Quote:
|
Originally Posted by wendybeth
Again, it's the timeline that bothers me. He filed the motion three years after he moved in with his girlfriend, a full eight years after the injury.
|
I'd like to see more elaboration, but the judge in the February 2000 decission said about that, "That assertion hardly seems worthy of comment other than to say that he should not be faulted for having done what those opposed to him want to be continued." The decission also mentions that he consistently provided for a high level of care, and at the time visited her more regulararly than anyone else, including her family. Hardly sounds like someone who considered her a burden he wanted to get rid of.