California Special Election & Propositions - May 19, 2009
 

Tuesday, May 19, 2009 is a special election day in California, with many state-wide propositions placed on the ballot by Arnold Schwarzenegger and the state's legislature, who are seeking more money since they've already wasted too much of it.

I am voting NO on ALL the state-wide Propositions 1A to 1F.

Prop. 1A especially deserves a NO vote, since this measure "extends" the recent tax increases for up to two "additional" years in exchange for a spending limit that doesn’t limit spending.

What do you think will happen if 1A-1F fail?

You guys already have pretty much the highest state tax burden in the country next to New York, don't you?

I don't live there, but I'm voting no with you in spirit.

I already pay about 25% of everything I earn to the gov. NO MORE! THAT's IT. They need to learn to deal with less money. Everyone needs to cut back.

I say start at the top. How many of the top administrators really have a job that we can't live without? Or how about cut their pay? or benies? I don't have a pension. I don't get a car. I don't get 3 weeks of vacation.

I'm voting no on all of them.

I don't know what will happen if they don't pass. Perhaps we'll find out.

Oh dear, I never mailed in my ballot

Going at lunch....NO on all!

If the propositions fail and most Californians are seemingly going to vote "no" on them (according to polls), then I hope the state legislators will be forced to make even more budget cuts and spending cuts.

Even if the propositions passed, the state would still be in a major financial mess of $15 billion to $21 billion deficit.

The state's elected officials--like the rest of California's citizens--need to:
1) Live within your means.
2) Do your job.

We all have to live within a budget; so does the state. Our representatives were elected to make these tough decisions: quit trying to duck these decisions and do your job--balance the budget and cut spending.

Would that it will work out that way, but it won't. They may get voted down, probably will, but the government NEVER thinks it should have to do with less.

It isn't just an issue of the CA gov'ment spending too much, it is also an issue of significantly decreased revenue.

I'm still voting no, but wanted to consider all sides of the issues.

I blame the budget issues in this state as 30% the fault of the politicians and 70% the fault of past idiocy by the voters.

Nothing useful is going to get fixed until Prop 13 is repealed or significantly updated and the general proposition process is revised so I held my nose and voted yes on all of them.

The people of this state created an idiotic system, and so we get idiotic results.