![]() |
Super Heavy New Element
Periodic table gets a new element
Quote:
|
Not mentioned is one of the side reasons for hold up on recognition. Namely that Victor Ninov, a member of the team that first observed 112 was later implicated in producing fraudulent data at Berkeley leading to erroneous claims that the Berkeley team had observed 118 and 116. This caused them to look at the data on 112 again and they found altered records there as well though some observations withstood scrutiny.
But that put a bit more extra scrutiny into reproducing the observations. It was quite a little academic scandal at the time. |
Great. Guess i have to buy a new chemistry book for my high schooler now. :)
|
"This is heavy, Doc."
|
By the way, if anybody is interested in a recent history of the new elements search (last 40 years) and the methods (how, exactly do you know you created an element when there was only a few atoms at most and they survived for only milliseconds at best) then I recommend the Victor Ninov chapter of When Science Goes Wrong by Simon Levay.
|
Haha, when I first saw the title of this thread last night, since mousepod posted it, I figured it was some new band.
Thanks for keepin' it unpredictable, pod. BTW, I think your thread title makes a delicious band name, as well. |
I guess this makes me some sort of Luddite, but I disdain new additions to the periodic table in the same way I insist Pluto is still a planet, and the big dinosaur remains the Brontosaurus.
Besides, isn't it "cheating" to CREATE a new element? Why should it be in the Periodic Table if it does not exist in the natural universe? |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Why don't we just get back to the basic 4 elements: air, earth, fire, and water.
|
Hey now, they weren't called Earth, Wind & Fire... & Water.
Do you remember... the 21st night of September? |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.