View Single Post
Old 11-17-2006, 11:18 AM   #22
Bornieo: Fully Loaded
Lego
 
Bornieo: Fully Loaded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Disneyland, USA
Posts: 3,704
Bornieo: Fully Loaded is the epitome of coolBornieo: Fully Loaded is the epitome of coolBornieo: Fully Loaded is the epitome of coolBornieo: Fully Loaded is the epitome of coolBornieo: Fully Loaded is the epitome of coolBornieo: Fully Loaded is the epitome of coolBornieo: Fully Loaded is the epitome of coolBornieo: Fully Loaded is the epitome of coolBornieo: Fully Loaded is the epitome of coolBornieo: Fully Loaded is the epitome of coolBornieo: Fully Loaded is the epitome of cool
Send a message via Yahoo to Bornieo: Fully Loaded Send a message via Skype™ to Bornieo: Fully Loaded
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor
All this seperation stuff reminds me of early Hollywood, where studios owned actors and movie theaters. If you wanted to see Judy Garland in a movie it had to be an MGM film at an MGM-owned theater. I'm surprised we seem to be regressing to similar specificity.
As someone who ran a projection room for 18 years, I would welcome this with open arms. I would love to see the major stuidos "owning" the theatres they show thier films in. I think this would fix alot of the problems out there in "theatre-land." Knowing that digital is on the way and film will be gone in the next 10 years, I think having the studio involved in the presentation would make perfect sense.
Bornieo: Fully Loaded is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote