Quote:
Originally Posted by Moonliner
Sooo..
It turns out that wall in the Tigers cage was not quite as tall as advertised. In fact it was three feet shorter than standards. Oh and that mote.... Apparently it was of the water free variety.
You better go visit them critters now before the civil lawsuits bankrupts the LA zoo.
|
Of course the "standard" is presented as a "recommendation", not a requirement and zoo oversight organizations had inspected the enclosure and declared it adequate, so I don't think the zoo can be held responsible.
Although they should get some deserved flack for saying it was 18 feet when in fact it was 12. As per usual, it's not the act, it's the cya lying that takes place after that act.