View Single Post
Old 06-25-2008, 08:35 PM   #127
LSPoorEeyorick
scribblin'
 
LSPoorEeyorick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: in the moment
Posts: 3,872
LSPoorEeyorick is the epitome of coolLSPoorEeyorick is the epitome of coolLSPoorEeyorick is the epitome of coolLSPoorEeyorick is the epitome of coolLSPoorEeyorick is the epitome of coolLSPoorEeyorick is the epitome of coolLSPoorEeyorick is the epitome of coolLSPoorEeyorick is the epitome of coolLSPoorEeyorick is the epitome of coolLSPoorEeyorick is the epitome of coolLSPoorEeyorick is the epitome of cool
Purely on a logical level, the harmfulness of one thing does not change the harmfulness of another. One thing is very harmful. One thing is somewhat harmful. The very-harmful doesn't negate the somewhat-harmfulness of the other. It simply means they are both harmful in different ways to different degrees.

This is a totally ridiculous comparison, but the "not AS bad for you" statement seems to me a bit of a ridiculous defense, so I'm going to go for it.

Dude A shows up late for work every day for a month. Dude B plays hookey and forgets to call in once. Dude B is probably getting a warning, maybe fired. But that doesn't mean Dude A isn't going to get a talking-to about his chronic tardiness.

I was going to go with murder and rape, but it struck me that those are crack crimes, not pot ones, heh.

(ETA: maybe that was poor humor. I was being glib.)
LSPoorEeyorick is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote