View Single Post
Old 10-26-2006, 08:18 AM   #43
innerSpaceman
Kink of Swank
 
innerSpaceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Inner Space
Posts: 13,075
innerSpaceman is the epitome of coolinnerSpaceman is the epitome of coolinnerSpaceman is the epitome of coolinnerSpaceman is the epitome of coolinnerSpaceman is the epitome of coolinnerSpaceman is the epitome of coolinnerSpaceman is the epitome of coolinnerSpaceman is the epitome of coolinnerSpaceman is the epitome of coolinnerSpaceman is the epitome of coolinnerSpaceman is the epitome of cool
Send a message via AIM to innerSpaceman Send a message via MSN to innerSpaceman Send a message via Yahoo to innerSpaceman
I'm still hoping to catch it somewhere, if not at the El Cap.

But frankly, I'm dismayed by the method that was used to make the film 3-D. Apparently, every character and set and object was scanned into a computer, and everything was completely recreated and recomposited as computer imagery. Reportedly, this results in seeing even more detail of the original puppets and sets .... but I feel as if I'm not watching the original puppets and sets.

I guess, in a way, photography provides just as much of a false image of the puppets as a computer scan of those puppets ... but I feel very odd and displeased that I would not be seeing the painstaking stop-motion work done by human artists, but rather computer scans of that work. It just doesn't quite sit right with me.

Strangely, I wouldn't so much mind a computerization of hand-drawn 2-D animation ... but computerizing the stop-motion work sorta bugs me.


(And I also find it strangely amusing that the new Aardman film, Flushed Away, uses computers to generate characters in the exact style of their previous hand-wrought claymation efforts.)
innerSpaceman is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote