View Single Post
Old 06-12-2007, 06:00 PM   #2
mousepod
You broke your Ramadar!
 
mousepod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,635
mousepod is the epitome of coolmousepod is the epitome of coolmousepod is the epitome of coolmousepod is the epitome of coolmousepod is the epitome of coolmousepod is the epitome of coolmousepod is the epitome of coolmousepod is the epitome of coolmousepod is the epitome of coolmousepod is the epitome of coolmousepod is the epitome of cool
Send a message via Skype™ to mousepod
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevy Baby View Post
Wouldn't, technically speaking, ANY digital format be "lossy"?

And it varies at what sampling rate one finds the loss unacceptable. I have my standard (for ripping of any CD) set at 256. The iTunes default (unless it has changed) is 128. If I am making a copy of a CD for use in my car, I use Jam to copy.

I am curious what others have their iTunes ripping sampling rate set at.

ETA: To clarify my earlier post about how MG shouldn't be getting any loss on copies: I was thinking of making copies a la Jam.
Stickler.

If the source is analog, then I guess that one could argue that any digital copy is "lossy" - what I'm talking about is the way that companies talk about compressed audio as "cd quality". If it's not lossless, it's lossy. Simple as that.

My setting for ripping to my iPod is 192. I can hear the difference, but it's acceptable. For saving to my computer, I use FLAC (lossless).
__________________
"Give the public everything you can give them, keep the place as clean as you can keep it, keep it friendly" - Walt Disney
mousepod is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote