View Single Post
Old 02-27-2008, 11:55 AM   #9
Sohrshah
Purveyor of Fine Blue People
 
Sohrshah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 358
Sohrshah is the most, man, the mostSohrshah is the most, man, the mostSohrshah is the most, man, the mostSohrshah is the most, man, the mostSohrshah is the most, man, the mostSohrshah is the most, man, the mostSohrshah is the most, man, the mostSohrshah is the most, man, the mostSohrshah is the most, man, the mostSohrshah is the most, man, the mostSohrshah is the most, man, the most
Send a message via AIM to Sohrshah Send a message via Yahoo to Sohrshah
Quote:
Originally Posted by innerSpaceman View Post
Surely you mean buying an animal now will only be for the rich. Owning one has always only been for the rich. It's very, very expensive to own and properly care for a pet.
Millions of Americans don't have health insurance and therefore cannot see a doctor. If its too good for humans, then it's hard to say that animals not brought to a vet regularly are being improperly cared for.

That said, I have only had health insurance for about a year of my adult working life. My pets have gone more regularly to vets than I have to doctors.

It was once considered kindness to feed and love a pet. Now you're a "bad" owner if you don't also provide it with expensive care way beyond what many PEOPLE get.
Sohrshah is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote