The gasp is the least convincing part of this production. It sounds like the videographer knew there had to be one, and put in minimal acting effort.
Actually, even if I were to learn that this is undoctored live footage (not likely), I would still need lots of evidence that these weren't human-made experimental craft of some kind.
I imagine that digital photography and videos are already highly suspect as evidence in trials and often inadmissible. Anyone here have any expertise in this area? It'd be interesting to know.
|