Thread: Yes, we can.
View Single Post
Old 04-18-2008, 03:48 PM   #11
Ghoulish Delight
I Floop the Pig
 
Ghoulish Delight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Alternative Swankstyle
Posts: 19,348
Ghoulish Delight is the epitome of coolGhoulish Delight is the epitome of coolGhoulish Delight is the epitome of coolGhoulish Delight is the epitome of coolGhoulish Delight is the epitome of coolGhoulish Delight is the epitome of coolGhoulish Delight is the epitome of coolGhoulish Delight is the epitome of coolGhoulish Delight is the epitome of coolGhoulish Delight is the epitome of coolGhoulish Delight is the epitome of cool
Send a message via AIM to Ghoulish Delight Send a message via Yahoo to Ghoulish Delight
Quote:
Originally Posted by Morrigoon View Post
I think 2001-2 could be explained by the bursting of the dot-com bubble and resultant hesitancy to participate in the stock market.
Or how about the fact that, because the tax was reduced, people began selling off investments to take advantage of the lower taxes in 98/99, leaving them with far fewer investments to sell off in 01/02. That's a phenomenon that's been pretty consistent with these kinds of tax cuts, people cash out immediately, temporarily bumping revenue, but really all it does is shift revenue ahead a year or two, leveling out in the following years.

I've posted several stats and links before that show that there is zero evidence for any direct causal relationship between tax decrease and increased tax revenue. There are way too many factors, and way too much variation on the results to even remotely link the two.
__________________
'He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.'
-TJ

Ghoulish Delight is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote