|
I find this very interesting, really.
If same sex marriage is the goal, and this is the type of ruling that is encouraging, then why worry about the timing? Seriously.
I believe it is attitudes like that which lead to the hidden "gay agenda" cries. Same sex marriage is a goal. However, moving toward the goal prior to an election being considered bad timing says a lot, mostly that the "agenda" really is something that proponents want to stay hidden, or at least in the political shadows.
In AZ, there is a ballot proposition which would change the AZ Constitution to include some sort of definition of marriage as between one man and one woman. There are TV ads currently running against it. In these ads, there are pictures of young couples, old couples, white couples, black couples.....but not one same sex couple. Why?
It is not my goal to debate same sex marriage, only the approach to stopping amendments or promoting same sex marriage.
|