Thread: Is the irrelevance of the Grammys a good thing?
View Single Post
Old 02-14-2008, 11:03 AM   #9
mousepod
You broke your Ramadar!
 
mousepod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,635
mousepod is the epitome of coolmousepod is the epitome of coolmousepod is the epitome of coolmousepod is the epitome of coolmousepod is the epitome of coolmousepod is the epitome of coolmousepod is the epitome of coolmousepod is the epitome of coolmousepod is the epitome of coolmousepod is the epitome of coolmousepod is the epitome of cool
Send a message via Skype™ to mousepod
Quote:
Originally Posted by SacTown Chronic View Post
1989:

-Jethro Tull over Metallica for Best Hard rock/Metal performance.

-DJ Jazzy Jeff and the Fresh Prince over Public Enemy's "It Takes a Nation of Millions to Hold Us Back".



Yeah, the Grammys have been irrelevant - dead to me even - for almost 20 years. Best twenty years of my life.
1985 - Lionel Richie's "Can't Slow Down" beats Cyndi Lauper's "She's So Unusual," Tina Turner's "Private Dancer," Springsteen's "Born In The USA" and Prince's "Purple Rain" for Album of the Year.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Griffin View Post
Oh God, Lionel. You have been hurt...you have been hurt by somebody...that much is clear. Who hurt you? Who hurt you? Who hurt you?
__________________
"Give the public everything you can give them, keep the place as clean as you can keep it, keep it friendly" - Walt Disney
mousepod is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote