Thread: Emma Watson
View Single Post
Old 04-11-2008, 08:52 AM   #39
LSPoorEeyorick
scribblin'
 
LSPoorEeyorick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: in the moment
Posts: 3,872
LSPoorEeyorick is the epitome of coolLSPoorEeyorick is the epitome of coolLSPoorEeyorick is the epitome of coolLSPoorEeyorick is the epitome of coolLSPoorEeyorick is the epitome of coolLSPoorEeyorick is the epitome of coolLSPoorEeyorick is the epitome of coolLSPoorEeyorick is the epitome of coolLSPoorEeyorick is the epitome of coolLSPoorEeyorick is the epitome of coolLSPoorEeyorick is the epitome of cool
Yeah, but C, you probably weren't likely to have birthed him at 10. (Nor was Tom likely to have spawned me at 7.) Obviously, I don't think that people have to be the exact same age when in love. And, indeed, age of the wide-gap couple matters. If a 60 year old and an 80 year old wanted to get it on, I probably wouldn't blink. I have to admit, though, that if they were hooking up 40 years prior, and if I were honest about exactly how judgemental I am, it might make me uncomfortable - unless the couple were such a perfect match that I didn't even think about it. (This is the case for one of my very dearest friends.)

I think the deal is that... as my nieces and nephews grow older, particularly, I can't stomach the idea of being attracted to anyone close to their age. (Not to mention the fact that I'm female and biologically we're said to be attracted to stability/age, not verility/youth.) I was rarely interested in movie-star crushes my age, and find this to be true even now.

Though I will admit that early on, I predicted that Daniel Radcliffe was going to be a looker, and those French posters from the second film seemed to agree with me. Somewhere along the line, I guess he did get pretty? But my interest waned with my active participation in Potter fandom.
LSPoorEeyorick is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote