|
If we can't discuss things we may not see precisely eye-to-eye on without calling it contention, we shouldn't be in the same forest together.
I don't see what's wrong with suggesting things, having those suggestions disagreed with, counter-points made, tangent issues raised, etc. ... all without calling it an argument, or making personal attitude assumptions about the people discussing stuff.
Speaking of discussing stuff, I wonder why my team decided on Saturday breakfast without discussing it with me, particularly since we saw each other day before yesterday and discussed potential meals.
So, I unilaterally moved it to Friday breakfast ... because the breakfast plan we discussed involved things best prepared earlier in the schedule.
There ... I'm talking about meals. It's happy pappy fun. FOOD! Yay!
|