Lounge of Tomorrow

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)
-   Egg Head (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=13)
-   -   Super Heavy New Element (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=9619)

mousepod 06-11-2009 09:05 AM

Super Heavy New Element
 
Periodic table gets a new element

Quote:

The ubiquitous periodic table will soon have a new addition - the "super-heavy" element 112.
More than a decade after experiments first produced a single atom of the element, a team of German scientists has been credited with its discovery.
Element 112/Super-heavy : my new electronica band.

Alex 06-11-2009 09:18 AM

Not mentioned is one of the side reasons for hold up on recognition. Namely that Victor Ninov, a member of the team that first observed 112 was later implicated in producing fraudulent data at Berkeley leading to erroneous claims that the Berkeley team had observed 118 and 116. This caused them to look at the data on 112 again and they found altered records there as well though some observations withstood scrutiny.

But that put a bit more extra scrutiny into reproducing the observations. It was quite a little academic scandal at the time.

scaeagles 06-11-2009 09:35 AM

Great. Guess i have to buy a new chemistry book for my high schooler now. :)

Cadaverous Pallor 06-11-2009 03:25 PM

"This is heavy, Doc."

Alex 06-11-2009 03:28 PM

By the way, if anybody is interested in a recent history of the new elements search (last 40 years) and the methods (how, exactly do you know you created an element when there was only a few atoms at most and they survived for only milliseconds at best) then I recommend the Victor Ninov chapter of When Science Goes Wrong by Simon Levay.

blueerica 06-12-2009 07:51 AM

Haha, when I first saw the title of this thread last night, since mousepod posted it, I figured it was some new band.


Thanks for keepin' it unpredictable, pod. BTW, I think your thread title makes a delicious band name, as well.

innerSpaceman 06-12-2009 10:54 AM

I guess this makes me some sort of Luddite, but I disdain new additions to the periodic table in the same way I insist Pluto is still a planet, and the big dinosaur remains the Brontosaurus.


Besides, isn't it "cheating" to CREATE a new element? Why should it be in the Periodic Table if it does not exist in the natural universe?

Moonliner 06-12-2009 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman (Post 287057)

Besides, isn't it "cheating" to CREATE a new element? Why should it be in the Periodic Table if it does not exist in the natural universe?

Ummm, exactly how old are you?

Quote:

No element with atomic number higher than 92 occurs naturally. These elements are produced artificially in nuclear reactors or particle accelerators.

Pirate Bill 06-12-2009 11:19 AM

Why don't we just get back to the basic 4 elements: air, earth, fire, and water.

blueerica 06-12-2009 11:32 AM

Hey now, they weren't called Earth, Wind & Fire... & Water.

Do you remember... the 21st night of September?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.