View Single Post
Old 06-14-2008, 09:00 PM   #3423
wendybeth
Nevermind
 
wendybeth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,847
wendybeth is the epitome of coolwendybeth is the epitome of coolwendybeth is the epitome of coolwendybeth is the epitome of coolwendybeth is the epitome of coolwendybeth is the epitome of coolwendybeth is the epitome of coolwendybeth is the epitome of coolwendybeth is the epitome of coolwendybeth is the epitome of coolwendybeth is the epitome of cool
Send a message via Yahoo to wendybeth
Take it up with the Supreme Court then. They rendered a decision based upon their interpretation of the Constitution- read their decision (and not just the dissenting opinions), and you may have your question answered. (I'm not being flip- I haven't read the decision thoroughly yet, but I am fairly confident that their conclusion adheres to the meaning and intent set forth by the Constitution with regards to this subject. They are the Constitutional experts, after all. Even that Thomas guy.).
__________________









wendybeth is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote