Lounge of Tomorrow - View Single Post

Tramspotter · 11-03-2006, 09:27 AM

Those adds are not for the foundation now are they?

I am going simply by his ads and the democratic partys platform on stem cell reserch as presented he must not have wanted us to know about the foundation he dosen't mention it during all this publicity.

Stumping for spector hardley a Republicans Republican more like providing cover.

And where did I say he got Parkinsons to start a foundation in his name I said I wouldnt have lost respect for him and called it whoring himself out if it were just an issue add or apeal for private funds.

And Prudance and Wendybeth look it up your selves and show Scientific progress not Scientists puffing up thier results growing an ear on a mouses back and wanting to do further research at the publics expense. Raw tissue harvesting is comming and my opinion is it's too early to write it a blank government check. When the first nasty nasty mistake or ethical violation occours why not this time not have it be us why act now why such a rush why cant we stay out of the fray. Others are working on it private firms are complaining about the stock of cells they alreay harvested going bad. He fails to mention this either. I can only assume he wants more $ and little to no restrictions as seen in the Democratic Party Platform. How does the most Agressive jive with under the strictest ethical guidelines? perhaps we should consult DR Nick.

California is already coffed up a large amount that we shouldn't be spending on it's own. Why the fvck is this the governments responsibility anyhow.

At best and there is of course no certianty bleeding the public coffers and raising embryos to 250 cells or so or whatever the best time to harvest them and having the best doctors work on it for years the best estimates are 10 years to even start testing on humans. How do you feel about animal testing? because they will burn thrugh many many thousands of animals before then.

So working people up and jumpping on bandwagons and support good ideas but not give a rats ass about thier implimentation or mitigating problems before they happen especialy problems that can't be undone. yup sounds like the classic liberal way to do things to me.

I would rather be a Dick than an Asshole or Pussy if those are my only options.

11-03-2006, 09:27 AM	#21
Tramspotter Show me on the bear. Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: LA Posts: 445	Those adds are not for the foundation now are they? I am going simply by his ads and the democratic partys platform on stem cell reserch as presented he must not have wanted us to know about the foundation he dosen't mention it during all this publicity. Stumping for spector hardley a Republicans Republican more like providing cover. And where did I say he got Parkinsons to start a foundation in his name I said I wouldnt have lost respect for him and called it whoring himself out if it were just an issue add or apeal for private funds. And Prudance and Wendybeth look it up your selves and show Scientific progress not Scientists puffing up thier results growing an ear on a mouses back and wanting to do further research at the publics expense. Raw tissue harvesting is comming and my opinion is it's too early to write it a blank government check. When the first nasty nasty mistake or ethical violation occours why not this time not have it be us why act now why such a rush why cant we stay out of the fray. Others are working on it private firms are complaining about the stock of cells they alreay harvested going bad. He fails to mention this either. I can only assume he wants more $ and little to no restrictions as seen in the Democratic Party Platform. How does the most Agressive jive with under the strictest ethical guidelines? perhaps we should consult DR Nick. California is already coffed up a large amount that we shouldn't be spending on it's own. Why the fvck is this the governments responsibility anyhow. At best and there is of course no certianty bleeding the public coffers and raising embryos to 250 cells or so or whatever the best time to harvest them and having the best doctors work on it for years the best estimates are 10 years to even start testing on humans. How do you feel about animal testing? because they will burn thrugh many many thousands of animals before then. So working people up and jumpping on bandwagons and support good ideas but not give a rats ass about thier implimentation or mitigating problems before they happen especialy problems that can't be undone. yup sounds like the classic liberal way to do things to me. I would rather be a Dick than an Asshole or Pussy if those are my only options.
	Submit to Quotes