![]() |
Self-Auctioning Art
|
Wow! What a great concept. It would be interesting to keep track of its wanderings, demand curve, etc.
|
I'll admit I'm half tempted to buy it just to mess with his art by refusing to plug it in and thus suffering the loss of it being declared "no longer art."
|
Quote:
|
No, it'd be an extremely discursive act. What does it say about art if an object ceases to be art simply because the person who created it waves a contract in the air and says "poof! that is no longer ze art!"
By pooping on the party I'd actually be fulfilling to the logical extension the abstractness of what is art. One might even argue that by being unlabeled as art it would in fact become even artier, thus causing the universe to implode. ETA: I know I did not use the word discursive correctly. It is an inside joke that I realize after the fact that only I will get. |
actually, I think the Artist might be amused by Alex's twist - transforming the "art" from object to concept playing with the whole notion of conceptual art- I know I would.
Of course, you could do the same thing by buying a traditional artwork and painting over it, or destroying it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
SFMOMA is already doing that. I was listening to an interview about their 75th Anniversary exhibitions and one of them includes some Rhodesian watercolors that
A) They didn't know they had until recently. B) They had never wanted in the first place (they'd requested 100 pieces from a Rhodesian art school that they'd sell to support the school; the school sent 700 and most didn't sell). C) Were stored in crates in closets for the last 60 years. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:16 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.