Lounge of Tomorrow

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)
-   Lounge Lizard (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   Help Us End the R-Word (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=9329)

3894 03-24-2009 10:24 AM

Help Us End the R-Word
 
Special Olympics is designating next Tuesday, March 31 the day to “Spread the Word to End the Word.” Help end the use of the slur “retard”.

For more information and to join the campaign, visit their website. They've got info, blog buttons, and everything else you can imagine.

Thanks in advance for considering helping.

innerSpaceman 03-24-2009 11:02 AM

Saying retard is so gay!

cirquelover 03-24-2009 12:07 PM

I saw that guy on Bonnie Hunt. I think a lot of words that used to be common use are now politically incorrect and should be gone from our everyday vocab.

Kevy Baby 03-24-2009 12:18 PM

In this case, the word itself doesn't (and shouldn't) be banned from our language; just the usage in this case.

I was just at a Special Olympics planning session for the upcoming Games in Orange County (as usual, I am volunteering) and there was no mention of this. I will have to ask my contact about it.

Strangler Lewis 03-24-2009 12:27 PM

Okay, I'll play devil's advocate. While I don't condone making fun of disabled people, I feel that the word is often an apt criticism of the presumptively abled--even though I think it more than say it. If we can't say "retard," may one/must one then say, "He repeatedly engages in conduct, the foolishness of which should be obvious to anyone of even borderline normal intelligence"? If we can say that, aren't we saying the same thing as "God, what a retard." If we can't say "retard," do we also lose "idiot" and "moron" and other terms that have at their root a specific definition of cognitive limitations?

Kevy Baby 03-24-2009 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strangler Lewis (Post 274761)
...do we also lose "idiot" and "moron" and other terms that have at their root a specific definition of cognitive limitations?

No; we need those words to describe Moonliner

3894 03-24-2009 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strangler Lewis (Post 274761)
Okay, I'll play devil's advocate. While I don't condone making fun of disabled people, I feel that the word is often an apt criticism of the presumptively abled--even though I think it more than say it. If we can't say "retard," may one/must one then say, "He repeatedly engages in conduct, the foolishness of which should be obvious to anyone of even borderline normal intelligence"?

No. “Retard” is a slur. “Retarded” works in a developmental context to describe intellectual development. It's nicer and more accurate to keep the linguistic focus on the individual, not the disability.

Call my brother developmentally disabled, autistic, or impaired. Call him a "retard" and all bets are off.

Andrew 03-24-2009 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strangler Lewis (Post 274761)
If we can't say "retard," do we also lose "idiot" and "moron" and other terms that have at their root a specific definition of cognitive limitations?

I like "dumbass" for that.

Ghoulish Delight 03-24-2009 01:45 PM

Alright, I can get behind that.

eta - 3894's post, not Andrew's.


actually, Andrew's too.

Moonliner 03-24-2009 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevy Baby (Post 274775)
No; we need those words to describe Moonliner

Unfortunately, this is what happens when we use the appropriate words to describe you....

Kevy is a ***** rat ***** ***** ****** son of a ****** *******.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.