View Single Post
Old 06-12-2007, 07:33 PM   #25
DreadPirateRoberts
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,483
DreadPirateRoberts is the epitome of coolDreadPirateRoberts is the epitome of coolDreadPirateRoberts is the epitome of coolDreadPirateRoberts is the epitome of coolDreadPirateRoberts is the epitome of coolDreadPirateRoberts is the epitome of coolDreadPirateRoberts is the epitome of coolDreadPirateRoberts is the epitome of coolDreadPirateRoberts is the epitome of coolDreadPirateRoberts is the epitome of coolDreadPirateRoberts is the epitome of cool
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor View Post
Non-music geek question - How large is a FLAC song in comparison to a more standard size, like 192?
Here's what one reference says:

"FLAC is for efficient packing of audio data, unlike general lossless algorithms such as ZIP and gzip. While ZIP may compress a CD-quality audio file by 10–20%, FLAC achieves compression rates of 30–50% for most music, with significantly greater compression for voice recordings. This leads to bitrates of roughly 800 - 950 kbit/s.

Lossy codecs can achieve ratios of 80% or more by discarding data from the original stream. FLAC uses linear prediction to convert the audio samples to a series of small, uncorrelated numbers (known as the residual), which are stored efficiently using Golomb-Rice coding. It also uses run-length encoding for blocks of identical samples, such as silent passages. The technical strengths of FLAC compared to other lossless codecs lie in its ability to be streamed and in a fast decode time, which is independent of compression level."
DreadPirateRoberts is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote