Lounge of Tomorrow - Possibly distressing Futurama news

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)

- Beatnik (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=9)

- - Possibly distressing Futurama news (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=9746)

Ghoulish Delight

07-17-2009 02:27 PM

Possibly distressing Futurama news

Quote:

When the "Futurama" characters come back for new episodes on Comedy Central in mid-2010, they may sound different.

That is because producing studio 20th TV is proceeding with auditioning new actors after failing to reach an agreement with the original voice cast: John DiMaggio, Maurice LaMarche, Billy West, Tress MacNeille and Katey Sagal.

:eek:

But wait, odds are that's B.S. They pulled the same thing with the Simpsons cast a while back. This is more than likely either (or both) a negotiating tactic or a way to draw attention heading into ComiCon.

Phil Lamar wrote on his blog: "It's a negotiating ploy by 20th Century Fox studio. It's the same thing they did w/ the Simpsons several years ago. They're hoping to scare the actors into accepting lower pay.
They don't think that it matters to the audience who is doing the voices. If people's emails don't convince them, maybe they'll find out at the Comic-Con panel next week."

If anything, they'd definitely have quite the spectacle if they set up an audition booth at the Con.

Moonliner

07-17-2009 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 292316)

After success with the straight-to-video Futurama movies (I thought the first one was solidly funny, the others just so-so at best), it was announced that Futurama would be brought back to TV in the old half hour format.

Today comes this news:
link

:eek:

But wait, odds are that's B.S. They pulled the same thing with the Simpsons cast a while back. This is more than likely either (or both) a negotiating tactic or a way to draw attention heading into ComiCon.

Phil Lamar wrote on his blog: "It's a negotiating ploy by 20th Century Fox studio. It's the same thing they did w/ the Simpsons several years ago. They're hoping to scare the actors into accepting lower pay.
They don't think that it matters to the audience who is doing the voices. If people's emails don't convince them, maybe they'll find out at the Comic-Con panel next week."

If anything, they'd definitely have quite the spectacle if they set up an audition booth at the Con.

Hummm... I can do a pretty mean Bender. "Kiss my shiny ass human!"

Ghoulish Delight

07-17-2009 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moonliner (Post 292317)

Hummm... I can do a pretty mean Bender. "Kiss my shiny ass human!"

Shiny metal ass.

NEXT!

Moonliner

07-17-2009 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 292319)

Shiny metal ass.

NEXT!

(Pssst... An accurate quote would have spoiled the joke)

Gemini Cricket

07-17-2009 04:29 PM

Quote:

Bad news, everyone!

Alex	07-17-2009 04:46 PM

Other than Katy Segal I don't find the voices super distinctive. And experience with voice changes on other animated shows suggests I'd soon not notice.

So, unless the new voices are horrible I'm probably in the "don't really care" camp.

Strangler Lewis

07-17-2009 05:39 PM

I've given it a shot, but I kind of lump this show with Spongebob. I think there's a clever mix of characters, but they don't make me care what happens to any of them, and I seldom find much to laugh at in the proceedings. That said, as a creature of habit, I never like to see actors leave shows, so I will agree this is a tragedy.

Ghoulish Delight

07-17-2009 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex (Post 292328)

Whereas as even the changes that the same voice actor makes to their characterizations over the course of a series stick out to me like a sore thumb, so a wholesale cast change would be like watching an entirely different show for me.

Melonballer

07-17-2009 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 292316)

If anything, they'd definitely have quite the spectacle if they set up an audition booth at the Con.

Now that would be awesome to see.

I can see someone reading a part and then suddenly going into an expletive filled rant.

Alex	07-17-2009 05:47 PM

Well, the obvious answer is for Fox to commission a death duel between you and me and then let the result rule.

I have the advantage of mass, stubbornness and never having been knocked down in a fight. You have the advantage of not be a lardass.

SacTown Chronic

07-17-2009 07:02 PM

Remember when Waylon Smithers was black before he was gay?

Gemini Cricket

07-17-2009 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SacTown Chronic (Post 292338)

Remember when Waylon Smithers was black before he was gay?

I do remember that.

:D

Ghoulish Delight

07-31-2009 02:06 PM

Good news everyone!

http://www.thestar.com/comment/colum...article/674841

SzczerbiakManiac

07-31-2009 02:48 PM

Quote:

The compromise agreement, with the studio paying more and the actors accepting less

How does that work...?

Ghoulish Delight

07-31-2009 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SzczerbiakManiac (Post 293946)

How does that work...?

I assume the complete thought in that sentence was "...with the studio paying more [than they initially offered] and the actors accepting less [than they were initially demanding]." Which seems a little unnecessary to state when proceeded by the words "compromise agreement". I think that's kinda implicit in the phrase.

Melonballer

07-31-2009 03:26 PM

That is good news.

So is this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1D1cap6yETA

SzczerbiakManiac

07-31-2009 03:28 PM

That makes total sense GD, thanks for knocking some of the cobwebs out of my brain.

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:25 AM.