Quote:
Originally Posted by scaeagles
"Negotiations" with North Korea during the 90s made them a nuclear power.
"Negotiations" with Hitler during the 30s emboldened him because he swore he'd stop after the Sudetenland (sp?).
"Negotiations" between Isreal and Arafat led to 97% of the land the Palestinians were demanding being offered to them, but it wasn't good enough because land wasn't the goal of Arafat.
Diplomacy is fine. Diplomacy, however, when performed by the naive, makes things much, much worse. This is my fear.
|
I'm sorry but that's kind of an empty argument. First off successful negotiations often lead to nothing happening. How do you cite a war that never happened? Of course the failures stick out like a sore thumb.
Also why pick on just "negotiations" when ANY policy by a naive leader leads to trouble.
If you think Obama is naive then let's talk about that. At least there I can understand your fear, especially when you look at the damage done by perhaps the most naive president we have ever had.