Well, not really.
But Jim Rutz seems to think it's soy! Here's some of
what he has to say:
Quote:
There's a slow poison out there that's severely damaging our children and threatening to tear apart our culture. The ironic part is, it's a "health food," one of our most popular.
<snip>
Soy is feminizing, and commonly leads to a decrease in the size of the penis, sexual confusion and homosexuality. That's why most of the medical (not socio-spiritual) blame for today's rise in homosexuality must fall upon the rise in soy formula and other soy products. (Most babies are bottle-fed during some part of their infancy, and one-fourth of them are getting soy milk!) Homosexuals often argue that their homosexuality is inborn because "I can't remember a time when I wasn't homosexual." No, homosexuality is always deviant. But now many of them can truthfully say that they can't remember a time when excess estrogen wasn't influencing them.
|
Now here's some of
what Christopher Mims from Scientific American has to say about this topic:
Quote:
|
Soy contains phytoestrogens. <snip> Phytoestrogens are estrogen mimics. BUT--get this--they are actually less effective than regular estrogens when they hit estrogen receptors on your cells. That's right--these substances, far from juicing you up with lady-hormones, might actually block the effects of estrogen, which as we all know is a good and important thing if you're a man, since John Wayne is dead and it's on us to pick up the slack. (Riiiight.)
|
So assuming
Putz Rutz is correct in his theory, why isn't this excess of estrogen producing SuperheteroŠ females?
