|
Actually, it wasn't the margin of error that was 92%; that was the number of households that ... at the conclusion of the interview ... produced a death certificate to back up their claims of who had died.
Hmmm, let's see, this was published in that hack rag The Lancet. And the methodology of the polling and accuracy of the results confirmed by that rookie John Zagby. And they had the audacity to use the same methodology that's been standard for death rate determination in war time by the U.N. and the U.S. government.
Yeah, the results must be bogus.
(oh, and I love how General Casey dismisses the study while admitting he has not seen it.)
|