Quote:
Originally Posted by Strangler Lewis
By the way, why shouldn't the state or federal government be in the business of providing "charity?" By government charity, I assume you don't want to pay to help poor people.
|
If someone doesn't want the
government to help poor people, it does
not automatically mean that person doesn't want to pay to help poor people. There are far better ways to assist the poor.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strangler Lewis
What else don't you want to pay for, directly or indirectly? Social security? Farm subsidies? Tax credits to industries? Public schools your kids don't attend? Maintenance on roads you don't drive?
|
It should not be the government's job to provide charity (including the ones you mentioned) Charity works best when run by private organisations who actually have to answer to those who donate to them. And besides, is it really "charity" when you're
forced to donate? If Mr. Lewis comes to my door and threatens to kidnap me and throw me in his dungeon until I donate to Jerry's Kids, am I
really making a charitable donation?
I don't think so.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strangler Lewis
Government is just one form of organization and human action.
|
True, the worst example of it. It's bloated full of waste because it doesn't have to answer to anyone and is too big to manage effectively.