Quote:
Originally Posted by FEJ
ha ha
While not as exciting I figured I better chime in so people didn't think it was something personal to exclude anyone out of maliciousness. It was just fun tinkering with the HTML a couple years ago. €uro and GD were privy to it adit happened.
To be honest, I forgot it was there. If CP still feels slighted or excluded (I had no idea she took that much offense to it) it is easy enough to remove.
|
It's not so much for me, seriously. The biggest glaring omission is that the people that designed the logo aren't included. The amazing logo!
I was fine with it because I thought people wouldn't find it. But people keep tripping over it...and then it's brought up over and over. It's just incomplete, which means it requires explanation every time. At work, I'm constantly filling holes in procedure to avoid confusion in the future. I'm a born nitpicker, fact checker, verifier. So when people ask, I'm running up to fill them in.
I'm just glad Kevy is here to endlessly quote me
