Landmark for Bush
 

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la...,7483745.story

Now, that's a movement I'd support! :snap:

It's funny on the surface but I do wonder if it's a path we really want to go down...........after all, this sort of pettiness can easily be employed by both sides.

My thoughts exactly.

I think naming a sewage facility after Bush is bad form.
But then again, I don't want anything (landmarks, statues, buildings) named after him. Yeah, I'll give having his own library named after him but that's all.

I think it's a bit of political theater. If the plant is renamed, I would think of it as an after-effect of a great bit of political action by the public.

To get attention, you need press. To get press, you need drama. Political Drama is the only way for the powerless in this society to have the free speech effect on politics that is essential to the concept of America.


Old-style protesters aren't allowed anywhere near the people or entities to whom they are trying to communicate. Instead, they are shunted off, far-away, to fenced-in animal pens called, apparenly with zero Orwellian irony, "Free Speech Zones."



I don't think it matters at all if the plant is untimately renamed ... but if it is, it will be a kind of silly thing done in service of a glorious goal.

In the surprisingly good movie Super High Me, comedian Doug Benson stands in front of a "Free Speech Zone" sign and proclaims, "Fvck Free Speech Zones!"

I soo wish I could sign this. :evil: