View Single Post
Old 12-06-2007, 03:57 PM   #17
Stan4dSteph
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: East Bay Area, CA
Posts: 3,156
Stan4dSteph is the epitome of coolStan4dSteph is the epitome of coolStan4dSteph is the epitome of coolStan4dSteph is the epitome of coolStan4dSteph is the epitome of coolStan4dSteph is the epitome of coolStan4dSteph is the epitome of coolStan4dSteph is the epitome of coolStan4dSteph is the epitome of coolStan4dSteph is the epitome of coolStan4dSteph is the epitome of cool
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex View Post
Almost everything we do leave a transaction record. That will continue to be the case and I don't really want to go back to the technology where that won't be the case.

Every transaction record, if stored, will end up being available to government review with warrant/subpoena and I am ok with that. You're free to not buy an On-Star enabled car. If enough people refuse to buy the service because of records that are stored, then On-Star will stop storing the records. I wouldn't support the government requiring On-Star to keep records such as those, but I don't have a problem with the government being able to subpoena them if they exist.
That's my opinion on the subject as well.
Stan4dSteph is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote