Thread: Surrogacy
View Single Post
Old 07-30-2007, 09:43 PM   #2
alphabassettgrrl
Senior Member
 
alphabassettgrrl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,978
alphabassettgrrl is the epitome of coolalphabassettgrrl is the epitome of coolalphabassettgrrl is the epitome of coolalphabassettgrrl is the epitome of coolalphabassettgrrl is the epitome of coolalphabassettgrrl is the epitome of coolalphabassettgrrl is the epitome of coolalphabassettgrrl is the epitome of coolalphabassettgrrl is the epitome of coolalphabassettgrrl is the epitome of coolalphabassettgrrl is the epitome of cool
I looked into it once, to be a surrogate, but they only want women who have already birthed a child so I don't qualify.

Thinking about it, when there are no unwanted children, and no children left who need homes, and overpopulation not a concern, then I would consider this a more valid option. But currently there are *so* many of us, and so many children needing families, that to deliberately birth a child you don't want seems irresponsible.

I realize wanting a child and not being able to have one causes a lot of heartbreak, but I don't think surrogacy is the answer. A child being "yours" isn't caused by genetics, it's caused by being there for all the bumps and bruises and learning experiences of that child's life.
__________________

Why cycling? Anything [sport] that had to do with a ball, I wasn't very good at.
-Lance Armstrong
alphabassettgrrl is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote