View Single Post
Old 04-26-2007, 08:07 PM   #69
blueerica
Nueve
 
blueerica's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,497
blueerica is the epitome of coolblueerica is the epitome of coolblueerica is the epitome of coolblueerica is the epitome of coolblueerica is the epitome of coolblueerica is the epitome of coolblueerica is the epitome of coolblueerica is the epitome of coolblueerica is the epitome of coolblueerica is the epitome of coolblueerica is the epitome of cool
Send a message via AIM to blueerica Send a message via Yahoo to blueerica Send a message via Skype™ to blueerica
Normally, that's exactly how I feel, however when talking about demographics for a paper I had to write, it came up in the course of races being labeled Black, Filipino, White-European, White Non-European, Japanese, Chinese, South Asian... Which I thought was odd, as well.

Anyhow, regarding HR asking your race, I find the whole practice really odd. I always understood it as an "according to the law" thing, that prospective employers can't do things like ask your race or ethnicity, age, etc - since hiring or not hiring could be construed as discrimination. I would have figured the same practices would continue once hired. By knowing your ethnicity, if you were to be fired or lose your job in the near future, could you potentially accuse them of firing you because of your race (and the whole quota thing)?
__________________
Tomorrow is the day for you and me
blueerica is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote