Gn2Dlnd |
01-01-2008 01:03 PM |
Well, he did say it was meaningless and stupid.
The problem I find with this comparison is that the poll doesn't come with a comparative laundry list of reasons at which I may roll my eyes. Probably, because nobody can come up with one. The best that can be said is a percentage of Americans will admire the sitting president, no matter how bad he is. You can also say that a percentage of Americans think the South was wronged, that Guantanamo's a good deal, that Bill O'Reilly's a stand-up guy, that they've been abducted by aliens, that the Earth may be flat, that evolution is a lie concocted by Satan, that the Jewish Holocaust has been blown all out of proportion - you get my drift. For anyone to defend this man who considers the Constitution something to be circumvented, the Geneva Conventions to be "quaint," has made the U. N. irrelevant, and has sent our citizens into a contrived war to show up his own father, well, it takes a special kind of denial to support and admire a man like this. Out here, in the real world, we try to get someone like that to go to some Al-anon meetings, start looking at this person in their life a little more realistically, perhaps do some repair work on their own faulty perceptions. Problem is, Bush is surrounded by hundreds of enablers, it's unlikely any useful change is ever going to happen for him. The best the rest of us can do is walk away from the problem.
Except for Sarah Jane Moore. I mean, if the old girl's still got it in her.
|