Lounge of Tomorrow

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)
-   Beatnik (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=9)
-   -   Roland Emmerich doing The Foundation Trilogy (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=10298)

Alex 02-12-2010 10:51 AM

Roland Emmerich doing The Foundation Trilogy
 
http://www.firstshowing.net/2009/01/...ation-trilogy/

Maybe he will do good by it, but if you'd asked me to name a big movie director most likely to completely ruin an adaptation of The Foundation Trilogy it would have been a tight race between Emmerich and McG.

Sure, it is a movie that could make great use of digital environments, but they're hardly action oriented stories.

JWBear 02-12-2010 11:44 AM

If there was any literary work that I would consider unfilmable, it would be Foundation. It'll be a train wreck!

Alex 02-12-2010 12:43 PM

But can't you just picture the cinematic psychohistorical equations floating around Hari Seldon's head?

Box office gold!

JWBear 02-12-2010 12:53 PM

More like box office pyrite...

SzczerbiakManiac 02-12-2010 07:55 PM

VJWBM—I almost spit out my corn dog.

Moonliner 02-12-2010 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 314445)
If there was any literary work that I would consider unfilmable, it would be Foundation. It'll be a train wreck!

Unfimable? From what point of view. Visually I don't see any real problems with today's effects wizards. From a story point of view, the fact that you have an entirely new set of characters every few chapters could be problematic to the studio exec/marketing types.

Off hand I can't think of any movies where each act has an entirely different cast (unless you count Sheldon).

I think the biggest issue might be it's perceived lack of originality since many of it's themes have been copied....

Corisant = Trantor, etc....

Moonliner 02-12-2010 09:24 PM

Oh and just to put everone at ease, I just ran across this....

Emmerich is going to film Foundation in 3D, because Avatar showed you can charge more for 3D movies.

*Whew*

I feel better about this already.

Quote:

Emmerich said he's looking forward to a new challenge at this point in his career. "Probably now all big movies have to be 3-D," he said. "It's not only the effect of 3-D, ['Avatar' has] just shown that if you do a movie in 3-D, you can ask for more money and that's the trick. I think now everybody who does bigger movies has to shoot them in 3-D. I think there's no way around it. I was on the set of 'Avatar' and I saw how it worked and I really thought, 'That's the ultimate way of making movies.' "

JWBear 02-13-2010 01:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moonliner (Post 314475)
Unfimable? From what point of view. Visually I don't see any real problems with today's effects wizards. From a story point of view, the fact that you have an entirely new set of characters every few chapters could be problematic to the studio exec/marketing types.

Off hand I can't think of any movies where each act has an entirely different cast (unless you count Sheldon).

I think the biggest issue might be it's perceived lack of originality since many of it's themes have been copied....

Corisant = Trantor, etc....

OK... Let me rephrase... I can't see how you could make a film (or films) that is/are faithful to the series and wouldn't confuse the hell out of the majority of the movie going public.

Tref 02-13-2010 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 314445)
It'll be a train wreck!

Having watched the previews of 2012 I can tell you a train wreck is something Emmerich can handle.



Moonliner 02-13-2010 12:20 PM

I wonder if it will be like I-Robot where the only similarity to the book was the title.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.