I wonder if it's cheaper/easier to arrange for a surrogate than to arrange a traditional adoption? I haven't looked in to adoption that much, but it seems like you basically have to be perfect, rich, etc.... to adopt. Plus, with surrogacy (assuming use of sperm/egg from parents-to-be - renting womb only) you wouldn't necessarily have the same concerns about hidden genetic problems. Or at least they'd be your own hidden genetic problems and not deceit from baby brokers.
__________________
traguna macoities tracorum satis de
|