a Daddy".

The kids were creepy looking and it made no sense anyway. There are tons of single parent families, for whatever reason, are you going make them all marry someone of the opposite sex?

Gemini Cricket 11-03-2008 12:35 PM

Quote:

Hundreds of Mormon Moms Rally Against Prop. 8 in Salt Lake City
More than 600 Mormon moms, their gay sons and daughters, and allies rallied against Proposition 8 in Salt Lake City on Sunday -- a sharp contrast to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints' effort to pass the California ballot measure.
The Salt Lake Tribune reports that the candlelight vigil was held in the city's Library Square and was organized by mothers disappointed in the church's muscular support of Prop. 8, which would eliminate the right of gay people to marry. The Mormon church has donated millions of dollars to the Yes on 8 campaign.
"This is what happens when people in California say mean things about our gay kids. Mothers come out of the closet," Millie Watts, one of the organizers, said at the event, according to the Tribune. Watts told the paper that she feels "disappointment and betrayal" at her church's involvement in Prop. 8.
Linda Barney, another mom who spoke at the rally, told the Tribune that her heart "reaches out to young Californians, teens who are not out of the closet who are alone...listening to hateful [rhetoric]," adding, "They need to hear from us. They need to know there are people with loving hearts."
The Salt Lake City event was one of several rallies that occurred on Sunday in support of, or in opposition to, Prop. 8. (The Advocate)

Source

MouseWife 11-03-2008 12:44 PM

BTD & JWBear;

I haven't posted in a bit, been in a whirlwind of schtuff.

But, my sister, who I sent the email, to, well, I've lost her over other less important things before. But, at first she said the email that I sent her kept freezing the computer {it was her email, just forwarded back to her}. When she finally received it, she said I was wrong.

But, seriously, I have lost her before over other things, always, not going along with her. Or, making her happy.

Once, I sent her one of those happy emails about sisterly love/friendship and her response to me was 'I haven't felt that way in a long time'.

Funny, cause I know people who I see rarely, even if after years, and, it is always the same, we never dislike someone because we haven't been able to chat or hang out.

The damn yes signs, all over the main road. Isn't that illegal? It is public property. I don't think people should be allowed to put them out there.

I am maybe going to take my son to election central tomorrow night. I think that, as like some others here, I want to be with others when things come down.

Not Afraid 11-03-2008 12:57 PM

I'm picking up a No on 8 sign from my client. I live close to the local polling place. Better late than never.

Another client left me a note that said "Please take down the Obama sign in our window after he wins the election". :)

Morrigoon 11-03-2008 03:02 PM

There is an effort to reach out on election day, but which requires attending training tonight. If anyone wants to participate, pm me and I'll forward the info.

BarTopDancer 11-03-2008 03:11 PM

I think I'm going to a gaybar with my friend tomorrow night. I'm a little scared about being there if 8 passes. Though I would hope they would know I'm not the moron who voted yes.

JWBear 11-03-2008 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 250566)
I think I'm going to a gaybar with my friend tomorrow night. I'm a little scared about being there if 8 passes. Though I would hope they would know I'm not the moron who voted yes.

Like anyone who votes "yes" would be in a gay bar.....

BarTopDancer 11-03-2008 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 250567)
Like anyone who votes "yes" would be in a gay bar.....

You would think...

They know me there, but still.

blueerica 11-03-2008 03:35 PM

Interestingly, ABC out here went with a story about Mormon moms with homosexual children. They're holding a vigil against Prop 8.

I haven't seen the story for myself, yet, but I'm sure it'll get more coverage as I heard a radio ad for Fox running a similar storyline. Doubtful it'll be on our NBC affiliate as it is essentially run by the church.

Morrigoon 11-03-2008 03:53 PM

They've reached a whole new level of appalling behavior... the yes people just hired a skywriter to write:

"Save traditional marriage
Vote yes on prop 8"

OVER DISNEYLAND :mad:

Then they circled and started writing again.

(Disneyphile is there today and called to share this info)

Gemini Cricket 11-03-2008 04:07 PM

The LA Times endorses NO on Prop 8:
Quote:

Clever magicians practice the art of misdirection -- distracting the eyes of the audience to something attention-grabbing but irrelevant so that no one notices what the magician is really doing. Look over at that fuchsia scarf, up this sleeve, at anything besides the actual trick.

The campaign promoting Proposition 8, which proposes to amend the state Constitution to ban same-sex marriages, has masterfully misdirected its audience, California voters. Look at the first-graders in San Francisco, attending their lesbian teacher's wedding! Look at Catholic Charities, halting its adoption services in Massachusetts, where same-sex marriage is legal! Look at the church that lost its tax exemption over gay marriage! Look at anything except what Proposition 8 is actually about: a group of people who are trying to impose on the state their belief that homosexuality is immoral and that gays and lesbians are not entitled to be treated equally under the law.
Source

It's a good write up that highlights the lies the Yes camp has been spewing.

BarTopDancer 11-03-2008 06:43 PM

I ended up calling the cops on a huge Yes on 8 demonstration at an intersection near my office.

It all started out 'innocently enough'. I was arguing with kids about it. Those poor kids were so misinformed (not surprised). I told them that churches will not be forced to marry gay people, nor should they and they should research state and federal laws - just because something happened in MA doesn't mean it will happen here. I also asked them why someone would want to get married in a place where people don't approve of their relationship. I saw the look in their eyes changed when I was talking to them. I probably shouldn't have told them their parents are homophobic and their parents and church are telling them lies.

While I was arguing with them I saw the protesters (kids too) impeding the flow of traffic by standing(kids too) in the crosswalks preventing people from turning right, which in turn was backing up traffic to another stoplight. Close to 100 people were in a very small intersection at rush hour was creating a huge traffic hazard and putting kids in danger. All I said when I called was that there was a very large political demonstration at x location that is causing a traffic hazard by standing in the street and putting kids in danger.

Kevy Baby 11-03-2008 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 250595)
I ended up calling the cops on a huge Yes on 8 demonstration at an intersection near my office.

<snip>

While I was arguing with them I saw the protesters (kids too) impeding the flow of traffic by standing(kids too) in the crosswalks preventing people from turning right, which in turn was backing up traffic to another stoplight. Close to 100 people were in a very small intersection at rush hour was creating a huge traffic hazard and putting kids in danger. All I said when I called was that there was a very large political demonstration at x location that is causing a traffic hazard by standing in the street and putting kids in danger.

Would you have called the cops if they were protesting No on 8?

BarTopDancer 11-03-2008 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevy Baby (Post 250598)
Would you have called the cops if they were protesting No on 8?

I was annoyed enough that they were making the intersection such a cluster that if No on 8 were standing in the road blocking traffic, I would have most likely reported it like I did - people, including kids are impeeding the flow of traffic.

That intersection is bad enough at 5pm, it doesn't need idiots in the street blocking traffic to make it worse.

alphabassettgrrl 11-03-2008 07:16 PM

Standing on streetcorners is fine, blocking traffic not so much.

Disneyphile 11-03-2008 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Morrigoon (Post 250572)
They've reached a whole new level of appalling behavior... the yes people just hired a skywriter to write:

"Save traditional marriage
Vote yes on prop 8"

OVER DISNEYLAND :mad:

Then they circled and started writing again.

(Disneyphile is there today and called to share this info)

Here's an example of what caused massive disruption and upset for most guests and CMs around me:



I already can't stand the "Yes on 8" bigots. But, today, they crossed the line to damn near pure hatred by me for bringing their ****ing hatred to the skies over Disneyland. I don't think any political **** belongs in Disneyland, let alone political **** that spouts such horrible messages such as this lowly crap. It's a good thing I didn't see any sign-carriers on my drive home, because it would have taken everything to hold me back from driving over to them and ripping their ****ing heads off. (Yeah, it takes a lot to get me this pissed, and I'm pissed.)

However, from what I could see, most guests and CMs were very upset over it, so hopefully that will be a sign that this proposition won't pass.

My sister even brought up a good point - she works with severely handicapped children who are results of extreme abuse in "traditional" marriages who were conceived and not wanted or not planned. She deals with kids with smashed-in heads, etc., because the "traditional spouse" chose to repeatedly slam them against a wall or floor. She said that with gay marriages, there is no chance for an unwanted or unplanned child, and that she trusts gays more than "traditional" marriages because of that.

Gemini Cricket 11-03-2008 08:15 PM

So, I had an idea and I'm giving it a whirl over at Facebook.
I'm sending people messages to see if they will (for just tonight and tomorrow) change their Profile Pictures to this:



I figured it's worth a shot. Everyone sees the Profile Pic. It goes everywhere.

Visibility! United front! No on 8!

:)

alphabassettgrrl 11-03-2008 08:20 PM

DP- I'm sorry. That's awful. I agree that politics is not well suited to Disney.

One more day.

Disneyphile 11-03-2008 08:22 PM

I hope they at least lost some "yes" votes because of it. It's just so beyond tacky.

BarTopDancer 11-03-2008 08:34 PM

Done.

Kevy Baby 11-03-2008 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gemini Cricket (Post 250612)
So, I had an idea and I'm giving it a whirl over at Facebook.
I'm sending people messages to see if they will (for just tonight and tomorrow) change their Profile Pictures to this:

I would, but I am not in Facebook, LiveJournal, or any other on line presence.

Sorry :(

Gemini Cricket 11-03-2008 10:24 PM

16 people so far did it.
I am all teary-eyed.
:) :blush:

Alex 11-03-2008 10:29 PM

I haven't seen that kind of skywriting before. Is it essentially a dot matrix printer out the back of the plane?

Disneyphile 11-03-2008 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex (Post 250628)
I haven't seen that kind of skywriting before. Is it essentially a dot matrix printer out the back of the plane?

That's about what it looked like.

Kevy Baby 11-03-2008 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex (Post 250628)
I haven't seen that kind of skywriting before. Is it essentially a dot matrix printer out the back of the plane?

You've never seen that? Maybe it is a So Cal thing as I have seen this type for years.

Yes, it is basically several planes (five it looks like in this case) flying together putting out puffs of smoke in synchronization.

Alex 11-03-2008 10:40 PM

Honestly, it has probably been years since I've seen skywriting of any type and that was at Disneyland and it was the traditional write it out type.

Outside of LA I've probably seen skywriting used maybe a half dozen times in my life.

Chernabog 11-03-2008 10:49 PM

Yeah, amazing how all that money can go into good things like hurting the faggots, rather than stuff like education, or feeding the homeless. Some of these bastards put their LIFE SAVINGS into hurting the fvcking queers, it means that much to them. It isn't that just some people hate you, it's that so goddamn MANY people hate you because of something that doesn't affect them.

It is really difficult not to hate them back, because right know I really, really do. I'm absolutely seething.

Disneyphile 11-03-2008 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chernabog (Post 250634)
It is really difficult not to hate them back, because right know I really, really do. I'm absolutely seething.

I hear you. I was already to the edge before today, and after the biggest in-your-face display of bigotry that I've ever witnessed, I'm now over that edge.

Ghoulish Delight 11-03-2008 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex (Post 250628)
I haven't seen that kind of skywriting before. Is it essentially a dot matrix printer out the back of the plane?

Better than that, it's a dot matrix printer out the back of several planes at once. It's pretty astounding to watch, when it's not spewing hate.

ETA: oops, didn't see the next page before replying

Kevy Baby 11-03-2008 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevy Baby (Post 250454)
There were a lot of new "Yes on 8" signs that popped up last night in front of our property (I live in a condo).

They were there still this morning, but when I returned home from work, they were gone. Had they not been gone, I would have removed them. Yes, it would have been illegal, but I would have done it anyways.

But someone beat me to it.

innerSpaceman 11-03-2008 11:49 PM

On a personal front ... things are heating up among another group of friends of mine that includes a few ... ahem ... MORMONS.


This could get ugly. I hope and pray things turn out ok tomorrow.

Morrigoon 11-04-2008 12:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gemini Cricket (Post 250612)
So, I had an idea and I'm giving it a whirl over at Facebook.
I'm sending people messages to see if they will (for just tonight and tomorrow) change their Profile Pictures to this:



I figured it's worth a shot. Everyone sees the Profile Pic. It goes everywhere.

Visibility! United front! No on 8!

:)

Done

Deebs 11-04-2008 12:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gemini Cricket (Post 250627)
16 people so far did it.
I am all teary-eyed.
:) :blush:

+1

keith - SuPeR K! 11-04-2008 01:01 AM

I changed my profile image on Facebook and MySpace to the NO on 8 button. I also tagged everyone I knew was supporting the NO on 8 campaign in the the photo so it would appear in their friends' news feeds ;)

CoasterMatt 11-04-2008 01:14 AM

At the corner of Ventura Blvd. and Topanga Canyon this afternoon, there were a TON of Yes on 8 signs, those stupid things that say "Protect Marriage"- I got off the bus for a bit to have some fun with the supporters.

I went to Office Depot, down the street, got a sheet of posterboard, and with my handy Sharpie, whipped up my own sign.

One side - "Protect Justice- NO ON 8"

Other side - "Keep Seperate Church And State - NO ON 8"

Morrigoon 11-04-2008 02:29 AM

MOTHERF*CKERS!... They pushed their yes ads into my myspace too!

Okay guys, remember that they pay for click-throughs... so click away, cost them money!

Morrigoon 11-04-2008 02:30 AM

I also sent out a No On 8 bulletin

Isaac 11-04-2008 06:48 AM

Prop 8 Spokesman Compares Gays To Hitler


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_VZoqKQCTw

Morrigoon 11-04-2008 09:22 AM

Can Godwin's law be applied to elections? He automatically loses, right?

Gemini Cricket 11-04-2008 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Isaac (Post 250668)
Prop 8 Spokesman Compares Gays To Hitler


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_VZoqKQCTw

Isaac,
What this guy fails to remember is that homosexuals were also in Hitler's concentration camps. It's desperate of him to link gays to Hitler.
I hope that video stays around until his children and their children can see it and realize that he is a bigot.

Chernabog 11-04-2008 09:44 AM

I think it's funny that on (other) boards people are offended when you call them a homophobic bigot for voting yes on 8. I'm just tellin' it like it is!

I mean, if you told an African-American that he/she couldn't marry their white significant other because God had made the races separate for a reason, then... omigod you'd be a fvcking racist bigot (or living before the 1960s in the South). And sorry, but the "I have a black friend!" thing isn't gonna make you any less of one, dumba$$.

Kevy Baby 11-04-2008 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chernabog (Post 250706)
And sorry, but the "I have a black friend!" thing isn't gonna make you any less of one, dumba$$.

I am always highly amused by this line (or "I have gay friends"). My response is that I don't have any black (gay) friends. I do have some friends who happen to be black (gay), but I don't keep score.

BarTopDancer 11-04-2008 10:54 AM

If 8 fails (and I will say if, not when because it's so fvcking close) I think we need to have a Yes on 8 sign bonfire.

Kevy Baby 11-04-2008 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 250743)
If 8 fails (and I will say if, not when because it's so fvcking close) I think we need to have a Yes on 8 sign bonfire.

All the ones I've seen are made of plastic. Either way, I would choose to not pollute.

BarTopDancer 11-04-2008 11:00 AM

Aww. Boo plastic.

Is 8 a majority rule to fail/pass or must have x% of the vote to fail/pass?

JWBear 11-04-2008 11:02 AM

It must pass with 50% plus 1.

Moonliner 11-04-2008 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex (Post 250632)
Honestly, it has probably been years since I've seen skywriting of any type and that was at Disneyland and it was the traditional write it out type.

Outside of LA I've probably seen skywriting used maybe a half dozen times in my life.

I wonder what happened to the "No Fly Zone" around Disneyland.

Also, did anyone catch the Daily show last night? He did a bit on Prop-8.

There is a link at http://www.thedailyshow.com/

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daily Show
Prop-8 Has been boosted by donations from the Mormons, because if there is one core value the Mormons have always had it's that marriage should be between one man and errr, uhhhh


blueerica 11-04-2008 01:15 PM

No on 8 signs in Steve Young's yard... Woo!

(Of course, all my news comes with a Mormon filter LOL)

BarTopDancer 11-04-2008 01:23 PM

Who the fvck is Steve Young?

Of course all my posts regarding anything to do with the state of UT come with a profanity non-filter. ;)

Strangler Lewis 11-04-2008 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 250838)
Who the fvck is Steve Young?

He played an American sport, B.

MF'ing Steve Young

Watch the run at 0:43.

More to the point, Steve Young is a moderate Republican whom people assume will run for office. Also, since he didn't get married until his late 30s, there was a lot of speculation that he was gay.

blueerica 11-04-2008 01:36 PM

And he's something of a 'Mormon hero'... or so I've been told.

innerSpaceman 11-04-2008 01:43 PM

Then he's definitely gay. His wife's a beard.

All the mormons are gay. Methinks they doth protest too much.


If they can't have 20 wives, they won't have none ... I think that's their new creed as they breed their wives for duty, then go on to their secret cocksvcking pleasures.





(Yes, I'm none too happy with Mormons today)

SzczerbiakManiac 11-04-2008 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moonliner (Post 250754)
did anyone catch the Daily show last night? He did a bit on Prop-8.

Here's the direct link to that clip.

Gn2Dlnd 11-04-2008 02:37 PM

If it passes I'll be at Santa Monica and San Vicente tomorrow, marching towards the Mormon Temple in Westwood.

If I can get a couple thousand friends to join me, that is.

We didn't get arrested during the AB101 marches, I doubt that a peaceful, i.e., no destruction of property, march would get us arrested now.

Nice, easy, beginner protest march, straight down Santa Monica Blvd. and back. I'm thinking 4 or 5 in the evening. Fvcks up traffic all kinds of ways. "You don't like being stuck in traffic? Go home and tell your wife!"

innerSpaceman 11-04-2008 04:05 PM

A friend of mine texted me to say he and a pal went around town last night and removed about 60 Yes on 8 signs. Says his hands are dirty.

I've been tempted to do the same, but have always resisted. Yet I can't say I wasn't tickled to learn of this. So I texted back, "But your soul is clean."


He responded that, in all seriousness, his hands were covered in this oily gunk that coats the signposts, and was really hard to get off.

I wrote back, "Yes, but still easier to remove than the stain on some people's hearts."


We have Mormon friends in common. Le sigh.

BarTopDancer 11-04-2008 04:14 PM

Someone stuck a Yes on 8 sign on our office property. I got to take it down. It felt good to crumple it up.

And now a Jeep with Yes on 8 signs all over it is driving around my business park honking an air horn for attention.

~MS~ 11-04-2008 04:34 PM

I love it, I drove Missy to her program this morning and there was a long row of 'yes on 8' signs...and someone had gone thru and did the big red circle with the slash on each and every one!

BarTopDancer 11-04-2008 05:14 PM

OC Voter turn out way down.

Quote:

What a surprise! The Orange County Registrar says as of 3 p.m. only 28 percent of those eligible to vote have gone to the polls here. If you turn the calendar back to the last general election in 2004, there was a turnout of 44 percent at the same time of day. The comparisons mean either there will be a huge rush this evening, or voters in the OC have become suddenly complacent.

The oddity is that we saw dozens of folks driving to the Registrar's Santa Ana office this morning as if hell or high water couldn't keep them from voting.

What's it all mean?

We'll know better after the absentee ballots are counted at 8 p.m. Those voters tend to skew conservative, so let' s wait and see which way the political winds are blowing once the polls close.
GET OUT AND VOTE IF YOU LIVE IN OC!

Kevy Baby 11-04-2008 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 250934)
GET OUT AND VOTE IF YOU LIVE IN OC!

Unless you are voting yes on 8, in which case your election is tomorrow

JWBear 11-04-2008 05:28 PM

I just got back from voting. (I left work early at 3:30.) A very short line at our polling place - about 4-5 people in front of us.

innerSpaceman 11-04-2008 05:52 PM

Yep, OC voters please stay home. Your Selfish Conservative Ways of Rule are Over (for now), so go hide in your McMansions and don't come out till January 20.

SzczerbiakManiac 11-04-2008 08:24 PM

Too late, but I found this kind of chilling.

Gemini Cricket 11-04-2008 09:12 PM

This is early but....

Yes: 57%
No: 43%

(CNN.com)

SzczerbiakManiac 11-04-2008 09:15 PM

I think I'm gonna be sick.

BarTopDancer 11-04-2008 09:16 PM

2% reporting. But still :(

BarTopDancer 11-04-2008 09:21 PM

From Andrew - results by area

JWBear 11-04-2008 09:35 PM

Remember... If it passes, it will be immediately challenged in court. All is not lost.

Cadaverous Pallor 11-04-2008 09:41 PM

I'm sad about 8. Very, very sad. Why are so many people so full of hate, or so stupid that they can be swayed by these morons?

:( We'll have to fight it.

Disneyphile 11-04-2008 09:44 PM

There's a gay guy over at a fairly large message board who is in full support of 8.

I think that pisses me off even worse.

JWBear 11-04-2008 09:51 PM

Most of the counties that are reporting so far are heavily red counties. There is still hope.

JWBear 11-04-2008 09:57 PM

Yes 54%
No 46%

The gap is closing! When San Francisco and the other 90% of LA (nearly 1/4 of the state population) reports in, I think we'll see better results.

Gn2Dlnd 11-04-2008 10:06 PM

I'm halftomistic.

But ready to act up, if need be.

BarTopDancer 11-04-2008 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 251073)
Yes 54%
No 46%

The gap is closing! When San Francisco and the other 90% of LA (nearly 1/4 of the state population) reports in, I think we'll see better results.

LA isn't done? I can't find an interactive map by county that works.

Not Afraid 11-04-2008 10:10 PM

16.8% ( 4283 of 25429 ) precincts
reporting as of Nov. 4, 2008, at 9:08 p.m.

8Y Eliminates Right of Same-Sex Couples to Marry1,428,88554.9%1,177,52545.1%Map

BarTopDancer 11-04-2008 10:11 PM

It's not loading for any of us where I am :(

Morrigoon 11-04-2008 10:12 PM

I'm not liking the numbers, last I saw was 55%, but only like 10% reporting.

Hopefully that means only Fresno was in?

Morrigoon 11-04-2008 10:14 PM

ABC is tracking results

BarTopDancer 11-04-2008 10:16 PM

But not by county. I want by county!!!!!!!

Not Afraid 11-04-2008 10:17 PM

Secretary of State official results (where the last info came from)

JWBear 11-04-2008 10:18 PM

Go here. It works fine. I also can't get the SOS site to work.

belleh5 11-04-2008 10:19 PM

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/res...llot.measures/

Updated 4 mins ago

55% YES
45% NO

BarTopDancer 11-04-2008 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Not Afraid (Post 251091)
Secretary of State official results (where the last info came from)

It's not working for any of us. :(

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 251092)
Go here. It works fine.

Thank you!!!!!!

Morrigoon 11-04-2008 10:21 PM

okay, less than 10% of precincts reporting, after checking abc and cbs.

Not Afraid 11-04-2008 10:24 PM

I'm VERY disappointed in LA County. But, the OC number is just astonishing - and GROSS! I ****ing HATE OC.

Kevy Baby 11-04-2008 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Not Afraid (Post 251091)
Secretary of State official results (where the last info came from)

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 251095)
It's not working for any of us. :(

Works fine for me. Once again: proof that the Mac is a superior platform :D

flippyshark 11-04-2008 10:27 PM

OMG - This is such a sh!tty load on an otherwise fantastic night. I'm going to bed now, but I hope this has pulled together by tomorrow morning. (*sigh*)

belleh5 11-04-2008 10:28 PM

Sacramento Voted

56% Yes
44% No


WTF!!:mad:

Kevy Baby 11-04-2008 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by belleh5 (Post 251105)
WTF!!:mad:

I blame STC

belleh5 11-04-2008 10:29 PM

STC?

JWBear 11-04-2008 10:32 PM

Back down to 54/46 per CNN.

Morrigoon 11-04-2008 10:32 PM

15% reporting, still 55% assh0le

edit: err.... 54%

Kevy Baby 11-04-2008 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by belleh5 (Post 251109)
STC?

SacTown Chronic

belleh5 11-04-2008 10:35 PM

What is wrong with this country??

Arizona Proposition 102:
Ban on Gay Marriage 56% Yes, 44% No

Arkansas Initiative 1:
Ban on Gay Couples Adopting Children 57% Yes, 43% No

Florida Amendment 2:
Ban on Gay Marriage 62% Yes, 38% No

Morrigoon 11-04-2008 10:46 PM

Shame, shame

Kevy Baby 11-04-2008 10:47 PM

OK, this is a little odd.
The CA SOS site reports:
23.2% Reporting
1,698,447 - Yes
1,421,309 - No

The CNN site reports:
22% Reporting
1,943,806 - Yes
1,655,645 - No

How do higher counts provide a lower percentage?

belleh5 11-04-2008 10:49 PM

2 Counties left, Sutter and Mono.....

JWBear 11-04-2008 10:51 PM

LA county is only at 10% reporting (per CNN). With 1/4 of the state's population, it would only take a move of a few percentage points to the "no" column in LA to tip the whole state.

Kevy Baby 11-04-2008 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by belleh5 (Post 251127)
2 Counties left, Sutter and Mono.....

I am not sure what you are looking at. There are several counties not reporting. And of those who are, none are anywhere near complete (see JWB's 10% of LA County for example).

Kevy Baby 11-04-2008 10:59 PM

And according to the CA SOS site, the percentage is now:
53.4 - Yes
46.6 - No

belleh5 11-04-2008 10:59 PM

CNN, Maybe I should put my glasses on. :blush:

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/res...unty/#CAI01map

Morrigoon 11-04-2008 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Not Afraid (Post 251101)
I'm VERY disappointed in LA County. But, the OC number is just astonishing - and GROSS! I ****ing HATE OC.

Check Marin County. OC is downright progressive by comparison.

Shame on the whole fvcking state.

Kevy Baby 11-04-2008 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Morrigoon (Post 251134)
Check Marin County. OC is downright progressive by comparison.

And Shasta is not far behind

belleh5 11-04-2008 11:03 PM

SF ROCKS!!

75% NO

JWBear 11-04-2008 11:04 PM

Here's a map of LA county precincts that have reported.

Morrigoon 11-04-2008 11:12 PM

53-47 with 25% reporting! Move baby move! Maybe LA can save it?

JWBear 11-04-2008 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Morrigoon (Post 251142)
53-47 with 25% reporting! Move baby move! Maybe LA can save it?

I'm hoping!

Kevy Baby 11-04-2008 11:19 PM

CA SOS with 28.5% reporting:
52.5% - Yes
47.5% - No

Alex 11-04-2008 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Morrigoon (Post 251134)
Check Marin County. OC is downright progressive by comparison.

Be aware that the CNN page does not always list Yes first then No. The first listed is always teh one in the lead. Marin County has voted 73% No so far.

Kevy Baby 11-04-2008 11:22 PM

Modoc is 74.8% Yes

Morrigoon 11-04-2008 11:23 PM

Alex: thanks, I was misreading and getting totally disgusted

BarTopDancer 11-04-2008 11:26 PM

Fvckin religious nazijackholelyingSoBs of Orange County.

On behalf of the population of OC who thinks taking away rights is WRONG, I apologize. I do not represent nor associate with such twatwaffles.

I am LIVID!

It sounds like they have 3.2 million left to count in LA county.

Alex 11-04-2008 11:27 PM

If CNN's county numbers are right then Napa and Santa Cruz have barely begun. Most of the other Bay Area counties have a long way to go still.

Hoping, hoping, hoping.

BarTopDancer 11-04-2008 11:55 PM

Watching the people cheering that 8 is passing makes me want to puke.

Gemini Cricket 11-05-2008 12:12 AM

It seems like Prop 8 is going to pass.
But please remember that this isn't the end of the fight. This matter will go before the courts again.
Also it's important to remember who supported 8 and fight back. Find out which hotel magnate supported the Yes campaign and never stay at any of his hotels. And avoid any support of any Mormon run business, charities... heck I don't even buy CDs by the Mormon Tabernacle Choir.
Yes, some people will say that this is me being close-minded and petty. But I feel that this course of action will make the people who think we don't count, who think that our relationships are not as important as theirs take notice and realize that they are 100% wrong in this matter.

Also, think on these people as allies. You want to send a gift to someone who has everything? Donate a gift to one of these organizations in their name. Volunteer at these organizations. Write them a thank you note. There's so much you can do.

If you're mad, do something about it.

Gemini Cricket 11-05-2008 12:15 AM

Yes on 8 Supporters:
Churches & Ministries

Spoiler:


A. V. Alpha & Omega Ministries, Palmdale
Abundant Life Assembly of God, Copeland
All Seasons Ministries, El Cajon
Alpha and Omega Arlington Apostolic Church, Riverside
Alpine Anglican Church, Alpine
Amador Family Fellowship
Baldwin Park Church of Christ
Bethel Christian Fellowship
Bible Fellowship Church, Ventura
Biggs Community Assembly of God
Bright Mission Chapel
Bundy Canyon Christian Church and School, Wildomar
Calvary Assembly of God
Calvary Assembly, Milpitas
Calvary Baptist Church
Calvary Baptist Church, Modesto
Calvary Chapel of the Harbour
Calvary Chapel Chino Hills
Calvary Chapel Rancho Santa Margarita
Calvary Christian Center
Calvary Church
Calvary Temple
Camarillo Community Church
Canopy of Prayer Ministries
Canyon View Church of Christ, San Diego
Cathedral of the Blessed Sacrament
Centerpoint Church
Central Baptist Church of Indio
Centro Cristiano Pan De Vida
Chapel in the Pines, Arnold
Chinese Evangelical Free Church, Monterey Park
Chinese Grace Bible Church, Sacramento
Christ Driven Church of Fowler Ca.
Christian Life Assembly
Christian Life Center
Christian Life Tools
Christian Outreach for Armenians, Glendale
Church of Christ, Upland
Church of the Living Christ
Church of the Living God of Perris
Church of the Nazarene
Church of the Rock
Church of Scientology of San Diego
Community Counseling Services, Inc.
Community Christian Alliance Church
Core Christian Fellowship, Murrieta
Cornerstone Baptist Church
Cornerstone Baptist Church, Nicholasville KY
Cornerstone Christian Church, El Dorado Hills
Cornerstone Community Church of San Clemente
Cornerstone Fellowship, Livermore
CrossPoint Community Church of the Nazarene
Dan Kricorian Ministries Int'l
Dayspring Christian Fellowship
Desert Stream Ministries
Destiny Faith Center
Divine Mercy Knights of Columbus (14158), Natomas
Door of Faith Ministries International
East Clairemont Baptist Church, San Diego
Eastside Christian Church
El Cajon Wesleyan Church, El Cajon
Elsinore Christian Center, Lake Elsinore
Evangelical Free Church of Walnut
Faith Chapel Church of God in Christ, San Diego
Faith Community Church by the Sea, Encinitas
Faith Tabernacle
Faith to Faith Fellowship, Temecula
F.C.F. Int'l Ministries
Filipino American Community Church
First Baptist Church Anaheim
First Baptist Church of Fillmore
First Baptist Church of Hesperia
First Baptist Church of Menlo Park
First Baptist Church of Taft
First Baptist Church, Lomita
First Evangelical Church of Cerritos
First Fil-Am Christian Church
First Foursquare Gospel Church of San Jose, San Jose
First Fundamental Bible Church of Monterey Park
First Presbyterian Church, Amarillo TX
First Southern Baptist, Yucca Valley
Fontana Foursquare Church
Foxworthy Baptist Church
Free Indeed Christian Fellowship, Perris
Freedom Community Christian Church, Perris
Freewill Missionary Baptist Church, San Diego
Freewill Missionary Baptist Church, San Diego
Friends Church, Yorba Linda
Friendship Christian Fellowship Church, Moreno Valley
Gem of the Valley Church, Murrieta
God’s Word Church, Apple Valley
Golden Altar Ministries, San Jose
Golden Gate Christian Church
Hamilton Square Baptist Church
Harvest Christian Fellowship
Heart of the Canyons Church
High Desert Church, Victorville
Highland Springs Fellowship, Banning
Hillsdale Baptist Church, North Highlands
Hope Vineyard Church, Santa Clarita
House of Luke, Hemet
Independent Church of Lake Elsinore
Irvine First Chinese Baptist Church
Joy Ministry for Christ, Los Angeles
Jubilee Family Church, Oskaloosa IA
Kingdom Conditioning Ministries, INC.
Koinonia Evangelistic Center, Moreno Valley
Lake Murray Church, Assemblies of God
Life Center Church, Lakewood
Light by the Bay Church, San Lorenzo
Lighthouse Assembly of God, Murrieta
Lighthouse Community Church, Lathrop
Live Ride Christian Church
Living Faith Christian Fellowship, Garden Grove
Living Stones Ministries
Living Word Christian Church, San Diego
Love and Unity Church of God in Christ, Compton
Luke Four Eighteen Ministries International, Temecula
Maranatha Chapel
Maranatha Chapel, Rancho Bernardo
Menlo Park Community Church of God in Christ, Menlo Park
Meridian Southern Baptist, El Cajon
Mount Pisgah Baptist Church, San Diego
Mountain View Community Church, Temecula
Mount Zion Assemblies
Napoleon Washington, Jr. Evangelistic Assn.
Nations Harvest Church, Sunnyvale
New Birth Kingdom Covenant
New Covenant Ministries Christian Fellowship
New Day Church
New Destiny Christian Church, Inc.
New Life Presbyterian Church
New Light Church of God, Riverside
New Seasons Church
Newhall Church of the Nazarene
New Venture Christian Fellowship
Northside Christian Church
Oasis of Faith Christian Center
Oroville Nazarene Church
Our Lady of the Redwoods Catholic Church
Our Redeemer Lives Church, Lake Elsinore
Paradise Hills Southern Baptist Church
Progressive M.B.C. of Berkeley
Rancho Baptist Church, Temecula
Ray of Hope Church, Pomona
Redemption Christian Fellowship
Refuge Ministries
Resurrection Power Ministries
Revival Christian Fellowship, Menifee
Ripon Grace Brethren Church
Rose Drive Friends Church, Yorba Linda
Rubidoux First Assembly of God
San Antonio Heights Community Church, San Bernardino
San Diego Christian Worship Center, San Diego
San Jose Church of Christ, San Jose
San Jose Foursquare Church, San Jose
San Jose Open Bible Church, San Jose
San Jose Word of Faith Christian Center, San Jose
San Mateo Pro Life
Santa Rosa Diocesan Council of Catholic Women
Set Free Ministries of San Diego, San Diego
Seventh Day Sabbath Second Advent Church
Sierra Madre Congregational Church
Shepherd of the Hills
Skyline Wesleyan Church, El Cajon
Solid Ground Brethren in Christ Church, Alta Loma
Sonoma Valley Community Church
South Coast Christian Assembly
South Valley Christian Church, San Jose
Southwest Christian Church, Temecula
Southwest Community Church, Indian Wells
Spirit Life Worship Center
St. Andrew Orthodox Church
St. Joseph Church
St Timothy Orthodox Church
St. Mary Catholic Church
St. Patrick's Church
State College Blvd. Church of Christ, Anaheim
Survivors of Assault Recovery/Living Word Christian Church, San Diego
TEN27 Church
The Bridge Church
The Calvary Chapel Churches
The Church of God of Prophecy, National City
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
The Home Church, Campbell
The Oasis Foursquare Church
The Rock Church, San Diego
Trinity Baptist Church
Tyler Baptist Church, Riverside
Valley Christian Church, Chino
Victory International Church, San Mateo
Victory Outreach of Eagle Rock
Vineyard Family Christian Fellowship, Downey
Vista Hope Church of the Nazarene
Voices of Hope Ministries
Whittier Church of Christ, Whittier
Wildwood Calvary Chapel
Windsor Hills Baptist Church, La Mesa
Word of Life Ministries Int’l, Riverside
Word of Truth Ministries
World Overcomers Church International
Zion Christian Fellowship, Spring Valley
Zion Lutheran Church, North Highlands, CA

Gemini Cricket 11-05-2008 12:15 AM

Yes on 8 Supporters:
Public Officials

Spoiler:
State Senators

Senator Dick Ackerman
Senator Sam Aanestad
Senator Roy Ashburn
Senator James Battin, Jr.
Senator Dave Cogdill
Senator Dave Cox
Senator Jeff Denham
Senator Bob Dutton
Senator Tom Harman
Senator Dennis Hollingsworth
Senator Abel Maldonado
Senator Bob Margett
Senator Tom McClintock
Senator George Runner
Senator Mark Wyland

Assembly Members

Assemblyman Greg Aghzarian
Assemblyman Joel Anderson
Assemblyman John Benoit
Assemblyman Chuck Devore
Assemblyman Bill Emmerson
Assemblyman Guy Houston
Assemblyman Bob Huff
Assemblyman Rick Keene
Assemblyman Doug LaMalfa
Assemblyman Bill Maze
Assemblyman Mike Duvall
Assemblyman Alan Nakanishi
Assemblyman Roger Niello
Assemblyman George Plescia
Assemblywoman Sharon Runner
Assemblywoman Audra Strickland
Assemblyman Van Tran
Assemblyman Michael Villines
Assemblywoman Mimi Walters

Local Elected Officials

Mayor Candace Andersen, Town of Danville
Mayor Neil C. Blais, City of Rancho Santa Margarita
Michael Calta, Chino Valley Unified School District
Dick Daniels, Escondido Councilmember
Mayor Curt Hagman, City of Chino Hills
San Diego County Supervisor, Bill Horn (District 5)
Mayor Eric King, City of Folsom
Mayor Pro-Tem Dan Kirby, City of Monrovia
Placer County Supervisor Bruze Kranz (District 5)
Imperial County Supervisor Wally Leimgruber (District 5)
San Bernadino County Supervisor Brad Mitzelfel (District 1)
Linda Lindholm- Laguna Niguel Councilmember
Mayor Jeff Miller, City of Corona
Mayor Pro Tem Leroy Mills, City of Cypress
Mayor Pro Tem Robert Ming, City of Laguna Niguel
Mayor Randall Norton, Town of Duncan
Mayor Curt Pringle, City of Anaheim
Frank Ury- Mission Viejo Councilmember
Mayor Todd Seymore, City of Cypress
Mike Spence, West Covina Unified School Board Member
Mayor Pro Tem Justin White, City of Chowchilla
Marie Waldron, Escondido Councilmember
Mayor Dennis Yates, City of Chino

Other Public Officials

Ken Campbell, Placer County Republican Chairman
Former Assemblyman Ray Haynes
Former Assemblyman Tim Leslie

Gemini Cricket 11-05-2008 12:17 AM

More Yes Supporters:
Organizations

Spoiler:
Active Christian Media
Advocates for Faith and Freedom
Agudath Israel of California
Alliance Defense Fund, serving as Legal Counsel
American Family Association
American Veterans Christian Alliance
Americas Hope
Armineh Chelebian for State Assembly 40th AD
Association of Christian Schools International, Northern and Southern Districts of CA
Bakersfield Republican Assembly
Bethel Baptist Academy
Brethren in Christ Church Pacific Conference
California Catholic Conference of Bishops
California Catholic Women’s Forum
California Family Alliance
California Family Council
Capitol Resource Institute
Catholics at Work
Catholics for Protectmarriage.com
Catholics for the Common Good
Celebration Center, Modesto, CA
Center for Reclaiming America
CFFC-LA
Christians OnDemand
Communities of Western Washington African American Healthy Marriage Initiative
Comunidad Cristiana Internacional Campus Los Angeles
Seasoned Sisters
Bill and Pam Farrel Marriage and Family Communicators
National Organization for Marriage
FHR
Christian Citizenship Council of San Diego
Christian Educators Association International
Christian Examiner Newspaper
Concerned Women for America
Confraternidad Hispaña Bautista de California (Hispanic Southern Baptist Fellowship)
Coral Ridge Ministries
Creation Research of North America
Creation Research of the North Coast
Dobbins/Oregon House Action Committee
Duncan Hunter for 52nd Congressional District
Eagle Forum of California
Eagle Forum of Sacramento
East County Refuge Center
El Camino Christian Fellowship
ElectionForum.org
Evidence for God from Science
Faith2Action
Faith 316
Family Leader Network
Family Research Council
Father Neil W. Seidl Council # 13672
Focus on the Family
Foursquare International
G51 Group
Golden State Association of Christian Schools
Government for the People
Holistic Integrated Services Foundation (HIS), Fullerton
Home Fellowship
Iglesia de la Colina - RCA
Ignite Youth/New Wine Church
Institute for Families and Taxpayers
Jewish New Testament Publications, Inc.
Kerigma Entertainment
Knights of Columbus Council #3052
Knights of Columbus Frances Cabrini Council #8879
Knights of Columbus St. Elizabeth Council #8747, Milpitas
Knights of Columbus St. Michael's of Marin Council #10530, Novato
Knights of Columbus Council #12887, Roseville
Knights of Columbus Council #11724, Sacramento
Knights of Columbus Orange County
Knights of Columbus San Jose
Knights of Columbus St. Raphael Council #1292, San Rafael
Koinonia Sports & Fitness Assoc.
La Familia Hispana
Legacy Law Foundation
Liberty Counsel
Life After Foster Care
Los Angeles Community Builders Inc
Lydia Gutierrez for State Senate
Marriage and Parenting Students of Christ (MAPS)
Meridian Magazine
Network of Politically Active Christians
North Coast Republican Club
One Heart Foundation
Organized Business Council
Orthodox Union
Pacific Justice Institute
Pastors Rapid Response Team (Pastors in Coalition with ProtectMarriage.com)
Preserve Liberty
Proposition 22 Legal Defense and Education Fund
Public Awareness Ministries
Rancho Bernardo Baptist Church
Rancho Del Rey Church
RelayFast08
Republican Party of Riverside County
Revive Indonesia
Sacramento District Church of the Nazarene
SanDiegoAnglicans.com
Sonoma County Republican Party
Southbay Crossing
St. Mary's Charismatic Prayer Group
The Center for Teaching the Constitution
The Holy Name Society
The Knights of Columbus, Council 1346, San Mateo, CA
The River Worship Center
The Rock of Roseville
The Western Center for Law & Policy
Traditional Family Coalition
Traditional Values Coalition
Trinity Life Solutions
NorthBay Neonatology Associates, Inc.
Families First Counseling Services
Ebmeyer Charter & Tour
Superior Organizing Services
Ventura County Christian Leadership Council
Come Let Us Reason
Environmental Geology Services
54th AD Republican Central Committee
United Families California
Values Advocacy Council
VOCAL Californians for the Preservation of Family & Marriage
Wycliffe Bible Translators, Temecula

BarTopDancer 11-05-2008 12:23 AM

4% go baby go!

dammit. up to 6%.

CoasterMatt 11-05-2008 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gemini Cricket (Post 251172)
If you're mad, do something about it.

I've already put a lot of horse porn on the webservers at the local Catholic school.

keith - SuPeR K! 11-05-2008 12:29 AM

So worried about 8.

Gemini Cricket 11-05-2008 12:39 AM

Even More:

Spoiler:
Ag West Distributing Co., Inc.
Alpasina Insurance Services
Pastor Marcelo Alvarado, Iglesia Misionnera HispanoAmericana
Patricia Arnold, Calvary Christian Center
Automated Environments
Bambrick & Associates
Be Ready, Inc.
Best Tire and Automotive
Rich Bott-Bott Radio Network
Pastor Kenny Burchard-The Oasis Foursquare Church
Busy Little Bee Daycare
Mary J. Buzzell, M.J.B. Floral Services
Catherine Callen - Lampstand Studios, Divide CO
Richard & Corrine Cardoza, The Lord's Church
Ron Carter- Carter Construction Company
CC Layne & Sons Inc.
Duncan Chamberlin-Duncan's Auto Sales
Richard and Marie Clayton- Maric Services
Community West Mortgage
Cornerstone Custom Construction
Dr. BAM Crawford, Bible Enrichment Fellowship International Center
CRS, Inc.
Culp Diversified Properties
Curry Copy Center of Hemet
Eldon Cyrus- Cyrus Tree Service
Thomas B. Dafoe – Briden Wilson Farm, Arbuckle
John DeCesare, President - inetMatrix
E. Denniston, Contractor: Creative Builders
Bishop Roy Dixon, Pastor
Dr. Johnny Dlakley, God in our Midst
Joyce Edge, Founder/President – Survivors of Assault Recovery
EL VOCERO MAGAZINE
Esthetique Dental Center
Everything4Mom.com
Jason & Andrea Ewell – Jason’s Glass Tint, San Clemente
Fahillion Technology Consultants
Fetal Diagnostic Center
First Experiences Preschool
GFBB Benefits and Insurance
Eric Glover- Wellspring Church
John J. Gobbell, Jr., Real Estate Appraiser
Netz Gomez, Houses of Light
Pastor David Gray, Bible Fellowship Community Church
Guy Strohmeiers Auto Center
Keith Hanks, Azusa City Councilmember
Hartman Construction of Home Services
Pastor Craig Hays, Crenshaw Christian Center
Dr. Jay W. Henderson, President - The Law Offices of Jay W. Henderson, Ltd.
Dan Herron, Zoe Kingdom Seeker
Inspired Stylus Writing and Copyediting
GLen Inverso- MJ Baxter Drilling Company
R. Christian Jesperson- Chiropractic Family Health Center
Justin A. March Associates, Inc.
Richard Kerr- Kerr Real Estate Advisors
George M. Knapp, Investment Advisor: Knapp Financial
James Knox, American Focus
Dr. Rafik George Labib
Land Resource Investments
Lane Associates, Inc.
Dr. James H. Lau
Law Offices of Kimber B. Goddard
Min. Henry Lein, Christian Mission
Leon's Place Independent Living
Tran M. Lewis Jr., Full Gospel COGIC
Lewis Appliance Repair and Installation
Pastor Carleton Lincoln, The Dwelling Place
Lodi Christian Radio KSTG 101.5 LP FM
David W. & Alice G. Magnusson: Haws, Record & Magnusson, Attorneys at Law
Vlade Mamayev, CEO – Buildex Inc.
Nora O. Marin - Little Angel's Daycare, Rancho Cordova
Wayne M. Martin – Wayne Martin Associates, Oxnard
Maximum Marketing Inc.
Joseph McFarland, DDS
MikeMcGill – Former Mayor, City of Cypress
Anchi Miller – ATM International, Kirkland WA
Ridley R. Molders – Molders Logistics, Santa Ana
Todd Mowrey-Fit-To-Be-Tyed
Fabricio Mundo- LinearB Enterprises
Snr. Pastor Dr. Charles Nauden, The Holy Way COGIC COGIC
Don Nordgren, Owner - Pacific Coast Auto Body, Paint & Frame, San Diego
Pastor Jim Ortiz, My Friends House
Dr. Phillip Ortiz, President/Owner - Direct to You Mobile Dentistry, Murrieta
Reverend Dr. Raul Pacheco, FCCI Ministries
Michael A. Padgett – Law Office, Fontana
Pastor Charles/Gwen Patrick, Sunago Christian Fellowship Church-Compton
Bishop Virgil Patterson, Crusaders Ministry
Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson, BOND Action
Paul Pothier – The Paleo Conservatist, Yorba Linda
Dr. Frederick K.C. Price, Crenshaw Christian Center
Pastor Fred Price, Jr., Crenshaw Christian Center
Bradley L. Quick - Bradley L. Quick Insurance Agency
Rick J. Radecki – Lion’s Roar Media, Victorville
Min. Leonard Radomskiy, World Outreach House of Prayer
RCS Door Service/ Rodney Press.
Peter M. Reimer - Peter Reimer Farms, Shafter
Reimer's Wholesale Nursery
Brandon Renfro, Lay Pastor – Calvary Baptist Church, Modesto
Resources For Continuing Education, Inc.
RF Sweet & Associates Real Estate
Minister Terrance Richmond, Calvary Christian Center
Gerry Rickert – Cottonwood Quilting, Silverado
George Rickert – Rickert Cabinetry, Silverado
Anthony Rios- First Security Home Loans
Roche Oil, Inc.
Rockingham Asset Management
Denise M. Roland – Reliable Referrals LLC, La Crosse WI
RPM Events, Inc.
Joel Sanders – Sanders Heavy Towing, Williams
Ross L. Sardo – RLS Inspections, Inc. Ventura
Janice Schindler, President - Schindler & Schindler Inc. Fountain Valley
Scott McDonald & Assoc.
Pastor Kenneth Sesley, Kingdom Advancers Family
Sheppard & Associates Insurance Agency
Angela Sisneroz, MEDELEC
Pastor Ed Smith, Zoe Christian Fellowship-Whittier
Patricia Smith – Classic Clean, Inc. Los Gatos
Splash! Designworks
Cynthia L. Stevens - Cynthia’s Cleaning Service
Douglas Stevenson-Quietcool, inc.
Bishop Frank Stewart, Zoe Christian Fellowship-LA
Stubblefield Family Chiropractic
Style Concrete
Scott Suchomel-Sibling Systems
Tai Pan Trading
Teague Construction
Pastor Ray Telles, Hope of Glory Fellowship
The Wellness Advantage
Snr. Pastor, Min. Trena Thompson, The Dwelling Place- Carlton Lincon
President Daniel y Susana Torres, Vision De Futuroag
William U. Valencia, Tax Consultant: Valencia Tax Service
Dr. David M. Walden - Chaplain
Dr. David M. Walden – MOTE Inc., San Diego
Keith Walker, Writer-Publisher: Golden Door Press
Robert R. Weedon LCSW, Coherent Counseling Services
West Coast Commercial Mortgage, Inc.
White Diamond Jewelers
WishIHadThat.com
Pastor Lawrence Witherspoon, Fortress Community Church
Zane Schaeffer Construction
Neftali Zazueta, Grace Harvest Fellowship

Disneyphile 11-05-2008 01:00 AM

Thanks for the lists of companies and organizations to boycott!! :snap:

Morrigoon 11-05-2008 02:08 AM

52-48 with 69% of precincts reporting

Morrigoon 11-05-2008 02:23 AM

Contra Costa only has 44% of precincts reporting so far. They're populous enough to help! Right now 54-46 AGAINST :)

Los Angeles has only 65% of precincts in so far, unfortunately tiped 52-48 FOR - let's hope that WeHo hasn't been counted yet, that could shift things

Monterey reporting 34% of precincts, 52-48 AGAINST :) Not the biggest county, but more votes against will help

San Francisco's almost fully in, so no help there, but they were 77-23 AGAINST in a nice populous area

Santa Clara 55-45 AGAINST, with only 53% reporting, and enough population to have an impact (thought not enough to swing it)

Betty 11-05-2008 06:52 AM

It saddens me that 8 passed. There are employees I work with, people that I like, that voted yes on 8. I'm having a hard time thinking nicely of them at the moment. To think that they would willingly deprive someone of rights makes me think less of them. I don't want to feel that way, but can't help it.

Stan4dSteph 11-05-2008 07:24 AM

The CNN breakdown by age looks promising though. It shows 63% No in voters under 30. There's still hope for the future.

Kevy Baby 11-05-2008 07:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gemini Cricket (Post 251172)
Also, think of these people as allies.

One of the things that depresses me is how short this list is.

I am ashamed and embarrassed to be a Californian today.

Moonliner 11-05-2008 07:54 AM

Does the passing of 8 imply that all the recent gay marriages in the state will be annulled?

Ghoulish Delight 11-05-2008 08:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moonliner (Post 251215)
Does the passing of 8 imply that all the recent gay marriages in the state will be annulled?

That's yet to be determined, some have said yes, some no.

No one has called it yet, but with 95% reporting and a ~400,000 vote lead it looks like it's going to pass.

I went to bed last night with the hopes of waking up to a different story this morning. It's amazing how I can go from feeling so proud of our country watching Barack give his victory speech to so disgusted.

I will wait until the result is official, but I plan on printing a sign for my car:

"Prop 8: Congratulations Bigots"

:mad:

keith - SuPeR K! 11-05-2008 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moonliner (Post 251215)
Does the passing of 8 imply that all the recent gay marriages in the state will be annulled?

I'm curious to see how that will work out as well. I read somewhere that the state will most likely continue giving out marriage licenses to same-sex couples for at least a month- until the paperwork all goes through and the department that controls the licenses tells everyone to stop handing out licenses.

blueerica 11-05-2008 08:05 AM

:(

Moonliner 11-05-2008 08:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keith - SuPeR K! (Post 251220)
I'm curious to see how that will work out as well. I read somewhere that the state will most likely continue giving out marriage licenses to same-sex couples for at least a month- until the paperwork all goes through and the department that controls the licenses tells everyone to stop handing out licenses.

That's not good. I will create the situation where couples feel like they have to get married now ready or not.

BarTopDancer 11-05-2008 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 251219)
I will wait until the result is official, but I plan on printing a sign for my car:

"Prop 8: Congratulations Bigots"

:mad:

I was going to print a sign for my car "I voted to NOT take away rights." but I think I may steal your idea.

I am so disgusted by the majority of the population in this state.

BarTopDancer 11-05-2008 09:33 AM

My co-worker said there are 3 million absentee ballots to count still. Can anyone verify?

Ghoulish Delight 11-05-2008 09:39 AM

Hmm, I read that absentee ballots were counted first.

Either way, absentee ballots tend to skew conservative, so I wouldn't hold my breath on that.

ETA: Here's corroboration of the 3 million figure. That would include provisional ballots as well as absentee.

Kevy Baby 11-05-2008 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moonliner (Post 251222)
That's not good. It will create the situation where couples feel like they have to get married now ready or not.

So gays get to experience what it is like to get pregnant?

Gn2Dlnd 11-05-2008 09:45 AM

According to the KNX website, the amendment will take effect immediately. The first Lesbian couple to be married in L.A. county is filing a lawsuit claiming the amendment is unconstitutional, as is the San Francisco city attorney.

I have to drive to Redlands today to make a delivery, last time I was there my waitress proudly introduced me to her female fiancee. I hope they were able to get married before this shiat.

I'm disgusted.

Ghoulish Delight 11-05-2008 09:49 AM

A bit of ignorance re: law, but I believe I'm right in thinking that federal constitutional law trumps state, yes? So if "separate but equal" has by precedent been deemed unconstitutional at the federal level, wouldn't that hold at the state level, even ignoring the "can't take away rights with a simple majority" precedent?

Gemini Cricket 11-05-2008 09:55 AM

It was such a buzz kill to read the LA Times newspaper headline this morning.
Big letters proclaiming Obama's win and directly under that in pretty big font "Gay Marriage Opposition Takes Early Lead" or something like that. Ugh.

Some will disagree with me but I knew 8 would pass when I looked at how well-funded Yes was. Way more money than No.

I am glad there are lawsuits being filed against 8 already. A struggle for equal rights is a long process.

I also wonder why the Mormon Church still has their tax-exempt status. Why doesn't something like this affect that status? Just curious.

I am glad Massachusetts still has marriage equality.

Kevy Baby 11-05-2008 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gemini Cricket (Post 251245)
I also wonder why the Mormon Church still has their tax-exempt status. Why doesn't something like this affect that status? Just curious.

Why would they lose their tax-exampt status?

Kevy Baby 11-05-2008 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gn2Dlnd (Post 250884)
If it passes I'll be at Santa Monica and San Vicente tomorrow, marching towards the Mormon Temple in Westwood.

If I can get a couple thousand friends to join me, that is.

We didn't get arrested during the AB101 marches, I doubt that a peaceful, i.e., no destruction of property, march would get us arrested now.

Nice, easy, beginner protest march, straight down Santa Monica Blvd. and back. I'm thinking 4 or 5 in the evening. Fvcks up traffic all kinds of ways. "You don't like being stuck in traffic? Go home and tell your wife!"

Do you know of any marches being planned? I would love to join if I can.

Kevy Baby 11-05-2008 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 251219)
"Prop 8: Congratulations Bigots"

On my drive in this morning, I modified (in my mind) your sign to read:

Proposition 8
The Bigots Win
This Round


Ghoulish Delight 11-05-2008 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevy Baby (Post 251248)
Why would they lose their tax-exampt status?

Because tax exempt status for churches has been conditional on the basis that they refrain from political activity.

ETA: Here are the pertinent lines in the IRS code:

no substantial part of [a 501(c)(3) organization's] activities" may consist of "carrying on propaganda, or otherwise attempting, to influence legislation."9 The second restriction mandates that 501(c)(3) organizations may "not participate in, or intervene in (including the publishing or distributing of statements), any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office."

Yeah, I'm going to have to say there's a pretty good case to be made that the Mormon church's substantial contributions violate the "influence legislation" clause in a big way, so don't count on anything happening.

That said, the IRS has never enforced that clause, and the question of that clause's Constitutionality in regards to free speech has never been challenged.

BarTopDancer 11-05-2008 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevy Baby (Post 251249)
Do you know of any marches being planned? I would love to join if I can.

Me too.

BarTopDancer 11-05-2008 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 251251)
Yeah, I'm going to have to say there's a pretty good case to be made that the Mormon church's substantial contributions violate the "influence legislation" clause in a big way.

Let's sue the Mormon church!!!!!!

JWBear 11-05-2008 10:08 AM

According to the CA SOS site... There are 17.3 million registered voters (74.5% of those eligible to vote), but there were only 10.5 million votes cast - 60.7% turnout.

What a differnece that other 7 million could have made. :mad:

BarTopDancer 11-05-2008 10:10 AM

I find it interesting that it's 52 - 48 yes while Prop 4 is 52-48 no.

Strangler Lewis 11-05-2008 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 251242)
A bit of ignorance re: law, but I believe I'm right in thinking that federal constitutional law trumps state, yes? So if "separate but equal" has by precedent been deemed unconstitutional at the federal level, wouldn't that hold at the state level, even ignoring the "can't take away rights with a simple majority" precedent?

It's been a while, but separate but equal was a racial concept. In equal protection law, you're always going to get your strictest scrutiny when race is at issue. For there to be any equal protection violation, there usually has to be a suspect classification. Gays have not been held to be a suspect class. However, in Lawrence v. Texas, the Supreme Court held that there was no rational basis for criminalizing gay sex, tradition and ancient moral codes notwithstanding. While there is arguably a difference between what is criminalized and what is given civil approval, I think Lawrence is probably the best argument out there.

Kevy Baby 11-05-2008 10:15 AM

Obviously, this is just my uneducated two cents on the subject.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 251251)
ETA: Here are the pertinent lines in the IRS code:

no substantial part of [a 501(c)(3) organization's] activities" may consist of "carrying on propaganda, or otherwise attempting, to influence legislation."

The easy out on this clause is that these activities were not a substantial part of the Mormon church's activities. Yes, the donations themselves could be considered substantial, but I can see where this is only a small part of the churches efforts (both financial and time).

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 251251)
The second restriction mandates that 501(c)(3) organizations may "not participate in, or intervene in (including the publishing or distributing of statements), any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office."

This clause is not relevant to this case because it refers to a candidate only.

Again, I am not arguing for the LDS church (I am no fan of them), but just giving my $0.02.

Kevy Baby 11-05-2008 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strangler Lewis (Post 251257)
Gays have not been held to be a suspect class.

Are you kidding me? Have you met iSm?!? He's as suspect as they get!











(Joking here kids - don't take this post seriously!)

Gemini Cricket 11-05-2008 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevy Baby (Post 251248)
Why would they lose their tax-exampt status?

Quote:

Consequences of Political Campaign Activity

When it participates in political campaign activity, a church or religious organization jeopardizes both its tax-exempt status under IRC section 501(c)(3) and its eligibility to receive tax-deductible contributions. In addition, it may become subject to an excise tax on its political expenditures. This excise tax may be imposed in addition to revocation, or it may be imposed instead of revocation. Also, the church or religious organization should correct the violation.
Source

Quote:

(f) Affiliated organizations (1) In general Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (4), if for a taxable year two or more organizations described in section 501(c)(3) are members of an affiliated group of organizations as defined in paragraph (2), and an election under section 501 (h) is effective for at least one such organization for such year, then—
(A) the determination as to whether excess lobbying expenditures have been made and the determination as to whether the expenditure limits of section 501 (h)(1) have been exceeded shall be made as though such affiliated group is one organization,
(B) if such group has excess lobbying expenditures, each such organization as to which an election under section 501 (h) is effective for such year shall be treated as an organization which has excess lobbying expenditures in an amount which equals such organization’s proportionate share of such group’s excess lobbying expenditures,
(C) if the expenditure limits of section 501 (h)(1) are exceeded, each such organization as to which an election under section 501 (h) is effective for such year shall be treated as an organization which is not described in section 501 (c)(3) by reason of the application of 501(h), and
(D) subparagraphs (C) and (D) of subsection (d)(2), paragraph (3) or subsection (d), and clause (i) of subsection (e)(1)(C) shall be applied as if such affiliated group were one organization.
Source

Gn2Dlnd 11-05-2008 10:27 AM

Hey, give the Mormons, in fact, give ALL churches all the free speech they want, but make them pay taxes. I don't see a problem.

Gemini Cricket 11-05-2008 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gn2Dlnd (Post 251261)
Hey, give the Mormons, in fact, give ALL churches all the free speech they want, but make them pay taxes. I don't see a problem.

Which brings up a good point. It's not just the Mormons who funded 8. There were other churches involved. Other close-minded, ignorant, pretentiously pious, scruffy-looking Nerf herding churches involved...

€uroMeinke 11-05-2008 10:33 AM

The Good news for 8 was in looking at the exit poll numbers - the No votes in the under 30 age group was overwhellming - but at 20% of the vote the impact was diminished. In time however, that demographic at least indicates to me that it's just a matter of time.

Betty 11-05-2008 10:34 AM

What's nerf-herding?

JWBear 11-05-2008 10:37 AM

I'm pissed at my nephew! He opposed 8, but "never got around to" voting yesterday! :mad:

Gemini Cricket 11-05-2008 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Betty (Post 251266)
What's nerf-herding?

Click
0:40

:D

Gn2Dlnd 11-05-2008 11:32 AM

Nobody's answering the phone at LAGLC, If I get through, and can find out where there are protests, I'll post that info here and on twitter.

Ghoulish Delight 11-05-2008 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman (Post 250366)
Really, it's complete Bullsh!t that Obama's against Prop 8. He doesn't support Gay Marriage, i.e., he supports Prop 8. Less talking out of both side of his mouth might make me less disposed to not vote for him Tuesday.

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman (Post 250431)
I understand Obama thinks he can't get elected if he supports gay marriage. But coming out against Prop 8 IS supporting existing gay marriage rights. He can't have it both ways ... at least not with me. Ugh, he's not president-elect till tomorrow and already the lies start.

Sorry to drag this old line of discussion up, but I came across something yesterday that I think is interesting.

I'm reading Sarah Vowell's Assassination Vacation, the first half of which is about the assassination of Lincoln. She discusses the speech that Frederick Douglas gave at the dedication of the Freeman's Memorial in Lincoln Park. Here are some key exerpts:

Quote:

It must be admitted, truth compels me to admit, even here in the presence of the monument we have erected to his memory, Abraham Lincoln was not, in the fullest sense of the word, either our man or our model. In his interests, in his associations, in his habits of thought, and in his prejudices, he was a white man.

He was preeminently the white man’s President, entirely devoted to the welfare of white men. He was ready and willing at any time during the first years of his administration to deny, postpone, and sacrifice the rights of humanity in the colored people to promote the welfare of the white people of this country.

.......

When, therefore, it shall be asked what we have to do with the memory of Abraham Lincoln, or what Abraham Lincoln had to do with us, the answer is ready, full, and complete. Though he loved Caesar less than Rome, though the Union was more to him than our freedom or our future, under his wise and beneficent rule we saw ourselves gradually lifted from the depths of slavery to the heights of liberty and manhood; under his wise and beneficent rule, and by measures approved and vigorously pressed by him, we saw that the handwriting of ages, in the form of prejudice and proscription, was rapidly fading away from the face of our whole country;




It was as honest a speech as there ever was. Lincoln took a long path to his role as champion of the end of slavery. Much as Obama now stops well short of actually supporting full equal rights for gays, Lincoln stopped well short of supporting freedom for slaves. And his eventual change of heart was more convenience than principle.

But:

Quote:

Can any colored man, or any white man friendly to the freedom of all men, ever forget the night which followed the first day of January, 1863, when the world was to see if Abraham Lincoln would prove to be as good as his word? I shall never forget that memorable night, when in a distant city I waited and watched at a public meeting, with three thousand others not less anxious than myself, for the word of deliverance which we have heard read today. Nor shall I ever forget the outburst of joy and thanksgiving that rent the air when the lightning brought to us the emancipation proclamation. In that happy hour we forgot all delay, and forgot all tardiness, forgot that the President had bribed the rebels to lay down their arms by a promise to withhold the bolt which would smite the slave-system with destruction; and we were thenceforward willing to allow the President all the latitude of time, phraseology, and every honorable device that statesmanship might require for the achievement of a great and beneficent measure of liberty and progress.


Obama is no Lincoln, and he's surely not achieved, under any guise, the gains for gays that Lincoln achieved for the slaves. But reading this speech, knowing that a great man can truly hold questionable views, play both sides, use those he's purportedly helping merely to serve his own ends, and yet in the end make the right decision, gives me hope that one day, given the opportunity, Obama can do the same.



LSPoorEeyorick 11-05-2008 11:53 AM

We're a quick drive from the Mormon temple. You let us know when we should take our "angry lunch" hour and march with you.

Gemini Cricket 11-05-2008 11:53 AM

Obama mentioned gays in his acceptance speech. That made me extremely happy and proud that I voted for him.

Ghoulish Delight 11-05-2008 11:54 AM

Oh, forgot, here's a link to the full text of Douglas's speech. It's a powerful read.

Kevy Baby 11-05-2008 12:00 PM

Minor detail (and sorry for playing the devil's advocate here). Without looking into the specifics (and relying on my oft faulty memory), I believe that the churches skirted the issue by encouraging their MEMBERS to donate. Again, I am probably wrong somehow, just thinking out loud.

Gemini Cricket 11-05-2008 12:02 PM

I just got an email from Love Honor Cherish. They are conceding the passage of Prop 8.

Ghoulish Delight 11-05-2008 12:04 PM

Yes, most news sites have given it the check mark.

I didn't have time to print my sign up this morning. And I'm not dumb enough to use a company printer for that. It'll have to go up tomorrow.

innerSpaceman 11-05-2008 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by €uroMeinke (Post 251264)
The Good news for 8 was in looking at the exit poll numbers - the No votes in the under 30 age group was overwhellming ... that demographic at least indicates to me that it's just a matter of time.

Um, except that the young grow old.


Young people do not automatically retain their optimism, peacefulness, love and good-heartedness. It evaporates in all too many people.


If that weren't the sad truth, the 80's would have been utopia when all the wonderful youth of the 60's grew to be the core of society. It didn't happen that way then, and it won't now.

Gemini Cricket 11-05-2008 12:18 PM

I received an email from my former boss at GLAD (Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders) in Boston. I'd like to share it with everyone because it's hopeful.

Quote:

Today is an extraordinary day for all Americans.
For LGBT Americans, it's a day when we embrace hope and change - and also re-charge for the work and challenges ahead.
For eight years, we've endured an administration that has been downright hostile to our community. President-elect Obama, in contrast has expressed support for many of our issues, and an openness to reconsider his position on others - namely, marriage equality.

Our wish list, of course, is long: there's the prospect of getting rid of discriminatory laws, like Don't Ask Don't Tell, and the so-called "Defense of Marriage Act". There's the prospect of enacting good laws, like an inclusive Employment Non-Discrimination Act, Hate Crimes legislation, the Uniting American Families Act, and domestic partner benefits for federal workers. We expect the appointment of judges and justices who support civil rights and civil liberties as inherent in our constitution, and appointments of fair-minded people at all levels of the federal government.

None of this will happen without our community's unified efforts. While we believe we have a friend in the White House, our community must remain strong, focused, and disciplined in working with the new administration.

More great news came yesterday from Connecticut, where marriage equality is safe! Thanks to a strong and broad coalition working night and day, Connecticut's voters rejected a Constitutional Convention by a large margin. Anti-gay forces saw the convention as a way to strip our community of GLAD's historic win in Kerrigan & Mock v. Department of Public Health.
Now we can look forward to weddings, happiness, and security for the state's same-sex couples and their families, starting Wednesday, November 12. GLAD will continue our efforts to achieve the goal we have set of marriage equality for every state in New England by 2012.

Tempering these sweet victories are losses on initiated measures - in Florida and Arizona amending state constitutions to restrict marriage, in Arkansas to deny adoption rights, and of course California's apparent approval of a constitutional amendment banning marriage equality. There are provisional and absentee ballots still to be counted, but our opponents have maintained a consistent lead.

In California, our opponents relied on a $30 million campaign of deception, scare tactics, and false claims. That's not sour grapes; it was the reality of that hard-fought campaign. We thank Equality for All, the entire No On Prop 8 coalition, and the California families - gay and non-gay - who did so much to tell the truth in that campaign.

This apparent blow to California families and stain of discrimination now embedded in California's constitution shows that those who support equality and inclusion are not yet a majority. Our community gained a level of national unity and organization we've never seen before in this tough battle, but the fight in California and our nation is far from over.

We must keep bright the beacon of equality here in New England - as well as in other states, like New York and New Jersey, where we are closer to winning. The truth will win out. Equality will win out. We must all do the work necessary to make that day come soon.

Please savor these wins and the history of this day -and re-dedicate yourself to working impossibly hard for equality.


Sincerely,
Lee Swislow Executive Director


Gemini Cricket 11-05-2008 12:38 PM

Protest Rally Scheduled for Tonight
Quote:

A protest rally has been scheduled for tonight (Wednesday) at 7 pm on San Vicente Blvd between West Hollywood Park and the Pacific Design Center - 647 N. San Vicente Blvd.
San Vicente Blvd, between Santa Monica Blvd and Melrose Avenue will be closed tonight starting at 6 pm. San Vicente south-bound traffic will be directed to make left or right at Santa Monica Blvd.

Ghoulish Delight 11-05-2008 12:42 PM

If you hear of any in OC, let us know.

Gemini Cricket 11-05-2008 12:54 PM

I wrote this last night and posted it to No on 8's Facebook page this morning.
It's a call to action. It's something not everyone will agree with me on, but I put it out there for people to see.
I think there is a lot of anger out there and I'd like to see that anger channeled into something productive and not destructive.
Quote:

The news about Proposition 8 is not good.

A group of well-funded, small-minded people got together and wrote discrimination into California's Constitution. It is now in writing that your relationship and the commitment made by two loving people is not as important as others. It's law.

But my question to all those who supported the No on 8 Campaign is this: What are you going to do about that?

As a gay man who supports marriage equality, this is the third time I have lived through a lively discussion about same-sex marriage, once in Hawai'i in 1998, again in Boston when gay marriage was legalized and now in California where Prop 8 was passed by a slim majority. The faces were different but the hate was the same. There were people out there who believed that they owned the truth and wanted to define it for all of us. The reality is that despite the hate and lies that was spewed, they haven't taken away something important. They haven't taken away your self-pride and the love you feel for your husband, wife, or partner. That they can never take away.

But I ask again: What are you going to do about this display of hate directed at you and your family?

The answer is simple. There needs to be a call to action. We need to fight back. Take note of all of those organizations and business leaders who funded taking away your rights. You need to think twice before ever, ever giving your hard earned money or support to them.

If there is a "charitable" organization out there who funded Prop 8, do not donate to their cause. Find a like minded cause that also acknowledges and accepts you and fund them instead. For example: find out which hotel owner gave a lot of money to the Yes group and book another hotel instead on that vacation you're taking. Think to yourself, 'Hmm, do I really need to sign up for membership on the Mormon run site Ancestry.com?' The answer is no.

Channel the anger you're feeling today into action. Let your voice be heard in a peaceful manner. If these bigots won't listen to reason, then maybe they will listen to their falling profits when there's no money from the GLBT community and the GLBT-friendly community to support them.

Never help fund anyone who avidly fights to make you a second class citizen. Spend wisely, do your research.

Don't give up. This fight may be over but the battle has just begun and will end when all Americans are all equal under the law.

Brad

Chernabog 11-05-2008 01:02 PM

PROTEST DEMONSTRATION AGAINST PROP 8 TONIGHT AT 7PM AT SAN VICENTE AND MELROSE



SPREAD THE WORD WIDELY



OUR FIGHT FOR OUR EQUALITY, DIGNITY AND FULL CITIZENSHIP IS FAR FROM OVER



LET THIS DEFEAT ENERGIZE US TO TAKE ACTION - REACH OUT - BUILD STRENGTH ACROSS COMMUNITIES



WE CANNOT LAY DOWN IN DEFEAT - WE MUST STAND UP AND FIGHT


San Vicente Blvd, between Santa Monica Blvd and Melrose Avenue will be closed tonight starting at 6 pm. San Vicente south-bound traffic will be directed to make left or right at Santa Monica Blvd. Signs have already been posted to help divert traffic.

For more information about tonight's rally, please contact (323) 848-6460.

innerSpaceman 11-05-2008 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gemini Cricket (Post 251330)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chernabog
PROTEST DEMONSTRATION AGAINST PROP 8 TONIGHT AT 7PM AT SAN VICENTE AND MELROSE

Either of you planning on going? We could meet up. :) ... oh, :(

Chernabog 11-05-2008 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman (Post 251343)
Either of you planning on going? We could meet up. :) ... oh, :(

Whats the oh :( for? BJ has to work, but I might go.

Stan4dSteph 11-05-2008 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stan4dSteph (Post 251209)
The CNN breakdown by age looks promising though. It shows 63% No in voters under 30. There's still hope for the future.

Quote:

Originally Posted by €uroMeinke (Post 251264)
The Good news for 8 was in looking at the exit poll numbers - the No votes in the under 30 age group was overwhellming - but at 20% of the vote the impact was diminished. In time however, that demographic at least indicates to me that it's just a matter of time.

Great minds think alike.

SzczerbiakManiac 11-05-2008 01:18 PM

Have fun at your rally. If you get some sort of venting enjoyment out of it, that's fine. I will not be attending the futility.

Ya see, when somebody's imaginary friend tells them that fâggots aren't worth shït, there's really nothing intelligent, open-minded people can do (including protesting) to sway them. The only thing we can hope for is that these fücktards will eventually die off and people who can actually think will prevail.

LSPoorEeyorick 11-05-2008 01:23 PM

Indeed we can't necessarily change the minds of the bigoted. But we have to stay in action to remind the intelligent, open-minded people (and particularly the young ones who are coming into their own - I came from a homophobic family, myself, once upon a time) how important this issue is.

Isaac 11-05-2008 01:24 PM

I think I'll attend this one.

innerSpaceman 11-05-2008 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chernabog (Post 251345)
Whats the oh :( for? BJ has to work, but I might go.

Oh, I was just like :) Yay, let's meet up and have fun at the Protest because, oh :( California is full of suckwads who think fags are less worthy of respect than the chickens they eat.

Gemini Cricket 11-05-2008 01:26 PM

I think I will be there. But where the heck do you park?

Chernabog 11-05-2008 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SzczerbiakManiac (Post 251349)
Ya see, when somebody's imaginary friend tells them that fâggots aren't worth shït, there's really nothing intelligent, open-minded people can do (including protesting) to sway them. The only thing we can hope for is that these fücktards will eventually die off and people who can actually think will prevail.

I think it's more of a way to a) vent and b) try and get it out of your system to mentally move on and regroup for the next marriage battle (and there will be many many more, as long as people continue to believe that their magical sky fairy should control other people's lives, we need to be there to meet that battle).

It is not to change anyone's minds, but a way to process the crushing blow we have been dealt. I am having a very difficult time today comprehending how to deal with people, particularly Mormons and Christians. They are misguided bigots who are either too stupid to think for themselves or too chickensh!t to stand up to a church that they know is hurting people.

I do know that any respect that I had for them -- they can find their own path to God as long as it doesn't hurt me -- is obviously over. I just can't tell who the good people are and the bad people are just from walking down the street, y'know?

innerSpaceman 11-05-2008 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gemini Cricket (Post 251356)
I think I will be there. But where the heck do you park?

I'm gonna park at in front of my friend's Apartment just south of Melrose, just east of LaCienega ... only because I know how to get there and it was easy to find parking even for the WeHo Halloween Carnaval.

Want directions?

Gemini Cricket 11-05-2008 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman (Post 251369)
Want directions?

Yes.

LSPoorEeyorick 11-05-2008 01:52 PM

Not all Christians. Certainly, many. But not all. Look at the faith-based groups on this huge list; even the Catholic Democrats of California are on our side.

innerSpaceman 11-05-2008 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chernabog (Post 251357)
I am having a very difficult time today comprehending how to deal with people, particularly Mormons and Christians. They are misguided bigots who are either too stupid to think for themselves or too chickensh!t to stand up to a church that they know is hurting people.

I do know that any respect that I had for them -- they can find their own path to God as long as it doesn't hurt me -- is obviously over. I just can't tell who the good people are and the bad people are just from walking down the street, y'know?

Worse than that, for me (as I alluded to last night), I have some good friends who are good people AND Mormons ... and I'm gonna have a hard time telling their obviously good side from their obviously bad side during the future times of our relationships.

In any case, if I can get out of my previous obligation for this evening, I'd like to attend the rally to, yes, process some of my distressing feelings today. I'd certainly like to process them in a more healthy and releasing way than I have so far (which this morning involved a scalding hot shower of water and tears, and a razor blade when the soap was not enough to wash away the disgusting filth I felt.)


Hmmm, maybe I need psychotherapy instead. :mad:


And of course, I'm mindful of LPSE and Tom's story last night of meeting the day after their 2004 crushing election defeat and falling in love.


Yes, hmmm, rally in WeHo. :D

LSPoorEeyorick 11-05-2008 01:57 PM

We will be at the rally tonight. Our marriage isn't truly valid until yours are.

Cadaverous Pallor 11-05-2008 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SzczerbiakManiac (Post 251349)
Have fun at your rally. If you get some sort of venting enjoyment out of it, that's fine. I will not be attending the futility.

Ya see, when somebody's imaginary friend tells them that fâggots aren't worth shït, there's really nothing intelligent, open-minded people can do (including protesting) to sway them. The only thing we can hope for is that these fücktards will eventually die off and people who can actually think will prevail.

The only way things change is if people stand up and are counted.

Every person attending the rally means one more number to add to the headline the next day. Every sign placed means that more people are forced to consider their positions again. Sitting back and accepting a fate of inequality will only result in more inequality.

Fight, fight, fight, otherwise nothing ever changes.

madmonkeygirl 11-05-2008 02:02 PM

It disgusts me that people are that way and i am very saddened that people think that they can take away people's constiutional rights to marry who they want to. It's like to me what if someone's kid comes to them saying they are gay? then what? Or is that kid gonna be so homophobic that they stay in the closet affecting their health etc. Sad sad world that we live in. I just can't imagine taking away someone's right. It's discrimination of sorts in a way. Ok i could go on and on but i won't.

BarTopDancer 11-05-2008 02:11 PM

Andrew sent me this a bit earlier. It may have come before LHC conceeded

Quote:

Nov 05, 2008 Statement by No on Prop 8 Campaign on Election Status [http://www.noonprop8.com/headlines/s...status/%5d Roughly 400,000 votes separate yes from no on Prop 8 – out of 10 million votes tallied. Based on turnout estimates reported yesterday, we expect that there are more than 3 million and possibly as many as 4 million absentee and provisional ballots yet to be counted. Given that fundamental rights are at stake, we must wait to hear from the Secretary of State tomorrow how many votes are yet to be counted as well as where they are from. It is clearly a very close election and we monitored the results all evening and this morning. As of this point, the election is too close to call. Because Prop 8 involves the sensitive matter of individual rights, we believe it is important to wait until we receive further information about the outcome. Geoff Kors Executive Committee NO on Prop 8 K

innerSpaceman 11-05-2008 02:24 PM

GC, check your PMs.


All others who are going, shall we have a meet plan or just rely on cell phones?

Andrew 11-05-2008 02:35 PM

Quote:

As the vote counting continued this morning, opponents of Prop. 8 filed a lawsuit directly with the state Supreme Court - whose May 15 ruling legalized same-sex marriage - asking the justices to overturn the measure.

The suit argued that Prop. 8 would change the California Constitution in such fundamental ways - taking important rights away from a minority group - that it amounted to a constitutional revision, which requires approval by the Legislature before being submitted to the voters.
Source

SzczerbiakManiac 11-05-2008 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LSPoorEeyorick (Post 251374)
Our marriage isn't truly valid until yours are.

Thank you for that ray of light on this very, very dark day.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 251379)
Every person attending the rally means one more number to add to the headline the next day. Every sign placed means that more people are forced to consider their positions again.

It doesn't matter if there are 5 or five million at the rally. It doesn't matter how many No on H8 signs they read on their way home form work. Nothing, absolutely nothing is going to change the mind of a "person" who thinks homosexuals are not full human beings.

You cannot reason a person out of a position they weren't reasoned into in the first place.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 251379)
Sitting back and accepting a fate of inequality will only result in more inequality.

I don't disagree with you on that point. I just think that a rally will not change any enemy minds.

Quote:

Originally Posted by madmonkeygirl (Post 251380)
what if someone's kid comes to them saying they are gay? then what? Or is that kid gonna be so homophobic that they stay in the closet affecting their health etc.

The most likely scenarios are:
  1. The kid stays in the closet and becomes sick and/or commits suicide.
  2. The kid grows up and becomes a gay basher. He who screams "fag" loudest invariably is one.

Ghoulish Delight 11-05-2008 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SzczerbiakManiac (Post 251390)

It doesn't matter if there are 5 or five million at the rally. It doesn't matter how many No on H8 signs they read on their way home form work. Nothing, absolutely nothing is going to change the mind of a "person" who thinks homosexuals are not full human beings.

You cannot reason a person out of a position they weren't reasoned into in the first place.

Just as nothing could have changed the minds of people who didn't think blacks were human.

The good news is, you don't have to change the minds of those too entrenched to change. You need to change the minds of the small few who are simply misinformed, and the ones who just didn't understand the importance and didn't vote.

Prop 8 did not win in a landslide. It barely snuck by. The louder those of us who know better are now, the more likely things will tilt the other way next time.

Stan4dSteph 11-05-2008 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chernabog (Post 251357)
It is not to change anyone's minds, but a way to process the crushing blow we have been dealt. I am having a very difficult time today comprehending how to deal with people, particularly Mormons and Christians. They are misguided bigots who are either too stupid to think for themselves or too chickensh!t to stand up to a church that they know is hurting people.

I do know that any respect that I had for them -- they can find their own path to God as long as it doesn't hurt me -- is obviously over. I just can't tell who the good people are and the bad people are just from walking down the street, y'know?

That's a hurtful generalization. I don't live in CA, so I couldn't vote on Prop 8, but I would have voted no. I am also a Christian.

Gn2Dlnd 11-05-2008 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gemini Cricket (Post 251330)

Thanks for the info, I'll be back from Redlands in plenty of time to attend.

SzczerbiakManiac 11-05-2008 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 251396)
nothing could have changed the minds of people who didn't think blacks were human.

I agree with you. The only way this situation will change is when the courts force the ignorant to play nice. But judges don't make decisions based on how many people attended a post-election rally. The good judges (ones not unduly influenced by imaginary friends) make decisions based on what is fair and just.

BarTopDancer 11-05-2008 03:21 PM

Mormon leaders urge respect for foes in gay-marriage debate.

Link

Quote:

Now that California voters have outlawed same-sex marriage, an LDS Church leader called Wednesday for members to heal any rifts caused by the emotional campaign by treating each other with "civility, with respect and with love."
So now that they got what they wanted they should love thy neighbor?

I feel like I've just been slapped in the face.

Ghoulish Delight 11-05-2008 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SzczerbiakManiac (Post 251404)
I agree with you. The only way this situation will change is when the courts force the ignorant to play nice. But judges don't make decisions based on how many people attended a post-election rally. The good judges (ones not unduly influenced by imaginary friends) make decisions based on what is fair and just.

The Civil Rights act in 1964 was passed by Congress and signed into law by the President. Elected officials acting because they could not ignore a motivated citizenship that was not standing by quietly waiting for judges to fix things.

Obama got flack for this old quote, but it's a good message:

"And I think one of the tragedies of the civil rights movement was that the civil rights movement became so court-focused, I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and organizing activities on the ground that are able to bring about the coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change, and in some ways we still suffer from that."

And beyond all that, think back to being taught about the civil rights movement during your own formative years. What do you remember as having the biggest impression on you? The kind of impression that ensured that your generation was instilled with a sense of tolerance and equality for people no like yourself. Was it details of court rulings? Or was it images like these:






This isn't about this election. It isn't about the next election. It's not about 3 lawsuits, a pending court battle, or even a possible federal Supreme Court ruling. It's about letting everyone know that human beings deserve rights and being sure no one forgets it. It's about making sure future generations know that people are willing to fight for their right.

I understand being too angry to want to face the insurmountable force of ignorance yourself. But there are people who are planning to stand in the streets and proclaim their support for you as a human being. I cheer them on, and wish I could be there myself. I hope you feel the same.

Morrigoon 11-05-2008 03:30 PM

Amendments cannot be struck from the Constitution, they must be repealed by a subsequent amendment. So I sincerely hope someone is starting the signature-gathering effort RIGHT NOW for that amendment.

BarTopDancer 11-05-2008 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Morrigoon (Post 251409)
Amendments cannot be struck from the Constitution, they must be repealed by a subsequent amendment. So I sincerely hope someone is starting the signature-gathering effort RIGHT NOW for that amendment.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Andrew (Post 251388)
Source

Quote:

As the vote counting continued this morning, opponents of Prop. 8 filed a lawsuit directly with the state Supreme Court - whose May 15 ruling legalized same-sex marriage - asking the justices to overturn the measure.

The suit argued that Prop. 8 would change the California Constitution in such fundamental ways - taking important rights away from a minority group - that it amounted to a constitutional revision, which requires approval by the Legislature before being submitted to the voters.

.

innerSpaceman 11-05-2008 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight
What do you remember as having the biggest impression on you? The kind of impression that ensured that your generation was instilled with a sense of tolerance and equality for people no like yourself. Was it details of court rulings? Or was it images like these:


^ awesome point.

Pictures speak a thousand words, don't they?


I was alive then. I remember it well, and all the Vietnam protests, too.


I don't remember any of the court rulings. Yawn.



That said, I'm confident this will be won in the Courts. And that's fine for California ... but does not help the rest of America in the way a voter affirmation of gay rights here would have.

Bah.

Sad cheese. :(

Andrew 11-05-2008 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Morrigoon (Post 251409)
Amendments cannot be struck from the Constitution, they must be repealed by a subsequent amendment. So I sincerely hope someone is starting the signature-gathering effort RIGHT NOW for that amendment.

The matter under question is whether 8 is in fact a valid, legitimate amendment. The No-8 people say it isn't, because the kind of change implied by 8 has to be enacted by the Legislature and can't be done by Initiative.

Morrigoon 11-05-2008 03:36 PM

I'm not ignoring that, BTD, one can hope that it is prevented from being added to the Constitution at all.

But just as they did not wait for gay marriage to be legalized before starting their amendment activities, let's not wait for their amendment to be legitimized before starting our own efforts to repeal it. IF 8 stays, why waste even a moment that could be spent working to repeal it?

Chernabog 11-05-2008 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stan4dSteph (Post 251401)
That's a hurtful generalization. I don't live in CA, so I couldn't vote on Prop 8, but I would have voted no. I am also a Christian.

I re-read what I wrote and I wasn't clear. By "they" I didn't mean all Christians and Mormons. By "they" I meant the Christians and Mormons who voted yes on 8.

BarTopDancer 11-05-2008 03:45 PM

I was talking to my co-worker who voted yes, and I started crying and he felt properly bad for participating in this and encouraging his children to take part and he realized he is not promoting tolerance, but intolerance.

It took putting a face to the pain, to who was hurt by this (hurting because your friends were just denied something by the majority of the state) for him to realize he messed up. I hope others come around - not in the backhanded way from the article above, but really come around.

Chernabog 11-05-2008 03:50 PM

Quote:

Now that California voters have outlawed same-sex marriage, an LDS Church leader called Wednesday for members to heal any rifts caused by the emotional campaign by treating each other with "civility, with respect and with love."
What utter horsesh!t. I'd like to heal their rift with my fist, frankly.

I'm now of the opinion that the LDS Church is a horrible institution, not from some kind of misguided anti-religious irrational hysteria, but by its actions in the past few weeks. They have gone far beyond redemption.

innerSpaceman 11-05-2008 03:51 PM

TeeHee, just heard a cool story from a friend of mine. Her 17-year-old straight boy son was driving along, came upon a bunch of YesHead protesters and shouted out to them, "I Love Sucking Dick!!"

Hahahahahahah! :D

LSPoorEeyorick 11-05-2008 03:52 PM

Are we carrying signs tonight?

innerSpaceman 11-05-2008 04:00 PM

I want to. But ... I don't know anyplace to stop and get posterboard between here and WeHo (though if I go straight from work - - no pun intended -- I'll get there too early).

Chernabog 11-05-2008 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LSPoorEeyorick (Post 251418)
Are we carrying signs tonight?

Isn't there a place right around our work? Like an Aaron Bros or something? I haven't taken a lunch yet, should I meet you there? :D

Isaac 11-05-2008 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman (Post 251386)
GC, check your PMs.


All others who are going, shall we have a meet plan or just rely on cell phones?

Need directions too, please :)

Stan4dSteph 11-05-2008 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chernabog (Post 251414)
I re-read what I wrote and I wasn't clear. By "they" I didn't mean all Christians and Mormons. By "they" I meant the Christians and Mormons who voted yes on 8.

Thanks for the clarification.

I wish I could be there to lend a hand with the protest.

JWBear 11-05-2008 04:14 PM

I will be there with you in spirit, my bretheren.

SzczerbiakManiac 11-05-2008 04:34 PM

To all my straight friends who voted no on H8:
Let me be absolutely clear, since this may have only been hinted at in my previous rants. I unequivocally love and thank you for supporting us same-sex-loving folks. You did not have to take a stand on this issue but you did. I know I speak for my G&L brothers & sisters when I tell you our appreciation knows no bounds.

To all those who will be attending the anti-H8 rally this evening:
More power to you! I'm glad you feel energized to get out and protest the passing of this ridiculous proposition. If you wish to march, yell, honk your horn, or any other non-violent form of protesting, you have my blessing. I have my own reasons for not attending, but you should absolutely do what you feel you need to do.

Chernabog 11-05-2008 04:36 PM

There's a Kinkos by me. I'm sure they have posterboard for signs and poster rolls for "sticks". I'm trying to think what to say on it. Perhaps "I am not a second-class citizen" or "Shame on the Mormon Church" or "Jesus says MIND YOUR OWN FVCKING BUSINESS" or "We will overcome your hate" or...

innerSpaceman 11-05-2008 04:37 PM

Isaac, I forwarded you the PM I sent to Gemini Cricket.



I have no idea what to put on a sign that would not be unduly offensive.

I want some positive slogan, but I'm not coming up with anything so far ... so if there are any suggestions, they are welcome (notwithstanding those suggested by Chernabog above) ;)

BarTopDancer 11-05-2008 04:42 PM

How about "I didn't realize that Jesus was down with discrimination"

Or

"I thought Jesus said don't judge?"

Ghoulish Delight 11-05-2008 04:45 PM

"What does my marriage have to do with yours?"

"Stop 8igotry"

"Equality is for Everyone, Whether you Like it or Not"

Alex 11-05-2008 04:47 PM

If anybody knows of any protests/rallies up here in the Bay Area, could you point them out. I'm not sure where exactly to look for them.

Going into the city on a weeknight isn't the easiest thing, but if I can I will.

Promo-Man 11-05-2008 04:52 PM

Prop 8 = Fear
Fear = Hate

BarTopDancer 11-05-2008 04:52 PM

Facebook has a 1,000,000 strong to challenge Prop 8 group. I can't join from my phone, but if someone can I think they are talking about rallies in OC. If someone could check that'd be awesome.

BarTopDancer 11-05-2008 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex (Post 251434)
If anybody knows of any protests/rallies up here in the Bay Area, could you point them out. I'm not sure where exactly to look for them.

Going into the city on a weeknight isn't the easiest thing, but if I can I will.

Alex,

On that Facebook group I just mentioned there is a wall post that says

"San Francisco Rally 6:30PM City Hall 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place."

I hope that makes sense to you.

Gemini Cricket 11-05-2008 04:56 PM

Nov 05, 2008
Community Gatherings

Across the state this evening, people who support equality for all and oppose Prop 8 gather together. With an estimated 3 to 4 million votes remaining to be counted, the race is still too close to call.
Event listing updated regularly

Los Angeles
7:00 p.m. | West Hollywood
Corner of Santa Monica Blvd and San Vicente Blvd


Modesto
7:00 p.m.| Stanislaus Pride Center
Silent walk to Graceada Park


Oceanside
5:30 p.m. | Civic Center Library Community Rooms
330 N. Coast Highway

Food will be served, but feel free to bring something to share.


Sacramento
5 p.m. | Capitol Steps


San Diego
6:30 | The Center
3909 Centre Street
Co-sponsored by the Center, EQCA and HRC



San Luis Obispo
5:30 p.m. | Mission Plaza Amphitheater


San Francisco
6:30 | City Hall
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place

Kevy Baby 11-05-2008 05:07 PM

Shocking: nothing in Orange County :rolleyes:


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.