|
Are those measured by box office, international box office, or gross post-budget? Because, sadly, I think that Wild Hogs might've been a better bargain than #10. (Blech, blech, blech.) I ask because it strikes me that the other films might have hemhorraged more funds through effects and market-market-marketing.
I find it kind of disheartening that the top three were not movies I enjoyed. In fact, I thought the top two were so bad that I considered walking out on them. I felt unclean after watching them - and not in the good way.
On the upside, Potter, Ratatouille and Simpsons were delights of my viewing year.
In other (semi-related) news, Tom just realized that Wild Hogs is probably William H. Macy's top-grossing film. This made us both feel sad. He suggests that someone ought to cast him in a Pixar flick posthaste, so that he can be prouder of his top-grosser. (Or so I can be prouder of his top-grosser, but something tells me that it wasn't Macy's favrorite credit, considering his previous body of work.)
|