Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor
So, men, do you prefer porn that involves men that are more like you?
Caveat #1: I know the straight ones are going to say "I'm not looking at the guy", but still, I'm asking.
Caveat #2: If you answer "Why yes, that's why I hit "MonsterC0cks.com" all the time", then you've just gotten predictable   |
You know, again I think there is a gender difference at work. A lot of conventional (straight) porn seldom depicts a guy beyond his package. And I think that makes it easy to imagine the gal(s) in the porn are doing their thing to your surrogete thing. For me anyway it's easy to make the leap from look at what she's doing to that **** to what she could be doing to my ****. Color and size differences don't seem to matter to me.
I think a lot of women have a hard time disengaging in a similar fashion, and tend to compare themselves to the women in the porno (much like they do when flipping through fashion magazines, or checking each other out as a potential competitor).
I think there's also a visual gender difference in how we view our genitalia, penisis are by thier vary nature quite visible (at least in their arroused state). I suspect few women have spent as much time gazing at the wonders between their legs as men have. Thus the image of tongue on clitoris, probably is a bigger turn on for a guy than a gal, as the guy is more likely to have seen it or fantasized about seeing it. Likewise, you seldom see felatio filmed from a female perspective compared to that of a male perspective.
Perhaps we just need to give women the control of the camera more often...
But back to the question, for me personally, I'd prefer not to see Ron Jeremy again - but, I usually am focused on the woman and my surrogate fantasy ****.