Past Life Regression
 

Thanks for the responses on the PLR and Hypnosis. And the emails. If anyone has any questions on past life regression let me know.... Its fun, safe and really revealing... Its also great doing it with a group...

My apologies for what was originally here. I never see the forums so I forget that they exist.

My dismissal of Past Life Regression wasn't appropriately placed.

There I went, going out on a limb to make sure Alex wasn't only target of what could potentially be a nasty argument, and he goes and retracts his statement.

I do not want to give the impression that I'm trying to insult anyone here at the LoT .

I'm sure that if the topic is brought up in a different manner, and I feel I can add something constructive to the conversation, I will do so.

Consider my snipe withdrawn, as well.

Eh, who's to say. But, people are free to believe - and post about what they believe - here at LoT.

Never look back, I say. But looking forward, in my next life I'm coming back as a super model.

Fair warning.

Well, you know 3894, Super Models don't live long. ;)

I'd like to come back as breast implants.

if I can help it, I aint comin back.

My feeling about past life regression is that it's most likely revealing our subconscious image of ourselves, or how we'd like others to perceive us. In high school I know a girl who's father was featured on "In Search Of" with Leonard Nimoy. Through past life regression, he "discovered" he was a former King of Atlantis. He was, in real life, a man who owned a small security system intallation and monitoring company, and I think he thought of himself a something of a benevolent leader/caretaker.

That said, I'd be curious to know what my subconscious would dredge up, and I'd definitely like to know what Alex's has to say!

(I'm also curious to know what inflammatory remarks were pancaked, you guys are being entirely too civil)

Civility is for the birds!

I would assume that thecorndogwalker is well aware of the skeptics and can respond accordingly. And personally, I think I would find that debate to be an interesting read. Still, I would imagine that he may not define "fun" as in debating your profession online with a bunch of people you have just met, and he should be the one to instigate such a debate if he so chooses. As it stands, it is probably best for those who are skeptical (myself included) to wait for an appropriate opportunity. This thread doesn't seem to be that vehicle and I think the editing of remarks was the right thing to do under the circumstances.

Just my two cents...