Lounge of Tomorrow

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)
-   Lounge Lizard (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   Calvin And Hobbes Puts Everything In Perspective (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=8968)

CoasterMatt 12-16-2008 09:10 PM

Calvin And Hobbes Puts Everything In Perspective
 
:)

Cadaverous Pallor 12-16-2008 09:12 PM

Wow! :snap:

bewitched 12-16-2008 10:03 PM

I love Calvin And Hobbes. :D

Kevy Baby 12-16-2008 10:22 PM

I am on my second pass on The Complete Calvin and Hobbes. It is a great thing.

flippyshark 12-16-2008 11:07 PM

I'd love to have the Complete C&A, but I don't want to deal with that gigantic hardcover. (I guess I could try to collect all the individual books.) Does that come with a dvd-rom for computer viewing?

Kevy Baby 12-16-2008 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flippyshark (Post 259553)
I'd love to have the Complete C&A, but I don't want to deal with that gigantic hardcover. (I guess I could try to collect all the individual books.) Does that come with a dvd-rom for computer viewing?

No.

As much as I hate the weight of each book, there is a certain pleasure in reading EVERY cartoon drawn, in sequence. Plus, you get some extra stuff that I don't believe is available anywhere else.

I have the collection in the bathroom and it is great library material.

Gemini Cricket 12-17-2008 12:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevy Baby (Post 259545)
I am on my second pass on The Complete Calvin and Hobbes. It is a great thing.

I have it too. I love it.
:)

bewitched 12-17-2008 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flippyshark (Post 259553)
(I guess I could try to collect all the individual books.)

That's what I've done...but as they came out, not all at once. It would be cool to read them all, in sequence, all the way through though.

Andrew 12-17-2008 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gemini Cricket (Post 259563)
I have it too. I love it.
:)

Me three, but we haven't actually opened it yet! It lives next to our "Complete Far Side" and there's a space waiting for the "Complete Dilbert".

Alex 12-17-2008 12:17 PM

I've always found disappointment in reading "complete x" comic strip collections.

They aren't meant to be read that way and I find it really brings to the forefront the little cheats, repetitions, and gimmicks that all daily strip writers must, out of necessity, use.

I've discovered the same thing now that I frequently watch entire seasons of some TV show in a couple weeks due to the wonder of DVD. The writing, for the most part, really isn't meant to be seen in bulk over a short period of time.

Moonliner 12-17-2008 12:19 PM

I was amazed to find that CP's link to the searchable Calvin and Hobbs database is not only still working but has grown to include 3481 strips.

It has moved just a bit however, you can now find it here.

Note: A search for ' ' returns all 3481 strips.

Snowflake 12-17-2008 12:25 PM

Oh, I love Calvin and Hobbs and long for The Complete Far Side....

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 12-17-2008 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex (Post 259625)
I've always found disappointment in reading "complete x" comic strip collections.

They aren't meant to be read that way and I find it really brings to the forefront the little cheats, repetitions, and gimmicks that all daily strip writers must, out of necessity, use.

I've discovered the same thing now that I frequently watch entire seasons of some TV show in a couple weeks due to the wonder of DVD. The writing, for the most part, really isn't meant to be seen in bulk over a short period of time.

I've had the opposite happen, as well. I tried to do a marathon viewing of 24, and viewed in sequence, one hour after the next, the show was just ridiculous to me. But I could imagine how I would have enjoyed a weekly viewing, one hour at a time.

In contrast, I did a marathon viewing of Buffy Season 6 (which was close to universally hated by a large percentage of the fan base, though I enjoyed it) and found that it was even more enjoyable that way. It was much more humorous than I realized the first time around.

I think I would have preferred reading Dickens serialized. The fat in his novels would have bothered me far less, I think.

Kevy Baby 12-17-2008 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bewitched (Post 259594)
That's what I've done...but as they came out, not all at once. It would be cool to read them all, in sequence, all the way through though.

When you buy the individual collections, they are not a complete series running from one date to the next. Rather, they are selected works, typically from a loose time-frame, but not limited to that time-frame.

Tom 12-17-2008 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eliza Hodgkins 1812 (Post 259653)
In contrast, I did a marathon viewing of Buffy Season 6 (which was close to universally hated by a large percentage of the fan base, though I enjoyed it) and found that it was even more enjoyable that way. It was much more humorous than I realized the first time around.

I found this with Buffy season 6 as well, enjoying it much more viewed on dvd than on air. When viewed on dvd, I found that subpar episodes had much less negative impact on the total viewing experience, as one could immediately move on to a better ep, instead of being left to stew over the suck for a week or more.

Eliza Hodgkins 1812 12-17-2008 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom (Post 259705)
I found this with Buffy season 6 as well, enjoying it much more viewed on dvd than on air. When viewed on dvd, I found that subpar episodes had much less negative impact on the total viewing experience, as one could immediately move on to a better ep, instead of being left to stew over the suck for a week or more.

Yes! Exactly. I also found it a lot less depressing, but that was likely because I knew the outcome of season 7.

mousepod 12-17-2008 07:06 PM

To further derail this thread, I will add that I had a similar experience the first time I watched the second season of Twin Peaks "back to back".

bewitched 12-17-2008 07:56 PM

Lost gains quite a bit when viewed back to back. You don't forget all of the little things which IMO leads to better continuity.



And fine, Kevy...rub in your superior C&H collection. It doesn't bother me at all. :mad: ;)

Alex 12-17-2008 08:01 PM

Yes, I'd agree that heavily or moderately serialized TV shows benefit well from fast viewing (though it could also highlight flaws).

But while I still love Perry Mason, watching Season 1 in three weeks was not helpful.

bewitched 12-17-2008 08:32 PM

My favorite C&H ever:


Not Afraid 12-17-2008 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mousepod (Post 259709)
To further derail this thread, I will add that I had a similar experience the first time I watched the second season of Twin Peaks "back to back".

I just bought Chris the whole shebang, so we'll have to try the back to back method and see who it works out.

CoasterMatt 12-17-2008 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Not Afraid (Post 259725)
I just bought Chris the whole shebang, so we'll have to try the back to back method and see who it works out.

Sounds kinky.

Ghoulish Delight 12-17-2008 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex (Post 259713)
Yes, I'd agree that heavily or moderately serialized TV shows benefit well from fast viewing (though it could also highlight flaws).

But while I still love Perry Mason, watching Season 1 in three weeks was not helpful.

I think Red Dwarf is one of the best examples ever of straddling that line between serial vs. discrete episodes. Makes it eminently watchable either way, in small bits or strung together. The episodes don't require you to have followed the story, but they thread together a few slow-developing character sub stories, enough to keep it from getting overly repetitive.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.